From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: bugzilla-daemon@freedesktop.org Subject: [Bug 76490] Hang during boot when DPM is on (R9 270X) Date: Wed, 28 Sep 2016 20:10:28 +0000 Message-ID: References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============1882467586==" Return-path: Received: from culpepper.freedesktop.org (culpepper.freedesktop.org [131.252.210.165]) by gabe.freedesktop.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C8F7E6E7F8 for ; Wed, 28 Sep 2016 20:10:28 +0000 (UTC) In-Reply-To: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dri-devel-bounces@lists.freedesktop.org Sender: "dri-devel" To: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org List-Id: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org --===============1882467586== Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="14750934286.A1bD.17043"; charset="UTF-8" --14750934286.A1bD.17043 Date: Wed, 28 Sep 2016 20:10:28 +0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://bugs.freedesktop.org/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3D76490 --- Comment #118 from Alex Deucher --- (In reply to Daniel Exner from comment #117) > (In reply to Alex Deucher from comment #116) > > Created attachment 126814 [details] [review] [review] > > possible fix > >=20 > > Does this patch help? >=20 > I applied the patch on Kernel 4.8.0-rc8-00771-g8ab293e: result is a stable > system as before, so at least it didn't introduce a regression. >=20 > Then I disabled the override for my card below: >=20 > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/si_dpm.c > b/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/si_dpm.c > index e6abc09..bcaa675 100644 > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/si_dpm.c > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/si_dpm.c > @@ -2924,7 +2924,6 @@ struct si_dpm_quirk { > /* cards with dpm stability problems */ > static struct si_dpm_quirk si_dpm_quirk_list[] =3D { > /* PITCAIRN - https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3D7649= 0 */ > - { PCI_VENDOR_ID_ATI, 0x6810, 0x1462, 0x3036, 0, 120000 }, > { PCI_VENDOR_ID_ATI, 0x6811, 0x174b, 0xe271, 0, 120000 }, > { PCI_VENDOR_ID_ATI, 0x6811, 0x174b, 0x2015, 0, 120000 }, > { PCI_VENDOR_ID_ATI, 0x6810, 0x174b, 0xe271, 85000, 90000 }, >=20 > Result is the same as without your patch: black screen and non responsive > system. Ok. >=20 > Should I also revert "drm/radeon: load different smc firmware on some SI > variants"? No. --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.= --14750934286.A1bD.17043 Date: Wed, 28 Sep 2016 20:10:28 +0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://bugs.freedesktop.org/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated

Comme= nt # 118 on bug 76490<= /a> from Alex Deucher 
(In reply to Daniel Exner from comment #117)
> (In reply to Alex Deucher from comment #116)
> > Created attachment 126814 [d=
etails] [review] [review] [review]
> > possible fix
> >=20
> > Does this patch help?
>=20
> I applied the patch on Kernel 4.8.0-rc8-00771-g8ab293e: result is a st=
able
> system as before, so at least it didn't introduce a regression.
>=20
> Then I disabled the override for my card below:
>=20
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/si_dpm.c
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/si_dpm.c
> index e6abc09..bcaa675 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/si_dpm.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/si_dpm.c
> @@ -2924,7 +2924,6 @@ struct si_dpm_quirk {
>  /* cards with dpm stability problems */
>  static struct si_dpm_quirk si_dpm_quirk_list[] =3D {
>         /* PITCAIRN - https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.c=
gi?id=3D76490 */
> -       { PCI_VENDOR_ID_ATI, 0x6810, 0x1462, 0x3036, 0, 120000 },
>         { PCI_VENDOR_ID_ATI, 0x6811, 0x174b, 0xe271, 0, 120000 },
>         { PCI_VENDOR_ID_ATI, 0x6811, 0x174b, 0x2015, 0, 120000 },
>         { PCI_VENDOR_ID_ATI, 0x6810, 0x174b, 0xe271, 85000, 90000 },
>=20
> Result is the same as without your patch: black screen and non respons=
ive
> system.

Ok.

>=20
> Should I also revert "drm/radeon: load different smc firmware on =
some SI
> variants"?

No.

You are receiving this mail because:
  • You are the assignee for the bug.
= --14750934286.A1bD.17043-- --===============1882467586== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 Content-Disposition: inline X19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX18KZHJpLWRldmVs IG1haWxpbmcgbGlzdApkcmktZGV2ZWxAbGlzdHMuZnJlZWRlc2t0b3Aub3JnCmh0dHBzOi8vbGlz dHMuZnJlZWRlc2t0b3Aub3JnL21haWxtYW4vbGlzdGluZm8vZHJpLWRldmVsCg== --===============1882467586==--