From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: bugzilla-daemon@freedesktop.org Subject: [Bug 82050] R9270X pyrit benchmark perf regressions with latest kernel/llvm Date: Thu, 02 Oct 2014 07:11:55 +0000 Message-ID: References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============1910059476==" Return-path: Received: from culpepper.freedesktop.org (unknown [131.252.210.165]) by gabe.freedesktop.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C2E5E6E405 for ; Thu, 2 Oct 2014 00:11:54 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dri-devel-bounces@lists.freedesktop.org Sender: "dri-devel" To: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org List-Id: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org --===============1910059476== Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="1412233914.CeE6Eb2.28828"; charset="UTF-8" --1412233914.CeE6Eb2.28828 Date: Thu, 2 Oct 2014 07:11:54 +0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3D82050 --- Comment #72 from Michel D=C3=A4nzer --- (In reply to comment #62) > I do have 2 gig, but looking at the screenshot of elemantal to be attache= d I > see that used and requested differ. That's probably because of VRAM fragmentation. (BTW, I find it easier to ke= ep track of this with requested-VRAM+VRAM-usage,requested-GTT+GTT-usage instea= d of requested-VRAM+requested-GTT,VRAM-usage+GTT-usage) > This shot doesn't really show how long the pauses are - they are really b= ad, > it takes about 2 minutes to render the first few frames with pauses of ma= ny > seconds after that. >=20 > It's so bad it's hard to tell whether the revert helps - probably not, I > guess it's something different. Have you tried Elemental? Yes, but even on Kaveri with only 1G of VRAM, it doesn't take two minutes f= or it to get going, and I don't notice such long pauses either. So I think it's better if we track the UE4 issues in a separate report, and= it would be great if you guys could bisect the kernel or Mesa for that. (In reply to comment #65) > Keep in mind that revert broke 32bit complitely, lot of corruption :) I haven't been able to reproduce that. If you still can, please file a bug = for it, as there's nothing preventing the kernel from using GTT instead of VRAM when the latter is full. > I am not trying other demos , but seems like newer kernels requests more > VRAM from the apps :) The Mesa commit in question makes the r600g and radeonsi drivers try to use VRAM for more things, but only with newer kernels, because older kernels di= dn't guarantee reliability when using VRAM for those things. --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. --1412233914.CeE6Eb2.28828 Date: Thu, 2 Oct 2014 07:11:54 +0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Commen= t # 72 on bug 82050<= /a> from Michel D=C3=A4nzer
(In reply to comment #=
62)
> I do have 2 gig, but looking at the screenshot o=
f elemantal to be attached I
> see that used and requested differ.

That's probably because of VRAM fragmentation. (BTW, I find it easier to ke=
ep
track of this with requested-VRAM+VRAM-usage,requested-GTT+GTT-usage instea=
d of
requested-VRAM+requested-GTT,VRAM-usage+GTT-usage)


> This shot doesn't really show how long the pause=
s are - they are really bad,
> it takes about 2 minutes to render the first few frames with pauses of=
 many
> seconds after that.
>=20
> It's so bad it's hard to tell whether the revert helps - probably not,=
 I
> guess it's something different. Have you tried Elemental?

Yes, but even on Kaveri with only 1G of VRAM, it doesn't take two minutes f=
or
it to get going, and I don't notice such long pauses either.

So I think it's better if we track the UE4 issues in a separate report, and=
 it
would be great if you guys could bisect the kernel or Mesa for that.


(In reply to comment #65)
> Keep in mind that revert broke 32bit complitely,=
 lot of corruption :)

I haven't been able to reproduce that. If you still can, please file a bug =
for
it, as there's nothing preventing the kernel from using GTT instead of VRAM
when the latter is full.


> I am not trying other demos , but seems like new=
er kernels requests more
> VRAM from the apps :)

The Mesa commit in question makes the r600g and radeonsi drivers try to use
VRAM for more things, but only with newer kernels, because older kernels di=
dn't
guarantee reliability when using VRAM for those things.


You are receiving this mail because: =20=20=20=20=20=20
  • You are the assignee for the bug.
--1412233914.CeE6Eb2.28828-- --===============1910059476== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline _______________________________________________ dri-devel mailing list dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel --===============1910059476==--