From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6172EC433EF for ; Mon, 18 Oct 2021 01:19:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 447D0610A6 for ; Mon, 18 Oct 2021 01:19:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S231983AbhJRBV1 (ORCPT ); Sun, 17 Oct 2021 21:21:27 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:38868 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S234408AbhJRBV0 (ORCPT ); Sun, 17 Oct 2021 21:21:26 -0400 Received: from mail-io1-xd2d.google.com (mail-io1-xd2d.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::d2d]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id ABAD4C06161C for ; Sun, 17 Oct 2021 18:19:15 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-io1-xd2d.google.com with SMTP id i189so14389026ioa.1 for ; Sun, 17 Oct 2021 18:19:15 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kernel-dk.20210112.gappssmtp.com; s=20210112; h=subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language:content-transfer-encoding; bh=/Ss6rRSBafTIyy3JhG9gpWccPlEHBJC6ZWuBmCdlDp0=; b=Xrvkrt26FJkelTeTryGVQXkGgmwphAIS0XbuvXrHExwVfeZ1NSjegp/rkUYOKtCN4I IoO/SgnPZnSa9wN5y018mZFcoY1oTJsMYeWv4krUryHKxi6YItVdaWH4GnRlL808LhSc WEou4qvAXRdUHtoAh7ODDawwJzo67nqpGgaJIFFlNJgAx4sDmYJB7v2+JA3FYoKU3CPQ i2O7l5L9j+81NB6SKnHw6xuDk7g91oVx951lRYVxNBP04vQVce5qDpHjh8I2GZTovBe3 mMqao8t3Abe0WrFqYWQAm087iJxbdobeecCjK7vkB3hICmRH+e+O93+Mm3ES3NYjLSUj t/wA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=/Ss6rRSBafTIyy3JhG9gpWccPlEHBJC6ZWuBmCdlDp0=; b=CVy/Pgr6kVMcRzIBZwjoygxUsPKqYoJSxWJ+hn5igrYYUOZNBuNmil5Leh7CIc/Df4 wSLdR9ssk1owj+Ap9Z8EsUt+DZ8KpHCc6svTDevz7Yg0ilAUGEe6W1KrRbGjR2SXmjtl d424Tci/tYPM0jp+FWK0ykPBAhpARbxz2b2kV3wGc1x8gXOh70YQSAk5yMPV9aHTZ35n HDvC95kson1iYX48woQIlus6roMkWDyU/FN2f3YfMIAjmRNSJ5x3Nh3IyIZGJj+xSxz2 jv9weX4f1s0FNhlcPCmUIvCXwrr9whGzmoFl92qEIB1Y7zWx5nfw7Eb2LD2AFFU4xdCf wOdg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533BKTT+CdL5dO9gguoSmPqV2l/eJsmmoDzUoZGdjZURTPw4jLBJ J9yVptwEyrmNqfd9ZsJLqH73Ww== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJz46apwwR3fPj7comOfIeu5CLlqxArnD7r0hvgNjTJBUvusbXLbDOJ2jDqFbZ4E1gktMYuLIA== X-Received: by 2002:a02:858c:: with SMTP id d12mr16836425jai.110.1634519954760; Sun, 17 Oct 2021 18:19:14 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.1.116] ([66.219.217.159]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id i8sm1167604ilm.10.2021.10.17.18.19.13 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Sun, 17 Oct 2021 18:19:14 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: [PATCH V4 0/6] blk-mq: support concurrent queue quiescing To: Ming Lei , Christoph Hellwig Cc: linux-block@vger.kernel.org, linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org, Chaitanya Kulkarni , Sagi Grimberg , Keith Busch , Bart Van Assche , Yu Kuai References: <20211014081710.1871747-1-ming.lei@redhat.com> <20211014121145.GB15198@lst.de> From: Jens Axboe Message-ID: Date: Sun, 17 Oct 2021 19:19:13 -0600 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.10.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-block@vger.kernel.org On 10/17/21 7:05 PM, Ming Lei wrote: > On Thu, Oct 14, 2021 at 02:11:45PM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote: >> Except for the nitpick just noted this looks fine to me: >> >> Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig >> >> I plan to apply at least 1-5 to the nvme tree with that nitpick fixed >> up locally. >> >> Jens: do you want me to take the last patch through the nvme tree as >> well? > > Hello Jens & Christoph, > > Any chance to make it in v5.16? Yep, I'll take a look at this in the morning. Rebasing the block tree anyway, I'll let you know if we need any changes here. -- Jens Axboe