From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S262333AbTJIVhR (ORCPT ); Thu, 9 Oct 2003 17:37:17 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S262590AbTJIVhR (ORCPT ); Thu, 9 Oct 2003 17:37:17 -0400 Received: from tmr-02.dsl.thebiz.net ([216.238.38.204]:5649 "EHLO gatekeeper.tmr.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S262333AbTJIVhQ (ORCPT ); Thu, 9 Oct 2003 17:37:16 -0400 To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Path: gatekeeper.tmr.com!davidsen From: davidsen@tmr.com (bill davidsen) Newsgroups: mail.linux-kernel Subject: Re: [Fastboot] kexec update (2.6.0-test7) Date: 9 Oct 2003 21:27:35 GMT Organization: TMR Associates, Schenectady NY Message-ID: References: <20031008172235.70d6b794.rddunlap@osdl.org> X-Trace: gatekeeper.tmr.com 1065734855 6571 192.168.12.62 (9 Oct 2003 21:27:35 GMT) X-Complaints-To: abuse@tmr.com Originator: davidsen@gatekeeper.tmr.com Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In article , Eric W. Biederman wrote: | Cherry George Mathew writes: | | > On Wed, 8 Oct 2003, Randy.Dunlap wrote: | > | > > You'll need to update the kexec-syscall.c file for the correct | > > kexec syscall number (274). | > | > Is there a consensus about what the syscall number will finally be ? We've | > jumped from 256 to 274 over the 2.5.x+ series kernels. Or is it the law | > the Jungle ? | | So far the law of the jungle. Regardless of the rest it looks like it | is time to submit a place keeping patch. Forgive me if the politics of this have changed, but will a place keeping patch be accepted for a feature which has not? -- bill davidsen CTO, TMR Associates, Inc Doing interesting things with little computers since 1979.