From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970
From: bugzilla-daemon@freedesktop.org
Subject: [Bug 82050] R9270X pyrit benchmark perf regressions with latest
kernel/llvm
Date: Thu, 02 Oct 2014 07:11:55 +0000
Message-ID:
References:
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============1910059476=="
Return-path:
Received: from culpepper.freedesktop.org (unknown [131.252.210.165])
by gabe.freedesktop.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C2E5E6E405
for ; Thu, 2 Oct 2014 00:11:54 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To:
List-Unsubscribe: ,
List-Archive:
List-Post:
List-Help:
List-Subscribe: ,
Errors-To: dri-devel-bounces@lists.freedesktop.org
Sender: "dri-devel"
To: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
List-Id: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
--===============1910059476==
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="1412233914.CeE6Eb2.28828"; charset="UTF-8"
--1412233914.CeE6Eb2.28828
Date: Thu, 2 Oct 2014 07:11:54 +0000
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3D82050
--- Comment #72 from Michel D=C3=A4nzer ---
(In reply to comment #62)
> I do have 2 gig, but looking at the screenshot of elemantal to be attache=
d I
> see that used and requested differ.
That's probably because of VRAM fragmentation. (BTW, I find it easier to ke=
ep
track of this with requested-VRAM+VRAM-usage,requested-GTT+GTT-usage instea=
d of
requested-VRAM+requested-GTT,VRAM-usage+GTT-usage)
> This shot doesn't really show how long the pauses are - they are really b=
ad,
> it takes about 2 minutes to render the first few frames with pauses of ma=
ny
> seconds after that.
>=20
> It's so bad it's hard to tell whether the revert helps - probably not, I
> guess it's something different. Have you tried Elemental?
Yes, but even on Kaveri with only 1G of VRAM, it doesn't take two minutes f=
or
it to get going, and I don't notice such long pauses either.
So I think it's better if we track the UE4 issues in a separate report, and=
it
would be great if you guys could bisect the kernel or Mesa for that.
(In reply to comment #65)
> Keep in mind that revert broke 32bit complitely, lot of corruption :)
I haven't been able to reproduce that. If you still can, please file a bug =
for
it, as there's nothing preventing the kernel from using GTT instead of VRAM
when the latter is full.
> I am not trying other demos , but seems like newer kernels requests more
> VRAM from the apps :)
The Mesa commit in question makes the r600g and radeonsi drivers try to use
VRAM for more things, but only with newer kernels, because older kernels di=
dn't
guarantee reliability when using VRAM for those things.
--=20
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
--1412233914.CeE6Eb2.28828
Date: Thu, 2 Oct 2014 07:11:54 +0000
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Commen=
t # 72
on bug 82050<=
/a>
from Michel D=C3=A4nzer
(In reply to comment #=
62)
> I do have 2 gig, but looking at the screenshot o=
f elemantal to be attached I
> see that used and requested differ.
That's probably because of VRAM fragmentation. (BTW, I find it easier to ke=
ep
track of this with requested-VRAM+VRAM-usage,requested-GTT+GTT-usage instea=
d of
requested-VRAM+requested-GTT,VRAM-usage+GTT-usage)
> This shot doesn't really show how long the pause=
s are - they are really bad,
> it takes about 2 minutes to render the first few frames with pauses of=
many
> seconds after that.
>=20
> It's so bad it's hard to tell whether the revert helps - probably not,=
I
> guess it's something different. Have you tried Elemental?
Yes, but even on Kaveri with only 1G of VRAM, it doesn't take two minutes f=
or
it to get going, and I don't notice such long pauses either.
So I think it's better if we track the UE4 issues in a separate report, and=
it
would be great if you guys could bisect the kernel or Mesa for that.
(In reply to comment #65)
> Keep in mind that revert broke 32bit complitely,=
lot of corruption :)
I haven't been able to reproduce that. If you still can, please file a bug =
for
it, as there's nothing preventing the kernel from using GTT instead of VRAM
when the latter is full.
> I am not trying other demos , but seems like new=
er kernels requests more
> VRAM from the apps :)
The Mesa commit in question makes the r600g and radeonsi drivers try to use
VRAM for more things, but only with newer kernels, because older kernels di=
dn't
guarantee reliability when using VRAM for those things.
You are receiving this mail because:
=20=20=20=20=20=20
- You are the assignee for the bug.
--1412233914.CeE6Eb2.28828--
--===============1910059476==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
--===============1910059476==--