All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: bugzilla-daemon@bugzilla.kernel.org
To: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [Bug 15688] New: mptsas & poor performance
Date: Mon, 5 Apr 2010 20:35:37 GMT	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <bug-15688-11613@https.bugzilla.kernel.org/> (raw)

https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15688

           Summary: mptsas & poor performance
           Product: SCSI Drivers
           Version: 2.5
    Kernel Version: 2.6.34-020634rc1
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
              Tree: Mainline
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P1
         Component: Other
        AssignedTo: scsi_drivers-other@kernel-bugs.osdl.org
        ReportedBy: bexamous@gmail.com
        Regression: No


The mptsas module from LSI's website, v4.18.00.00, performs much better than
the mptsas module included in the kernel, v3.something.

I'm only comparing sequential writes (dd if=/dev/zero of=zeros bs=1M), but...

6 drive MD RAID5 with fresh btrfs, writing 10GB of zeros with dd,
kernel version:  <200MB/sec
LSI's v4.18.00.00: 395MB/sec

Pretty big difference.  I've gone back and forth a few times,
enabling/disabling write cache on the drives, enabling/disabling ioc,
enabling/disabling filesystem barriers...  I can make small changes in
performance but nothing compares to simply updating to v4.18.00.00.

--- Comment #1 from Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>  2010-04-05 20:35:32 ---
(switched to email.  Please respond via emailed reply-to-all, not via the
bugzilla web interface).

scsi_drivers-other reports don't appear to be coming out on the
linux-scsi list.

On Sat, 3 Apr 2010 21:16:31 GMT
bugzilla-daemon@bugzilla.kernel.org wrote:

> https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15688
> 
>            Summary: mptsas & poor performance
>            Product: SCSI Drivers
>            Version: 2.5
>     Kernel Version: 2.6.34-020634rc1
>           Platform: All
>         OS/Version: Linux
>               Tree: Mainline
>             Status: NEW
>           Severity: normal
>           Priority: P1
>          Component: Other
>         AssignedTo: scsi_drivers-other@kernel-bugs.osdl.org
>         ReportedBy: bexamous@gmail.com
>         Regression: No
> 
> 
> The mptsas module from LSI's website, v4.18.00.00, performs much better than
> the mptsas module included in the kernel, v3.something.
> 
> I'm only comparing sequential writes (dd if=/dev/zero of=zeros bs=1M), but...
> 
> 6 drive MD RAID5 with fresh btrfs, writing 10GB of zeros with dd,
> kernel version:  <200MB/sec
> LSI's v4.18.00.00: 395MB/sec
> 
> Pretty big difference.  I've gone back and forth a few times,
> enabling/disabling write cache on the drives, enabling/disabling ioc,
> enabling/disabling filesystem barriers...  I can make small changes in
> performance but nothing compares to simply updating to v4.18.00.00.
>

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are watching the assignee of the bug.

             reply	other threads:[~2010-04-05 20:35 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-04-05 20:35 bugzilla-daemon [this message]
2010-04-08 10:31 ` [Bug 15688] mptsas & poor performance bugzilla-daemon
2010-04-08 15:36 ` bugzilla-daemon
2010-04-09 11:49   ` Desai, Kashyap
2010-04-09 11:50 ` bugzilla-daemon
2010-04-10 12:00 ` bugzilla-daemon
2010-04-10 16:58 ` bugzilla-daemon
2010-04-29  8:36 ` bugzilla-daemon
2010-07-01  7:53 ` bugzilla-daemon
2010-07-01  9:25 ` bugzilla-daemon
2011-03-20 16:03 ` bugzilla-daemon
2012-01-29 21:53 ` bugzilla-daemon
2012-01-30 18:10 ` bugzilla-daemon
2012-01-30 20:27 ` bugzilla-daemon
2012-01-30 20:44 ` bugzilla-daemon
2012-01-30 20:52 ` bugzilla-daemon
2012-01-31  5:06 ` bugzilla-daemon
2012-06-18 20:19 ` bugzilla-daemon

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=bug-15688-11613@https.bugzilla.kernel.org/ \
    --to=bugzilla-daemon@bugzilla.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.