From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 106D2C6FD1D for ; Sat, 1 Apr 2023 13:10:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S229708AbjDANKE (ORCPT ); Sat, 1 Apr 2023 09:10:04 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:48462 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229379AbjDANKD (ORCPT ); Sat, 1 Apr 2023 09:10:03 -0400 Received: from dfw.source.kernel.org (dfw.source.kernel.org [IPv6:2604:1380:4641:c500::1]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A555920DA1 for ; Sat, 1 Apr 2023 06:10:02 -0700 (PDT) Received: from smtp.kernel.org (relay.kernel.org [52.25.139.140]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by dfw.source.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 494E360E05 for ; Sat, 1 Apr 2023 13:10:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A5A87C43442 for ; Sat, 1 Apr 2023 13:10:01 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1680354601; bh=MTJIpzMj7+F59T0CmzNWKBJHjtRXloICwZBIAkNYHac=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=sZUxLqP+XRq3IJ2mWfAOSdxygZLj3l220HmPU332LpSiK1GqK4cUCUoik/wJm1HgN uiq92WFDT7CSvwsHSz/fBkie4tEb1TuyvhcoffAL8+MlowOOXMayjcyblJGF+bPyRo faBTCWtk0/p0QuooBvIohMLXPus9OY+YluhdBfif3iRB7FtSuEM4dqfp7XJLV1LGut mUSQYCkLtYbTtAVGUzd+tVhC3NgEr9DcJ59xC7PGdCZ+uSquSASX5bccpAiTReXuP8 ozGUD96gJ+UsJxRBojoyM2AH0iC77IDfeAlzaQVqF2Ke+DdIHtMOK7Nqiq5OzTOxSs 5HavZLlhJMWSA== Received: by aws-us-west-2-korg-bugzilla-1.web.codeaurora.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id 96873C43141; Sat, 1 Apr 2023 13:10:01 +0000 (UTC) From: bugzilla-daemon@kernel.org To: platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org Subject: [Bug 204807] Hardware monitoring sensor nct6798d doesn't work unless acpi_enforce_resources=lax is enabled Date: Sat, 01 Apr 2023 13:09:59 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: AssignedTo drivers_platform_x86@kernel-bugs.osdl.org X-Bugzilla-Product: Drivers X-Bugzilla-Component: Platform_x86 X-Bugzilla-Version: 2.5 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: high X-Bugzilla-Who: pauk.denis@gmail.com X-Bugzilla-Status: RESOLVED X-Bugzilla-Resolution: CODE_FIX X-Bugzilla-Priority: P1 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: drivers_platform_x86@kernel-bugs.osdl.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: attachments.isobsolete attachments.created Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3D204807 Denis Pauk (pauk.denis@gmail.com) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Attachment #304011|0 |1 is obsolete| | --- Comment #321 from Denis Pauk (pauk.denis@gmail.com) --- Created attachment 304071 --> https://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=3D304071&action=3Dedit Asus WMI for nct6775 v6.2.9 base (2023.04.01) Updated patch version. (In reply to Micka=C3=ABl Blanchard from comment #320) > Hi, >=20 > I wonder why the board B550M-K has disappeared from the final patch > integrated in the kernel sources. It's somewhat the same board as B550M-A, > which is included. > Moreover, it's in the list in comment #278: > https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3D204807#c278 >=20 > An unfortunate omission? :) >=20 > Thanks! Do you mean "PRIME B550M-K"? Both hwmon-next branch and patch have it in https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/groeck/linux-staging.git/tr= ee/drivers/hwmon/nct6775-platform.c?h=3Dhwmon-next&id=3D8a863eb1b1162653d13= 3856702e13560f3596b85#n1076 Do you have some load issue with new patch?=20=20 (In reply to Jeroen Beerstra from comment #319) > (In reply to Jeroen Beerstra from comment #311) > > (In reply to Denis Pauk from comment #310) > > > Could you please check new one ? I have rebased patch to 6.2.7 > >=20 > > Applies, compiles, and works just fine. Thank you very much for your ha= rd > > work, hope all of this lands in 6.3. >=20 > Same for 6.2.8. I did notice these warnings though: Thank you, should be fixed in new patch. --=20 You may reply to this email to add a comment. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching the assignee of the bug.=