All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org>
To: daejun7.park@samsung.com, ALIM AKHTAR <alim.akhtar@samsung.com>,
	"avri.altman@wdc.com" <avri.altman@wdc.com>,
	"jejb@linux.ibm.com" <jejb@linux.ibm.com>,
	"martin.petersen@oracle.com" <martin.petersen@oracle.com>,
	"asutoshd@codeaurora.org" <asutoshd@codeaurora.org>,
	"beanhuo@micron.com" <beanhuo@micron.com>,
	"stanley.chu@mediatek.com" <stanley.chu@mediatek.com>,
	"cang@codeaurora.org" <cang@codeaurora.org>,
	"tomas.winkler@intel.com" <tomas.winkler@intel.com>
Cc: "linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org" <linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Sang-yoon Oh <sangyoon.oh@samsung.com>,
	Sung-Jun Park <sungjun07.park@samsung.com>,
	yongmyung lee <ymhungry.lee@samsung.com>,
	Jinyoung CHOI <j-young.choi@samsung.com>,
	Adel Choi <adel.choi@samsung.com>,
	BoRam Shin <boram.shin@samsung.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 5/5] scsi: ufs: Prepare HPB read for cached sub-region
Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2020 18:37:18 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <bdc420e4-3f2e-cf52-eb42-f85e747b2fb1@acm.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <336371513.41591323603173.JavaMail.epsvc@epcpadp1>

On 2020-06-04 19:12, Daejun Park wrote:
> +static inline bool ufshpb_is_read_cmd(struct scsi_cmnd *cmd)
> +{
> +	if (cmd->cmnd[0] == READ_10 || cmd->cmnd[0] == READ_16)
> +		return true;
> +
> +	return false;
> +}

Has it been considered to check req_op(cmd->request) instead of checking
the SCSI CDB?

> +static inline bool ufshpb_is_write_discard_cmd(struct scsi_cmnd *cmd)
> +{
> +	if (cmd->cmnd[0] == WRITE_10 || cmd->cmnd[0] == WRITE_16 ||
> +	    cmd->cmnd[0] == UNMAP)
> +		return true;
> +
> +	return false;
> +}

Does the above code depend on how the sd driver translates write and
discard requests? Do UFS devices support the WRITE SAME SCSI command?
Has it been considered to check req_op(cmd->request) instead of checking
the SCSI CDB?

> +static inline bool ufshpb_is_support_chunk(int transfer_len)
> +{
> +	return transfer_len <= HPB_MULTI_CHUNK_HIGH;
> +}

The names used in the above function are mysterious. What is a support
chunk? What does "multi chunk high" mean? Please add a comment.

> +static inline u32 ufshpb_get_lpn(struct scsi_cmnd *cmnd)
> +{
> +	return blk_rq_pos(cmnd->request) >>
> +		(ilog2(cmnd->device->sector_size) - 9);
> +}
>
> +static inline unsigned int ufshpb_get_len(struct scsi_cmnd *cmnd)
> +{
> +	return blk_rq_sectors(cmnd->request) >>
> +		(ilog2(cmnd->device->sector_size) - 9);
> +}

Do the above two functions perhaps each include a duplicate of
sectors_to_logical()?

> +/* routine : READ10 -> HPB_READ  */
> +static void ufshpb_prep_fn(struct ufs_hba *hba, struct ufshcd_lrb *lrbp)
> +{
> +	struct ufshpb_lu *hpb;
> +	struct ufshpb_region *rgn;
> +	struct ufshpb_subregion *srgn;
> +	struct scsi_cmnd *cmd = lrbp->cmd;
> +	u32 lpn;
> +	u64 ppn;
> +	unsigned long flags;
> +	int transfer_len, rgn_idx, srgn_idx, srgn_offset;
> +	int err = 0;
> +
> +	hpb = ufshpb_get_hpb_data(cmd);
> +	err = ufshpb_lu_get(hpb);
> +	if (unlikely(err))
> +		return;
> +
> +	WARN_ON(hpb->lun != cmd->device->lun);
        ^^^^^^^
        WARN_ON_ONCE()?

> +	if (!ufshpb_is_write_discard_cmd(cmd) &&
> +	    !ufshpb_is_read_cmd(cmd))
> +		goto put_hpb;
> +
> +	transfer_len = ufshpb_get_len(cmd);
> +	if (unlikely(!transfer_len))
> +		goto put_hpb;
> +
> +	lpn = ufshpb_get_lpn(cmd);
> +	ufshpb_get_pos_from_lpn(hpb, lpn, &rgn_idx, &srgn_idx, &srgn_offset);
> +	rgn = hpb->rgn_tbl + rgn_idx;
> +	srgn = rgn->srgn_tbl + srgn_idx;
> +
> +	/* If commnad type is WRITE and DISCARD, set bitmap as drity */
              ^^^^^^^               ^^^                        ^^^^^
              command?              or?                        dirty?
> +	if (ufshpb_is_write_discard_cmd(cmd)) {
> +		spin_lock_irqsave(&hpb->hpb_state_lock, flags);
> +		ufshpb_set_ppn_dirty(hpb, rgn_idx, srgn_idx, srgn_offset,
> +				 transfer_len);
> +		spin_unlock_irqrestore(&hpb->hpb_state_lock, flags);
> +		goto put_hpb;
> +	}
> +
> +	WARN_ON(!ufshpb_is_read_cmd(cmd));
        ^^^^^^^
        WARN_ON_ONCE()?

> +	if (!ufshpb_is_support_chunk(transfer_len))
> +		goto put_hpb;
> +
> +	spin_lock_irqsave(&hpb->hpb_state_lock, flags);
> +	if (ufshpb_test_ppn_dirty(hpb, rgn_idx, srgn_idx, srgn_offset,
> +				   transfer_len)) {
> +		atomic_inc(&hpb->stats.miss_cnt);
> +		spin_unlock_irqrestore(&hpb->hpb_state_lock, flags);
> +		goto put_hpb;
> +	}
> +
> +	ppn = ufshpb_get_ppn(hpb, srgn->mctx, srgn_offset, &err);
> +	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&hpb->hpb_state_lock, flags);
> +	if (unlikely(err)) {
> +		/*
> +		 * In this case, the region state is active,
> +		 * but the ppn table is not allocated.
> +		 * Make sure that ppn tabie must be allocated on
                                      ^^^^^
                                      table?
> +		 * active state
> +		 */
> +		WARN_ON(true);
> +		dev_err(&hpb->hpb_lu_dev,
> +			"ufshpb_get_ppn failed. err %d\n", err);
> +		goto put_hpb;
> +	}
> +
> +	ufshpb_set_hpb_read_to_upiu(hpb, lrbp, lpn, ppn, transfer_len);
> +
> +	atomic_inc(&hpb->stats.hit_cnt);
> +put_hpb:
> +	ufshpb_lu_put(hpb);
> +}

Thanks,

Bart.

  parent reply	other threads:[~2020-06-11  1:37 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 41+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <CGME20200605011604epcms2p8bec8ef6682583d7248dc7d9dc1bfc882@epcms2p8>
2020-06-05  1:16 ` [RFC PATCH 0/5] scsi: ufs: Add Host Performance Booster Support Daejun Park
     [not found]   ` <CGME20200605011604epcms2p8bec8ef6682583d7248dc7d9dc1bfc882@epcms2p5>
2020-06-05  1:22     ` [RFC PATCH 1/5] scsi: ufs: Add UFS feature related parameter Daejun Park
2020-06-06 12:11       ` Avri Altman
2020-06-10  2:49     ` [RFC PATCH 4/5] scsi: ufs: L2P map management for HPB read Daejun Park
2020-06-12  3:37     ` Daejun Park
2020-06-13 15:24       ` Bart Van Assche
     [not found]   ` <CGME20200605011604epcms2p8bec8ef6682583d7248dc7d9dc1bfc882@epcms2p1>
2020-06-05  1:30     ` [RFC PATCH 2/5] scsi: ufs: Add UFS-feature layer Daejun Park
2020-06-10  4:15       ` Bart Van Assche
2020-06-11  1:39       ` Bart Van Assche
2020-06-09  0:51     ` [RFC PATCH 1/5] scsi: ufs: Add UFS feature related parameter Daejun Park
2020-06-06 12:02   ` [RFC PATCH 0/5] scsi: ufs: Add Host Performance Booster Support Avri Altman
     [not found]   ` <CGME20200605011604epcms2p8bec8ef6682583d7248dc7d9dc1bfc882@epcms2p4>
2020-06-09  0:49     ` Daejun Park
2020-06-09  7:00       ` Avri Altman
2020-06-09  0:52     ` [RFC PATCH 4/5] scsi: ufs: L2P map management for HPB read Daejun Park
2020-06-09  6:39       ` Avri Altman
2020-06-09  6:48       ` Avri Altman
2020-06-12  2:25     ` [RFC PATCH 3/5] scsi: ufs: Introduce HPB module Daejun Park
2020-06-12  2:27     ` [RFC PATCH 2/5] scsi: ufs: Add UFS-feature layer Daejun Park
2020-06-12  4:28       ` Bart Van Assche
     [not found]   ` <CGME20200605011604epcms2p8bec8ef6682583d7248dc7d9dc1bfc882@epcms2p2>
2020-06-05  1:56     ` [RFC PATCH 4/5] scsi: ufs: L2P map management for HPB read Daejun Park
2020-06-06 18:26       ` Avri Altman
2020-06-09  1:15         ` Bart Van Assche
2020-06-11  1:16       ` Bart Van Assche
2020-06-05  2:12     ` [RFC PATCH 5/5] scsi: ufs: Prepare HPB read for cached sub-region Daejun Park
2020-06-06 18:38       ` Avri Altman
2020-06-09  1:23         ` Bart Van Assche
2020-06-11  1:37       ` Bart Van Assche [this message]
2020-06-11  6:43         ` Avri Altman
2020-06-09  0:53     ` Daejun Park
2020-06-10  3:51     ` RE: [RFC PATCH 4/5] scsi: ufs: L2P map management for HPB read Daejun Park
2020-06-10  9:50   ` [RFC PATCH 0/5] scsi: ufs: Add Host Performance Booster Support Bean Huo
2020-06-05  1:38 ` [RFC PATCH 3/5] scsi: ufs: Introduce HPB module Daejun Park
2020-06-06 14:58   ` Avri Altman
2020-06-07  7:06   ` Avri Altman
2020-06-10  4:29   ` Bart Van Assche
2020-06-10  9:57     ` Bean Huo
     [not found]   ` <CGME20200605011604epcms2p8bec8ef6682583d7248dc7d9dc1bfc882@epcms2p6>
2020-06-12  2:29     ` Daejun Park
2020-06-09  0:52 ` Daejun Park
2020-06-09  6:51   ` Avri Altman
2020-06-09  0:53 ` Daejun Park
2020-06-12  3:39 ` [RFC PATCH 5/5] scsi: ufs: Prepare HPB read for cached sub-region Daejun Park

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=bdc420e4-3f2e-cf52-eb42-f85e747b2fb1@acm.org \
    --to=bvanassche@acm.org \
    --cc=adel.choi@samsung.com \
    --cc=alim.akhtar@samsung.com \
    --cc=asutoshd@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=avri.altman@wdc.com \
    --cc=beanhuo@micron.com \
    --cc=boram.shin@samsung.com \
    --cc=cang@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=daejun7.park@samsung.com \
    --cc=j-young.choi@samsung.com \
    --cc=jejb@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=martin.petersen@oracle.com \
    --cc=sangyoon.oh@samsung.com \
    --cc=stanley.chu@mediatek.com \
    --cc=sungjun07.park@samsung.com \
    --cc=tomas.winkler@intel.com \
    --cc=ymhungry.lee@samsung.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.