From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.4 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1A169C4708F for ; Wed, 2 Jun 2021 04:25:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DFA2D61075 for ; Wed, 2 Jun 2021 04:25:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S229571AbhFBE13 (ORCPT ); Wed, 2 Jun 2021 00:27:29 -0400 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:35628 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229469AbhFBE13 (ORCPT ); Wed, 2 Jun 2021 00:27:29 -0400 Received: by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2D5DB6108C for ; Wed, 2 Jun 2021 04:25:47 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1622607947; bh=EeUSZ5YMyW7KVeAVG9XiJP90/W8L1H+hnOEINRRtJlM=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=exhQt52dq5qnXblpNp+uDoc5phPTnQPCQu3xMQmZcjKSRhXXoWpyv8pOdMjaH6DIm 3MOZWMWkNIVUosiQ24LzjIJFluBUojfevOT+wM78XCHysTQqfZV2dNBHA1m4sTYBz/ MGcM4doYanRqBEtq9n4mJVHty2N3NJeE4zyHs6iyYNucFu66Cy6aD4XgJk5f7PNBFG AQnQfTZag61wae7K2cDL/c8erzBfOMWJtMLQ0TSXxcfbZQRJno7bH1nDQe7/rVftdr FBCKl5QuygvO4JKCvo1PgqIIaLdq/Y+u1USpvQtoh81/dRxrmWBBMFgEuHGXFFEdmb S0AEX0fGNKzKA== From: bugzilla-daemon@bugzilla.kernel.org To: linux-usb@vger.kernel.org Subject: [Bug 212955] Possible kernel regression USB2 (not USB3) port EDIROL UA-101 (in USB 1.1 mode, not USB2) error -110 Date: Wed, 02 Jun 2021 04:25:46 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: AssignedTo drivers_usb@kernel-bugs.kernel.org X-Bugzilla-Product: Drivers X-Bugzilla-Component: USB X-Bugzilla-Version: 2.5 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: jaffa225man@gmail.com X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P1 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: drivers_usb@kernel-bugs.kernel.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-usb@vger.kernel.org https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3D212955 --- Comment #12 from Lucas Endres (jaffa225man@gmail.com) --- (In reply to Alan Stern from comment #9) > Interesting. I don't see any particular differences as far as the USB co= re > is concerned, but there are major differences in the way the device gets > used. You can even see it in the dmesg output: >=20 > [ 963.375444] usb 4-1.5: 0:1: add audio endpoint 0x2 > [ 963.376273] usb 4-1.5: 1:1: add audio endpoint 0x81 >=20 > Those lines are present in 5.9 but not in 5.12, and they occur before the > problem happens. These messages may not be directly relevant to the prob= lem > at hand, but they do point to changes in the audio drivers. Those changes > may expose a bug somewhere else. >=20 > Judging from these results, I will guess that your bisection tests will > pinpoint a commit that affects the snd-ua101 audio driver. I'm not on a RISC processor, by the way, just a run-of-the-mill intel i5-24= 00. So, yes, to me this seems to be a wider commit that may affect much more. --=20 You may reply to this email to add a comment. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching the assignee of the bug.=