From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970
From: bugzilla-daemon@freedesktop.org
Subject: [Bug 111482] Sapphire Pulse RX 5700 XT power consumption
Date: Thu, 05 Sep 2019 14:21:54 +0000
Message-ID:
References:
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============0949892641=="
Return-path:
Received: from culpepper.freedesktop.org (culpepper.freedesktop.org
[131.252.210.165])
by gabe.freedesktop.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 483BD89DFD
for ; Thu, 5 Sep 2019 14:21:54 +0000 (UTC)
In-Reply-To:
List-Unsubscribe: ,
List-Archive:
List-Post:
List-Help:
List-Subscribe: ,
Errors-To: dri-devel-bounces@lists.freedesktop.org
Sender: "dri-devel"
To: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
List-Id: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
--===============0949892641==
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="15676933140.296fbB1Bf.8312"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
--15676933140.296fbB1Bf.8312
Date: Thu, 5 Sep 2019 14:21:54 +0000
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://bugs.freedesktop.org/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3D111482
--- Comment #12 from Robert ---
Andrew, you're my hero ;-) While I'm even more sad now (because I now think
that this issue will be indeed never be fixed) I now at least can imagine
what's going on.
As you recommended I changed resolution to 1920x1080. That's quite common I
would say. And tata! Indeed "sensors" reported 8W. Then I changed to 3840x2=
160.
Not so usual I guess but the 2nd biggest resolution my monitor supports. St=
ill
8W! And then back to 5120x1440. And tata! 33W :-(
That could mean two things: 1) There is a bug somewhere (firmware, driver, =
...)
with this resolution which causes that high idle power consumption or 2) wh=
ich
is even worse I suspect that with this resolution the 5700XT acts like you =
have
plugged in two monitors. And from what I read throughout all Navi10 reviews
multi monitor setups and power consumption was and still is a problem with =
AMD
graphic cards in general. Oh man, that's something I really didn't calculat=
ed
with :-( Yeah, in that case I can really only hope for the Intel Xe graphics
cards next year (if they really build a consumer card which nobody knows yet
;-) ).
I still don't understand why in console where KMS is enabled 8W is enough a=
nd
while running KDE Plasma in that resolution it takes round about 33W. But m=
aybe
it really has something to do with acceleration. It doesn't even consider
reducing memory clock at least a little bit even if I do nothing and haven't
even started any program. That's the funny thing in general: As long as I d=
on't
start Firefox, Thunderbird or something like that "sensors" don't even work=
. It
just prints garbage values and takes minutes to complete. If I start one of=
the
programs mentioned above the screen flickers very shortly and afterwards
"sensors" works as expected. I guess only the AMD god knows what that means=
;-)=20
At least I now know that I can't do anything further. It just would be cool=
if
one of the AMD engineers could confirm my assumption that with a resolution=
of
5144x1440 the card always runs at highest memory clock speed as it does wit=
h a
multi monitor setup (from what I've read so far).
--=20
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.=
--15676933140.296fbB1Bf.8312
Date: Thu, 5 Sep 2019 14:21:54 +0000
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://bugs.freedesktop.org/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Comme=
nt # 12
on bug 11148=
2
from Robert
Andrew, you're my hero ;-) While I'm even more sad now (becaus=
e I now think
that this issue will be indeed never be fixed) I now at least can imagine
what's going on.
As you recommended I changed resolution to 1920x1080. That's quite common I
would say. And tata! Indeed "sensors" reported 8W. Then I changed=
to 3840x2160.
Not so usual I guess but the 2nd biggest resolution my monitor supports. St=
ill
8W! And then back to 5120x1440. And tata! 33W :-(
That could mean two things: 1) There is a bug somewhere (firmware, driver, =
...)
with this resolution which causes that high idle power consumption or 2) wh=
ich
is even worse I suspect that with this resolution the 5700XT acts like you =
have
plugged in two monitors. And from what I read throughout all Navi10 reviews
multi monitor setups and power consumption was and still is a problem with =
AMD
graphic cards in general. Oh man, that's something I really didn't calculat=
ed
with :-( Yeah, in that case I can really only hope for the Intel Xe graphics
cards next year (if they really build a consumer card which nobody knows yet
;-) ).
I still don't understand why in console where KMS is enabled 8W is enough a=
nd
while running KDE Plasma in that resolution it takes round about 33W. But m=
aybe
it really has something to do with acceleration. It doesn't even consider
reducing memory clock at least a little bit even if I do nothing and haven't
even started any program. That's the funny thing in general: As long as I d=
on't
start Firefox, Thunderbird or something like that "sensors" don't=
even work. It
just prints garbage values and takes minutes to complete. If I start one of=
the
programs mentioned above the screen flickers very shortly and afterwards
"sensors" works as expected. I guess only the AMD god knows what =
that means ;-)=20
At least I now know that I can't do anything further. It just would be cool=
if
one of the AMD engineers could confirm my assumption that with a resolution=
of
5144x1440 the card always runs at highest memory clock speed as it does wit=
h a
multi monitor setup (from what I've read so far).
You are receiving this mail because:
- You are the assignee for the bug.
=
--15676933140.296fbB1Bf.8312--
--===============0949892641==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
Content-Disposition: inline
X19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX18KZHJpLWRldmVs
IG1haWxpbmcgbGlzdApkcmktZGV2ZWxAbGlzdHMuZnJlZWRlc2t0b3Aub3JnCmh0dHBzOi8vbGlz
dHMuZnJlZWRlc2t0b3Aub3JnL21haWxtYW4vbGlzdGluZm8vZHJpLWRldmVs
--===============0949892641==--