From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-12.3 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, MENTIONS_GIT_HOSTING,NICE_REPLY_A,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8C328C4338F for ; Mon, 23 Aug 2021 20:51:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 65D51613A6 for ; Mon, 23 Aug 2021 20:51:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S232697AbhHWUwg (ORCPT ); Mon, 23 Aug 2021 16:52:36 -0400 Received: from mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com ([148.163.156.1]:31164 "EHLO mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S232237AbhHWUwd (ORCPT ); Mon, 23 Aug 2021 16:52:33 -0400 Received: from pps.filterd (m0098399.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.16.0.43/8.16.0.43) with SMTP id 17NKWkLF024230; Mon, 23 Aug 2021 16:51:49 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ibm.com; h=subject : to : cc : references : from : message-id : date : in-reply-to : content-type : content-transfer-encoding : mime-version; s=pp1; bh=tx6WJXx4Qg6DcWSkc5MWS3/xUeu1B5M5t3tCihPoCwE=; b=hUeqHYGQi4MlmsYMbFq70mCH3M43qqVK2i6iu7ch6UDydSMeRxkVLOt58/1orN55yFY6 sLTGzXgJSPLee+BzphVdWYn8tzyacfHrkQBEQlAfjUad2wuLKQ6TAcmmHRRsFfoDyPMa vzHt2Py4r26IuXReLIPvurevRqjAL8xMnAmh1nqQaVIG59y2LYwUSfpzRJ66mgUX+wQ+ UguYzQFRYzRWOTVPl0/RXIZVttZZd9IXminwvonoqgo/+jAcplAWw/iT/jb036A/iHNS lmimnCZJ5tID5xpu0lHaTf3tK5kCGuXrygm7SnE4tSOKuYDYDu7amhLVra/Jy5Xnb47z FQ== Received: from pps.reinject (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 3ameuyq48r-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Mon, 23 Aug 2021 16:51:48 -0400 Received: from m0098399.ppops.net (m0098399.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by pps.reinject (8.16.0.43/8.16.0.43) with SMTP id 17NKg1tK057327; Mon, 23 Aug 2021 16:51:48 -0400 Received: from ppma03wdc.us.ibm.com (ba.79.3fa9.ip4.static.sl-reverse.com [169.63.121.186]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 3ameuyq486-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Mon, 23 Aug 2021 16:51:48 -0400 Received: from pps.filterd (ppma03wdc.us.ibm.com [127.0.0.1]) by ppma03wdc.us.ibm.com (8.16.1.2/8.16.1.2) with SMTP id 17NKhFMK014244; Mon, 23 Aug 2021 20:51:47 GMT Received: from b03cxnp08026.gho.boulder.ibm.com (b03cxnp08026.gho.boulder.ibm.com [9.17.130.18]) by ppma03wdc.us.ibm.com with ESMTP id 3ajs4b3xm8-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Mon, 23 Aug 2021 20:51:47 +0000 Received: from b03ledav002.gho.boulder.ibm.com (b03ledav002.gho.boulder.ibm.com [9.17.130.233]) by b03cxnp08026.gho.boulder.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id 17NKpjJ623003446 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Mon, 23 Aug 2021 20:51:46 GMT Received: from b03ledav002.gho.boulder.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id E03C8136061; Mon, 23 Aug 2021 20:51:45 +0000 (GMT) Received: from b03ledav002.gho.boulder.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id B6B4D13605E; Mon, 23 Aug 2021 20:51:44 +0000 (GMT) Received: from cpe-172-100-181-211.stny.res.rr.com (unknown [9.160.182.229]) by b03ledav002.gho.boulder.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP; Mon, 23 Aug 2021 20:51:44 +0000 (GMT) Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] s390/vfio-ap: r/w lock for PQAP interception handler function pointer To: Alex Williamson Cc: Jason Gunthorpe , Christian Borntraeger , linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, cohuck@redhat.com, pasic@linux.vnet.ibm.com, jjherne@linux.ibm.com, kwankhede@nvidia.com, david@redhat.com References: <20210719193503.793910-1-akrowiak@linux.ibm.com> <20210719193503.793910-2-akrowiak@linux.ibm.com> <1a9f15d7-0f4d-00a0-0a8b-f1c08aa52eeb@de.ibm.com> <358b1052-c751-7417-1263-308b133325b6@linux.ibm.com> <20210819115433.76153ae4.alex.williamson@redhat.com> <20210819175807.GC1721383@nvidia.com> <20210820164142.1dcea352.alex.williamson@redhat.com> From: Tony Krowiak Message-ID: Date: Mon, 23 Aug 2021 16:51:42 -0400 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.11.0 In-Reply-To: <20210820164142.1dcea352.alex.williamson@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00 X-Proofpoint-GUID: HytNPE2TXqxdzI7CABvGNFi0O1xJQ4_x X-Proofpoint-ORIG-GUID: WMHdJ2xhhFb82f-nIgLOhVirZSeo-fw1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Proofpoint-UnRewURL: 0 URL was un-rewritten MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:6.0.391,18.0.790 definitions=2021-08-23_04:2021-08-23,2021-08-23 signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 mlxscore=0 clxscore=1015 impostorscore=0 lowpriorityscore=0 phishscore=0 adultscore=0 bulkscore=0 spamscore=0 suspectscore=0 priorityscore=1501 mlxlogscore=999 malwarescore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-2107140000 definitions=main-2108230140 Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 8/20/21 6:41 PM, Alex Williamson wrote: > On Fri, 20 Aug 2021 18:05:08 -0400 > Tony Krowiak wrote: > >> On 8/19/21 1:58 PM, Jason Gunthorpe wrote: >>> On Thu, Aug 19, 2021 at 11:54:33AM -0600, Alex Williamson wrote: >>> >>>> Nope. The only requests for merges through my tree that I'm aware of >>>> were [1] and what I understand was the evolution of that here now [2]. >>>> Maybe you're thinking of [3], which I do see in mainline where this was >>>> 2/2 in that series but afaict only patch 1/2 was committed. I guess >>>> that explains why there was no respin based on comments for this patch. >>>> Thanks, >>> Tony, >>> >>> If you take Alex's tree from here: >>> >>> https://github.com/awilliam/linux-vfio/commits/next >> I navigated to this URL and clicked the green 'Code' >> button. I was given the option to download the zip file or >> use git to checkout the code at the URL displayed >> 'https://github.com/awilliam/linux-vfio.git'. I cloned the >> repo at that URL and the code was definitely not in any >> way similar to my code base. In particular, the >> arch/s390/include/asm/kvm_host.h file did not have any >> of the crypto structures. >> >> I then downloaded the zip file and expanded it. The code >> looked legitimate, but this was not a git repository, so I >> had no way to cherry-pick my patches nor format patches >> to post to this mailing list. >> >> Next, I tried cloning from >> 'https://github.com/awilliam/linux-vfio-next.git', >> but I was prompted for uid/pw. >> >> So, the question is, how to I get the linux-vfio-next repo upon which I >> can rebase my patches? I apologize for my ignorance. > You can use git fetch to download the objects, ex: > > $ git fetch git://github.com/awilliam/linux-vfio.git next > $ git checkout FETCH_HEAD > > Or you could add a remote, ex: > > $ git remote add vfio git://github.com/awilliam/linux-vfio.git > $ git remote update vfio > $ git checkout vfio/next > > The former might be easier and add a lot less crufty objects to your > local tree if this is a one-off activity. Thanks, > > Alex Thanks Alex, I was able to get the repo, cherry-pick my patches and build and test the kernel. Barring any anomalies, I will be posting the patches today. >