From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from wp530.webpack.hosteurope.de (wp530.webpack.hosteurope.de [80.237.130.52]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2A9CE20EC for ; Mon, 2 Jan 2023 07:08:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [2a02:8108:963f:de38:eca4:7d19:f9a2:22c5]; authenticated by wp530.webpack.hosteurope.de running ExIM with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) id 1pCEvi-0003ql-G6; Mon, 02 Jan 2023 08:08:18 +0100 Message-ID: Date: Mon, 2 Jan 2023 08:08:17 +0100 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: llvm@lists.linux.dev List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.6.0 Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] arch: fix broken BuildID for arm64 and riscv Content-Language: en-US, de-DE To: Nathan Chancellor , Masahiro Yamada Cc: linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, linux-kbuild@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Ard Biesheuvel , Catalin Marinas , Will Deacon , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, Dennis Gilmore , Albert Ou , Arnd Bergmann , Jisheng Zhang , Nicolas Schier , Palmer Dabbelt , Paul Walmsley , llvm@lists.linux.dev References: <20221226184537.744960-1-masahiroy@kernel.org> From: "Linux kernel regression tracking (#info)" Reply-To: Thorsten Leemhuis In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-bounce-key: webpack.hosteurope.de;regressions@leemhuis.info;1672643320;09b81048; X-HE-SMSGID: 1pCEvi-0003ql-G6 [TLDR: I'm adding this report to the list of tracked Linux kernel regressions; all text you find below is based on a few templates paragraphs you might have encountered already already in similar form. See link in footer if these mails annoy you.] On 02.01.23 05:16, Nathan Chancellor wrote: > On Tue, Dec 27, 2022 at 03:45:37AM +0900, Masahiro Yamada wrote: >> Dennis Gilmore reports that the BuildID is missing in the arm64 vmlinux >> since commit 994b7ac1697b ("arm64: remove special treatment for the >> link order of head.o"). > [...] > I just bisected this change as the cause of a few link failures that we > now see in CI with Debian's binutils (2.35.2): > > https://storage.tuxsuite.com/public/clangbuiltlinux/continuous-integration2/builds/2Jjl88DXc3YRi2RtvXAzlS8NQ4p/build.log > > This does not appear to be related to clang/LLVM because I can easily > reproduce it with Debian's s390x GCC and binutils building defconfig: > > [...] > > I ended up bisecting binutils for the fix, as I could not reproduce it > with 2.36+. My bisect landed on commit 21401fc7bf6 ("Duplicate output > sections in scripts"): > > https://sourceware.org/git/?p=binutils-gdb.git;a=commit;h=21401fc7bf67dbf73f4a3eda4bcfc58fa4211584 > > Unfortunately, I cannot immediately grok why this commit cause the above > issue nor why the binutils commit resolves it so I figured I would > immediately report it for public investigation's sake and quicker > resolution. Thanks for the report. To be sure the issue doesn't fall through the cracks unnoticed, I'm adding it to regzbot, the Linux kernel regression tracking bot: #regzbot ^introduced 99cb0d917ffa1ab628bb67364ca9b162c07699b1 #regzbot title arch: link failures in CI with Debian's binutils #regzbot ignore-activity This isn't a regression? This issue or a fix for it are already discussed somewhere else? It was fixed already? You want to clarify when the regression started to happen? Or point out I got the title or something else totally wrong? Then just reply and tell me -- ideally while also telling regzbot about it, as explained by the page listed in the footer of this mail. Reminder for developers: When fixing the issue, add 'Link:' tags pointing to the report (see page linked in footer for details). Ciao, Thorsten -- Everything you wanna know about Linux kernel regression tracking: https://linux-regtracking.leemhuis.info/about/#tldr Annoyed by mails like this? Feel free to send them to /dev/null: https://linux-regtracking.leemhuis.info/about/#infomails From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6B3F0C4167B for ; Mon, 2 Jan 2023 07:08:58 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:Reply-To:List-Subscribe:List-Help: List-Post:List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:In-Reply-To:From:References: Cc:To:Subject:MIME-Version:Date:Message-ID:Content-ID:Content-Description: Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID: List-Owner; bh=Q6QVlXwPrkkStXhj3lviafHs5+En6sVA+zhZUJFcgho=; b=KGXzUD743LDhtQ Ej2DcGq8OZHe1QsVSlGdRQqjGIHrXANLRavFnK+8mLUx9yJdEVN6xd+r5sVHggaxAjtHWP3cFo+gM Ebz/y44dQY36ljqXkGGCWX+//0eou7AE/O70PvJ9UmNRsi+4rH9k5le/1Wv0xWPKizxB8fX2mk+IY a3DPaAgf8bT99QWOyApPqYzg8sILdeDYpPLdAoR4XBCBKBxK4THM2aWT2UMO3Q8nSTvLfmGatv9Gj rRrXlhs3hWxcn1mLY4yJfuBcq+exVBtddApapY5w1V5E1jJEi6ew1AGwEso88q54bdXENFAHQAfgl rS4ItmjCw9wYnL5EXqhA==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.94.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1pCEw9-009Afp-Od; Mon, 02 Jan 2023 07:08:45 +0000 Received: from wp530.webpack.hosteurope.de ([80.237.130.52]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.94.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1pCEvv-009Acf-Ut; Mon, 02 Jan 2023 07:08:34 +0000 Received: from [2a02:8108:963f:de38:eca4:7d19:f9a2:22c5]; authenticated by wp530.webpack.hosteurope.de running ExIM with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) id 1pCEvi-0003ql-G6; Mon, 02 Jan 2023 08:08:18 +0100 Message-ID: Date: Mon, 2 Jan 2023 08:08:17 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.6.0 Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] arch: fix broken BuildID for arm64 and riscv Content-Language: en-US, de-DE To: Nathan Chancellor , Masahiro Yamada Cc: linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, linux-kbuild@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Ard Biesheuvel , Catalin Marinas , Will Deacon , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, Dennis Gilmore , Albert Ou , Arnd Bergmann , Jisheng Zhang , Nicolas Schier , Palmer Dabbelt , Paul Walmsley , llvm@lists.linux.dev References: <20221226184537.744960-1-masahiroy@kernel.org> From: "Linux kernel regression tracking (#info)" In-Reply-To: X-bounce-key: webpack.hosteurope.de;regressions@leemhuis.info;1672643312;c84dbd9c; X-HE-SMSGID: 1pCEvi-0003ql-G6 X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20230101_230832_253930_8C8A25EF X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 21.30 ) X-BeenThere: linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-To: Thorsten Leemhuis Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "linux-riscv" Errors-To: linux-riscv-bounces+linux-riscv=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org [TLDR: I'm adding this report to the list of tracked Linux kernel regressions; all text you find below is based on a few templates paragraphs you might have encountered already already in similar form. See link in footer if these mails annoy you.] On 02.01.23 05:16, Nathan Chancellor wrote: > On Tue, Dec 27, 2022 at 03:45:37AM +0900, Masahiro Yamada wrote: >> Dennis Gilmore reports that the BuildID is missing in the arm64 vmlinux >> since commit 994b7ac1697b ("arm64: remove special treatment for the >> link order of head.o"). > [...] > I just bisected this change as the cause of a few link failures that we > now see in CI with Debian's binutils (2.35.2): > > https://storage.tuxsuite.com/public/clangbuiltlinux/continuous-integration2/builds/2Jjl88DXc3YRi2RtvXAzlS8NQ4p/build.log > > This does not appear to be related to clang/LLVM because I can easily > reproduce it with Debian's s390x GCC and binutils building defconfig: > > [...] > > I ended up bisecting binutils for the fix, as I could not reproduce it > with 2.36+. My bisect landed on commit 21401fc7bf6 ("Duplicate output > sections in scripts"): > > https://sourceware.org/git/?p=binutils-gdb.git;a=commit;h=21401fc7bf67dbf73f4a3eda4bcfc58fa4211584 > > Unfortunately, I cannot immediately grok why this commit cause the above > issue nor why the binutils commit resolves it so I figured I would > immediately report it for public investigation's sake and quicker > resolution. Thanks for the report. To be sure the issue doesn't fall through the cracks unnoticed, I'm adding it to regzbot, the Linux kernel regression tracking bot: #regzbot ^introduced 99cb0d917ffa1ab628bb67364ca9b162c07699b1 #regzbot title arch: link failures in CI with Debian's binutils #regzbot ignore-activity This isn't a regression? This issue or a fix for it are already discussed somewhere else? It was fixed already? You want to clarify when the regression started to happen? Or point out I got the title or something else totally wrong? Then just reply and tell me -- ideally while also telling regzbot about it, as explained by the page listed in the footer of this mail. Reminder for developers: When fixing the issue, add 'Link:' tags pointing to the report (see page linked in footer for details). Ciao, Thorsten -- Everything you wanna know about Linux kernel regression tracking: https://linux-regtracking.leemhuis.info/about/#tldr Annoyed by mails like this? Feel free to send them to /dev/null: https://linux-regtracking.leemhuis.info/about/#infomails _______________________________________________ linux-riscv mailing list linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E7773C4167B for ; Mon, 2 Jan 2023 07:13:16 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:Reply-To:List-Subscribe:List-Help: List-Post:List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:In-Reply-To:From:References: Cc:To:Subject:MIME-Version:Date:Message-ID:Content-ID:Content-Description: Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID: List-Owner; bh=mkDKl5lw+OGRklQErnvKY1YbU5RblYn8abvU7oks1lE=; b=P11HPdZvb03T/3 AZauViQW1UzVgLiaooXfyRt7/xIchjVAaVQWByy4NNmIcRDzwsKlQoM17YPCeYJ6P4i/sp6sAhJaN c2TZbIPIGwCk9vXktbXHkWqL0tGCSJv1J54057uf+Q3wHbzTNmTlcUyM1D55sODBsEp2wCcKbJtJI C7JefiNu5c3tla4s3KDE0NocGYLk5peDA+yK0lIPrgHPRa+rbBhuiSJDkL/LPYC3oLh1HG2w8Ol/U 0WmM9qa9bzHUOii3aCGM/fJzt+lvxpGS0HyfugbGzkWowRU3GQLCGN0mmaYtqp0DEWAbySt5RPQHV 7I0ERDHVC2kSrS6YTDqA==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.94.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1pCEyv-009B35-VE; Mon, 02 Jan 2023 07:11:38 +0000 Received: from wp530.webpack.hosteurope.de ([80.237.130.52]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.94.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1pCEvv-009Acf-Ut; Mon, 02 Jan 2023 07:08:34 +0000 Received: from [2a02:8108:963f:de38:eca4:7d19:f9a2:22c5]; authenticated by wp530.webpack.hosteurope.de running ExIM with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) id 1pCEvi-0003ql-G6; Mon, 02 Jan 2023 08:08:18 +0100 Message-ID: Date: Mon, 2 Jan 2023 08:08:17 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.6.0 Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] arch: fix broken BuildID for arm64 and riscv Content-Language: en-US, de-DE To: Nathan Chancellor , Masahiro Yamada Cc: linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, linux-kbuild@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Ard Biesheuvel , Catalin Marinas , Will Deacon , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, Dennis Gilmore , Albert Ou , Arnd Bergmann , Jisheng Zhang , Nicolas Schier , Palmer Dabbelt , Paul Walmsley , llvm@lists.linux.dev References: <20221226184537.744960-1-masahiroy@kernel.org> From: "Linux kernel regression tracking (#info)" In-Reply-To: X-bounce-key: webpack.hosteurope.de;regressions@leemhuis.info;1672643312;c84dbd9c; X-HE-SMSGID: 1pCEvi-0003ql-G6 X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20230101_230832_253930_8C8A25EF X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 21.30 ) X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-To: Thorsten Leemhuis Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org [TLDR: I'm adding this report to the list of tracked Linux kernel regressions; all text you find below is based on a few templates paragraphs you might have encountered already already in similar form. See link in footer if these mails annoy you.] On 02.01.23 05:16, Nathan Chancellor wrote: > On Tue, Dec 27, 2022 at 03:45:37AM +0900, Masahiro Yamada wrote: >> Dennis Gilmore reports that the BuildID is missing in the arm64 vmlinux >> since commit 994b7ac1697b ("arm64: remove special treatment for the >> link order of head.o"). > [...] > I just bisected this change as the cause of a few link failures that we > now see in CI with Debian's binutils (2.35.2): > > https://storage.tuxsuite.com/public/clangbuiltlinux/continuous-integration2/builds/2Jjl88DXc3YRi2RtvXAzlS8NQ4p/build.log > > This does not appear to be related to clang/LLVM because I can easily > reproduce it with Debian's s390x GCC and binutils building defconfig: > > [...] > > I ended up bisecting binutils for the fix, as I could not reproduce it > with 2.36+. My bisect landed on commit 21401fc7bf6 ("Duplicate output > sections in scripts"): > > https://sourceware.org/git/?p=binutils-gdb.git;a=commit;h=21401fc7bf67dbf73f4a3eda4bcfc58fa4211584 > > Unfortunately, I cannot immediately grok why this commit cause the above > issue nor why the binutils commit resolves it so I figured I would > immediately report it for public investigation's sake and quicker > resolution. Thanks for the report. To be sure the issue doesn't fall through the cracks unnoticed, I'm adding it to regzbot, the Linux kernel regression tracking bot: #regzbot ^introduced 99cb0d917ffa1ab628bb67364ca9b162c07699b1 #regzbot title arch: link failures in CI with Debian's binutils #regzbot ignore-activity This isn't a regression? This issue or a fix for it are already discussed somewhere else? It was fixed already? You want to clarify when the regression started to happen? Or point out I got the title or something else totally wrong? Then just reply and tell me -- ideally while also telling regzbot about it, as explained by the page listed in the footer of this mail. Reminder for developers: When fixing the issue, add 'Link:' tags pointing to the report (see page linked in footer for details). Ciao, Thorsten -- Everything you wanna know about Linux kernel regression tracking: https://linux-regtracking.leemhuis.info/about/#tldr Annoyed by mails like this? Feel free to send them to /dev/null: https://linux-regtracking.leemhuis.info/about/#infomails _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel