From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.1 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_INVALID, DKIM_SIGNED,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,NICE_REPLY_A, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B5D61C49EA6 for ; Thu, 24 Jun 2021 13:54:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 21BBA613F3 for ; Thu, 24 Jun 2021 13:54:50 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 21BBA613F3 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=ashroe.eu Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=dev-bounces@dpdk.org Received: from [217.70.189.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 170E640040; Thu, 24 Jun 2021 15:54:49 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mail-109-mta248.mxroute.com (mail-109-mta248.mxroute.com [136.175.109.248]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 60DE14003C for ; Thu, 24 Jun 2021 15:54:47 +0200 (CEST) Received: from filter004.mxroute.com ([149.28.56.236] filter004.mxroute.com) (Authenticated sender: mN4UYu2MZsgR) by mail-109-mta248.mxroute.com (ZoneMTA) with ESMTPSA id 17a3e4d38c00002d34.001 for (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256); Thu, 24 Jun 2021 13:54:46 +0000 X-Zone-Loop: 69348b1f13198e1f08796537a623637ba58c47721882 X-Originating-IP: [149.28.56.236] DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ashroe.eu; s=x; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Date: Message-ID:From:References:To:Subject:Sender:Reply-To:Cc:Content-ID: Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc :Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe: List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=4QoZv38yQBXn4vpjTBhJjgl9lNv03EZORykGU/0sSUk=; b=c8mY8SImFbO8bD7eH4gMvdZRbg ZZt7HUANC8l1XqDLCgE0AZWix3dunj8Wlk8YuWIRE/eIxbtobFKavjI/0JmzZ4rILJiMy9aL+YOvP 4BZHHJZo2UgovKCvys8mQB4q6UMzxgvvKI9Z2De53Ne94kkWSJfDQnrNm/afO/lA0aV55q2yFdci2 oc+pyv074LlHobPHRofr+ubJ/eFJW24h7aHQvsfC7tnb3y+RNjFvOdYI1U24M3vzZsSoExLmRrfHB pWjpmbrASfhgLx7aTmKGx9d9MBJnslNpWWIr3GFFWAs3lM49ejdMBbMpEgFAqrv2cqfUfyRaChAnd k/ArVZeg==; To: Ferruh Yigit , Thomas Monjalon , Stephen Hemminger , dpdk-dev References: <7ecdea57-f87e-6a1e-e52d-422a925046e4@ashroe.eu> From: "Kinsella, Ray" Message-ID: Date: Thu, 24 Jun 2021 14:54:42 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.11.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-AuthUser: mdr@ashroe.eu X-Zone-Spam-Resolution: no action X-Zone-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.1, required=15, tests=[ARC_NA=0, TO_DN_ALL=0, FROM_HAS_DN=0, RCPT_COUNT_THREE=0, MIME_GOOD=-0.1, FROM_EQ_ENVFROM=0, MIME_TRACE=0, RCVD_COUNT_ZERO=0, NEURAL_SPAM=0, MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM=0] Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] Experimental symbols in kni lib X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" Sounds more than reasonable, +1 from me. Ray K On 24/06/2021 14:24, Ferruh Yigit wrote: > On 6/24/2021 11:42 AM, Kinsella, Ray wrote: >> Hi Ferruh, >> >> The following kni experimental symbols are present in both v21.05 and v19.11 release. These symbols should be considered for promotion to stable as part of the v22 ABI in DPDK 21.11, as they have been experimental for >= 2yrs at this point. >> >> * rte_kni_update_link >> >> Ray K >> > > Hi Ray, > > Thanks for follow up. > > I just checked the API and planning a small behavior update to it. > If the update is accepted, I suggest keeping the API experimental for 21.08 too, > but can mature it on v21.11. > > Thanks, > ferruh >