From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mga02.intel.com (mga02.intel.com [134.134.136.20]) by mx1.pokylinux.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5DD2E4C811EE for ; Mon, 20 Dec 2010 14:24:01 -0600 (CST) Received: from orsmga001.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.18]) by orsmga101.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 20 Dec 2010 12:23:58 -0800 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.60,203,1291622400"; d="scan'208";a="689034109" Received: from scottrif-desktop.jf.intel.com (HELO localhost) ([10.7.201.54]) by orsmga001.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 20 Dec 2010 12:23:58 -0800 Message-Id: In-Reply-To: References: From: Scott Rifenbark Date: Wed, 15 Dec 2010 14:37:33 -0800 To: poky@yoctoproject.org CC: Subject: [PATCH 20/29] documentation/bsp-guide/bsp.xml: Changed numbering scheme. X-BeenThere: poky@yoctoproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Poky build system developer discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 20 Dec 2010 20:24:01 -0000 It makes more sense to have the sections that describe the various parts of the common structure as sub-sections to that. That pulls out the click-through licensing into a higher-level section. This is better overall section organization. Signed-off-by: Scott Rifenbark --- documentation/bsp-guide/bsp.xml | 47 +++++++++++++++++++-------------------- 1 files changed, 23 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-) diff --git a/documentation/bsp-guide/bsp.xml b/documentation/bsp-guide/bsp.xml index 37e7fe8..8518bf0 100644 --- a/documentation/bsp-guide/bsp.xml +++ b/documentation/bsp-guide/bsp.xml @@ -115,9 +115,7 @@ meta-crownbay/recipes-kernel/linux/linux-wrs_git.bbappend The following sections describe each part of the proposed BSP format. - - -
+
License Files meta-<bsp_name>/<bsp_license_file> @@ -134,9 +132,9 @@ meta-<bsp_name>/<bsp_license_file> Licensing files can be MIT, BSD, GPLv*, and so forth. These files are recommended for the BSP but are optional and totally up to the BSP developer. -
+
-
+
README File meta-<bsp_name>/README @@ -153,9 +151,9 @@ meta-<bsp_name>/README Technically speaking a README is optional but it is highly recommended that every BSP has one. -
+
-
+
Pre-built User Binaries meta-<bsp_name>/binary/<bootable_images> @@ -177,9 +175,9 @@ meta-<bsp_name>/binary/<bootable_images> If pre-built binaries are present, source code to meet licensing requirements must also be provided in some form. -
+
-
+
Layer Configuration File meta-<bsp_name>/conf/layer.conf @@ -209,9 +207,9 @@ BBFILE_PRIORITY_bsp = "5" This file simply makes BitBake aware of the recipes and configuration directories. This file must exist so that Poky can recognize the BSP. -
+
-
+
Hardware Configuration Options meta-<bsp_name>/conf/machine/*.conf @@ -262,9 +260,9 @@ TARGET_CC_ARCH = "-m32 -march=core2 -msse3 -mtune=generic -mfpmath=sse" Both the base package architecuture file and the tune file are optional for a Poky BSP layer. -
+
-
+
Miscellaneous Recipe Files meta-<bsp_name>/recipes-bsp/* @@ -280,9 +278,9 @@ meta-crownbay/recipes-bsp/formfactor/formfactor/crownbay/machconfig meta-crownbay/recipes-bsp/formfactor/formfactor_0.0.bbappend -
+
-
+
Display Support Files meta-<bsp_name>/recipes-graphics/* @@ -304,9 +302,9 @@ meta-crownbay/recipes-graphics/xorg-xserver/xserver-xf86-emgd/nodolt.patch meta-crownbay/recipes-graphics/xorg-xserver/xserver-xf86-emgd_1.7.99.2.bb -
+
-
+
Linux Kernel Configuration meta-<bsp_name>/recipes-kernel/linux/linux-wrs_git.bbappend @@ -353,9 +351,9 @@ meta-emenlow/recipes-kernel/linux/linux-bsp-2.6.50/defconfig-bsp Examples of kernel recipes are available in Poky itself, and thus, make these files optional. However, it would be unusual not to have a kernel configuration. -
+
- + --> +
BSP 'Click-Through' Licensing Procedure -- 1.7.0.4