All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "chenxiang (M)" <chenxiang66@hisilicon.com>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>,
	Jeffle Xu <jefflexu@linux.alibaba.com>,
	Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>,
	Damien Le Moal <Damien.LeMoal@wdc.com>,
	Keith Busch <kbusch@kernel.org>, Sagi Grimberg <sagi@grimberg.me>,
	"Wunderlich, Mark" <mark.wunderlich@intel.com>,
	"Vasudevan, Anil" <anil.vasudevan@intel.com>,
	<linux-block@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>,
	<linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 14/16] block: switch polling to be bio based
Date: Wed, 3 Nov 2021 15:11:25 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <beb633f4-4508-ea53-4a34-adf0f20cda85@hisilicon.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20211012111226.760968-15-hch@lst.de>

Hi Christoph,


在 2021/10/12 19:12, Christoph Hellwig 写道:
> Replace the blk_poll interface that requires the caller to keep a queue
> and cookie from the submissions with polling based on the bio.
>
> Polling for the bio itself leads to a few advantages:
>
>   - the cookie construction can made entirely private in blk-mq.c
>   - the caller does not need to remember the request_queue and cookie
>     separately and thus sidesteps their lifetime issues
>   - keeping the device and the cookie inside the bio allows to trivially
>     support polling BIOs remapping by stacking drivers
>   - a lot of code to propagate the cookie back up the submission path can
>     be removed entirely.
>
> Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
> Tested-by: Mark Wunderlich <mark.wunderlich@intel.com>
> ---
......
>   /**
>    * blk_cloned_rq_check_limits - Helper function to check a cloned request
>    *                              for the new queue limits
> diff --git a/block/blk-exec.c b/block/blk-exec.c
> index 1fa7f25e57262..55f0cd34b37b9 100644
> --- a/block/blk-exec.c
> +++ b/block/blk-exec.c
> @@ -65,13 +65,19 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(blk_execute_rq_nowait);
>   
>   static bool blk_rq_is_poll(struct request *rq)
>   {
> -	return rq->mq_hctx && rq->mq_hctx->type == HCTX_TYPE_POLL;
> +	if (!rq->mq_hctx)
> +		return false;
> +	if (rq->mq_hctx->type != HCTX_TYPE_POLL)
> +		return false;
> +	if (WARN_ON_ONCE(!rq->bio))
> +		return false;
> +	return true;
>   }
>   
>   static void blk_rq_poll_completion(struct request *rq, struct completion *wait)
>   {
>   	do {
> -		blk_poll(rq->q, request_to_qc_t(rq->mq_hctx, rq), 0);
> +		bio_poll(rq->bio, 0);
>   		cond_resched();
>   	} while (!completion_done(wait));
>   }

For some scsi command sent by function __scsi_execute() without data, it 
has request but no bio (bufflen = 0),
then how to use bio_poll() for them ?

Best Regards,
Xiang Chen


  parent reply	other threads:[~2021-11-03  7:11 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 64+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-10-12 11:12 switch block layer polling to a bio based model v4 Christoph Hellwig
2021-10-12 11:12 ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-10-12 11:12 ` [PATCH 01/16] direct-io: remove blk_poll support Christoph Hellwig
2021-10-12 11:12   ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-10-13 10:42   ` Sagi Grimberg
2021-10-13 10:42     ` Sagi Grimberg
2021-10-28  1:26   ` Chaitanya Kulkarni
2021-10-12 11:12 ` [PATCH 02/16] block: don't try to poll multi-bio I/Os in __blkdev_direct_IO Christoph Hellwig
2021-10-12 11:12   ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-10-12 11:12 ` [PATCH 03/16] iomap: don't try to poll multi-bio I/Os in __iomap_dio_rw Christoph Hellwig
2021-10-12 11:12   ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-10-12 11:12 ` [PATCH 04/16] io_uring: fix a layering violation in io_iopoll_req_issued Christoph Hellwig
2021-10-12 11:12   ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-10-12 11:12 ` [PATCH 05/16] blk-mq: factor out a blk_qc_to_hctx helper Christoph Hellwig
2021-10-12 11:12   ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-10-12 11:12 ` [PATCH 06/16] blk-mq: factor out a "classic" poll helper Christoph Hellwig
2021-10-12 11:12   ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-10-12 11:12 ` [PATCH 07/16] blk-mq: remove blk_qc_t_to_tag and blk_qc_t_is_internal Christoph Hellwig
2021-10-12 11:12   ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-10-12 11:12 ` [PATCH 08/16] blk-mq: remove blk_qc_t_valid Christoph Hellwig
2021-10-12 11:12   ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-10-12 11:12 ` [PATCH 09/16] block: replace the spin argument to blk_iopoll with a flags argument Christoph Hellwig
2021-10-12 11:12   ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-10-13 10:44   ` Sagi Grimberg
2021-10-13 10:44     ` Sagi Grimberg
2021-10-12 11:12 ` [PATCH 10/16] io_uring: don't sleep when polling for I/O Christoph Hellwig
2021-10-12 11:12   ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-10-13 10:45   ` Sagi Grimberg
2021-10-13 10:45     ` Sagi Grimberg
2021-10-12 11:12 ` [PATCH 11/16] block: rename REQ_HIPRI to REQ_POLLED Christoph Hellwig
2021-10-12 11:12   ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-10-13 10:45   ` Sagi Grimberg
2021-10-13 10:45     ` Sagi Grimberg
2021-10-12 11:12 ` [PATCH 12/16] block: use SLAB_TYPESAFE_BY_RCU for the bio slab Christoph Hellwig
2021-10-12 11:12   ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-10-12 11:12 ` [PATCH 13/16] block: define 'struct bvec_iter' as packed Christoph Hellwig
2021-10-12 11:12   ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-10-12 11:12 ` [PATCH 14/16] block: switch polling to be bio based Christoph Hellwig
2021-10-12 11:12   ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-10-13  9:59   ` Ming Lei
2021-10-13  9:59     ` Ming Lei
2021-10-13 10:45   ` Sagi Grimberg
2021-10-13 10:45     ` Sagi Grimberg
2021-10-15  8:30   ` Pankaj Raghav
2021-10-15 13:24     ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-11-03  7:11   ` chenxiang (M) [this message]
2021-11-03  7:22     ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-11-03  8:05       ` chenxiang (M)
2021-10-12 11:12 ` [PATCH 15/16] block: don't allow writing to the poll queue attribute Christoph Hellwig
2021-10-12 11:12   ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-10-12 11:12 ` [PATCH 16/16] nvme-multipath: enable polled I/O Christoph Hellwig
2021-10-12 11:12   ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-10-13 10:46   ` Sagi Grimberg
2021-10-13 10:46     ` Sagi Grimberg
2021-10-12 14:47 ` switch block layer polling to a bio based model v4 Jens Axboe
2021-10-12 14:47   ` Jens Axboe
2021-10-12 14:57   ` Sagi Grimberg
2021-10-12 14:57     ` Sagi Grimberg
2021-10-12 14:58     ` Jens Axboe
2021-10-12 14:58       ` Jens Axboe
2021-10-12 15:09       ` Sagi Grimberg
2021-10-12 15:09         ` Sagi Grimberg
2021-10-12 15:06     ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-10-12 15:06       ` Christoph Hellwig

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=beb633f4-4508-ea53-4a34-adf0f20cda85@hisilicon.com \
    --to=chenxiang66@hisilicon.com \
    --cc=Damien.LeMoal@wdc.com \
    --cc=anil.vasudevan@intel.com \
    --cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=jefflexu@linux.alibaba.com \
    --cc=kbusch@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=mark.wunderlich@intel.com \
    --cc=ming.lei@redhat.com \
    --cc=sagi@grimberg.me \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.