From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: bugzilla-daemon@freedesktop.org Subject: [Bug 81644] Random crashes on RadeonSI with Chromium. Date: Fri, 26 Sep 2014 23:17:32 +0000 Message-ID: References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============0197271503==" Return-path: Received: from culpepper.freedesktop.org (unknown [131.252.210.165]) by gabe.freedesktop.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F1C3B6E7E2 for ; Fri, 26 Sep 2014 16:17:31 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dri-devel-bounces@lists.freedesktop.org Sender: "dri-devel" To: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org List-Id: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org --===============0197271503== Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="1411773451.a6cCE72.8438"; charset="us-ascii" --1411773451.a6cCE72.8438 Date: Fri, 26 Sep 2014 23:17:31 +0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=81644 --- Comment #119 from Alexandre Demers --- Small question Alex Deucher or Christian may answer: is it normal ring 5 is completely in a different GPU's memory address area? [ 9.353518] radeon 0000:01:00.0: fence driver on ring 0 use gpu addr 0x00000000c0000c00 and cpu addr 0xffff880411a25c00 [ 9.353519] radeon 0000:01:00.0: fence driver on ring 1 use gpu addr 0x00000000c0000c04 and cpu addr 0xffff880411a25c04 [ 9.353521] radeon 0000:01:00.0: fence driver on ring 2 use gpu addr 0x00000000c0000c08 and cpu addr 0xffff880411a25c08 [ 9.353522] radeon 0000:01:00.0: fence driver on ring 3 use gpu addr 0x00000000c0000c0c and cpu addr 0xffff880411a25c0c [ 9.353524] radeon 0000:01:00.0: fence driver on ring 4 use gpu addr 0x00000000c0000c10 and cpu addr 0xffff880411a25c10 [ 9.356425] radeon 0000:01:00.0: fence driver on ring 5 use gpu addr 0x0000000000075a18 and cpu addr 0xffffc90015fb5a18 rings 0 to 4 are all in the same gpu address subset, but not ring 5? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. --1411773451.a6cCE72.8438 Date: Fri, 26 Sep 2014 23:17:31 +0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8"

Comment # 119 on bug 81644 from 
Small question Alex Deucher or Christian may answer: is it normal ring 5 is
completely in a different GPU's memory address area?
[    9.353518] radeon 0000:01:00.0: fence driver on ring 0 use gpu addr
0x00000000c0000c00 and cpu addr 0xffff880411a25c00
[    9.353519] radeon 0000:01:00.0: fence driver on ring 1 use gpu addr
0x00000000c0000c04 and cpu addr 0xffff880411a25c04
[    9.353521] radeon 0000:01:00.0: fence driver on ring 2 use gpu addr
0x00000000c0000c08 and cpu addr 0xffff880411a25c08
[    9.353522] radeon 0000:01:00.0: fence driver on ring 3 use gpu addr
0x00000000c0000c0c and cpu addr 0xffff880411a25c0c
[    9.353524] radeon 0000:01:00.0: fence driver on ring 4 use gpu addr
0x00000000c0000c10 and cpu addr 0xffff880411a25c10
[    9.356425] radeon 0000:01:00.0: fence driver on ring 5 use gpu addr
0x0000000000075a18 and cpu addr 0xffffc90015fb5a18

rings 0 to 4 are all in the same gpu address subset, but not ring 5?

You are receiving this mail because:
  • You are the assignee for the bug.
--1411773451.a6cCE72.8438-- --===============0197271503== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline _______________________________________________ dri-devel mailing list dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel --===============0197271503==--