From: "Philippe Mathieu-Daudé" <philmd@redhat.com>
To: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>, qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Cc: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
Richard Henderson <rth@twiddle.net>,
David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 6/8] cpus: Remove the mutex parameter from do_run_on_cpu()
Date: Wed, 28 Jul 2021 20:39:07 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <bce51ec7-d218-408d-c9bc-7e5ce5f5ac75@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210728183151.195139-7-peterx@redhat.com>
On 7/28/21 8:31 PM, Peter Xu wrote:
> We must use the BQL for do_run_on_cpu() without much choice, it means the
> parameter is useless. Remove it. Meanwhile use the newly introduced
> qemu_cond_wait_iothread() in do_run_on_cpu().
>
> Reviewed-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
> Signed-off-by: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>
> ---
> softmmu/cpus.c | 7 +++----
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@redhat.com>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-07-28 18:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-07-28 18:31 [PATCH v3 0/8] memory: Sanity checks memory transaction when releasing BQL Peter Xu
2021-07-28 18:31 ` [PATCH v3 1/8] cpus: Export queue work related fields to cpu.h Peter Xu
2021-07-28 18:40 ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2021-07-28 18:31 ` [PATCH v3 2/8] cpus: Move do_run_on_cpu into softmmu/cpus.c Peter Xu
2021-07-28 18:35 ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2021-07-28 18:31 ` [PATCH v3 3/8] memory: Introduce memory_region_transaction_depth_{inc|dec}() Peter Xu
2021-07-28 20:06 ` David Hildenbrand
2021-07-28 18:31 ` [PATCH v3 4/8] memory: Don't do topology update in memory finalize() Peter Xu
2021-07-28 18:31 ` [PATCH v3 5/8] cpus: Use qemu_cond_wait_iothread() where proper Peter Xu
2021-07-28 18:38 ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2021-07-28 18:31 ` [PATCH v3 6/8] cpus: Remove the mutex parameter from do_run_on_cpu() Peter Xu
2021-07-28 18:39 ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé [this message]
2021-07-28 18:31 ` [PATCH v3 7/8] memory: Assert on no ongoing memory transaction before release BQL Peter Xu
2021-07-28 18:31 ` [PATCH v3 8/8] memory: Delay the transaction pop() until commit completed Peter Xu
2021-09-08 15:30 ` [PATCH v3 0/8] memory: Sanity checks memory transaction when releasing BQL Peter Xu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=bce51ec7-d218-408d-c9bc-7e5ce5f5ac75@redhat.com \
--to=philmd@redhat.com \
--cc=david@redhat.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=peterx@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=rth@twiddle.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.