From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.1 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_INVALID, DKIM_SIGNED,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,NICE_REPLY_A, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E4C24C47094 for ; Thu, 10 Jun 2021 14:36:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AC71761287 for ; Thu, 10 Jun 2021 14:36:43 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org AC71761287 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Received: from localhost ([::1]:39780 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lrLnW-0000mw-U4 for qemu-devel@archiver.kernel.org; Thu, 10 Jun 2021 10:36:42 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:34012) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lrLma-0007Ep-P7 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 10 Jun 2021 10:35:44 -0400 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com ([216.205.24.124]:28190) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lrLmT-0002lK-24 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 10 Jun 2021 10:35:43 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1623335736; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=Qm4Ld7TIuZa3/6QsWiB7y+NwEBtlb3GIvQGOU8CNAAo=; b=WB9zqLiJ2IUokYhx4fkElxggvpSnXS6fSLEEaIvEizOl7FHm3tupk8Njka2V8H+V9fl7Q0 gPFNl3b/eIb9/3mdGB52pA9h9XPOpAEJ1NldARMCKWPSt20xdbx9Lmy6DUefp6ahR3Y2Sp 2RkpgX2TR0tZONiFv5J5cPp7uLm9UZU= Received: from mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (mimecast-mx01.redhat.com [209.132.183.4]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-193-8sZgy1aXP2SdX1c2bibmWg-1; Thu, 10 Jun 2021 10:35:34 -0400 X-MC-Unique: 8sZgy1aXP2SdX1c2bibmWg-1 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx08.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.23]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CEFA7801FCD; Thu, 10 Jun 2021 14:35:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [10.10.116.110] (ovpn-116-110.rdu2.redhat.com [10.10.116.110]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F373119C45; Thu, 10 Jun 2021 14:35:25 +0000 (UTC) Subject: Re: GSoC Intro - TUI interface for QMP To: =?UTF-8?Q?Daniel_P=2e_Berrang=c3=a9?= References: <87czswxuwn.fsf@dusky.pond.sub.org> <1577ce78-bf98-3f3d-7594-2b91d84967ec@redhat.com> From: John Snow Message-ID: Date: Thu, 10 Jun 2021 10:35:25 -0400 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.10.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.84 on 10.5.11.23 Authentication-Results: relay.mimecast.com; auth=pass smtp.auth=CUSA124A263 smtp.mailfrom=jsnow@redhat.com X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Received-SPF: pass client-ip=216.205.24.124; envelope-from=jsnow@redhat.com; helo=us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com X-Spam_score_int: -29 X-Spam_score: -3.0 X-Spam_bar: --- X-Spam_report: (-3.0 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.199, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: qemu-devel@nongnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: kwolf@redhat.com, ehabkost@redhat.com, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, wainersm@redhat.com, Markus Armbruster , "Niteesh G. S." , Stefan Hajnoczi Errors-To: qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Sender: "Qemu-devel" On 6/9/21 8:07 AM, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote: > I think that's overthinking things. Even a small QEMU install is > 10s of MB in size once you add up the qemu binary, firmware blobs > and depedancies. If we only keep the raw help text from the json, > we'll have < 1/2 MB, which is lost in the noise of the overall > deploymnt size. No need for compression or complex load-on-demand, > just keep it small and simple. > Yes, you're right. Our first step should be to keep it small and simple and prove that it works. We can worry about load on demand later if we still want it at that point. --js