From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: bugzilla-daemon@freedesktop.org Subject: [Bug 111482] Sapphire Pulse RX 5700 XT power consumption Date: Thu, 05 Sep 2019 14:21:54 +0000 Message-ID: References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============0949892641==" Return-path: Received: from culpepper.freedesktop.org (culpepper.freedesktop.org [131.252.210.165]) by gabe.freedesktop.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 483BD89DFD for ; Thu, 5 Sep 2019 14:21:54 +0000 (UTC) In-Reply-To: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dri-devel-bounces@lists.freedesktop.org Sender: "dri-devel" To: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org List-Id: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org --===============0949892641== Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="15676933140.296fbB1Bf.8312" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit --15676933140.296fbB1Bf.8312 Date: Thu, 5 Sep 2019 14:21:54 +0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://bugs.freedesktop.org/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3D111482 --- Comment #12 from Robert --- Andrew, you're my hero ;-) While I'm even more sad now (because I now think that this issue will be indeed never be fixed) I now at least can imagine what's going on. As you recommended I changed resolution to 1920x1080. That's quite common I would say. And tata! Indeed "sensors" reported 8W. Then I changed to 3840x2= 160. Not so usual I guess but the 2nd biggest resolution my monitor supports. St= ill 8W! And then back to 5120x1440. And tata! 33W :-( That could mean two things: 1) There is a bug somewhere (firmware, driver, = ...) with this resolution which causes that high idle power consumption or 2) wh= ich is even worse I suspect that with this resolution the 5700XT acts like you = have plugged in two monitors. And from what I read throughout all Navi10 reviews multi monitor setups and power consumption was and still is a problem with = AMD graphic cards in general. Oh man, that's something I really didn't calculat= ed with :-( Yeah, in that case I can really only hope for the Intel Xe graphics cards next year (if they really build a consumer card which nobody knows yet ;-) ). I still don't understand why in console where KMS is enabled 8W is enough a= nd while running KDE Plasma in that resolution it takes round about 33W. But m= aybe it really has something to do with acceleration. It doesn't even consider reducing memory clock at least a little bit even if I do nothing and haven't even started any program. That's the funny thing in general: As long as I d= on't start Firefox, Thunderbird or something like that "sensors" don't even work= . It just prints garbage values and takes minutes to complete. If I start one of= the programs mentioned above the screen flickers very shortly and afterwards "sensors" works as expected. I guess only the AMD god knows what that means= ;-)=20 At least I now know that I can't do anything further. It just would be cool= if one of the AMD engineers could confirm my assumption that with a resolution= of 5144x1440 the card always runs at highest memory clock speed as it does wit= h a multi monitor setup (from what I've read so far). --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.= --15676933140.296fbB1Bf.8312 Date: Thu, 5 Sep 2019 14:21:54 +0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://bugs.freedesktop.org/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated

Comme= nt # 12 on bug 11148= 2 from Robert
Andrew, you're my hero ;-) While I'm even more sad now (becaus=
e I now think
that this issue will be indeed never be fixed) I now at least can imagine
what's going on.

As you recommended I changed resolution to 1920x1080. That's quite common I
would say. And tata! Indeed "sensors" reported 8W. Then I changed=
 to 3840x2160.
Not so usual I guess but the 2nd biggest resolution my monitor supports. St=
ill
8W! And then back to 5120x1440. And tata! 33W :-(

That could mean two things: 1) There is a bug somewhere (firmware, driver, =
...)
with this resolution which causes that high idle power consumption or 2) wh=
ich
is even worse I suspect that with this resolution the 5700XT acts like you =
have
plugged in two monitors. And from what I read throughout all Navi10 reviews
multi monitor setups and power consumption was and still is a problem with =
AMD
graphic cards in general. Oh man, that's something I really didn't calculat=
ed
with :-( Yeah, in that case I can really only hope for the Intel Xe graphics
cards next year (if they really build a consumer card which nobody knows yet
;-) ).

I still don't understand why in console where KMS is enabled 8W is enough a=
nd
while running KDE Plasma in that resolution it takes round about 33W. But m=
aybe
it really has something to do with acceleration. It doesn't even consider
reducing memory clock at least a little bit even if I do nothing and haven't
even started any program. That's the funny thing in general: As long as I d=
on't
start Firefox, Thunderbird or something like that "sensors" don't=
 even work. It
just prints garbage values and takes minutes to complete. If I start one of=
 the
programs mentioned above the screen flickers very shortly and afterwards
"sensors" works as expected. I guess only the AMD god knows what =
that means ;-)=20

At least I now know that I can't do anything further. It just would be cool=
 if
one of the AMD engineers could confirm my assumption that with a resolution=
 of
5144x1440 the card always runs at highest memory clock speed as it does wit=
h a
multi monitor setup (from what I've read so far).


You are receiving this mail because:
  • You are the assignee for the bug.
= --15676933140.296fbB1Bf.8312-- --===============0949892641== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 Content-Disposition: inline X19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX18KZHJpLWRldmVs IG1haWxpbmcgbGlzdApkcmktZGV2ZWxAbGlzdHMuZnJlZWRlc2t0b3Aub3JnCmh0dHBzOi8vbGlz dHMuZnJlZWRlc2t0b3Aub3JnL21haWxtYW4vbGlzdGluZm8vZHJpLWRldmVs --===============0949892641==--