From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.0 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_INVALID,DKIM_SIGNED, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0606EC432C3 for ; Wed, 13 Nov 2019 18:46:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 30564206EF for ; Wed, 13 Nov 2019 18:46:40 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (1024-bit key) header.d=redhat.com header.i=@redhat.com header.b="E9iS6dqz" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 30564206EF Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Received: from localhost ([::1]:50002 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1iUxf4-0006vn-LV for qemu-devel@archiver.kernel.org; Wed, 13 Nov 2019 13:46:38 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:39150) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1iUxdF-0005LQ-MS for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 13 Nov 2019 13:44:46 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iUxdB-00072N-SX for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 13 Nov 2019 13:44:43 -0500 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-1.mimecast.com ([205.139.110.120]:33467 helo=us-smtp-1.mimecast.com) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iUxd9-00071b-Tz for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 13 Nov 2019 13:44:41 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1573670678; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=Fl3/8m+pW4nmcaQ4OWFkkkaqhyy2mESR42zlI3mNuCY=; b=E9iS6dqz+OZ/ugTXmQ92rTLGzIScq/bDhlNoQ1xGcmm6snP9MxGqmxHDRwM6/1C+Ad2ELU lmp8s+PxAHlQ+r+zqpxm4aMNkKdxY9KXk3ZIR+xcwyofP6JLsQSSamR8Vy9BehgDRMzZZq lfdwhz7UPg6GYpSc5Ru9OxxwaQRl0So= Received: from mail-wr1-f71.google.com (mail-wr1-f71.google.com [209.85.221.71]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-284-kxkG-lRZOjS6zsGr3soi6w-1; Wed, 13 Nov 2019 13:44:35 -0500 Received: by mail-wr1-f71.google.com with SMTP id f8so2191552wrq.6 for ; Wed, 13 Nov 2019 10:44:35 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=XzWR+E75UKHfTle3m9oATJfKNsF/86/YX9rJ9YqitJQ=; b=HKHjdUtr06PgARPOTAJyV5suuGR46TlVEoIrNmGg9Z8mOWUI3DMuVMYiysD78COzJ1 mV1NNY/35DiRcSCChNwPdbQGWsX/lQaptJkmylm+tS1S6K+Vaxd8v3D5ELqjO85DU2Gx mSgLnjuCf2/K6INbsOXGHo70h8yjrvwPlst+uaI6C/tRYjXEzNQqkC/MMcOXaOe9AaME VCSC09ajogTfSfad/Ar49nfYqzJNMBeKdLZrFF6tVYvu+weUBQc/wmFO7xVH7cM5L1Ya bRiOccz4muLahZls3vYuCpDKy7FoA4J1nyjL60YKRUi69pNE/FQCoMRdGIQS2/fNmL6y CGhg== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAXBd+uFnaiomuSu9Sc5Bc7jkXqTtga/xChN1GA1jH3mget42PvJ wlQuiFmwkGgxRhjHPEVf+CiAmOfcd/oYJYGYdzCeS4Zlsa2t2YgyIWogCpOFib9HdPA+OmdGVOq yXZOirTpi5iKgde0= X-Received: by 2002:a1c:de88:: with SMTP id v130mr4334001wmg.89.1573670674719; Wed, 13 Nov 2019 10:44:34 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqwITg0SpGvq13ZAUokvUf5ne9Wun1UgIg2cRIBdXicLUkDPhMPhs0MePBOPoQ8AB6Xd3Z6wOA== X-Received: by 2002:a1c:de88:: with SMTP id v130mr4333981wmg.89.1573670674544; Wed, 13 Nov 2019 10:44:34 -0800 (PST) Received: from [192.168.1.35] (170.red-83-59-162.dynamicip.rima-tde.net. [83.59.162.170]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id x9sm3861877wru.32.2019.11.13.10.44.32 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 13 Nov 2019 10:44:33 -0800 (PST) Subject: Re: [EXTERNAL]Re: [PATCH v1 5/5] .travis.yml: drop 32 bit systems from MAIN_SOFTMMU_TARGETS To: Aleksandar Markovic , =?UTF-8?Q?Alex_Benn=c3=a9e?= , "qemu-devel@nongnu.org" References: <20191113115952.775-1-alex.bennee@linaro.org> <20191113115952.775-6-alex.bennee@linaro.org> From: =?UTF-8?Q?Philippe_Mathieu-Daud=c3=a9?= Message-ID: Date: Wed, 13 Nov 2019 19:44:32 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.1.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Language: en-US X-MC-Unique: kxkG-lRZOjS6zsGr3soi6w-1 X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=WINDOWS-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] [fuzzy] X-Received-From: 205.139.110.120 X-BeenThere: qemu-devel@nongnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: "fam@euphon.net" , "berrange@redhat.com" , "stefanb@linux.vnet.ibm.com" , "richard.henderson@linaro.org" , "f4bug@amsat.org" , "cota@braap.org" , "stefanha@redhat.com" , "marcandre.lureau@redhat.com" , "pbonzini@redhat.com" , "aurelien@aurel32.net" Errors-To: qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Sender: "Qemu-devel" On 11/13/19 6:38 PM, Aleksandar Markovic wrote: >> From: Philippe Mathieu-Daud=E9 >>> - - MAIN_SOFTMMU_TARGETS=3D"aarch64-softmmu,arm-softmmu,i386-softmmu= ,mips-softmmu,mips64-softmmu,ppc64-softmmu,riscv64-softmmu,s390x-softmmu,x8= 6_64-softmmu" >>> + - MAIN_SOFTMMU_TARGETS=3D"aarch64-softmmu,mips64-softmmu,ppc64-sof= tmmu,riscv64-softmmu,s390x-softmmu,x86_64-softmmu" >> >> Aleksandar, since you mostly test 32-bit MIPS, are you OK we keep >> mips-softmmu and drop mips64-softmmu here? Another job (acceptance-test) >> builds the mips64el-softmmu. >=20 > Philippe, thanks for bringing this to my attention. Yes, 32-bit mips targ= ets are important to us, but, what can we do, time constraints are time con= straints, so I agree with Alex change, please go ahead, Alex. We can test 3= 2-bit mips targets via other acceptance tests (those that can run longer, s= o-called "slow" group), and perhaps we can extend them to test more 32-bit = mips systems. OK, let's keep mips64 as suggested Alex then. Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daud=E9