All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH V2] arm64: dts: qcom: sc7180: Add bandwidth votes for eMMC and SDcard
@ 2020-07-21 10:46 Shaik Sajida Bhanu
  2020-07-24 17:10 ` Matthias Kaehlcke
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread
From: Shaik Sajida Bhanu @ 2020-07-21 10:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: adrian.hunter, ulf.hansson, robh+dt, mka
  Cc: linux-mmc, linux-kernel, linux-arm-msm, devicetree, agross,
	bjorn.andersson, rnayak, Pradeep P V K, Shaik Sajida Bhanu

From: Pradeep P V K <ppvk@codeaurora.org>

Add the bandwidth domain supporting performance state and
the corresponding OPP tables for the sdhc device on sc7180.

Signed-off-by: Pradeep P V K <ppvk@codeaurora.org>
Signed-off-by: Shaik Sajida Bhanu <sbhanu@codeaurora.org>
---

Changes since V1:
	- Incorporated review comments by Bjorn Andersson.
---
 arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc7180.dtsi | 15 +++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+)

diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc7180.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc7180.dtsi
index 68f9894..d78a066 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc7180.dtsi
+++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc7180.dtsi
@@ -684,6 +684,9 @@
 			clocks = <&gcc GCC_SDCC1_APPS_CLK>,
 					<&gcc GCC_SDCC1_AHB_CLK>;
 			clock-names = "core", "iface";
+			interconnects = <&aggre1_noc MASTER_EMMC &mc_virt SLAVE_EBI1>,
+				<&gem_noc MASTER_APPSS_PROC &config_noc SLAVE_EMMC_CFG>;
+			interconnect-names = "sdhc-ddr","cpu-sdhc";
 			power-domains = <&rpmhpd SC7180_CX>;
 			operating-points-v2 = <&sdhc1_opp_table>;
 
@@ -704,11 +707,15 @@
 				opp-100000000 {
 					opp-hz = /bits/ 64 <100000000>;
 					required-opps = <&rpmhpd_opp_low_svs>;
+					opp-peak-kBps = <100000 100000>;
+					opp-avg-kBps = <100000 50000>;
 				};
 
 				opp-384000000 {
 					opp-hz = /bits/ 64 <384000000>;
 					required-opps = <&rpmhpd_opp_svs_l1>;
+					opp-peak-kBps = <600000 900000>;
+					opp-avg-kBps = <261438 300000>;
 				};
 			};
 		};
@@ -2476,6 +2483,10 @@
 			clocks = <&gcc GCC_SDCC2_APPS_CLK>,
 					<&gcc GCC_SDCC2_AHB_CLK>;
 			clock-names = "core", "iface";
+
+			interconnects = <&aggre1_noc MASTER_SDCC_2 &mc_virt SLAVE_EBI1>,
+				<&gem_noc MASTER_APPSS_PROC &config_noc	SLAVE_SDCC_2>;
+			interconnect-names = "sdhc-ddr","cpu-sdhc";
 			power-domains = <&rpmhpd SC7180_CX>;
 			operating-points-v2 = <&sdhc2_opp_table>;
 
@@ -2489,11 +2500,15 @@
 				opp-100000000 {
 					opp-hz = /bits/ 64 <100000000>;
 					required-opps = <&rpmhpd_opp_low_svs>;
+					opp-peak-kBps = <160000 100000>;
+					opp-avg-kBps = <80000 50000>;
 				};
 
 				opp-202000000 {
 					opp-hz = /bits/ 64 <202000000>;
 					required-opps = <&rpmhpd_opp_svs_l1>;
+					opp-peak-kBps = <200000	120000>;
+					opp-avg-kBps = <100000 60000>;
 				};
 			};
 		};
-- 
QUALCOMM INDIA, on behalf of Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member 
of Code Aurora Forum, hosted by The Linux Foundation


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH V2] arm64: dts: qcom: sc7180: Add bandwidth votes for eMMC and SDcard
  2020-07-21 10:46 [PATCH V2] arm64: dts: qcom: sc7180: Add bandwidth votes for eMMC and SDcard Shaik Sajida Bhanu
@ 2020-07-24 17:10 ` Matthias Kaehlcke
  2020-07-27  6:50   ` sbhanu
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread
From: Matthias Kaehlcke @ 2020-07-24 17:10 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Shaik Sajida Bhanu
  Cc: adrian.hunter, ulf.hansson, robh+dt, linux-mmc, linux-kernel,
	linux-arm-msm, devicetree, agross, bjorn.andersson, rnayak,
	Pradeep P V K

Hi Shaik,

On Tue, Jul 21, 2020 at 04:16:21PM +0530, Shaik Sajida Bhanu wrote:
> From: Pradeep P V K <ppvk@codeaurora.org>
> 
> Add the bandwidth domain supporting performance state and
> the corresponding OPP tables for the sdhc device on sc7180.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Pradeep P V K <ppvk@codeaurora.org>
> Signed-off-by: Shaik Sajida Bhanu <sbhanu@codeaurora.org>
> ---
> 
> Changes since V1:
> 	- Incorporated review comments by Bjorn Andersson.
> ---
>  arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc7180.dtsi | 15 +++++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 15 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc7180.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc7180.dtsi
> index 68f9894..d78a066 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc7180.dtsi
> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc7180.dtsi
> @@ -684,6 +684,9 @@
>  			clocks = <&gcc GCC_SDCC1_APPS_CLK>,
>  					<&gcc GCC_SDCC1_AHB_CLK>;
>  			clock-names = "core", "iface";
> +			interconnects = <&aggre1_noc MASTER_EMMC &mc_virt SLAVE_EBI1>,
> +				<&gem_noc MASTER_APPSS_PROC &config_noc SLAVE_EMMC_CFG>;
> +			interconnect-names = "sdhc-ddr","cpu-sdhc";
>  			power-domains = <&rpmhpd SC7180_CX>;
>  			operating-points-v2 = <&sdhc1_opp_table>;
>  
> @@ -704,11 +707,15 @@
>  				opp-100000000 {
>  					opp-hz = /bits/ 64 <100000000>;
>  					required-opps = <&rpmhpd_opp_low_svs>;
> +					opp-peak-kBps = <100000 100000>;
> +					opp-avg-kBps = <100000 50000>;
>  				};
>  
>  				opp-384000000 {
>  					opp-hz = /bits/ 64 <384000000>;
>  					required-opps = <&rpmhpd_opp_svs_l1>;
> +					opp-peak-kBps = <600000 900000>;
> +					opp-avg-kBps = <261438 300000>;
>  				};
>  			};
>  		};
> @@ -2476,6 +2483,10 @@
>  			clocks = <&gcc GCC_SDCC2_APPS_CLK>,
>  					<&gcc GCC_SDCC2_AHB_CLK>;
>  			clock-names = "core", "iface";
> +
> +			interconnects = <&aggre1_noc MASTER_SDCC_2 &mc_virt SLAVE_EBI1>,
> +				<&gem_noc MASTER_APPSS_PROC &config_noc	SLAVE_SDCC_2>;
> +			interconnect-names = "sdhc-ddr","cpu-sdhc";
>  			power-domains = <&rpmhpd SC7180_CX>;
>  			operating-points-v2 = <&sdhc2_opp_table>;
>  
> @@ -2489,11 +2500,15 @@
>  				opp-100000000 {
>  					opp-hz = /bits/ 64 <100000000>;
>  					required-opps = <&rpmhpd_opp_low_svs>;
> +					opp-peak-kBps = <160000 100000>;
> +					opp-avg-kBps = <80000 50000>;
>  				};
>  
>  				opp-202000000 {
>  					opp-hz = /bits/ 64 <202000000>;
>  					required-opps = <&rpmhpd_opp_svs_l1>;
> +					opp-peak-kBps = <200000	120000>;
> +					opp-avg-kBps = <100000 60000>;
>  				};
>  			};
>  		};

Does the sdhci-msm driver actually have BW scaling support at this point?

There is commit 4ece9795be56 ("mmc: sdhci-msm: Add interconnect
bandwidth scaling support"), whose commit message says "make sure
interconnect driver is ready before handling interconnect scaling.".

I haven't seen any patch adding the scaling support (supposedly by
adding dev_pm_opp_set_bw() calls?). Did I miss it? If not it seems
it would make sense to post it in a series together with this patch,
as far as I can tell this patch alone does nothing in practical terms.

grep sdhc /sys/kernel/debug/interconnect/interconnect_summary
  8804000.sdhci                          0            0            0
  7c4000.sdhci                           0            0            0
  7c4000.sdhci                           0            0            0
  8804000.sdhci                          0            0            0
  ...

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH V2] arm64: dts: qcom: sc7180: Add bandwidth votes for eMMC and SDcard
  2020-07-24 17:10 ` Matthias Kaehlcke
@ 2020-07-27  6:50   ` sbhanu
  2020-07-27 19:10     ` Matthias Kaehlcke
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread
From: sbhanu @ 2020-07-27  6:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Matthias Kaehlcke
  Cc: adrian.hunter, ulf.hansson, robh+dt, linux-mmc, linux-kernel,
	linux-arm-msm, devicetree, agross, bjorn.andersson, rnayak,
	Pradeep P V K, devicetree-owner

On 2020-07-24 22:40, Matthias Kaehlcke wrote:
> Hi Shaik,
> 
> On Tue, Jul 21, 2020 at 04:16:21PM +0530, Shaik Sajida Bhanu wrote:
>> From: Pradeep P V K <ppvk@codeaurora.org>
>> 
>> Add the bandwidth domain supporting performance state and
>> the corresponding OPP tables for the sdhc device on sc7180.
>> 
>> Signed-off-by: Pradeep P V K <ppvk@codeaurora.org>
>> Signed-off-by: Shaik Sajida Bhanu <sbhanu@codeaurora.org>
>> ---
>> 
>> Changes since V1:
>> 	- Incorporated review comments by Bjorn Andersson.
>> ---
>>  arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc7180.dtsi | 15 +++++++++++++++
>>  1 file changed, 15 insertions(+)
>> 
>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc7180.dtsi 
>> b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc7180.dtsi
>> index 68f9894..d78a066 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc7180.dtsi
>> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc7180.dtsi
>> @@ -684,6 +684,9 @@
>>  			clocks = <&gcc GCC_SDCC1_APPS_CLK>,
>>  					<&gcc GCC_SDCC1_AHB_CLK>;
>>  			clock-names = "core", "iface";
>> +			interconnects = <&aggre1_noc MASTER_EMMC &mc_virt SLAVE_EBI1>,
>> +				<&gem_noc MASTER_APPSS_PROC &config_noc SLAVE_EMMC_CFG>;
>> +			interconnect-names = "sdhc-ddr","cpu-sdhc";
>>  			power-domains = <&rpmhpd SC7180_CX>;
>>  			operating-points-v2 = <&sdhc1_opp_table>;
>> 
>> @@ -704,11 +707,15 @@
>>  				opp-100000000 {
>>  					opp-hz = /bits/ 64 <100000000>;
>>  					required-opps = <&rpmhpd_opp_low_svs>;
>> +					opp-peak-kBps = <100000 100000>;
>> +					opp-avg-kBps = <100000 50000>;
>>  				};
>> 
>>  				opp-384000000 {
>>  					opp-hz = /bits/ 64 <384000000>;
>>  					required-opps = <&rpmhpd_opp_svs_l1>;
>> +					opp-peak-kBps = <600000 900000>;
>> +					opp-avg-kBps = <261438 300000>;
>>  				};
>>  			};
>>  		};
>> @@ -2476,6 +2483,10 @@
>>  			clocks = <&gcc GCC_SDCC2_APPS_CLK>,
>>  					<&gcc GCC_SDCC2_AHB_CLK>;
>>  			clock-names = "core", "iface";
>> +
>> +			interconnects = <&aggre1_noc MASTER_SDCC_2 &mc_virt SLAVE_EBI1>,
>> +				<&gem_noc MASTER_APPSS_PROC &config_noc	SLAVE_SDCC_2>;
>> +			interconnect-names = "sdhc-ddr","cpu-sdhc";
>>  			power-domains = <&rpmhpd SC7180_CX>;
>>  			operating-points-v2 = <&sdhc2_opp_table>;
>> 
>> @@ -2489,11 +2500,15 @@
>>  				opp-100000000 {
>>  					opp-hz = /bits/ 64 <100000000>;
>>  					required-opps = <&rpmhpd_opp_low_svs>;
>> +					opp-peak-kBps = <160000 100000>;
>> +					opp-avg-kBps = <80000 50000>;
>>  				};
>> 
>>  				opp-202000000 {
>>  					opp-hz = /bits/ 64 <202000000>;
>>  					required-opps = <&rpmhpd_opp_svs_l1>;
>> +					opp-peak-kBps = <200000	120000>;
>> +					opp-avg-kBps = <100000 60000>;
>>  				};
>>  			};
>>  		};
> 
> Does the sdhci-msm driver actually have BW scaling support at this 
> point?
> 

yes

> There is commit 4ece9795be56 ("mmc: sdhci-msm: Add interconnect
> bandwidth scaling support"), whose commit message says "make sure
> interconnect driver is ready before handling interconnect scaling.".
> 
> I haven't seen any patch adding the scaling support (supposedly by
> adding dev_pm_opp_set_bw() calls?). Did I miss it? If not it seems
> it would make sense to post it in a series together with this patch,
> as far as I can tell this patch alone does nothing in practical terms.
> 
> grep sdhc /sys/kernel/debug/interconnect/interconnect_summary
>   8804000.sdhci                          0            0            0
>   7c4000.sdhci                           0            0            0
>   7c4000.sdhci                           0            0            0
>   8804000.sdhci                          0            0            0
>   ...

"mmc: sdhci-msm: Use OPP API to set clk/perf 
state"(https://lkml.org/lkml/2020/4/8/425) and "mmc: sdhci-msm: Add 
interconnect bandwidth scaling 
support"(https://lkml.org/lkml/2020/3/12/60) with these two patches 
scaling will be supported for sdhci-msm driver.

the values  in  grep sdhc 
/sys/kernel/debug/interconnect/interconnect_summary will be zero during 
device is in suspend state... and the values in  grep sdhc 
/sys/kernel/debug/interconnect/interconnect_summary during device in 
resume state will be like the following::

cicalhost / # cat /sys/kernel/debug/interconnect/interconnect_summary | 
grep sdh
   8804000.sdhci                          0        60000       120000
   7c4000.sdhci                           0       300000       900000
   7c4000.sdhci                           0       300000       900000
   8804000.sdhci                          0        60000       120000
   8804000.sdhci                          0       100000       200000
   7c4000.sdhci                           0       261438       600000
   8804000.sdhci                          0        60000       120000


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH V2] arm64: dts: qcom: sc7180: Add bandwidth votes for eMMC and SDcard
  2020-07-27  6:50   ` sbhanu
@ 2020-07-27 19:10     ` Matthias Kaehlcke
  2020-07-28 11:19       ` sbhanu
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread
From: Matthias Kaehlcke @ 2020-07-27 19:10 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: sbhanu
  Cc: adrian.hunter, ulf.hansson, robh+dt, linux-mmc, linux-kernel,
	linux-arm-msm, devicetree, agross, bjorn.andersson, rnayak,
	Pradeep P V K, devicetree-owner

Hi,

On Mon, Jul 27, 2020 at 12:20:38PM +0530, sbhanu@codeaurora.org wrote:
> On 2020-07-24 22:40, Matthias Kaehlcke wrote:
> > Hi Shaik,
> > 
> > On Tue, Jul 21, 2020 at 04:16:21PM +0530, Shaik Sajida Bhanu wrote:
> > > From: Pradeep P V K <ppvk@codeaurora.org>
> > > 
> > > Add the bandwidth domain supporting performance state and
> > > the corresponding OPP tables for the sdhc device on sc7180.
> > > 
> > > Signed-off-by: Pradeep P V K <ppvk@codeaurora.org>
> > > Signed-off-by: Shaik Sajida Bhanu <sbhanu@codeaurora.org>
> > > ---
> > > 
> > > Changes since V1:
> > > 	- Incorporated review comments by Bjorn Andersson.
> > > ---
> > >  arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc7180.dtsi | 15 +++++++++++++++
> > >  1 file changed, 15 insertions(+)
> > > 
> > > diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc7180.dtsi
> > > b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc7180.dtsi
> > > index 68f9894..d78a066 100644
> > > --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc7180.dtsi
> > > +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc7180.dtsi
> > > @@ -684,6 +684,9 @@
> > >  			clocks = <&gcc GCC_SDCC1_APPS_CLK>,
> > >  					<&gcc GCC_SDCC1_AHB_CLK>;
> > >  			clock-names = "core", "iface";
> > > +			interconnects = <&aggre1_noc MASTER_EMMC &mc_virt SLAVE_EBI1>,
> > > +				<&gem_noc MASTER_APPSS_PROC &config_noc SLAVE_EMMC_CFG>;
> > > +			interconnect-names = "sdhc-ddr","cpu-sdhc";
> > >  			power-domains = <&rpmhpd SC7180_CX>;
> > >  			operating-points-v2 = <&sdhc1_opp_table>;
> > > 
> > > @@ -704,11 +707,15 @@
> > >  				opp-100000000 {
> > >  					opp-hz = /bits/ 64 <100000000>;
> > >  					required-opps = <&rpmhpd_opp_low_svs>;
> > > +					opp-peak-kBps = <100000 100000>;
> > > +					opp-avg-kBps = <100000 50000>;
> > >  				};
> > > 
> > >  				opp-384000000 {
> > >  					opp-hz = /bits/ 64 <384000000>;
> > >  					required-opps = <&rpmhpd_opp_svs_l1>;
> > > +					opp-peak-kBps = <600000 900000>;
> > > +					opp-avg-kBps = <261438 300000>;
> > >  				};
> > >  			};
> > >  		};
> > > @@ -2476,6 +2483,10 @@
> > >  			clocks = <&gcc GCC_SDCC2_APPS_CLK>,
> > >  					<&gcc GCC_SDCC2_AHB_CLK>;
> > >  			clock-names = "core", "iface";
> > > +
> > > +			interconnects = <&aggre1_noc MASTER_SDCC_2 &mc_virt SLAVE_EBI1>,
> > > +				<&gem_noc MASTER_APPSS_PROC &config_noc	SLAVE_SDCC_2>;
> > > +			interconnect-names = "sdhc-ddr","cpu-sdhc";
> > >  			power-domains = <&rpmhpd SC7180_CX>;
> > >  			operating-points-v2 = <&sdhc2_opp_table>;
> > > 
> > > @@ -2489,11 +2500,15 @@
> > >  				opp-100000000 {
> > >  					opp-hz = /bits/ 64 <100000000>;
> > >  					required-opps = <&rpmhpd_opp_low_svs>;
> > > +					opp-peak-kBps = <160000 100000>;
> > > +					opp-avg-kBps = <80000 50000>;
> > >  				};
> > > 
> > >  				opp-202000000 {
> > >  					opp-hz = /bits/ 64 <202000000>;
> > >  					required-opps = <&rpmhpd_opp_svs_l1>;
> > > +					opp-peak-kBps = <200000	120000>;
> > > +					opp-avg-kBps = <100000 60000>;
> > >  				};
> > >  			};
> > >  		};
> > 
> > Does the sdhci-msm driver actually have BW scaling support at this
> > point?
> > 
> 
> yes
> 
> > There is commit 4ece9795be56 ("mmc: sdhci-msm: Add interconnect
> > bandwidth scaling support"), whose commit message says "make sure
> > interconnect driver is ready before handling interconnect scaling.".
> > 
> > I haven't seen any patch adding the scaling support (supposedly by
> > adding dev_pm_opp_set_bw() calls?). Did I miss it? If not it seems
> > it would make sense to post it in a series together with this patch,
> > as far as I can tell this patch alone does nothing in practical terms.
> > 
> > grep sdhc /sys/kernel/debug/interconnect/interconnect_summary
> >   8804000.sdhci                          0            0            0
> >   7c4000.sdhci                           0            0            0
> >   7c4000.sdhci                           0            0            0
> >   8804000.sdhci                          0            0            0
> >   ...
> 
> "mmc: sdhci-msm: Use OPP API to set clk/perf
> state"(https://lkml.org/lkml/2020/4/8/425) and "mmc: sdhci-msm: Add
> interconnect bandwidth scaling support"(https://lkml.org/lkml/2020/3/12/60)
> with these two patches scaling will be supported for sdhci-msm driver.

Are you testing with exactly these patches or with the ones that landed
upstream? At least the second one changed substantially

> the values  in  grep sdhc
> /sys/kernel/debug/interconnect/interconnect_summary will be zero during
> device is in suspend state...

Yes, I forgot to mention that I started MMC IO before looking at
'interconnect_summary'.

> and the values in  grep sdhc
> /sys/kernel/debug/interconnect/interconnect_summary during device in resume
> state will be like the following::
> 
> cicalhost / # cat /sys/kernel/debug/interconnect/interconnect_summary | grep
> sdh
>   8804000.sdhci                          0        60000       120000
>   7c4000.sdhci                           0       300000       900000
>   7c4000.sdhci                           0       300000       900000
>   8804000.sdhci                          0        60000       120000
>   8804000.sdhci                          0       100000       200000
>   7c4000.sdhci                           0       261438       600000
>   8804000.sdhci                          0        60000       120000

On my system the bandwidth is never set:

3.590152] sdhci_msm 7c4000.sdhci: DBG: old/new frequencies (384000000 Hz) are same, nothing to do
https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v5.7.8/source/drivers/opp/core.c#L847

This happens every time, even after the bandwith is set to 0. The problem
seems to be that opp_table->clk doesn't change for target_freq = 0.

My system is based on v5.4, so it is possible that my kernel is missing some
relevant patch from upstream.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH V2] arm64: dts: qcom: sc7180: Add bandwidth votes for eMMC and SDcard
  2020-07-27 19:10     ` Matthias Kaehlcke
@ 2020-07-28 11:19       ` sbhanu
  2020-08-11 17:08         ` Matthias Kaehlcke
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread
From: sbhanu @ 2020-07-28 11:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Matthias Kaehlcke
  Cc: adrian.hunter, ulf.hansson, robh+dt, linux-mmc, linux-kernel,
	linux-arm-msm, devicetree, agross, bjorn.andersson, rnayak,
	Pradeep P V K, devicetree-owner

On 2020-07-28 00:40, Matthias Kaehlcke wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> On Mon, Jul 27, 2020 at 12:20:38PM +0530, sbhanu@codeaurora.org wrote:
>> On 2020-07-24 22:40, Matthias Kaehlcke wrote:
>> > Hi Shaik,
>> >
>> > On Tue, Jul 21, 2020 at 04:16:21PM +0530, Shaik Sajida Bhanu wrote:
>> > > From: Pradeep P V K <ppvk@codeaurora.org>
>> > >
>> > > Add the bandwidth domain supporting performance state and
>> > > the corresponding OPP tables for the sdhc device on sc7180.
>> > >
>> > > Signed-off-by: Pradeep P V K <ppvk@codeaurora.org>
>> > > Signed-off-by: Shaik Sajida Bhanu <sbhanu@codeaurora.org>
>> > > ---
>> > >
>> > > Changes since V1:
>> > > 	- Incorporated review comments by Bjorn Andersson.
>> > > ---
>> > >  arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc7180.dtsi | 15 +++++++++++++++
>> > >  1 file changed, 15 insertions(+)
>> > >
>> > > diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc7180.dtsi
>> > > b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc7180.dtsi
>> > > index 68f9894..d78a066 100644
>> > > --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc7180.dtsi
>> > > +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc7180.dtsi
>> > > @@ -684,6 +684,9 @@
>> > >  			clocks = <&gcc GCC_SDCC1_APPS_CLK>,
>> > >  					<&gcc GCC_SDCC1_AHB_CLK>;
>> > >  			clock-names = "core", "iface";
>> > > +			interconnects = <&aggre1_noc MASTER_EMMC &mc_virt SLAVE_EBI1>,
>> > > +				<&gem_noc MASTER_APPSS_PROC &config_noc SLAVE_EMMC_CFG>;
>> > > +			interconnect-names = "sdhc-ddr","cpu-sdhc";
>> > >  			power-domains = <&rpmhpd SC7180_CX>;
>> > >  			operating-points-v2 = <&sdhc1_opp_table>;
>> > >
>> > > @@ -704,11 +707,15 @@
>> > >  				opp-100000000 {
>> > >  					opp-hz = /bits/ 64 <100000000>;
>> > >  					required-opps = <&rpmhpd_opp_low_svs>;
>> > > +					opp-peak-kBps = <100000 100000>;
>> > > +					opp-avg-kBps = <100000 50000>;
>> > >  				};
>> > >
>> > >  				opp-384000000 {
>> > >  					opp-hz = /bits/ 64 <384000000>;
>> > >  					required-opps = <&rpmhpd_opp_svs_l1>;
>> > > +					opp-peak-kBps = <600000 900000>;
>> > > +					opp-avg-kBps = <261438 300000>;
>> > >  				};
>> > >  			};
>> > >  		};
>> > > @@ -2476,6 +2483,10 @@
>> > >  			clocks = <&gcc GCC_SDCC2_APPS_CLK>,
>> > >  					<&gcc GCC_SDCC2_AHB_CLK>;
>> > >  			clock-names = "core", "iface";
>> > > +
>> > > +			interconnects = <&aggre1_noc MASTER_SDCC_2 &mc_virt SLAVE_EBI1>,
>> > > +				<&gem_noc MASTER_APPSS_PROC &config_noc	SLAVE_SDCC_2>;
>> > > +			interconnect-names = "sdhc-ddr","cpu-sdhc";
>> > >  			power-domains = <&rpmhpd SC7180_CX>;
>> > >  			operating-points-v2 = <&sdhc2_opp_table>;
>> > >
>> > > @@ -2489,11 +2500,15 @@
>> > >  				opp-100000000 {
>> > >  					opp-hz = /bits/ 64 <100000000>;
>> > >  					required-opps = <&rpmhpd_opp_low_svs>;
>> > > +					opp-peak-kBps = <160000 100000>;
>> > > +					opp-avg-kBps = <80000 50000>;
>> > >  				};
>> > >
>> > >  				opp-202000000 {
>> > >  					opp-hz = /bits/ 64 <202000000>;
>> > >  					required-opps = <&rpmhpd_opp_svs_l1>;
>> > > +					opp-peak-kBps = <200000	120000>;
>> > > +					opp-avg-kBps = <100000 60000>;
>> > >  				};
>> > >  			};
>> > >  		};
>> >
>> > Does the sdhci-msm driver actually have BW scaling support at this
>> > point?
>> >
>> 
>> yes
>> 
>> > There is commit 4ece9795be56 ("mmc: sdhci-msm: Add interconnect
>> > bandwidth scaling support"), whose commit message says "make sure
>> > interconnect driver is ready before handling interconnect scaling.".
>> >
>> > I haven't seen any patch adding the scaling support (supposedly by
>> > adding dev_pm_opp_set_bw() calls?). Did I miss it? If not it seems
>> > it would make sense to post it in a series together with this patch,
>> > as far as I can tell this patch alone does nothing in practical terms.
>> >
>> > grep sdhc /sys/kernel/debug/interconnect/interconnect_summary
>> >   8804000.sdhci                          0            0            0
>> >   7c4000.sdhci                           0            0            0
>> >   7c4000.sdhci                           0            0            0
>> >   8804000.sdhci                          0            0            0
>> >   ...
>> 
>> "mmc: sdhci-msm: Use OPP API to set clk/perf
>> state"(https://lkml.org/lkml/2020/4/8/425) and "mmc: sdhci-msm: Add
>> interconnect bandwidth scaling 
>> support"(https://lkml.org/lkml/2020/3/12/60)
>> with these two patches scaling will be supported for sdhci-msm driver.
> 
> Are you testing with exactly these patches or with the ones that landed
> upstream? At least the second one changed substantially
> 
>> the values  in  grep sdhc
>> /sys/kernel/debug/interconnect/interconnect_summary will be zero 
>> during
>> device is in suspend state...
> 
> Yes, I forgot to mention that I started MMC IO before looking at
> 'interconnect_summary'.
> 
>> and the values in  grep sdhc
>> /sys/kernel/debug/interconnect/interconnect_summary during device in 
>> resume
>> state will be like the following::
>> 
>> cicalhost / # cat /sys/kernel/debug/interconnect/interconnect_summary 
>> | grep
>> sdh
>>   8804000.sdhci                          0        60000       120000
>>   7c4000.sdhci                           0       300000       900000
>>   7c4000.sdhci                           0       300000       900000
>>   8804000.sdhci                          0        60000       120000
>>   8804000.sdhci                          0       100000       200000
>>   7c4000.sdhci                           0       261438       600000
>>   8804000.sdhci                          0        60000       120000
> 
> On my system the bandwidth is never set:
> 
> 3.590152] sdhci_msm 7c4000.sdhci: DBG: old/new frequencies (384000000
> Hz) are same, nothing to do
> https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v5.7.8/source/drivers/opp/core.c#L847
> 
> This happens every time, even after the bandwith is set to 0. The 
> problem
> seems to be that opp_table->clk doesn't change for target_freq = 0.
> 
> My system is based on v5.4, so it is possible that my kernel is missing 
> some
> relevant patch from upstream.
Hi matthias,

In order to aviod confusion this patch is continuation of the below 
patch::
"mmc: sdhci-msm: Add interconnect bandwidth scaling support" 
(https://lkml.org/lkml/2020/6/9/160).

Thanks,
sajida


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH V2] arm64: dts: qcom: sc7180: Add bandwidth votes for eMMC and SDcard
  2020-07-28 11:19       ` sbhanu
@ 2020-08-11 17:08         ` Matthias Kaehlcke
  2020-08-12 10:56           ` sbhanu
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread
From: Matthias Kaehlcke @ 2020-08-11 17:08 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: sbhanu
  Cc: adrian.hunter, ulf.hansson, robh+dt, linux-mmc, linux-kernel,
	linux-arm-msm, devicetree, agross, bjorn.andersson, rnayak,
	Pradeep P V K, devicetree-owner

On Tue, Jul 28, 2020 at 04:49:05PM +0530, sbhanu@codeaurora.org wrote:
> On 2020-07-28 00:40, Matthias Kaehlcke wrote:
> > Hi,
> > 
> > On Mon, Jul 27, 2020 at 12:20:38PM +0530, sbhanu@codeaurora.org wrote:
> > > On 2020-07-24 22:40, Matthias Kaehlcke wrote:
> > > > Hi Shaik,
> > > >
> > > > On Tue, Jul 21, 2020 at 04:16:21PM +0530, Shaik Sajida Bhanu wrote:
> > > > > From: Pradeep P V K <ppvk@codeaurora.org>
> > > > >
> > > > > Add the bandwidth domain supporting performance state and
> > > > > the corresponding OPP tables for the sdhc device on sc7180.
> > > > >
> > > > > Signed-off-by: Pradeep P V K <ppvk@codeaurora.org>
> > > > > Signed-off-by: Shaik Sajida Bhanu <sbhanu@codeaurora.org>
> > > > > ---
> > > > >
> > > > > Changes since V1:
> > > > > 	- Incorporated review comments by Bjorn Andersson.
> > > > > ---
> > > > >  arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc7180.dtsi | 15 +++++++++++++++
> > > > >  1 file changed, 15 insertions(+)
> > > > >
> > > > > diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc7180.dtsi
> > > > > b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc7180.dtsi
> > > > > index 68f9894..d78a066 100644
> > > > > --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc7180.dtsi
> > > > > +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc7180.dtsi
> > > > > @@ -684,6 +684,9 @@
> > > > >  			clocks = <&gcc GCC_SDCC1_APPS_CLK>,
> > > > >  					<&gcc GCC_SDCC1_AHB_CLK>;
> > > > >  			clock-names = "core", "iface";
> > > > > +			interconnects = <&aggre1_noc MASTER_EMMC &mc_virt SLAVE_EBI1>,
> > > > > +				<&gem_noc MASTER_APPSS_PROC &config_noc SLAVE_EMMC_CFG>;
> > > > > +			interconnect-names = "sdhc-ddr","cpu-sdhc";
> > > > >  			power-domains = <&rpmhpd SC7180_CX>;
> > > > >  			operating-points-v2 = <&sdhc1_opp_table>;
> > > > >
> > > > > @@ -704,11 +707,15 @@
> > > > >  				opp-100000000 {
> > > > >  					opp-hz = /bits/ 64 <100000000>;
> > > > >  					required-opps = <&rpmhpd_opp_low_svs>;
> > > > > +					opp-peak-kBps = <100000 100000>;
> > > > > +					opp-avg-kBps = <100000 50000>;
> > > > >  				};
> > > > >
> > > > >  				opp-384000000 {
> > > > >  					opp-hz = /bits/ 64 <384000000>;
> > > > >  					required-opps = <&rpmhpd_opp_svs_l1>;
> > > > > +					opp-peak-kBps = <600000 900000>;
> > > > > +					opp-avg-kBps = <261438 300000>;
> > > > >  				};
> > > > >  			};
> > > > >  		};
> > > > > @@ -2476,6 +2483,10 @@
> > > > >  			clocks = <&gcc GCC_SDCC2_APPS_CLK>,
> > > > >  					<&gcc GCC_SDCC2_AHB_CLK>;
> > > > >  			clock-names = "core", "iface";
> > > > > +
> > > > > +			interconnects = <&aggre1_noc MASTER_SDCC_2 &mc_virt SLAVE_EBI1>,
> > > > > +				<&gem_noc MASTER_APPSS_PROC &config_noc	SLAVE_SDCC_2>;
> > > > > +			interconnect-names = "sdhc-ddr","cpu-sdhc";
> > > > >  			power-domains = <&rpmhpd SC7180_CX>;
> > > > >  			operating-points-v2 = <&sdhc2_opp_table>;
> > > > >
> > > > > @@ -2489,11 +2500,15 @@
> > > > >  				opp-100000000 {
> > > > >  					opp-hz = /bits/ 64 <100000000>;
> > > > >  					required-opps = <&rpmhpd_opp_low_svs>;
> > > > > +					opp-peak-kBps = <160000 100000>;
> > > > > +					opp-avg-kBps = <80000 50000>;
> > > > >  				};
> > > > >
> > > > >  				opp-202000000 {
> > > > >  					opp-hz = /bits/ 64 <202000000>;
> > > > >  					required-opps = <&rpmhpd_opp_svs_l1>;
> > > > > +					opp-peak-kBps = <200000	120000>;
> > > > > +					opp-avg-kBps = <100000 60000>;
> > > > >  				};
> > > > >  			};
> > > > >  		};
> > > >
> > > > Does the sdhci-msm driver actually have BW scaling support at this
> > > > point?
> > > >
> > > 
> > > yes
> > > 
> > > > There is commit 4ece9795be56 ("mmc: sdhci-msm: Add interconnect
> > > > bandwidth scaling support"), whose commit message says "make sure
> > > > interconnect driver is ready before handling interconnect scaling.".
> > > >
> > > > I haven't seen any patch adding the scaling support (supposedly by
> > > > adding dev_pm_opp_set_bw() calls?). Did I miss it? If not it seems
> > > > it would make sense to post it in a series together with this patch,
> > > > as far as I can tell this patch alone does nothing in practical terms.
> > > >
> > > > grep sdhc /sys/kernel/debug/interconnect/interconnect_summary
> > > >   8804000.sdhci                          0            0            0
> > > >   7c4000.sdhci                           0            0            0
> > > >   7c4000.sdhci                           0            0            0
> > > >   8804000.sdhci                          0            0            0
> > > >   ...
> > > 
> > > "mmc: sdhci-msm: Use OPP API to set clk/perf
> > > state"(https://lkml.org/lkml/2020/4/8/425) and "mmc: sdhci-msm: Add
> > > interconnect bandwidth scaling
> > > support"(https://lkml.org/lkml/2020/3/12/60)
> > > with these two patches scaling will be supported for sdhci-msm driver.
> > 
> > Are you testing with exactly these patches or with the ones that landed
> > upstream? At least the second one changed substantially
> > 
> > > the values  in  grep sdhc
> > > /sys/kernel/debug/interconnect/interconnect_summary will be zero
> > > during
> > > device is in suspend state...
> > 
> > Yes, I forgot to mention that I started MMC IO before looking at
> > 'interconnect_summary'.
> > 
> > > and the values in  grep sdhc
> > > /sys/kernel/debug/interconnect/interconnect_summary during device in
> > > resume
> > > state will be like the following::
> > > 
> > > cicalhost / # cat
> > > /sys/kernel/debug/interconnect/interconnect_summary | grep
> > > sdh
> > >   8804000.sdhci                          0        60000       120000
> > >   7c4000.sdhci                           0       300000       900000
> > >   7c4000.sdhci                           0       300000       900000
> > >   8804000.sdhci                          0        60000       120000
> > >   8804000.sdhci                          0       100000       200000
> > >   7c4000.sdhci                           0       261438       600000
> > >   8804000.sdhci                          0        60000       120000
> > 
> > On my system the bandwidth is never set:
> > 
> > 3.590152] sdhci_msm 7c4000.sdhci: DBG: old/new frequencies (384000000
> > Hz) are same, nothing to do
> > https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v5.7.8/source/drivers/opp/core.c#L847
> > 
> > This happens every time, even after the bandwith is set to 0. The
> > problem
> > seems to be that opp_table->clk doesn't change for target_freq = 0.
> > 
> > My system is based on v5.4, so it is possible that my kernel is missing
> > some
> > relevant patch from upstream.
> Hi matthias,
> 
> In order to aviod confusion this patch is continuation of the below patch::
> "mmc: sdhci-msm: Add interconnect bandwidth scaling support"
> (https://lkml.org/lkml/2020/6/9/160).

My kernel contains this patch.

As you told me in private, the patch "opp: Fix dev_pm_opp_set_rate()
to not return early" (https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/11707003/) is
needed, which fixes exactly the problem I described.

It seems the tree you tested was not based on the maintainer tree or upstream,
please make that clear when someone reports issues. Since you said it works
for you I wasted time trying to chase down a missing patch which did not exist
(yet).

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH V2] arm64: dts: qcom: sc7180: Add bandwidth votes for eMMC and SDcard
  2020-08-11 17:08         ` Matthias Kaehlcke
@ 2020-08-12 10:56           ` sbhanu
  2020-08-12 15:15             ` Matthias Kaehlcke
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread
From: sbhanu @ 2020-08-12 10:56 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Matthias Kaehlcke
  Cc: adrian.hunter, ulf.hansson, robh+dt, linux-mmc, linux-kernel,
	linux-arm-msm, devicetree, agross, bjorn.andersson, rnayak,
	Pradeep P V K, devicetree-owner

On 2020-08-11 22:38, Matthias Kaehlcke wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 28, 2020 at 04:49:05PM +0530, sbhanu@codeaurora.org wrote:
>> On 2020-07-28 00:40, Matthias Kaehlcke wrote:
>> > Hi,
>> >
>> > On Mon, Jul 27, 2020 at 12:20:38PM +0530, sbhanu@codeaurora.org wrote:
>> > > On 2020-07-24 22:40, Matthias Kaehlcke wrote:
>> > > > Hi Shaik,
>> > > >
>> > > > On Tue, Jul 21, 2020 at 04:16:21PM +0530, Shaik Sajida Bhanu wrote:
>> > > > > From: Pradeep P V K <ppvk@codeaurora.org>
>> > > > >
>> > > > > Add the bandwidth domain supporting performance state and
>> > > > > the corresponding OPP tables for the sdhc device on sc7180.
>> > > > >
>> > > > > Signed-off-by: Pradeep P V K <ppvk@codeaurora.org>
>> > > > > Signed-off-by: Shaik Sajida Bhanu <sbhanu@codeaurora.org>
>> > > > > ---
>> > > > >
>> > > > > Changes since V1:
>> > > > > 	- Incorporated review comments by Bjorn Andersson.
>> > > > > ---
>> > > > >  arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc7180.dtsi | 15 +++++++++++++++
>> > > > >  1 file changed, 15 insertions(+)
>> > > > >
>> > > > > diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc7180.dtsi
>> > > > > b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc7180.dtsi
>> > > > > index 68f9894..d78a066 100644
>> > > > > --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc7180.dtsi
>> > > > > +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc7180.dtsi
>> > > > > @@ -684,6 +684,9 @@
>> > > > >  			clocks = <&gcc GCC_SDCC1_APPS_CLK>,
>> > > > >  					<&gcc GCC_SDCC1_AHB_CLK>;
>> > > > >  			clock-names = "core", "iface";
>> > > > > +			interconnects = <&aggre1_noc MASTER_EMMC &mc_virt SLAVE_EBI1>,
>> > > > > +				<&gem_noc MASTER_APPSS_PROC &config_noc SLAVE_EMMC_CFG>;
>> > > > > +			interconnect-names = "sdhc-ddr","cpu-sdhc";
>> > > > >  			power-domains = <&rpmhpd SC7180_CX>;
>> > > > >  			operating-points-v2 = <&sdhc1_opp_table>;
>> > > > >
>> > > > > @@ -704,11 +707,15 @@
>> > > > >  				opp-100000000 {
>> > > > >  					opp-hz = /bits/ 64 <100000000>;
>> > > > >  					required-opps = <&rpmhpd_opp_low_svs>;
>> > > > > +					opp-peak-kBps = <100000 100000>;
>> > > > > +					opp-avg-kBps = <100000 50000>;
>> > > > >  				};
>> > > > >
>> > > > >  				opp-384000000 {
>> > > > >  					opp-hz = /bits/ 64 <384000000>;
>> > > > >  					required-opps = <&rpmhpd_opp_svs_l1>;
>> > > > > +					opp-peak-kBps = <600000 900000>;
>> > > > > +					opp-avg-kBps = <261438 300000>;
>> > > > >  				};
>> > > > >  			};
>> > > > >  		};
>> > > > > @@ -2476,6 +2483,10 @@
>> > > > >  			clocks = <&gcc GCC_SDCC2_APPS_CLK>,
>> > > > >  					<&gcc GCC_SDCC2_AHB_CLK>;
>> > > > >  			clock-names = "core", "iface";
>> > > > > +
>> > > > > +			interconnects = <&aggre1_noc MASTER_SDCC_2 &mc_virt SLAVE_EBI1>,
>> > > > > +				<&gem_noc MASTER_APPSS_PROC &config_noc	SLAVE_SDCC_2>;
>> > > > > +			interconnect-names = "sdhc-ddr","cpu-sdhc";
>> > > > >  			power-domains = <&rpmhpd SC7180_CX>;
>> > > > >  			operating-points-v2 = <&sdhc2_opp_table>;
>> > > > >
>> > > > > @@ -2489,11 +2500,15 @@
>> > > > >  				opp-100000000 {
>> > > > >  					opp-hz = /bits/ 64 <100000000>;
>> > > > >  					required-opps = <&rpmhpd_opp_low_svs>;
>> > > > > +					opp-peak-kBps = <160000 100000>;
>> > > > > +					opp-avg-kBps = <80000 50000>;
>> > > > >  				};
>> > > > >
>> > > > >  				opp-202000000 {
>> > > > >  					opp-hz = /bits/ 64 <202000000>;
>> > > > >  					required-opps = <&rpmhpd_opp_svs_l1>;
>> > > > > +					opp-peak-kBps = <200000	120000>;
>> > > > > +					opp-avg-kBps = <100000 60000>;
>> > > > >  				};
>> > > > >  			};
>> > > > >  		};
>> > > >
>> > > > Does the sdhci-msm driver actually have BW scaling support at this
>> > > > point?
>> > > >
>> > >
>> > > yes
>> > >
>> > > > There is commit 4ece9795be56 ("mmc: sdhci-msm: Add interconnect
>> > > > bandwidth scaling support"), whose commit message says "make sure
>> > > > interconnect driver is ready before handling interconnect scaling.".
>> > > >
>> > > > I haven't seen any patch adding the scaling support (supposedly by
>> > > > adding dev_pm_opp_set_bw() calls?). Did I miss it? If not it seems
>> > > > it would make sense to post it in a series together with this patch,
>> > > > as far as I can tell this patch alone does nothing in practical terms.
>> > > >
>> > > > grep sdhc /sys/kernel/debug/interconnect/interconnect_summary
>> > > >   8804000.sdhci                          0            0            0
>> > > >   7c4000.sdhci                           0            0            0
>> > > >   7c4000.sdhci                           0            0            0
>> > > >   8804000.sdhci                          0            0            0
>> > > >   ...
>> > >
>> > > "mmc: sdhci-msm: Use OPP API to set clk/perf
>> > > state"(https://lkml.org/lkml/2020/4/8/425) and "mmc: sdhci-msm: Add
>> > > interconnect bandwidth scaling
>> > > support"(https://lkml.org/lkml/2020/3/12/60)
>> > > with these two patches scaling will be supported for sdhci-msm driver.
>> >
>> > Are you testing with exactly these patches or with the ones that landed
>> > upstream? At least the second one changed substantially
>> >
>> > > the values  in  grep sdhc
>> > > /sys/kernel/debug/interconnect/interconnect_summary will be zero
>> > > during
>> > > device is in suspend state...
>> >
>> > Yes, I forgot to mention that I started MMC IO before looking at
>> > 'interconnect_summary'.
>> >
>> > > and the values in  grep sdhc
>> > > /sys/kernel/debug/interconnect/interconnect_summary during device in
>> > > resume
>> > > state will be like the following::
>> > >
>> > > cicalhost / # cat
>> > > /sys/kernel/debug/interconnect/interconnect_summary | grep
>> > > sdh
>> > >   8804000.sdhci                          0        60000       120000
>> > >   7c4000.sdhci                           0       300000       900000
>> > >   7c4000.sdhci                           0       300000       900000
>> > >   8804000.sdhci                          0        60000       120000
>> > >   8804000.sdhci                          0       100000       200000
>> > >   7c4000.sdhci                           0       261438       600000
>> > >   8804000.sdhci                          0        60000       120000
>> >
>> > On my system the bandwidth is never set:
>> >
>> > 3.590152] sdhci_msm 7c4000.sdhci: DBG: old/new frequencies (384000000
>> > Hz) are same, nothing to do
>> > https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v5.7.8/source/drivers/opp/core.c#L847
>> >
>> > This happens every time, even after the bandwith is set to 0. The
>> > problem
>> > seems to be that opp_table->clk doesn't change for target_freq = 0.
>> >
>> > My system is based on v5.4, so it is possible that my kernel is missing
>> > some
>> > relevant patch from upstream.
>> Hi matthias,
>> 
>> In order to aviod confusion this patch is continuation of the below 
>> patch::
>> "mmc: sdhci-msm: Add interconnect bandwidth scaling support"
>> (https://lkml.org/lkml/2020/6/9/160).
> 
> My kernel contains this patch.
> 
> As you told me in private, the patch "opp: Fix dev_pm_opp_set_rate()
> to not return early" (https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/11707003/) is
> needed, which fixes exactly the problem I described.
> 
> It seems the tree you tested was not based on the maintainer tree or 
> upstream,
> please make that clear when someone reports issues. Since you said it 
> works
> for you I wasted time trying to chase down a missing patch which did 
> not exist
> (yet).


Hi Matthis,

Can you confirm from your end the issue that you reported got fixed
with Rajendra patch or not. Once you confirm, I can ask Bjorn to pull
this dt change.

thanks,
sajida

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH V2] arm64: dts: qcom: sc7180: Add bandwidth votes for eMMC and SDcard
  2020-08-12 10:56           ` sbhanu
@ 2020-08-12 15:15             ` Matthias Kaehlcke
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Matthias Kaehlcke @ 2020-08-12 15:15 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: sbhanu
  Cc: adrian.hunter, ulf.hansson, robh+dt, linux-mmc, linux-kernel,
	linux-arm-msm, devicetree, agross, bjorn.andersson, rnayak,
	Pradeep P V K, devicetree-owner

On Wed, Aug 12, 2020 at 04:26:08PM +0530, sbhanu@codeaurora.org wrote:
> On 2020-08-11 22:38, Matthias Kaehlcke wrote:
> > On Tue, Jul 28, 2020 at 04:49:05PM +0530, sbhanu@codeaurora.org wrote:
> > > On 2020-07-28 00:40, Matthias Kaehlcke wrote:
> > > > Hi,
> > > >
> > > > On Mon, Jul 27, 2020 at 12:20:38PM +0530, sbhanu@codeaurora.org wrote:
> > > > > On 2020-07-24 22:40, Matthias Kaehlcke wrote:
> > > > > > Hi Shaik,
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On Tue, Jul 21, 2020 at 04:16:21PM +0530, Shaik Sajida Bhanu wrote:
> > > > > > > From: Pradeep P V K <ppvk@codeaurora.org>
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Add the bandwidth domain supporting performance state and
> > > > > > > the corresponding OPP tables for the sdhc device on sc7180.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Pradeep P V K <ppvk@codeaurora.org>
> > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Shaik Sajida Bhanu <sbhanu@codeaurora.org>
> > > > > > > ---
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Changes since V1:
> > > > > > > 	- Incorporated review comments by Bjorn Andersson.
> > > > > > > ---
> > > > > > >  arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc7180.dtsi | 15 +++++++++++++++
> > > > > > >  1 file changed, 15 insertions(+)
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc7180.dtsi
> > > > > > > b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc7180.dtsi
> > > > > > > index 68f9894..d78a066 100644
> > > > > > > --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc7180.dtsi
> > > > > > > +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc7180.dtsi
> > > > > > > @@ -684,6 +684,9 @@
> > > > > > >  			clocks = <&gcc GCC_SDCC1_APPS_CLK>,
> > > > > > >  					<&gcc GCC_SDCC1_AHB_CLK>;
> > > > > > >  			clock-names = "core", "iface";
> > > > > > > +			interconnects = <&aggre1_noc MASTER_EMMC &mc_virt SLAVE_EBI1>,
> > > > > > > +				<&gem_noc MASTER_APPSS_PROC &config_noc SLAVE_EMMC_CFG>;
> > > > > > > +			interconnect-names = "sdhc-ddr","cpu-sdhc";
> > > > > > >  			power-domains = <&rpmhpd SC7180_CX>;
> > > > > > >  			operating-points-v2 = <&sdhc1_opp_table>;
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > @@ -704,11 +707,15 @@
> > > > > > >  				opp-100000000 {
> > > > > > >  					opp-hz = /bits/ 64 <100000000>;
> > > > > > >  					required-opps = <&rpmhpd_opp_low_svs>;
> > > > > > > +					opp-peak-kBps = <100000 100000>;
> > > > > > > +					opp-avg-kBps = <100000 50000>;
> > > > > > >  				};
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >  				opp-384000000 {
> > > > > > >  					opp-hz = /bits/ 64 <384000000>;
> > > > > > >  					required-opps = <&rpmhpd_opp_svs_l1>;
> > > > > > > +					opp-peak-kBps = <600000 900000>;
> > > > > > > +					opp-avg-kBps = <261438 300000>;
> > > > > > >  				};
> > > > > > >  			};
> > > > > > >  		};
> > > > > > > @@ -2476,6 +2483,10 @@
> > > > > > >  			clocks = <&gcc GCC_SDCC2_APPS_CLK>,
> > > > > > >  					<&gcc GCC_SDCC2_AHB_CLK>;
> > > > > > >  			clock-names = "core", "iface";
> > > > > > > +
> > > > > > > +			interconnects = <&aggre1_noc MASTER_SDCC_2 &mc_virt SLAVE_EBI1>,
> > > > > > > +				<&gem_noc MASTER_APPSS_PROC &config_noc	SLAVE_SDCC_2>;
> > > > > > > +			interconnect-names = "sdhc-ddr","cpu-sdhc";
> > > > > > >  			power-domains = <&rpmhpd SC7180_CX>;
> > > > > > >  			operating-points-v2 = <&sdhc2_opp_table>;
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > @@ -2489,11 +2500,15 @@
> > > > > > >  				opp-100000000 {
> > > > > > >  					opp-hz = /bits/ 64 <100000000>;
> > > > > > >  					required-opps = <&rpmhpd_opp_low_svs>;
> > > > > > > +					opp-peak-kBps = <160000 100000>;
> > > > > > > +					opp-avg-kBps = <80000 50000>;
> > > > > > >  				};
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >  				opp-202000000 {
> > > > > > >  					opp-hz = /bits/ 64 <202000000>;
> > > > > > >  					required-opps = <&rpmhpd_opp_svs_l1>;
> > > > > > > +					opp-peak-kBps = <200000	120000>;
> > > > > > > +					opp-avg-kBps = <100000 60000>;
> > > > > > >  				};
> > > > > > >  			};
> > > > > > >  		};
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Does the sdhci-msm driver actually have BW scaling support at this
> > > > > > point?
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > yes
> > > > >
> > > > > > There is commit 4ece9795be56 ("mmc: sdhci-msm: Add interconnect
> > > > > > bandwidth scaling support"), whose commit message says "make sure
> > > > > > interconnect driver is ready before handling interconnect scaling.".
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I haven't seen any patch adding the scaling support (supposedly by
> > > > > > adding dev_pm_opp_set_bw() calls?). Did I miss it? If not it seems
> > > > > > it would make sense to post it in a series together with this patch,
> > > > > > as far as I can tell this patch alone does nothing in practical terms.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > grep sdhc /sys/kernel/debug/interconnect/interconnect_summary
> > > > > >   8804000.sdhci                          0            0            0
> > > > > >   7c4000.sdhci                           0            0            0
> > > > > >   7c4000.sdhci                           0            0            0
> > > > > >   8804000.sdhci                          0            0            0
> > > > > >   ...
> > > > >
> > > > > "mmc: sdhci-msm: Use OPP API to set clk/perf
> > > > > state"(https://lkml.org/lkml/2020/4/8/425) and "mmc: sdhci-msm: Add
> > > > > interconnect bandwidth scaling
> > > > > support"(https://lkml.org/lkml/2020/3/12/60)
> > > > > with these two patches scaling will be supported for sdhci-msm driver.
> > > >
> > > > Are you testing with exactly these patches or with the ones that landed
> > > > upstream? At least the second one changed substantially
> > > >
> > > > > the values  in  grep sdhc
> > > > > /sys/kernel/debug/interconnect/interconnect_summary will be zero
> > > > > during
> > > > > device is in suspend state...
> > > >
> > > > Yes, I forgot to mention that I started MMC IO before looking at
> > > > 'interconnect_summary'.
> > > >
> > > > > and the values in  grep sdhc
> > > > > /sys/kernel/debug/interconnect/interconnect_summary during device in
> > > > > resume
> > > > > state will be like the following::
> > > > >
> > > > > cicalhost / # cat
> > > > > /sys/kernel/debug/interconnect/interconnect_summary | grep
> > > > > sdh
> > > > >   8804000.sdhci                          0        60000       120000
> > > > >   7c4000.sdhci                           0       300000       900000
> > > > >   7c4000.sdhci                           0       300000       900000
> > > > >   8804000.sdhci                          0        60000       120000
> > > > >   8804000.sdhci                          0       100000       200000
> > > > >   7c4000.sdhci                           0       261438       600000
> > > > >   8804000.sdhci                          0        60000       120000
> > > >
> > > > On my system the bandwidth is never set:
> > > >
> > > > 3.590152] sdhci_msm 7c4000.sdhci: DBG: old/new frequencies (384000000
> > > > Hz) are same, nothing to do
> > > > https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v5.7.8/source/drivers/opp/core.c#L847
> > > >
> > > > This happens every time, even after the bandwith is set to 0. The
> > > > problem
> > > > seems to be that opp_table->clk doesn't change for target_freq = 0.
> > > >
> > > > My system is based on v5.4, so it is possible that my kernel is missing
> > > > some
> > > > relevant patch from upstream.
> > > Hi matthias,
> > > 
> > > In order to aviod confusion this patch is continuation of the below
> > > patch::
> > > "mmc: sdhci-msm: Add interconnect bandwidth scaling support"
> > > (https://lkml.org/lkml/2020/6/9/160).
> > 
> > My kernel contains this patch.
> > 
> > As you told me in private, the patch "opp: Fix dev_pm_opp_set_rate()
> > to not return early" (https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/11707003/) is
> > needed, which fixes exactly the problem I described.
> > 
> > It seems the tree you tested was not based on the maintainer tree or
> > upstream,
> > please make that clear when someone reports issues. Since you said it
> > works
> > for you I wasted time trying to chase down a missing patch which did not
> > exist
> > (yet).
> 
> 
> Hi Matthis,
> 
> Can you confirm from your end the issue that you reported got fixed
> with Rajendra patch or not. Once you confirm, I can ask Bjorn to pull
> this dt change.

Yes, the issue is fixed with Rajendra's patch

Tested-by: Matthias Kaehlcke <mka@chromium.org>

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2020-08-12 15:15 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2020-07-21 10:46 [PATCH V2] arm64: dts: qcom: sc7180: Add bandwidth votes for eMMC and SDcard Shaik Sajida Bhanu
2020-07-24 17:10 ` Matthias Kaehlcke
2020-07-27  6:50   ` sbhanu
2020-07-27 19:10     ` Matthias Kaehlcke
2020-07-28 11:19       ` sbhanu
2020-08-11 17:08         ` Matthias Kaehlcke
2020-08-12 10:56           ` sbhanu
2020-08-12 15:15             ` Matthias Kaehlcke

This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.