* [linux-linus test] 152672: regressions - FAIL
@ 2020-08-23 5:24 osstest service owner
2020-08-23 5:52 ` Jürgen Groß
0 siblings, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread
From: osstest service owner @ 2020-08-23 5:24 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: xen-devel, osstest-admin
flight 152672 linux-linus real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/152672/
Regressions :-(
Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
including tests which could not be run:
test-amd64-i386-qemuu-rhel6hvm-intel 7 xen-boot fail REGR. vs. 152332
test-amd64-i386-qemut-rhel6hvm-intel 7 xen-boot fail REGR. vs. 152332
test-amd64-i386-xl-xsm 7 xen-boot fail REGR. vs. 152332
test-amd64-i386-xl-qemut-debianhvm-amd64 7 xen-boot fail REGR. vs. 152332
test-amd64-i386-xl-qemuu-dmrestrict-amd64-dmrestrict 7 xen-boot fail REGR. vs. 152332
test-amd64-i386-xl-qemuu-ws16-amd64 7 xen-boot fail REGR. vs. 152332
test-amd64-i386-xl-qemuu-debianhvm-amd64-shadow 7 xen-boot fail REGR. vs. 152332
test-amd64-i386-pair 10 xen-boot/src_host fail REGR. vs. 152332
test-amd64-i386-pair 11 xen-boot/dst_host fail REGR. vs. 152332
test-amd64-i386-xl-qemuu-debianhvm-i386-xsm 7 xen-boot fail REGR. vs. 152332
test-amd64-i386-examine 8 reboot fail REGR. vs. 152332
test-amd64-i386-libvirt 7 xen-boot fail REGR. vs. 152332
test-amd64-i386-xl-qemut-ws16-amd64 7 xen-boot fail REGR. vs. 152332
test-amd64-i386-libvirt-qemuu-debianhvm-amd64-xsm 7 xen-boot fail REGR. vs. 152332
test-amd64-i386-xl 7 xen-boot fail REGR. vs. 152332
test-amd64-i386-qemut-rhel6hvm-amd 7 xen-boot fail REGR. vs. 152332
test-amd64-coresched-i386-xl 7 xen-boot fail REGR. vs. 152332
test-amd64-i386-xl-qemuu-debianhvm-amd64 7 xen-boot fail REGR. vs. 152332
test-amd64-i386-libvirt-xsm 7 xen-boot fail REGR. vs. 152332
test-amd64-i386-qemuu-rhel6hvm-amd 7 xen-boot fail REGR. vs. 152332
test-amd64-i386-freebsd10-i386 7 xen-boot fail REGR. vs. 152332
test-amd64-i386-xl-raw 7 xen-boot fail REGR. vs. 152332
test-amd64-i386-freebsd10-amd64 7 xen-boot fail REGR. vs. 152332
test-amd64-i386-xl-qemut-debianhvm-i386-xsm 7 xen-boot fail REGR. vs. 152332
test-amd64-i386-xl-qemuu-win7-amd64 7 xen-boot fail REGR. vs. 152332
test-amd64-i386-xl-pvshim 7 xen-boot fail REGR. vs. 152332
test-amd64-i386-xl-shadow 7 xen-boot fail REGR. vs. 152332
test-amd64-i386-xl-qemut-win7-amd64 7 xen-boot fail REGR. vs. 152332
test-amd64-i386-xl-qemuu-ovmf-amd64 7 xen-boot fail REGR. vs. 152332
test-amd64-i386-libvirt-pair 10 xen-boot/src_host fail REGR. vs. 152332
test-amd64-i386-libvirt-pair 11 xen-boot/dst_host fail REGR. vs. 152332
test-amd64-i386-xl-qemut-stubdom-debianhvm-amd64-xsm 7 xen-boot fail REGR. vs. 152332
test-armhf-armhf-libvirt-raw 7 xen-boot fail REGR. vs. 152332
test-armhf-armhf-xl-credit2 7 xen-boot fail REGR. vs. 152332
test-armhf-armhf-xl 7 xen-boot fail REGR. vs. 152332
test-armhf-armhf-xl-arndale 7 xen-boot fail REGR. vs. 152332
test-armhf-armhf-libvirt 7 xen-boot fail REGR. vs. 152332
Tests which did not succeed, but are not blocking:
test-amd64-amd64-xl-qemut-win7-amd64 17 guest-stop fail like 152332
test-amd64-amd64-xl-qemut-ws16-amd64 17 guest-stop fail like 152332
test-amd64-amd64-xl-qemuu-win7-amd64 17 guest-stop fail like 152332
test-armhf-armhf-xl-rtds 16 guest-start/debian.repeat fail like 152332
test-amd64-amd64-xl-qemuu-ws16-amd64 17 guest-stop fail like 152332
test-arm64-arm64-xl-seattle 13 migrate-support-check fail never pass
test-arm64-arm64-xl-seattle 14 saverestore-support-check fail never pass
test-amd64-amd64-libvirt-xsm 13 migrate-support-check fail never pass
test-amd64-amd64-libvirt 13 migrate-support-check fail never pass
test-arm64-arm64-xl-thunderx 13 migrate-support-check fail never pass
test-arm64-arm64-xl-thunderx 14 saverestore-support-check fail never pass
test-arm64-arm64-xl 13 migrate-support-check fail never pass
test-arm64-arm64-xl-credit2 13 migrate-support-check fail never pass
test-arm64-arm64-xl 14 saverestore-support-check fail never pass
test-arm64-arm64-xl-credit2 14 saverestore-support-check fail never pass
test-arm64-arm64-xl-xsm 13 migrate-support-check fail never pass
test-arm64-arm64-xl-xsm 14 saverestore-support-check fail never pass
test-arm64-arm64-xl-credit1 13 migrate-support-check fail never pass
test-arm64-arm64-xl-credit1 14 saverestore-support-check fail never pass
test-amd64-amd64-libvirt-qemuu-debianhvm-amd64-xsm 11 migrate-support-check fail never pass
test-arm64-arm64-libvirt-xsm 13 migrate-support-check fail never pass
test-arm64-arm64-libvirt-xsm 14 saverestore-support-check fail never pass
test-amd64-amd64-libvirt-vhd 12 migrate-support-check fail never pass
test-armhf-armhf-xl-credit1 13 migrate-support-check fail never pass
test-armhf-armhf-xl-credit1 14 saverestore-support-check fail never pass
test-armhf-armhf-xl-rtds 13 migrate-support-check fail never pass
test-armhf-armhf-xl-rtds 14 saverestore-support-check fail never pass
test-armhf-armhf-xl-multivcpu 13 migrate-support-check fail never pass
test-armhf-armhf-xl-multivcpu 14 saverestore-support-check fail never pass
test-armhf-armhf-xl-cubietruck 13 migrate-support-check fail never pass
test-armhf-armhf-xl-cubietruck 14 saverestore-support-check fail never pass
test-armhf-armhf-xl-vhd 12 migrate-support-check fail never pass
test-armhf-armhf-xl-vhd 13 saverestore-support-check fail never pass
test-amd64-amd64-qemuu-nested-amd 17 debian-hvm-install/l1/l2 fail never pass
version targeted for testing:
linux f873db9acd3c92d4741bc3676c9eb511b2f9a6f6
baseline version:
linux deacdb3e3979979016fcd0ffd518c320a62ad166
Last test of basis 152332 2020-07-31 19:41:23 Z 22 days
Failing since 152366 2020-08-01 20:49:34 Z 21 days 21 attempts
Testing same since 152672 2020-08-22 12:17:18 Z 0 days 1 attempts
------------------------------------------------------------
2189 people touched revisions under test,
not listing them all
jobs:
build-amd64-xsm pass
build-arm64-xsm pass
build-i386-xsm pass
build-amd64 pass
build-arm64 pass
build-armhf pass
build-i386 pass
build-amd64-libvirt pass
build-arm64-libvirt pass
build-armhf-libvirt pass
build-i386-libvirt pass
build-amd64-pvops pass
build-arm64-pvops pass
build-armhf-pvops pass
build-i386-pvops pass
test-amd64-amd64-xl pass
test-amd64-coresched-amd64-xl pass
test-arm64-arm64-xl pass
test-armhf-armhf-xl fail
test-amd64-i386-xl fail
test-amd64-coresched-i386-xl fail
test-amd64-amd64-libvirt-qemuu-debianhvm-amd64-xsm pass
test-amd64-i386-libvirt-qemuu-debianhvm-amd64-xsm fail
test-amd64-amd64-xl-qemut-stubdom-debianhvm-amd64-xsm pass
test-amd64-i386-xl-qemut-stubdom-debianhvm-amd64-xsm fail
test-amd64-amd64-xl-qemut-debianhvm-i386-xsm pass
test-amd64-i386-xl-qemut-debianhvm-i386-xsm fail
test-amd64-amd64-xl-qemuu-debianhvm-i386-xsm pass
test-amd64-i386-xl-qemuu-debianhvm-i386-xsm fail
test-amd64-amd64-libvirt-xsm pass
test-arm64-arm64-libvirt-xsm pass
test-amd64-i386-libvirt-xsm fail
test-amd64-amd64-xl-xsm pass
test-arm64-arm64-xl-xsm pass
test-amd64-i386-xl-xsm fail
test-amd64-amd64-qemuu-nested-amd fail
test-amd64-amd64-xl-pvhv2-amd pass
test-amd64-i386-qemut-rhel6hvm-amd fail
test-amd64-i386-qemuu-rhel6hvm-amd fail
test-amd64-amd64-dom0pvh-xl-amd pass
test-amd64-amd64-xl-qemut-debianhvm-amd64 pass
test-amd64-i386-xl-qemut-debianhvm-amd64 fail
test-amd64-amd64-xl-qemuu-debianhvm-amd64 pass
test-amd64-i386-xl-qemuu-debianhvm-amd64 fail
test-amd64-i386-freebsd10-amd64 fail
test-amd64-amd64-qemuu-freebsd11-amd64 pass
test-amd64-amd64-qemuu-freebsd12-amd64 pass
test-amd64-amd64-xl-qemuu-ovmf-amd64 pass
test-amd64-i386-xl-qemuu-ovmf-amd64 fail
test-amd64-amd64-xl-qemut-win7-amd64 fail
test-amd64-i386-xl-qemut-win7-amd64 fail
test-amd64-amd64-xl-qemuu-win7-amd64 fail
test-amd64-i386-xl-qemuu-win7-amd64 fail
test-amd64-amd64-xl-qemut-ws16-amd64 fail
test-amd64-i386-xl-qemut-ws16-amd64 fail
test-amd64-amd64-xl-qemuu-ws16-amd64 fail
test-amd64-i386-xl-qemuu-ws16-amd64 fail
test-armhf-armhf-xl-arndale fail
test-amd64-amd64-xl-credit1 pass
test-arm64-arm64-xl-credit1 pass
test-armhf-armhf-xl-credit1 pass
test-amd64-amd64-xl-credit2 pass
test-arm64-arm64-xl-credit2 pass
test-armhf-armhf-xl-credit2 fail
test-armhf-armhf-xl-cubietruck pass
test-amd64-amd64-xl-qemuu-dmrestrict-amd64-dmrestrict pass
test-amd64-i386-xl-qemuu-dmrestrict-amd64-dmrestrict fail
test-amd64-amd64-examine pass
test-arm64-arm64-examine pass
test-armhf-armhf-examine pass
test-amd64-i386-examine fail
test-amd64-i386-freebsd10-i386 fail
test-amd64-amd64-qemuu-nested-intel pass
test-amd64-amd64-xl-pvhv2-intel pass
test-amd64-i386-qemut-rhel6hvm-intel fail
test-amd64-i386-qemuu-rhel6hvm-intel fail
test-amd64-amd64-dom0pvh-xl-intel pass
test-amd64-amd64-libvirt pass
test-armhf-armhf-libvirt fail
test-amd64-i386-libvirt fail
test-amd64-amd64-xl-multivcpu pass
test-armhf-armhf-xl-multivcpu pass
test-amd64-amd64-pair pass
test-amd64-i386-pair fail
test-amd64-amd64-libvirt-pair pass
test-amd64-i386-libvirt-pair fail
test-amd64-amd64-amd64-pvgrub pass
test-amd64-amd64-i386-pvgrub pass
test-amd64-amd64-xl-pvshim pass
test-amd64-i386-xl-pvshim fail
test-amd64-amd64-pygrub pass
test-amd64-amd64-xl-qcow2 pass
test-armhf-armhf-libvirt-raw fail
test-amd64-i386-xl-raw fail
test-amd64-amd64-xl-rtds pass
test-armhf-armhf-xl-rtds fail
test-arm64-arm64-xl-seattle pass
test-amd64-amd64-xl-qemuu-debianhvm-amd64-shadow pass
test-amd64-i386-xl-qemuu-debianhvm-amd64-shadow fail
test-amd64-amd64-xl-shadow pass
test-amd64-i386-xl-shadow fail
test-arm64-arm64-xl-thunderx pass
test-amd64-amd64-libvirt-vhd pass
test-armhf-armhf-xl-vhd pass
------------------------------------------------------------
sg-report-flight on osstest.test-lab.xenproject.org
logs: /home/logs/logs
images: /home/logs/images
Logs, config files, etc. are available at
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs
Explanation of these reports, and of osstest in general, is at
http://xenbits.xen.org/gitweb/?p=osstest.git;a=blob;f=README.email;hb=master
http://xenbits.xen.org/gitweb/?p=osstest.git;a=blob;f=README;hb=master
Test harness code can be found at
http://xenbits.xen.org/gitweb?p=osstest.git;a=summary
Not pushing.
(No revision log; it would be 287986 lines long.)
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: [linux-linus test] 152672: regressions - FAIL
2020-08-23 5:24 [linux-linus test] 152672: regressions - FAIL osstest service owner
@ 2020-08-23 5:52 ` Jürgen Groß
2020-08-24 6:44 ` Jan Beulich
2021-09-08 14:06 ` Juergen Gross
0 siblings, 2 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Jürgen Groß @ 2020-08-23 5:52 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: osstest service owner, xen-devel
On 23.08.20 07:24, osstest service owner wrote:
> flight 152672 linux-linus real [real]
> http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/152672/
>
> Regressions :-(
With 32-bit pv support now removed from the kernel the associated tests
should be removed for the upstream kernel, too.
Juergen
>
> Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
> including tests which could not be run:
> test-amd64-i386-qemuu-rhel6hvm-intel 7 xen-boot fail REGR. vs. 152332
> test-amd64-i386-qemut-rhel6hvm-intel 7 xen-boot fail REGR. vs. 152332
> test-amd64-i386-xl-xsm 7 xen-boot fail REGR. vs. 152332
> test-amd64-i386-xl-qemut-debianhvm-amd64 7 xen-boot fail REGR. vs. 152332
> test-amd64-i386-xl-qemuu-dmrestrict-amd64-dmrestrict 7 xen-boot fail REGR. vs. 152332
> test-amd64-i386-xl-qemuu-ws16-amd64 7 xen-boot fail REGR. vs. 152332
> test-amd64-i386-xl-qemuu-debianhvm-amd64-shadow 7 xen-boot fail REGR. vs. 152332
> test-amd64-i386-pair 10 xen-boot/src_host fail REGR. vs. 152332
> test-amd64-i386-pair 11 xen-boot/dst_host fail REGR. vs. 152332
> test-amd64-i386-xl-qemuu-debianhvm-i386-xsm 7 xen-boot fail REGR. vs. 152332
> test-amd64-i386-examine 8 reboot fail REGR. vs. 152332
> test-amd64-i386-libvirt 7 xen-boot fail REGR. vs. 152332
> test-amd64-i386-xl-qemut-ws16-amd64 7 xen-boot fail REGR. vs. 152332
> test-amd64-i386-libvirt-qemuu-debianhvm-amd64-xsm 7 xen-boot fail REGR. vs. 152332
> test-amd64-i386-xl 7 xen-boot fail REGR. vs. 152332
> test-amd64-i386-qemut-rhel6hvm-amd 7 xen-boot fail REGR. vs. 152332
> test-amd64-coresched-i386-xl 7 xen-boot fail REGR. vs. 152332
> test-amd64-i386-xl-qemuu-debianhvm-amd64 7 xen-boot fail REGR. vs. 152332
> test-amd64-i386-libvirt-xsm 7 xen-boot fail REGR. vs. 152332
> test-amd64-i386-qemuu-rhel6hvm-amd 7 xen-boot fail REGR. vs. 152332
> test-amd64-i386-freebsd10-i386 7 xen-boot fail REGR. vs. 152332
> test-amd64-i386-xl-raw 7 xen-boot fail REGR. vs. 152332
> test-amd64-i386-freebsd10-amd64 7 xen-boot fail REGR. vs. 152332
> test-amd64-i386-xl-qemut-debianhvm-i386-xsm 7 xen-boot fail REGR. vs. 152332
> test-amd64-i386-xl-qemuu-win7-amd64 7 xen-boot fail REGR. vs. 152332
> test-amd64-i386-xl-pvshim 7 xen-boot fail REGR. vs. 152332
> test-amd64-i386-xl-shadow 7 xen-boot fail REGR. vs. 152332
> test-amd64-i386-xl-qemut-win7-amd64 7 xen-boot fail REGR. vs. 152332
> test-amd64-i386-xl-qemuu-ovmf-amd64 7 xen-boot fail REGR. vs. 152332
> test-amd64-i386-libvirt-pair 10 xen-boot/src_host fail REGR. vs. 152332
> test-amd64-i386-libvirt-pair 11 xen-boot/dst_host fail REGR. vs. 152332
> test-amd64-i386-xl-qemut-stubdom-debianhvm-amd64-xsm 7 xen-boot fail REGR. vs. 152332
> test-armhf-armhf-libvirt-raw 7 xen-boot fail REGR. vs. 152332
> test-armhf-armhf-xl-credit2 7 xen-boot fail REGR. vs. 152332
> test-armhf-armhf-xl 7 xen-boot fail REGR. vs. 152332
> test-armhf-armhf-xl-arndale 7 xen-boot fail REGR. vs. 152332
> test-armhf-armhf-libvirt 7 xen-boot fail REGR. vs. 152332
>
> Tests which did not succeed, but are not blocking:
> test-amd64-amd64-xl-qemut-win7-amd64 17 guest-stop fail like 152332
> test-amd64-amd64-xl-qemut-ws16-amd64 17 guest-stop fail like 152332
> test-amd64-amd64-xl-qemuu-win7-amd64 17 guest-stop fail like 152332
> test-armhf-armhf-xl-rtds 16 guest-start/debian.repeat fail like 152332
> test-amd64-amd64-xl-qemuu-ws16-amd64 17 guest-stop fail like 152332
> test-arm64-arm64-xl-seattle 13 migrate-support-check fail never pass
> test-arm64-arm64-xl-seattle 14 saverestore-support-check fail never pass
> test-amd64-amd64-libvirt-xsm 13 migrate-support-check fail never pass
> test-amd64-amd64-libvirt 13 migrate-support-check fail never pass
> test-arm64-arm64-xl-thunderx 13 migrate-support-check fail never pass
> test-arm64-arm64-xl-thunderx 14 saverestore-support-check fail never pass
> test-arm64-arm64-xl 13 migrate-support-check fail never pass
> test-arm64-arm64-xl-credit2 13 migrate-support-check fail never pass
> test-arm64-arm64-xl 14 saverestore-support-check fail never pass
> test-arm64-arm64-xl-credit2 14 saverestore-support-check fail never pass
> test-arm64-arm64-xl-xsm 13 migrate-support-check fail never pass
> test-arm64-arm64-xl-xsm 14 saverestore-support-check fail never pass
> test-arm64-arm64-xl-credit1 13 migrate-support-check fail never pass
> test-arm64-arm64-xl-credit1 14 saverestore-support-check fail never pass
> test-amd64-amd64-libvirt-qemuu-debianhvm-amd64-xsm 11 migrate-support-check fail never pass
> test-arm64-arm64-libvirt-xsm 13 migrate-support-check fail never pass
> test-arm64-arm64-libvirt-xsm 14 saverestore-support-check fail never pass
> test-amd64-amd64-libvirt-vhd 12 migrate-support-check fail never pass
> test-armhf-armhf-xl-credit1 13 migrate-support-check fail never pass
> test-armhf-armhf-xl-credit1 14 saverestore-support-check fail never pass
> test-armhf-armhf-xl-rtds 13 migrate-support-check fail never pass
> test-armhf-armhf-xl-rtds 14 saverestore-support-check fail never pass
> test-armhf-armhf-xl-multivcpu 13 migrate-support-check fail never pass
> test-armhf-armhf-xl-multivcpu 14 saverestore-support-check fail never pass
> test-armhf-armhf-xl-cubietruck 13 migrate-support-check fail never pass
> test-armhf-armhf-xl-cubietruck 14 saverestore-support-check fail never pass
> test-armhf-armhf-xl-vhd 12 migrate-support-check fail never pass
> test-armhf-armhf-xl-vhd 13 saverestore-support-check fail never pass
> test-amd64-amd64-qemuu-nested-amd 17 debian-hvm-install/l1/l2 fail never pass
>
> version targeted for testing:
> linux f873db9acd3c92d4741bc3676c9eb511b2f9a6f6
> baseline version:
> linux deacdb3e3979979016fcd0ffd518c320a62ad166
>
> Last test of basis 152332 2020-07-31 19:41:23 Z 22 days
> Failing since 152366 2020-08-01 20:49:34 Z 21 days 21 attempts
> Testing same since 152672 2020-08-22 12:17:18 Z 0 days 1 attempts
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------
> 2189 people touched revisions under test,
> not listing them all
>
> jobs:
> build-amd64-xsm pass
> build-arm64-xsm pass
> build-i386-xsm pass
> build-amd64 pass
> build-arm64 pass
> build-armhf pass
> build-i386 pass
> build-amd64-libvirt pass
> build-arm64-libvirt pass
> build-armhf-libvirt pass
> build-i386-libvirt pass
> build-amd64-pvops pass
> build-arm64-pvops pass
> build-armhf-pvops pass
> build-i386-pvops pass
> test-amd64-amd64-xl pass
> test-amd64-coresched-amd64-xl pass
> test-arm64-arm64-xl pass
> test-armhf-armhf-xl fail
> test-amd64-i386-xl fail
> test-amd64-coresched-i386-xl fail
> test-amd64-amd64-libvirt-qemuu-debianhvm-amd64-xsm pass
> test-amd64-i386-libvirt-qemuu-debianhvm-amd64-xsm fail
> test-amd64-amd64-xl-qemut-stubdom-debianhvm-amd64-xsm pass
> test-amd64-i386-xl-qemut-stubdom-debianhvm-amd64-xsm fail
> test-amd64-amd64-xl-qemut-debianhvm-i386-xsm pass
> test-amd64-i386-xl-qemut-debianhvm-i386-xsm fail
> test-amd64-amd64-xl-qemuu-debianhvm-i386-xsm pass
> test-amd64-i386-xl-qemuu-debianhvm-i386-xsm fail
> test-amd64-amd64-libvirt-xsm pass
> test-arm64-arm64-libvirt-xsm pass
> test-amd64-i386-libvirt-xsm fail
> test-amd64-amd64-xl-xsm pass
> test-arm64-arm64-xl-xsm pass
> test-amd64-i386-xl-xsm fail
> test-amd64-amd64-qemuu-nested-amd fail
> test-amd64-amd64-xl-pvhv2-amd pass
> test-amd64-i386-qemut-rhel6hvm-amd fail
> test-amd64-i386-qemuu-rhel6hvm-amd fail
> test-amd64-amd64-dom0pvh-xl-amd pass
> test-amd64-amd64-xl-qemut-debianhvm-amd64 pass
> test-amd64-i386-xl-qemut-debianhvm-amd64 fail
> test-amd64-amd64-xl-qemuu-debianhvm-amd64 pass
> test-amd64-i386-xl-qemuu-debianhvm-amd64 fail
> test-amd64-i386-freebsd10-amd64 fail
> test-amd64-amd64-qemuu-freebsd11-amd64 pass
> test-amd64-amd64-qemuu-freebsd12-amd64 pass
> test-amd64-amd64-xl-qemuu-ovmf-amd64 pass
> test-amd64-i386-xl-qemuu-ovmf-amd64 fail
> test-amd64-amd64-xl-qemut-win7-amd64 fail
> test-amd64-i386-xl-qemut-win7-amd64 fail
> test-amd64-amd64-xl-qemuu-win7-amd64 fail
> test-amd64-i386-xl-qemuu-win7-amd64 fail
> test-amd64-amd64-xl-qemut-ws16-amd64 fail
> test-amd64-i386-xl-qemut-ws16-amd64 fail
> test-amd64-amd64-xl-qemuu-ws16-amd64 fail
> test-amd64-i386-xl-qemuu-ws16-amd64 fail
> test-armhf-armhf-xl-arndale fail
> test-amd64-amd64-xl-credit1 pass
> test-arm64-arm64-xl-credit1 pass
> test-armhf-armhf-xl-credit1 pass
> test-amd64-amd64-xl-credit2 pass
> test-arm64-arm64-xl-credit2 pass
> test-armhf-armhf-xl-credit2 fail
> test-armhf-armhf-xl-cubietruck pass
> test-amd64-amd64-xl-qemuu-dmrestrict-amd64-dmrestrict pass
> test-amd64-i386-xl-qemuu-dmrestrict-amd64-dmrestrict fail
> test-amd64-amd64-examine pass
> test-arm64-arm64-examine pass
> test-armhf-armhf-examine pass
> test-amd64-i386-examine fail
> test-amd64-i386-freebsd10-i386 fail
> test-amd64-amd64-qemuu-nested-intel pass
> test-amd64-amd64-xl-pvhv2-intel pass
> test-amd64-i386-qemut-rhel6hvm-intel fail
> test-amd64-i386-qemuu-rhel6hvm-intel fail
> test-amd64-amd64-dom0pvh-xl-intel pass
> test-amd64-amd64-libvirt pass
> test-armhf-armhf-libvirt fail
> test-amd64-i386-libvirt fail
> test-amd64-amd64-xl-multivcpu pass
> test-armhf-armhf-xl-multivcpu pass
> test-amd64-amd64-pair pass
> test-amd64-i386-pair fail
> test-amd64-amd64-libvirt-pair pass
> test-amd64-i386-libvirt-pair fail
> test-amd64-amd64-amd64-pvgrub pass
> test-amd64-amd64-i386-pvgrub pass
> test-amd64-amd64-xl-pvshim pass
> test-amd64-i386-xl-pvshim fail
> test-amd64-amd64-pygrub pass
> test-amd64-amd64-xl-qcow2 pass
> test-armhf-armhf-libvirt-raw fail
> test-amd64-i386-xl-raw fail
> test-amd64-amd64-xl-rtds pass
> test-armhf-armhf-xl-rtds fail
> test-arm64-arm64-xl-seattle pass
> test-amd64-amd64-xl-qemuu-debianhvm-amd64-shadow pass
> test-amd64-i386-xl-qemuu-debianhvm-amd64-shadow fail
> test-amd64-amd64-xl-shadow pass
> test-amd64-i386-xl-shadow fail
> test-arm64-arm64-xl-thunderx pass
> test-amd64-amd64-libvirt-vhd pass
> test-armhf-armhf-xl-vhd pass
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------
> sg-report-flight on osstest.test-lab.xenproject.org
> logs: /home/logs/logs
> images: /home/logs/images
>
> Logs, config files, etc. are available at
> http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs
>
> Explanation of these reports, and of osstest in general, is at
> http://xenbits.xen.org/gitweb/?p=osstest.git;a=blob;f=README.email;hb=master
> http://xenbits.xen.org/gitweb/?p=osstest.git;a=blob;f=README;hb=master
>
> Test harness code can be found at
> http://xenbits.xen.org/gitweb?p=osstest.git;a=summary
>
>
> Not pushing.
>
> (No revision log; it would be 287986 lines long.)
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: [linux-linus test] 152672: regressions - FAIL
2020-08-23 5:52 ` Jürgen Groß
@ 2020-08-24 6:44 ` Jan Beulich
2020-08-24 7:23 ` Jürgen Groß
2021-09-08 14:06 ` Juergen Gross
1 sibling, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread
From: Jan Beulich @ 2020-08-24 6:44 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jürgen Groß, osstest service owner; +Cc: xen-devel
On 23.08.2020 07:52, Jürgen Groß wrote:
> On 23.08.20 07:24, osstest service owner wrote:
>> flight 152672 linux-linus real [real]
>> http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/152672/
>>
>> Regressions :-(
>
> With 32-bit pv support now removed from the kernel the associated tests
> should be removed for the upstream kernel, too.
Not exactly sure how things are organized, but isn't the 2nd
<arch> in the test identifier currently specifying "Dom0
bitness" as a whole? If so, shouldn't testing a 32-bit tool
stack build continue to be done (under this same name perhaps),
just with a 64-bit kernel now? In which case the next question
is whether the 64-bit kernel is actually fully ready to be used
this way. I'm afraid it isn't, as there's still no privcmd
compat ioctl handling afaict, which I would say should have
been a prereq for removing PV support from 32-bit kernels.
Jan
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: [linux-linus test] 152672: regressions - FAIL
2020-08-24 6:44 ` Jan Beulich
@ 2020-08-24 7:23 ` Jürgen Groß
2020-08-24 7:51 ` Jan Beulich
0 siblings, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread
From: Jürgen Groß @ 2020-08-24 7:23 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jan Beulich, osstest service owner; +Cc: xen-devel
On 24.08.20 08:44, Jan Beulich wrote:
> On 23.08.2020 07:52, Jürgen Groß wrote:
>> On 23.08.20 07:24, osstest service owner wrote:
>>> flight 152672 linux-linus real [real]
>>> http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/152672/
>>>
>>> Regressions :-(
>>
>> With 32-bit pv support now removed from the kernel the associated tests
>> should be removed for the upstream kernel, too.
>
> Not exactly sure how things are organized, but isn't the 2nd
> <arch> in the test identifier currently specifying "Dom0
> bitness" as a whole? If so, shouldn't testing a 32-bit tool
> stack build continue to be done (under this same name perhaps),
> just with a 64-bit kernel now? In which case the next question
Only the linux-linus tests are affected right now. "Old" kernels can
still be used for 32-bit tests. And PVH ones, of course.
> is whether the 64-bit kernel is actually fully ready to be used
> this way. I'm afraid it isn't, as there's still no privcmd
> compat ioctl handling afaict, which I would say should have
> been a prereq for removing PV support from 32-bit kernels.
No, I don't think so.
32-bit pv linux kernels are missing Meltdown mitigation and using a
32-bit toolstack on a 64-bit kernel is no feature I'd like to encourage.
Juergen
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: [linux-linus test] 152672: regressions - FAIL
2020-08-24 7:23 ` Jürgen Groß
@ 2020-08-24 7:51 ` Jan Beulich
2020-08-24 8:00 ` Jürgen Groß
0 siblings, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread
From: Jan Beulich @ 2020-08-24 7:51 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jürgen Groß; +Cc: osstest service owner, xen-devel
On 24.08.2020 09:23, Jürgen Groß wrote:
> On 24.08.20 08:44, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> On 23.08.2020 07:52, Jürgen Groß wrote:
>>> On 23.08.20 07:24, osstest service owner wrote:
>>>> flight 152672 linux-linus real [real]
>>>> http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/152672/
>>>>
>>>> Regressions :-(
>>>
>>> With 32-bit pv support now removed from the kernel the associated tests
>>> should be removed for the upstream kernel, too.
>>
>> Not exactly sure how things are organized, but isn't the 2nd
>> <arch> in the test identifier currently specifying "Dom0
>> bitness" as a whole? If so, shouldn't testing a 32-bit tool
>> stack build continue to be done (under this same name perhaps),
>> just with a 64-bit kernel now? In which case the next question
>
> Only the linux-linus tests are affected right now. "Old" kernels can
> still be used for 32-bit tests. And PVH ones, of course.
>
>> is whether the 64-bit kernel is actually fully ready to be used
>> this way. I'm afraid it isn't, as there's still no privcmd
>> compat ioctl handling afaict, which I would say should have
>> been a prereq for removing PV support from 32-bit kernels.
>
> No, I don't think so.
>
> 32-bit pv linux kernels are missing Meltdown mitigation and using a
> 32-bit toolstack on a 64-bit kernel is no feature I'd like to encourage.
Where else do you propose to test the 32-bit tool stack then?
Even if right now only linux-linus is really affected, sooner
or later the stable Linux tree will also be switched to one
which doesn't have 32-bit PV support anymore.
I also have trouble seeing why it should be use to dictate what
bitness a user space people are running. Even more so that we've
never cared to support the x32 environment (irrespective of me
not being certain whether this shouldn't be considered mostly
dead by now: I'm unaware of uses, but I do know that the tool
chain continues to support it).
Jan
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: [linux-linus test] 152672: regressions - FAIL
2020-08-24 7:51 ` Jan Beulich
@ 2020-08-24 8:00 ` Jürgen Groß
2020-08-24 10:21 ` Andrew Cooper
0 siblings, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread
From: Jürgen Groß @ 2020-08-24 8:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jan Beulich; +Cc: osstest service owner, xen-devel
On 24.08.20 09:51, Jan Beulich wrote:
> On 24.08.2020 09:23, Jürgen Groß wrote:
>> On 24.08.20 08:44, Jan Beulich wrote:
>>> On 23.08.2020 07:52, Jürgen Groß wrote:
>>>> On 23.08.20 07:24, osstest service owner wrote:
>>>>> flight 152672 linux-linus real [real]
>>>>> http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/152672/
>>>>>
>>>>> Regressions :-(
>>>>
>>>> With 32-bit pv support now removed from the kernel the associated tests
>>>> should be removed for the upstream kernel, too.
>>>
>>> Not exactly sure how things are organized, but isn't the 2nd
>>> <arch> in the test identifier currently specifying "Dom0
>>> bitness" as a whole? If so, shouldn't testing a 32-bit tool
>>> stack build continue to be done (under this same name perhaps),
>>> just with a 64-bit kernel now? In which case the next question
>>
>> Only the linux-linus tests are affected right now. "Old" kernels can
>> still be used for 32-bit tests. And PVH ones, of course.
>>
>>> is whether the 64-bit kernel is actually fully ready to be used
>>> this way. I'm afraid it isn't, as there's still no privcmd
>>> compat ioctl handling afaict, which I would say should have
>>> been a prereq for removing PV support from 32-bit kernels.
>>
>> No, I don't think so.
>>
>> 32-bit pv linux kernels are missing Meltdown mitigation and using a
>> 32-bit toolstack on a 64-bit kernel is no feature I'd like to encourage.
>
> Where else do you propose to test the 32-bit tool stack then?
Right now stable kernels, later PVH only.
> Even if right now only linux-linus is really affected, sooner
> or later the stable Linux tree will also be switched to one
> which doesn't have 32-bit PV support anymore.
Yes.
> I also have trouble seeing why it should be use to dictate what
> bitness a user space people are running. Even more so that we've
We are not talking about some random user programs, but the tools
we are providing and which are running in dom0 only.
And I don't think running a 32-bit toolstack on a 64-bit kernel is
supported right now (in case it is, then we don't need to worry as
it should continue to work). I don't think we should start supporting
that just for being able to test it.
Juergen
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: [linux-linus test] 152672: regressions - FAIL
2020-08-24 8:00 ` Jürgen Groß
@ 2020-08-24 10:21 ` Andrew Cooper
2020-08-24 16:48 ` Roger Pau Monné
0 siblings, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread
From: Andrew Cooper @ 2020-08-24 10:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jürgen Groß, Jan Beulich; +Cc: osstest service owner, xen-devel
On 24/08/2020 09:00, Jürgen Groß wrote:
> On 24.08.20 09:51, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> On 24.08.2020 09:23, Jürgen Groß wrote:
>>> On 24.08.20 08:44, Jan Beulich wrote:
>>>> On 23.08.2020 07:52, Jürgen Groß wrote:
>>>>> On 23.08.20 07:24, osstest service owner wrote:
>>>>>> flight 152672 linux-linus real [real]
>>>>>> http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/152672/
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Regressions :-(
>>>>>
>>>>> With 32-bit pv support now removed from the kernel the associated
>>>>> tests
>>>>> should be removed for the upstream kernel, too.
>>>>
>>>> Not exactly sure how things are organized, but isn't the 2nd
>>>> <arch> in the test identifier currently specifying "Dom0
>>>> bitness" as a whole? If so, shouldn't testing a 32-bit tool
>>>> stack build continue to be done (under this same name perhaps),
>>>> just with a 64-bit kernel now? In which case the next question
>>>
>>> Only the linux-linus tests are affected right now. "Old" kernels can
>>> still be used for 32-bit tests. And PVH ones, of course.
>>>
>>>> is whether the 64-bit kernel is actually fully ready to be used
>>>> this way. I'm afraid it isn't, as there's still no privcmd
>>>> compat ioctl handling afaict, which I would say should have
>>>> been a prereq for removing PV support from 32-bit kernels.
>>>
>>> No, I don't think so.
>>>
>>> 32-bit pv linux kernels are missing Meltdown mitigation and using a
>>> 32-bit toolstack on a 64-bit kernel is no feature I'd like to
>>> encourage.
>>
>> Where else do you propose to test the 32-bit tool stack then?
>
> Right now stable kernels, later PVH only.
>
>> Even if right now only linux-linus is really affected, sooner
>> or later the stable Linux tree will also be switched to one
>> which doesn't have 32-bit PV support anymore.
>
> Yes.
>
>> I also have trouble seeing why it should be use to dictate what
>> bitness a user space people are running. Even more so that we've
>
> We are not talking about some random user programs, but the tools
> we are providing and which are running in dom0 only.
>
> And I don't think running a 32-bit toolstack on a 64-bit kernel is
> supported right now (in case it is, then we don't need to worry as
> it should continue to work). I don't think we should start supporting
> that just for being able to test it.
32bit toolstack on a 64bit kernel doesn't remotely work, due to pointers
embedded in structures which privcmd passes through unmodified.
It will actually start working again after the tools ABI stability work,
because this is just one of the many ABI mistakes which will be corrected.
That said, 32bit toolstacks are not a useful or sensible thing these
days. I strongly suspect it gets 0 use outside of OSSTest.
~Andrew
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: [linux-linus test] 152672: regressions - FAIL
2020-08-24 10:21 ` Andrew Cooper
@ 2020-08-24 16:48 ` Roger Pau Monné
0 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Roger Pau Monné @ 2020-08-24 16:48 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Andrew Cooper
Cc: Jürgen Groß, Jan Beulich, osstest service owner, xen-devel
On Mon, Aug 24, 2020 at 11:21:20AM +0100, Andrew Cooper wrote:
> On 24/08/2020 09:00, Jürgen Groß wrote:
> > On 24.08.20 09:51, Jan Beulich wrote:
> >> On 24.08.2020 09:23, Jürgen Groß wrote:
> >>> On 24.08.20 08:44, Jan Beulich wrote:
> >>>> On 23.08.2020 07:52, Jürgen Groß wrote:
> >>>>> On 23.08.20 07:24, osstest service owner wrote:
> >>>>>> flight 152672 linux-linus real [real]
> >>>>>> http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/152672/
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Regressions :-(
> >>>>>
> >>>>> With 32-bit pv support now removed from the kernel the associated
> >>>>> tests
> >>>>> should be removed for the upstream kernel, too.
> >>>>
> >>>> Not exactly sure how things are organized, but isn't the 2nd
> >>>> <arch> in the test identifier currently specifying "Dom0
> >>>> bitness" as a whole? If so, shouldn't testing a 32-bit tool
> >>>> stack build continue to be done (under this same name perhaps),
> >>>> just with a 64-bit kernel now? In which case the next question
> >>>
> >>> Only the linux-linus tests are affected right now. "Old" kernels can
> >>> still be used for 32-bit tests. And PVH ones, of course.
> >>>
> >>>> is whether the 64-bit kernel is actually fully ready to be used
> >>>> this way. I'm afraid it isn't, as there's still no privcmd
> >>>> compat ioctl handling afaict, which I would say should have
> >>>> been a prereq for removing PV support from 32-bit kernels.
> >>>
> >>> No, I don't think so.
> >>>
> >>> 32-bit pv linux kernels are missing Meltdown mitigation and using a
> >>> 32-bit toolstack on a 64-bit kernel is no feature I'd like to
> >>> encourage.
> >>
> >> Where else do you propose to test the 32-bit tool stack then?
> >
> > Right now stable kernels, later PVH only.
> >
> >> Even if right now only linux-linus is really affected, sooner
> >> or later the stable Linux tree will also be switched to one
> >> which doesn't have 32-bit PV support anymore.
> >
> > Yes.
> >
> >> I also have trouble seeing why it should be use to dictate what
> >> bitness a user space people are running. Even more so that we've
> >
> > We are not talking about some random user programs, but the tools
> > we are providing and which are running in dom0 only.
> >
> > And I don't think running a 32-bit toolstack on a 64-bit kernel is
> > supported right now (in case it is, then we don't need to worry as
> > it should continue to work). I don't think we should start supporting
> > that just for being able to test it.
>
> 32bit toolstack on a 64bit kernel doesn't remotely work, due to pointers
> embedded in structures which privcmd passes through unmodified.
>
> It will actually start working again after the tools ABI stability work,
> because this is just one of the many ABI mistakes which will be corrected.
>
>
> That said, 32bit toolstacks are not a useful or sensible thing these
> days. I strongly suspect it gets 0 use outside of OSSTest.
We still have the armhf tests on osstest, so a 32bit toolstack is
still getting exercised (albeit not exactly the same code paths as
x86-32).
Right now the PVH dom0 tests are amd64 only, but I could add a 32bit
one if that's found to be useful.
FWIW, on FreeBSD PVH is only implemented for amd64 (and so is dom0).
IIRC at some point we figured out that no one was using the 32bit
images provided for AWS so while there's still support for FreeBSD
running on Xen in 32bit mode I don't think anyone uses it (the more
that I tend to find 32bit specific issues whenever I test the images
myself, that no one seems to care about).
Roger.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: [linux-linus test] 152672: regressions - FAIL
2020-08-23 5:52 ` Jürgen Groß
2020-08-24 6:44 ` Jan Beulich
@ 2021-09-08 14:06 ` Juergen Gross
1 sibling, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Juergen Gross @ 2021-09-08 14:06 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: osstest service owner, xen-devel, Ian Jackson
[-- Attachment #1.1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 20752 bytes --]
On 23.08.20 07:52, Jürgen Groß wrote:
> On 23.08.20 07:24, osstest service owner wrote:
>> flight 152672 linux-linus real [real]
>> http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/152672/
>>
>> Regressions :-(
>
> With 32-bit pv support now removed from the kernel the associated tests
> should be removed for the upstream kernel, too.
Those tests are failing for more than a year now, due to non-existing PV
support in upstream 32-bit kernels.
Can we please disable the tests needing a 32-bit PV Linux system with a
kernel 5.9 or younger?
I have brought this up several times now (via mail and on IRC), and
nothing happened. This huge number of failures renders the linux-linus
tests completely worthless while trying to run the tests is consuming
test capacity.
Yes, I know that currently the testing of 32-bit tools is relying on
those tests, but without support in the kernel they can't work at all.
So I suggest to switch those tests either to a pre-5.9 kernel, or to use
BSD for that purpose (PVH can't work, because x86 dom0 needs x2apic for
PVH, and that support 64-bit only in the kernel).
Juergen
>
>
> Juergen
>
>>
>> Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
>> including tests which could not be run:
>> test-amd64-i386-qemuu-rhel6hvm-intel 7 xen-boot fail REGR.
>> vs. 152332
>> test-amd64-i386-qemut-rhel6hvm-intel 7 xen-boot fail REGR.
>> vs. 152332
>> test-amd64-i386-xl-xsm 7 xen-boot fail REGR.
>> vs. 152332
>> test-amd64-i386-xl-qemut-debianhvm-amd64 7 xen-boot fail REGR.
>> vs. 152332
>> test-amd64-i386-xl-qemuu-dmrestrict-amd64-dmrestrict 7 xen-boot fail
>> REGR. vs. 152332
>> test-amd64-i386-xl-qemuu-ws16-amd64 7 xen-boot fail REGR.
>> vs. 152332
>> test-amd64-i386-xl-qemuu-debianhvm-amd64-shadow 7 xen-boot fail
>> REGR. vs. 152332
>> test-amd64-i386-pair 10 xen-boot/src_host fail REGR.
>> vs. 152332
>> test-amd64-i386-pair 11 xen-boot/dst_host fail REGR.
>> vs. 152332
>> test-amd64-i386-xl-qemuu-debianhvm-i386-xsm 7 xen-boot fail REGR.
>> vs. 152332
>> test-amd64-i386-examine 8 reboot fail REGR.
>> vs. 152332
>> test-amd64-i386-libvirt 7 xen-boot fail REGR.
>> vs. 152332
>> test-amd64-i386-xl-qemut-ws16-amd64 7 xen-boot fail REGR.
>> vs. 152332
>> test-amd64-i386-libvirt-qemuu-debianhvm-amd64-xsm 7 xen-boot fail
>> REGR. vs. 152332
>> test-amd64-i386-xl 7 xen-boot fail REGR.
>> vs. 152332
>> test-amd64-i386-qemut-rhel6hvm-amd 7 xen-boot fail REGR.
>> vs. 152332
>> test-amd64-coresched-i386-xl 7 xen-boot fail REGR.
>> vs. 152332
>> test-amd64-i386-xl-qemuu-debianhvm-amd64 7 xen-boot fail REGR.
>> vs. 152332
>> test-amd64-i386-libvirt-xsm 7 xen-boot fail REGR.
>> vs. 152332
>> test-amd64-i386-qemuu-rhel6hvm-amd 7 xen-boot fail REGR.
>> vs. 152332
>> test-amd64-i386-freebsd10-i386 7 xen-boot fail REGR.
>> vs. 152332
>> test-amd64-i386-xl-raw 7 xen-boot fail REGR.
>> vs. 152332
>> test-amd64-i386-freebsd10-amd64 7 xen-boot fail REGR.
>> vs. 152332
>> test-amd64-i386-xl-qemut-debianhvm-i386-xsm 7 xen-boot fail REGR.
>> vs. 152332
>> test-amd64-i386-xl-qemuu-win7-amd64 7 xen-boot fail REGR.
>> vs. 152332
>> test-amd64-i386-xl-pvshim 7 xen-boot fail REGR.
>> vs. 152332
>> test-amd64-i386-xl-shadow 7 xen-boot fail REGR.
>> vs. 152332
>> test-amd64-i386-xl-qemut-win7-amd64 7 xen-boot fail REGR.
>> vs. 152332
>> test-amd64-i386-xl-qemuu-ovmf-amd64 7 xen-boot fail REGR.
>> vs. 152332
>> test-amd64-i386-libvirt-pair 10 xen-boot/src_host fail REGR.
>> vs. 152332
>> test-amd64-i386-libvirt-pair 11 xen-boot/dst_host fail REGR.
>> vs. 152332
>> test-amd64-i386-xl-qemut-stubdom-debianhvm-amd64-xsm 7 xen-boot fail
>> REGR. vs. 152332
>> test-armhf-armhf-libvirt-raw 7 xen-boot fail REGR.
>> vs. 152332
>> test-armhf-armhf-xl-credit2 7 xen-boot fail REGR.
>> vs. 152332
>> test-armhf-armhf-xl 7 xen-boot fail REGR.
>> vs. 152332
>> test-armhf-armhf-xl-arndale 7 xen-boot fail REGR.
>> vs. 152332
>> test-armhf-armhf-libvirt 7 xen-boot fail REGR.
>> vs. 152332
>>
>> Tests which did not succeed, but are not blocking:
>> test-amd64-amd64-xl-qemut-win7-amd64 17 guest-stop fail
>> like 152332
>> test-amd64-amd64-xl-qemut-ws16-amd64 17 guest-stop fail
>> like 152332
>> test-amd64-amd64-xl-qemuu-win7-amd64 17 guest-stop fail
>> like 152332
>> test-armhf-armhf-xl-rtds 16 guest-start/debian.repeat fail
>> like 152332
>> test-amd64-amd64-xl-qemuu-ws16-amd64 17 guest-stop fail
>> like 152332
>> test-arm64-arm64-xl-seattle 13 migrate-support-check fail
>> never pass
>> test-arm64-arm64-xl-seattle 14 saverestore-support-check fail
>> never pass
>> test-amd64-amd64-libvirt-xsm 13 migrate-support-check fail
>> never pass
>> test-amd64-amd64-libvirt 13 migrate-support-check fail
>> never pass
>> test-arm64-arm64-xl-thunderx 13 migrate-support-check fail
>> never pass
>> test-arm64-arm64-xl-thunderx 14 saverestore-support-check fail
>> never pass
>> test-arm64-arm64-xl 13 migrate-support-check fail
>> never pass
>> test-arm64-arm64-xl-credit2 13 migrate-support-check fail
>> never pass
>> test-arm64-arm64-xl 14 saverestore-support-check fail
>> never pass
>> test-arm64-arm64-xl-credit2 14 saverestore-support-check fail
>> never pass
>> test-arm64-arm64-xl-xsm 13 migrate-support-check fail
>> never pass
>> test-arm64-arm64-xl-xsm 14 saverestore-support-check fail
>> never pass
>> test-arm64-arm64-xl-credit1 13 migrate-support-check fail
>> never pass
>> test-arm64-arm64-xl-credit1 14 saverestore-support-check fail
>> never pass
>> test-amd64-amd64-libvirt-qemuu-debianhvm-amd64-xsm 11
>> migrate-support-check fail never pass
>> test-arm64-arm64-libvirt-xsm 13 migrate-support-check fail
>> never pass
>> test-arm64-arm64-libvirt-xsm 14 saverestore-support-check fail
>> never pass
>> test-amd64-amd64-libvirt-vhd 12 migrate-support-check fail
>> never pass
>> test-armhf-armhf-xl-credit1 13 migrate-support-check fail
>> never pass
>> test-armhf-armhf-xl-credit1 14 saverestore-support-check fail
>> never pass
>> test-armhf-armhf-xl-rtds 13 migrate-support-check fail
>> never pass
>> test-armhf-armhf-xl-rtds 14 saverestore-support-check fail
>> never pass
>> test-armhf-armhf-xl-multivcpu 13 migrate-support-check fail
>> never pass
>> test-armhf-armhf-xl-multivcpu 14 saverestore-support-check fail
>> never pass
>> test-armhf-armhf-xl-cubietruck 13 migrate-support-check fail
>> never pass
>> test-armhf-armhf-xl-cubietruck 14 saverestore-support-check fail
>> never pass
>> test-armhf-armhf-xl-vhd 12 migrate-support-check fail
>> never pass
>> test-armhf-armhf-xl-vhd 13 saverestore-support-check fail
>> never pass
>> test-amd64-amd64-qemuu-nested-amd 17 debian-hvm-install/l1/l2 fail
>> never pass
>>
>> version targeted for testing:
>> linux f873db9acd3c92d4741bc3676c9eb511b2f9a6f6
>> baseline version:
>> linux deacdb3e3979979016fcd0ffd518c320a62ad166
>>
>> Last test of basis 152332 2020-07-31 19:41:23 Z 22 days
>> Failing since 152366 2020-08-01 20:49:34 Z 21 days 21
>> attempts
>> Testing same since 152672 2020-08-22 12:17:18 Z 0 days 1
>> attempts
>>
>> ------------------------------------------------------------
>> 2189 people touched revisions under test,
>> not listing them all
>>
>> jobs:
>> build-amd64-xsm pass
>> build-arm64-xsm pass
>> build-i386-xsm pass
>> build-amd64 pass
>> build-arm64 pass
>> build-armhf pass
>> build-i386 pass
>> build-amd64-libvirt pass
>> build-arm64-libvirt pass
>> build-armhf-libvirt pass
>> build-i386-libvirt pass
>> build-amd64-pvops pass
>> build-arm64-pvops pass
>> build-armhf-pvops pass
>> build-i386-pvops pass
>> test-amd64-amd64-xl pass
>> test-amd64-coresched-amd64-xl pass
>> test-arm64-arm64-xl pass
>> test-armhf-armhf-xl fail
>> test-amd64-i386-xl fail
>> test-amd64-coresched-i386-xl fail
>> test-amd64-amd64-libvirt-qemuu-debianhvm-amd64-xsm pass
>> test-amd64-i386-libvirt-qemuu-debianhvm-amd64-xsm fail
>> test-amd64-amd64-xl-qemut-stubdom-debianhvm-amd64-xsm pass
>> test-amd64-i386-xl-qemut-stubdom-debianhvm-amd64-xsm fail
>> test-amd64-amd64-xl-qemut-debianhvm-i386-xsm pass
>> test-amd64-i386-xl-qemut-debianhvm-i386-xsm fail
>> test-amd64-amd64-xl-qemuu-debianhvm-i386-xsm pass
>> test-amd64-i386-xl-qemuu-debianhvm-i386-xsm fail
>> test-amd64-amd64-libvirt-xsm pass
>> test-arm64-arm64-libvirt-xsm pass
>> test-amd64-i386-libvirt-xsm fail
>> test-amd64-amd64-xl-xsm pass
>> test-arm64-arm64-xl-xsm pass
>> test-amd64-i386-xl-xsm fail
>> test-amd64-amd64-qemuu-nested-amd fail
>> test-amd64-amd64-xl-pvhv2-amd pass
>> test-amd64-i386-qemut-rhel6hvm-amd fail
>> test-amd64-i386-qemuu-rhel6hvm-amd fail
>> test-amd64-amd64-dom0pvh-xl-amd pass
>> test-amd64-amd64-xl-qemut-debianhvm-amd64 pass
>> test-amd64-i386-xl-qemut-debianhvm-amd64 fail
>> test-amd64-amd64-xl-qemuu-debianhvm-amd64 pass
>> test-amd64-i386-xl-qemuu-debianhvm-amd64 fail
>> test-amd64-i386-freebsd10-amd64 fail
>> test-amd64-amd64-qemuu-freebsd11-amd64 pass
>> test-amd64-amd64-qemuu-freebsd12-amd64 pass
>> test-amd64-amd64-xl-qemuu-ovmf-amd64 pass
>> test-amd64-i386-xl-qemuu-ovmf-amd64 fail
>> test-amd64-amd64-xl-qemut-win7-amd64 fail
>> test-amd64-i386-xl-qemut-win7-amd64 fail
>> test-amd64-amd64-xl-qemuu-win7-amd64 fail
>> test-amd64-i386-xl-qemuu-win7-amd64 fail
>> test-amd64-amd64-xl-qemut-ws16-amd64 fail
>> test-amd64-i386-xl-qemut-ws16-amd64 fail
>> test-amd64-amd64-xl-qemuu-ws16-amd64 fail
>> test-amd64-i386-xl-qemuu-ws16-amd64 fail
>> test-armhf-armhf-xl-arndale fail
>> test-amd64-amd64-xl-credit1 pass
>> test-arm64-arm64-xl-credit1 pass
>> test-armhf-armhf-xl-credit1 pass
>> test-amd64-amd64-xl-credit2 pass
>> test-arm64-arm64-xl-credit2 pass
>> test-armhf-armhf-xl-credit2 fail
>> test-armhf-armhf-xl-cubietruck pass
>> test-amd64-amd64-xl-qemuu-dmrestrict-amd64-dmrestrict pass
>> test-amd64-i386-xl-qemuu-dmrestrict-amd64-dmrestrict fail
>> test-amd64-amd64-examine pass
>> test-arm64-arm64-examine pass
>> test-armhf-armhf-examine pass
>> test-amd64-i386-examine fail
>> test-amd64-i386-freebsd10-i386 fail
>> test-amd64-amd64-qemuu-nested-intel pass
>> test-amd64-amd64-xl-pvhv2-intel pass
>> test-amd64-i386-qemut-rhel6hvm-intel fail
>> test-amd64-i386-qemuu-rhel6hvm-intel fail
>> test-amd64-amd64-dom0pvh-xl-intel pass
>> test-amd64-amd64-libvirt pass
>> test-armhf-armhf-libvirt fail
>> test-amd64-i386-libvirt fail
>> test-amd64-amd64-xl-multivcpu pass
>> test-armhf-armhf-xl-multivcpu pass
>> test-amd64-amd64-pair pass
>> test-amd64-i386-pair fail
>> test-amd64-amd64-libvirt-pair pass
>> test-amd64-i386-libvirt-pair fail
>> test-amd64-amd64-amd64-pvgrub pass
>> test-amd64-amd64-i386-pvgrub pass
>> test-amd64-amd64-xl-pvshim pass
>> test-amd64-i386-xl-pvshim fail
>> test-amd64-amd64-pygrub pass
>> test-amd64-amd64-xl-qcow2 pass
>> test-armhf-armhf-libvirt-raw fail
>> test-amd64-i386-xl-raw fail
>> test-amd64-amd64-xl-rtds pass
>> test-armhf-armhf-xl-rtds fail
>> test-arm64-arm64-xl-seattle pass
>> test-amd64-amd64-xl-qemuu-debianhvm-amd64-shadow pass
>> test-amd64-i386-xl-qemuu-debianhvm-amd64-shadow fail
>> test-amd64-amd64-xl-shadow pass
>> test-amd64-i386-xl-shadow fail
>> test-arm64-arm64-xl-thunderx pass
>> test-amd64-amd64-libvirt-vhd pass
>> test-armhf-armhf-xl-vhd pass
>>
>>
>> ------------------------------------------------------------
>> sg-report-flight on osstest.test-lab.xenproject.org
>> logs: /home/logs/logs
>> images: /home/logs/images
>>
>> Logs, config files, etc. are available at
>> http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs
>>
>> Explanation of these reports, and of osstest in general, is at
>>
>> http://xenbits.xen.org/gitweb/?p=osstest.git;a=blob;f=README.email;hb=master
>>
>>
>> http://xenbits.xen.org/gitweb/?p=osstest.git;a=blob;f=README;hb=master
>>
>> Test harness code can be found at
>> http://xenbits.xen.org/gitweb?p=osstest.git;a=summary
>>
>>
>> Not pushing.
>>
>> (No revision log; it would be 287986 lines long.)
>>
>
>
>
[-- Attachment #1.1.2: OpenPGP public key --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-keys, Size: 3135 bytes --]
[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 495 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2021-09-08 14:06 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2020-08-23 5:24 [linux-linus test] 152672: regressions - FAIL osstest service owner
2020-08-23 5:52 ` Jürgen Groß
2020-08-24 6:44 ` Jan Beulich
2020-08-24 7:23 ` Jürgen Groß
2020-08-24 7:51 ` Jan Beulich
2020-08-24 8:00 ` Jürgen Groß
2020-08-24 10:21 ` Andrew Cooper
2020-08-24 16:48 ` Roger Pau Monné
2021-09-08 14:06 ` Juergen Gross
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.