* [Bug 82455] New: Failed to allocate virtual address for buffer
@ 2014-08-11 9:16 bugzilla-daemon
2014-08-11 9:22 ` [Bug 82455] " bugzilla-daemon
` (36 more replies)
0 siblings, 37 replies; 38+ messages in thread
From: bugzilla-daemon @ 2014-08-11 9:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: dri-devel
[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 5824 bytes --]
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=82455
Priority: medium
Bug ID: 82455
Assignee: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
Summary: Failed to allocate virtual address for buffer
Severity: normal
Classification: Unclassified
OS: Linux (All)
Reporter: 407883775@qq.com
Hardware: SPARC
Status: NEW
Version: 9.2
Component: Drivers/Gallium/radeonsi
Product: Mesa
I am update kernel to 3.10.0 , and the mesa version is 9.2.5; Our video card is
AMD HD7750 .
The system is running very well in text mode. But when I am used
startx command start graphic desktop. The X can't work.
Our team analysis the problem and read the mesa code. Due to Mesa
, I think.
our computer arch is "sparc"
I sought you commit the bug in the freedesktoporg :
http://cgit.freedesktop.org/mesa/mesa/commit/?id=a37835c8eda017f0c955e0927e7418e7f3ba3b73
but the mesa (version 9.2.5) have this bug. how could i do . pls
give me some message . thk .
The attachment is system dmesg .
The debug message is follow:
[dmesg]
[ 355.852288] radeon 0000:01:00.0: soffset:0x00100000, eoffset: 0x00200000
[ 355.853024] radeon 0000:01:00.0: tmp->soffset:0x00000000, tmp->eoffset:
0x00000000, size:0x00100000
[ 359.114368] radeon 0000:01:00.0: soffset:0x00100000, eoffset: 0x00200000
[ 359.114399] radeon 0000:01:00.0: tmp->soffset:0x00000000, tmp->eoffset:
0x00000000, size:0x00100000
[ 359.433678] radeon 0000:01:00.0: soffset:0x00100000, eoffset: 0x00200000
[ 359.433711] radeon 0000:01:00.0: tmp->soffset:0x00000000, tmp->eoffset:
0x00000000, size:0x00100000
[ 359.433891] radeon 0000:01:00.0: soffset:0x00100000, eoffset: 0x00200000
[ 359.433915] radeon 0000:01:00.0: tmp->soffset:0x00000000, tmp->eoffset:
0x00000000, size:0x00100000
[ 519.314418] radeon 0000:01:00.0: soffset:0x00100000, eoffset: 0x00200000
[ 519.314453] radeon 0000:01:00.0: tmp->soffset:0x00000000, tmp->eoffset:
0x00000000, size:0x00100000
[ 521.768715] radeon 0000:01:00.0: soffset:0x00100000, eoffset: 0x00200000
[ 521.768746] radeon 0000:01:00.0: tmp->soffset:0x00000000, tmp->eoffset:
0x00000000, size:0x00100000
[ 522.077890] radeon 0000:01:00.0: soffset:0x00100000, eoffset: 0x00200000
[ 522.077924] radeon 0000:01:00.0: tmp->soffset:0x00000000, tmp->eoffset:
0x00000000, size:0x00100000
[ 522.078105] radeon 0000:01:00.0: soffset:0x00100000, eoffset: 0x00200000
[ 522.078129] radeon 0000:01:00.0: tmp->soffset:0x00000000, tmp->eoffset:
0x00000000, size:0x00100000
[ 565.368145] radeon 0000:01:00.0: [radeon_gem_va_ioctl, 525]:args->offset:
0x00800000, argx->flags:22
[ 565.368180] radeon 0000:01:00.0: soffset:0x00800000, eoffset: 0x00802000
[ 565.368201] radeon 0000:01:00.0: tmp->soffset:0x00000000, tmp->eoffset:
0x00000000, size:0x00002000
[ 565.368221] radeon 0000:01:00.0: tmp->soffset:0x00100000, tmp->eoffset:
0x00200000, size:0x00002000
[ 763.251113] radeon 0000:01:00.0: [radeon_gem_va_ioctl, 525]:args->offset:
0x00801000, argx->flags:22
[ 763.251148] radeon 0000:01:00.0: soffset:0x00801000, eoffset: 0x00803000
[ 763.251169] radeon 0000:01:00.0: tmp->soffset:0x00000000, tmp->eoffset:
0x00000000, size:0x00002000
[ 763.251189] radeon 0000:01:00.0: tmp->soffset:0x00100000, tmp->eoffset:
0x00200000, size:0x00002000
[ 763.251210] radeon 0000:01:00.0: tmp->soffset:0x00800000, tmp->eoffset:
0x00802000, size:0x00002000
[ 763.251234] radeon 0000:01:00.0: bo fffff801f3ee2c00 va 0x00000000 conflict
with (bo fffff801f3ee3000 0x00800000 0x00802000)
[ 763.251855] radeon 0000:01:00.0: [radeon_gem_va_ioctl, 525]:args->offset:
0x00801000, argx->flags:22
[ 763.251878] radeon 0000:01:00.0: soffset:0x00801000, eoffset: 0x00803000
[ 763.251899] radeon 0000:01:00.0: tmp->soffset:0x00000000, tmp->eoffset:
0x00000000, size:0x00002000
[ 763.251919] radeon 0000:01:00.0: tmp->soffset:0x00100000, tmp->eoffset:
0x00200000, size:0x00002000
[ 763.251939] radeon 0000:01:00.0: tmp->soffset:0x00800000, tmp->eoffset:
0x00802000, size:0x00002000
[ 763.251962] radeon 0000:01:00.0: bo fffff801f3ee2c00 va 0x00000000 conflict
with (bo fffff801f3ee3000 0x00800000 0x00802000)
[ 884.626830] radeon 0000:01:00.0: soffset:0x00100000, eoffset: 0x00200000
[ 884.626864] radeon 0000:01:00.0: tmp->soffset:0x00000000, tmp->eoffset:
0x00000000, size:0x00100000
[ 887.207173] radeon 0000:01:00.0: soffset:0x00100000, eoffset: 0x00200000
[ 887.207204] radeon 0000:01:00.0: tmp->soffset:0x00000000, tmp->eoffset:
0x00000000, size:0x00100000
[ 887.564451] radeon 0000:01:00.0: soffset:0x00100000, eoffset: 0x00200000
[ 887.564488] radeon 0000:01:00.0: tmp->soffset:0x00000000, tmp->eoffset:
0x00000000, size:0x00100000
[ 887.564672] radeon 0000:01:00.0: soffset:0x00100000, eoffset: 0x00200000
[ 887.564696] radeon 0000:01:00.0: tmp->soffset:0x00000000, tmp->eoffset:
0x00000000, size:0x00100000
[ 985.395298] radeon 0000:01:00.0: soffset:0x00100000, eoffset: 0x00200000
[ 985.395332] radeon 0000:01:00.0: tmp->soffset:0x00000000, tmp->eoffset:
0x00000000, size:0x00100000
[ 987.861353] radeon 0000:01:00.0: soffset:0x00100000, eoffset: 0x00200000
[ 987.861387] radeon 0000:01:00.0: tmp->soffset:0x00000000, tmp->eoffset:
0x00000000, size:0x00100000
[ 988.175840] radeon 0000:01:00.0: soffset:0x00100000, eoffset: 0x00200000
[ 988.175873] radeon 0000:01:00.0: tmp->soffset:0x00000000, tmp->eoffset:
0x00000000, size:0x00100000
[ 988.176054] radeon 0000:01:00.0: soffset:0x00100000, eoffset: 0x00200000
[ 988.176078] radeon 0000:01:00.0: tmp->soffset:0x00000000, tmp->eoffset:
0x00000000, size:0x00100000
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
[-- Attachment #1.2: Type: text/html, Size: 7401 bytes --]
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 159 bytes --]
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 38+ messages in thread
* [Bug 82455] Failed to allocate virtual address for buffer
2014-08-11 9:16 [Bug 82455] New: Failed to allocate virtual address for buffer bugzilla-daemon
@ 2014-08-11 9:22 ` bugzilla-daemon
2014-08-11 9:36 ` bugzilla-daemon
` (35 subsequent siblings)
36 siblings, 0 replies; 38+ messages in thread
From: bugzilla-daemon @ 2014-08-11 9:22 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: dri-devel
[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 363 bytes --]
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=82455
charlie <407883775@qq.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
QA Contact| |407883775@qq.com
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
[-- Attachment #1.2: Type: text/html, Size: 1051 bytes --]
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 159 bytes --]
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 38+ messages in thread
* [Bug 82455] Failed to allocate virtual address for buffer
2014-08-11 9:16 [Bug 82455] New: Failed to allocate virtual address for buffer bugzilla-daemon
2014-08-11 9:22 ` [Bug 82455] " bugzilla-daemon
@ 2014-08-11 9:36 ` bugzilla-daemon
2014-08-11 11:47 ` bugzilla-daemon
` (34 subsequent siblings)
36 siblings, 0 replies; 38+ messages in thread
From: bugzilla-daemon @ 2014-08-11 9:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: dri-devel
[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 648 bytes --]
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=82455
--- Comment #1 from Michel Dänzer <michel@daenzer.net> ---
> radeon 0000:01:00.0: bo fffff801f3ee2c00 va 0x00000000 conflict with (bo fffff801f3ee3000 0x00800000 0x00802000)
Looks like the Mesa radeon winsys is not assigning GPU virtual memory addresses
correctly (0x00000000 is not a valid virtual address).
You might have better luck with that with current Mesa Git master, but note
that the Mesa radeonsi driver needs a lot of work before it has any chance of
working correctly on big endian hosts.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
[-- Attachment #1.2: Type: text/html, Size: 1465 bytes --]
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 159 bytes --]
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 38+ messages in thread
* [Bug 82455] Failed to allocate virtual address for buffer
2014-08-11 9:16 [Bug 82455] New: Failed to allocate virtual address for buffer bugzilla-daemon
2014-08-11 9:22 ` [Bug 82455] " bugzilla-daemon
2014-08-11 9:36 ` bugzilla-daemon
@ 2014-08-11 11:47 ` bugzilla-daemon
2014-08-11 11:55 ` bugzilla-daemon
` (33 subsequent siblings)
36 siblings, 0 replies; 38+ messages in thread
From: bugzilla-daemon @ 2014-08-11 11:47 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: dri-devel
[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 532 bytes --]
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=82455
--- Comment #2 from charlie <407883775@qq.com> ---
Michel Dänzer thk for your answer ,you means that the Mesa radeonsi
drivers cannot work well on big endian hosts? Now ,I am read the Mesa codes and
analysis kernel code.the bo_object can create , but it not allocate virtual
space in the userspace.I am not cleaner for GEM/TTM ,and the docs is lacking. I
must analysis the code .
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
[-- Attachment #1.2: Type: text/html, Size: 1309 bytes --]
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 159 bytes --]
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 38+ messages in thread
* [Bug 82455] Failed to allocate virtual address for buffer
2014-08-11 9:16 [Bug 82455] New: Failed to allocate virtual address for buffer bugzilla-daemon
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2014-08-11 11:47 ` bugzilla-daemon
@ 2014-08-11 11:55 ` bugzilla-daemon
2014-08-12 1:20 ` bugzilla-daemon
` (32 subsequent siblings)
36 siblings, 0 replies; 38+ messages in thread
From: bugzilla-daemon @ 2014-08-11 11:55 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: dri-devel
[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 516 bytes --]
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=82455
--- Comment #3 from Christian König <deathsimple@vodafone.de> ---
(In reply to comment #2)
> Michel Dänzer thk for your answer ,you means that the Mesa
> radeonsi drivers cannot work well on big endian hosts?
The radeonsi driver currently isn't very well tested on big endian hosts. In
theory it should work, but that doesn't mean there might be a lot of bugs.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
[-- Attachment #1.2: Type: text/html, Size: 1382 bytes --]
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 159 bytes --]
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 38+ messages in thread
* [Bug 82455] Failed to allocate virtual address for buffer
2014-08-11 9:16 [Bug 82455] New: Failed to allocate virtual address for buffer bugzilla-daemon
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2014-08-11 11:55 ` bugzilla-daemon
@ 2014-08-12 1:20 ` bugzilla-daemon
2014-08-12 1:22 ` bugzilla-daemon
` (31 subsequent siblings)
36 siblings, 0 replies; 38+ messages in thread
From: bugzilla-daemon @ 2014-08-12 1:20 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: dri-devel
[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 4069 bytes --]
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=82455
--- Comment #4 from charlie <407883775@qq.com> ---
>>The radeonsi driver currently isn't very well tested on big endian hosts.
>>In theory it should work, but that doesn't mean there might be a lot of bugs.
I test the newest Mesa(10.2.5), The problem is still existing.
It isn't test very well on big-endian hosts , That means it can work? I never
analysis the mesa code, The code it too more, and haven't docs, Could you give
me some docs? Or give me some ideals? how to alter this code, pls give me a
direction.
Thk.
message:
Xorg.log
[ 2831.801] (II) LoadModule: "fbdevhw"
[ 2831.801] (II) Loading /usr/lib64/xorg/modules/libfbdevhw.so
[ 2831.802] (II) Module fbdevhw: vendor="X.Org Foundation"
[ 2831.802] compiled for 1.15.0, module version = 0.0.2
[ 2831.803] ABI class: X.Org Video Driver, version 15.0
[ 2831.803] (II) RADEON(0): Creating default Display subsection in Screen
section
"Default Screen Section" for depth/fbbpp 24/32
[ 2831.803] (==) RADEON(0): Depth 24, (--) framebuffer bpp 32
[ 2831.803] (II) RADEON(0): Pixel depth = 24 bits stored in 4 bytes (32 bpp
pixmaps)
[ 2831.803] (==) RADEON(0): Default visual is TrueColor
[ 2831.804] (==) RADEON(0): RGB weight 888
[ 2831.804] (II) RADEON(0): Using 8 bits per RGB (8 bit DAC)
[ 2831.804] (--) RADEON(0): Chipset: "VERDE" (ChipID = 0x683f)
[ 2831.805] (II) Loading sub module "dri2"
[ 2831.805] (II) LoadModule: "dri2"
[ 2831.805] (II) Module "dri2" already built-in
[ 2831.805] (II) Loading sub module "glamoregl"
[ 2831.805] (II) LoadModule: "glamoregl"
[ 2831.806] (II) Loading /usr/lib64/xorg/modules/libglamoregl.so
[ 2831.806] (II) Module glamoregl: vendor="X.Org Foundation"
[ 2831.806] compiled for 1.15.0, module version = 0.5.1
[ 2831.806] ABI class: X.Org ANSI C Emulation, version 0.4
[ 2831.806] (II) glamor: OpenGL accelerated X.org driver based.
[ 2831.915] (EE)
[ 2831.915] (EE) Backtrace:
[ 2831.916] (EE) 0: /usr/bin/X (0x100000+0x1d0704) [0x2d0704]
[ 2831.917] (EE) 1: /lib64/libc.so.6 (0xfffff80100ff0000+0x39d58)
[0xfffff80101029d58]
[ 2831.917] (EE) 2: /usr/lib64/dri/radeonsi_dri.so
(0xfffff80103e4c000+0x3c8778) [0xfffff80104214778]
[ 2831.917] (EE) 3: /usr/lib64/dri/radeonsi_dri.so
(0xfffff80103e4c000+0x3c9298) [0xfffff80104215298]
[ 2831.917] (EE) 4: /usr/lib64/dri/radeonsi_dri.so
(0xfffff80103e4c000+0x3c9670) [0xfffff80104215670]
[ 2831.918] (EE) 5: /usr/lib64/dri/radeonsi_dri.so
(0xfffff80103e4c000+0x45f88) [0xfffff80103e91f88]
[ 2831.918] (EE) 6: /usr/lib64/dri/radeonsi_dri.so
(0xfffff80103e4c000+0x3e630c) [0xfffff8010423230c]
[ 2831.918] (EE) 7: /usr/lib64/dri/radeonsi_dri.so
(0xfffff80103e4c000+0x4729c) [0xfffff80103e9329c]
[ 2831.918] (EE) 8: /lib64/libgbm.so.1 (0xfffff80102028000+0x4594)
[0xfffff8010202c594]
[ 2831.919] (EE) 9: /lib64/libgbm.so.1 (_gbm_create_device+0xc4)
[0xfffff8010202a964]
[ 2831.919] (EE) 10: /lib64/libgbm.so.1 (gbm_create_device+0x6c)
[0xfffff8010202a18c]
[ 2831.919] (EE) 11: /usr/lib64/xorg/modules/libglamoregl.so
(glamor_egl_init+0x88) [0xfffff80101dfe988]
[ 2831.919] (EE) 12: /usr/lib64/xorg/modules/drivers/radeon_drv.so
(0xfffff801038a0000+0x61ef4) [0xfffff80103901ef4]
[ 2831.920] (EE) 13: /usr/lib64/xorg/modules/drivers/radeon_drv.so
(0xfffff801038a0000+0x5b2a4) [0xfffff801038fb2a4]
[ 2831.920] (EE) 14: /usr/bin/X (InitOutput+0xd50) [0x189b30]
[ 2831.921] (EE) 15: /usr/bin/X (0x100000+0x3f880) [0x13f880]
[ 2831.921] (EE) 16: /lib64/libc.so.6 (__libc_start_main+0x100)
[0xfffff80101013c20]
[ 2831.922] (EE) 17: /usr/bin/X (_start+0x2c) [0x128d0c]
[ 2831.922] (EE)
[ 2831.922] (EE) Segmentation fault at address 0x48
[ 2831.923] (EE)
Fatal server error:
kernel
[ 2865.746929] radeon 0000:0a:00.0: bo fffff801f546ec00 va 0x00000000 conflict
with (bo fffff801f546c000 0x00802000 0x00804000)
[ 2865.747488] radeon 0000:0a:00.0: bo fffff801f546ec00 va 0x00000000 conflict
with (bo fffff801f546c000 0x00802000 0x00804000)
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
[-- Attachment #1.2: Type: text/html, Size: 4966 bytes --]
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 159 bytes --]
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 38+ messages in thread
* [Bug 82455] Failed to allocate virtual address for buffer
2014-08-11 9:16 [Bug 82455] New: Failed to allocate virtual address for buffer bugzilla-daemon
` (4 preceding siblings ...)
2014-08-12 1:20 ` bugzilla-daemon
@ 2014-08-12 1:22 ` bugzilla-daemon
2014-08-12 1:26 ` bugzilla-daemon
` (30 subsequent siblings)
36 siblings, 0 replies; 38+ messages in thread
From: bugzilla-daemon @ 2014-08-12 1:22 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: dri-devel
[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 504 bytes --]
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=82455
--- Comment #5 from Michel Dänzer <michel@daenzer.net> ---
(In reply to comment #3)
> In theory it should work, but that doesn't mean there might be a lot of bugs.
Actually, it most definitely can't work right now. Just for one thing, every
memory access by shaders (for constants, resource descriptors, ...) currently
can't work correctly on big endian hosts.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
[-- Attachment #1.2: Type: text/html, Size: 1360 bytes --]
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 159 bytes --]
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 38+ messages in thread
* [Bug 82455] Failed to allocate virtual address for buffer
2014-08-11 9:16 [Bug 82455] New: Failed to allocate virtual address for buffer bugzilla-daemon
` (5 preceding siblings ...)
2014-08-12 1:22 ` bugzilla-daemon
@ 2014-08-12 1:26 ` bugzilla-daemon
2014-08-12 1:33 ` bugzilla-daemon
` (29 subsequent siblings)
36 siblings, 0 replies; 38+ messages in thread
From: bugzilla-daemon @ 2014-08-12 1:26 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: dri-devel
[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 441 bytes --]
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=82455
--- Comment #6 from Michel Dänzer <michel@daenzer.net> ---
FWIW, the failure to assign a valid virtual address is probably an endianness
bug in the virtual memory related code in
src/gallium/winsys/radeon/drm/radeon_drm_bo.c, e.g. in radeon_bomgr_find_va(),
or maybe in the corresponding kernel code.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
[-- Attachment #1.2: Type: text/html, Size: 1227 bytes --]
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 159 bytes --]
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 38+ messages in thread
* [Bug 82455] Failed to allocate virtual address for buffer
2014-08-11 9:16 [Bug 82455] New: Failed to allocate virtual address for buffer bugzilla-daemon
` (6 preceding siblings ...)
2014-08-12 1:26 ` bugzilla-daemon
@ 2014-08-12 1:33 ` bugzilla-daemon
2014-08-14 9:07 ` bugzilla-daemon
` (28 subsequent siblings)
36 siblings, 0 replies; 38+ messages in thread
From: bugzilla-daemon @ 2014-08-12 1:33 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: dri-devel
[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 231 bytes --]
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=82455
--- Comment #7 from charlie <407883775@qq.com> ---
To all:
Thks for your help.^_^^_^^_^^_^^_^^_^^_^
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
[-- Attachment #1.2: Type: text/html, Size: 988 bytes --]
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 159 bytes --]
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 38+ messages in thread
* [Bug 82455] Failed to allocate virtual address for buffer
2014-08-11 9:16 [Bug 82455] New: Failed to allocate virtual address for buffer bugzilla-daemon
` (7 preceding siblings ...)
2014-08-12 1:33 ` bugzilla-daemon
@ 2014-08-14 9:07 ` bugzilla-daemon
2014-08-15 2:29 ` bugzilla-daemon
` (27 subsequent siblings)
36 siblings, 0 replies; 38+ messages in thread
From: bugzilla-daemon @ 2014-08-14 9:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: dri-devel
[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 252 bytes --]
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=82455
--- Comment #8 from charlie <407883775@qq.com> ---
Our system PAGE_SIZE is 8k, but the GPU PAGE_SIZE is 4k. The mesa radeon
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
[-- Attachment #1.2: Type: text/html, Size: 1009 bytes --]
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 159 bytes --]
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 38+ messages in thread
* [Bug 82455] Failed to allocate virtual address for buffer
2014-08-11 9:16 [Bug 82455] New: Failed to allocate virtual address for buffer bugzilla-daemon
` (8 preceding siblings ...)
2014-08-14 9:07 ` bugzilla-daemon
@ 2014-08-15 2:29 ` bugzilla-daemon
2014-08-15 7:17 ` bugzilla-daemon
` (26 subsequent siblings)
36 siblings, 0 replies; 38+ messages in thread
From: bugzilla-daemon @ 2014-08-15 2:29 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: dri-devel
[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 291 bytes --]
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=82455
--- Comment #9 from charlie <407883775@qq.com> ---
Created attachment 104647
--> https://bugs.freedesktop.org/attachment.cgi?id=104647&action=edit
detail
dmesg
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
[-- Attachment #1.2: Type: text/html, Size: 1153 bytes --]
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 159 bytes --]
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 38+ messages in thread
* [Bug 82455] Failed to allocate virtual address for buffer
2014-08-11 9:16 [Bug 82455] New: Failed to allocate virtual address for buffer bugzilla-daemon
` (9 preceding siblings ...)
2014-08-15 2:29 ` bugzilla-daemon
@ 2014-08-15 7:17 ` bugzilla-daemon
2014-08-19 9:23 ` bugzilla-daemon
` (25 subsequent siblings)
36 siblings, 0 replies; 38+ messages in thread
From: bugzilla-daemon @ 2014-08-15 7:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: dri-devel
[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1189 bytes --]
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=82455
--- Comment #10 from charlie <407883775@qq.com> ---
Created attachment 104657
--> https://bugs.freedesktop.org/attachment.cgi?id=104657&action=edit
detail
Our system PAGE_SIZE is 8k, but the GPU PAGE_SIZE is 4k. I have changed the
mesa radeonsi driver memory 8K alignment . So, the virtual address allocate
conflict disappear . But the new problem is come out .
The log message is :
[ 3574.344456] radeon 0000:01:00.0: GPU fault detected: 147 0x01424802
[ 3574.344481] radeon 0000:01:00.0: VM_CONTEXT1_PROTECTION_FAULT_ADDR
0x0002020A
[ 3574.344499] radeon 0000:01:00.0: VM_CONTEXT1_PROTECTION_FAULT_STATUS
0x02048002
[ 3574.344518] VM fault (0x02, vmid 1) at page 131594, read from TC (72)
[ 3574.344543] radeon 0000:01:00.0: GPU fault detected: 147 0x01424802
[ 3574.344563] radeon 0000:01:00.0: VM_CONTEXT1_PROTECTION_FAULT_ADDR
0x00000000
[ 3574.344583] radeon 0000:01:00.0: VM_CONTEXT1_PROTECTION_FAULT_STATUS
0x00000000
[ 3574.344601] VM fault (0x00, vmid 0) at page 0, read from unknown (0)
what's fault with it? The GPU cannot detected?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
[-- Attachment #1.2: Type: text/html, Size: 2052 bytes --]
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 159 bytes --]
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 38+ messages in thread
* [Bug 82455] Failed to allocate virtual address for buffer
2014-08-11 9:16 [Bug 82455] New: Failed to allocate virtual address for buffer bugzilla-daemon
` (10 preceding siblings ...)
2014-08-15 7:17 ` bugzilla-daemon
@ 2014-08-19 9:23 ` bugzilla-daemon
2014-08-19 9:59 ` bugzilla-daemon
` (24 subsequent siblings)
36 siblings, 0 replies; 38+ messages in thread
From: bugzilla-daemon @ 2014-08-19 9:23 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: dri-devel
[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 695 bytes --]
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=82455
--- Comment #11 from Michel Dänzer <michel@daenzer.net> ---
Created attachment 104877
--> https://bugs.freedesktop.org/attachment.cgi?id=104877&action=edit
Convert resource descriptors to little endian on big endian hosts
(In reply to comment #10)
> Our system PAGE_SIZE is 8k, but the GPU PAGE_SIZE is 4k. I have changed the
> mesa radeonsi driver memory 8K alignment . So, the virtual address allocate
> conflict disappear .
Please submit the fix to the mesa-dev mailing list.
> But the new problem is come out .
Does this patch help?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
[-- Attachment #1.2: Type: text/html, Size: 1897 bytes --]
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 159 bytes --]
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 38+ messages in thread
* [Bug 82455] Failed to allocate virtual address for buffer
2014-08-11 9:16 [Bug 82455] New: Failed to allocate virtual address for buffer bugzilla-daemon
` (11 preceding siblings ...)
2014-08-19 9:23 ` bugzilla-daemon
@ 2014-08-19 9:59 ` bugzilla-daemon
2014-08-19 10:01 ` bugzilla-daemon
` (23 subsequent siblings)
36 siblings, 0 replies; 38+ messages in thread
From: bugzilla-daemon @ 2014-08-19 9:59 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: dri-devel
[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 252 bytes --]
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=82455
--- Comment #12 from Marek Olšák <maraeo@gmail.com> ---
Don't we need to endian-swap the whole IB for big endian?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
[-- Attachment #1.2: Type: text/html, Size: 1036 bytes --]
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 159 bytes --]
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 38+ messages in thread
* [Bug 82455] Failed to allocate virtual address for buffer
2014-08-11 9:16 [Bug 82455] New: Failed to allocate virtual address for buffer bugzilla-daemon
` (12 preceding siblings ...)
2014-08-19 9:59 ` bugzilla-daemon
@ 2014-08-19 10:01 ` bugzilla-daemon
2014-08-19 13:37 ` bugzilla-daemon
` (22 subsequent siblings)
36 siblings, 0 replies; 38+ messages in thread
From: bugzilla-daemon @ 2014-08-19 10:01 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: dri-devel
[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 470 bytes --]
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=82455
--- Comment #13 from Christian König <deathsimple@vodafone.de> ---
(In reply to comment #12)
> Don't we need to endian-swap the whole IB for big endian?
That depends on which engine you use. IIRC the CP, DMA and UVD till SI can do
endian swap in hardware, but the support got removed for DMA with CIK.
VCE never could do it.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
[-- Attachment #1.2: Type: text/html, Size: 1335 bytes --]
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 159 bytes --]
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 38+ messages in thread
* [Bug 82455] Failed to allocate virtual address for buffer
2014-08-11 9:16 [Bug 82455] New: Failed to allocate virtual address for buffer bugzilla-daemon
` (13 preceding siblings ...)
2014-08-19 10:01 ` bugzilla-daemon
@ 2014-08-19 13:37 ` bugzilla-daemon
2014-08-19 14:16 ` bugzilla-daemon
` (21 subsequent siblings)
36 siblings, 0 replies; 38+ messages in thread
From: bugzilla-daemon @ 2014-08-19 13:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: dri-devel
[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 504 bytes --]
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=82455
--- Comment #14 from Alex Deucher <agd5f@yahoo.com> ---
(In reply to comment #13)
> (In reply to comment #12)
> > Don't we need to endian-swap the whole IB for big endian?
>
> That depends on which engine you use. IIRC the CP, DMA and UVD till SI can
> do endian swap in hardware, but the support got removed for DMA with CIK.
SDMA on CIK can still do endian swaps for IBs.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
[-- Attachment #1.2: Type: text/html, Size: 1392 bytes --]
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 159 bytes --]
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 38+ messages in thread
* [Bug 82455] Failed to allocate virtual address for buffer
2014-08-11 9:16 [Bug 82455] New: Failed to allocate virtual address for buffer bugzilla-daemon
` (14 preceding siblings ...)
2014-08-19 13:37 ` bugzilla-daemon
@ 2014-08-19 14:16 ` bugzilla-daemon
2014-08-20 1:54 ` bugzilla-daemon
` (20 subsequent siblings)
36 siblings, 0 replies; 38+ messages in thread
From: bugzilla-daemon @ 2014-08-19 14:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: dri-devel
[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 780 bytes --]
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=82455
--- Comment #15 from Christian König <deathsimple@vodafone.de> ---
(In reply to comment #14)
> (In reply to comment #13)
> > (In reply to comment #12)
> > > Don't we need to endian-swap the whole IB for big endian?
> >
> > That depends on which engine you use. IIRC the CP, DMA and UVD till SI can
> > do endian swap in hardware, but the support got removed for DMA with CIK.
>
> SDMA on CIK can still do endian swaps for IBs.
Than that was another engine, anyway you guys should test without the DMA
initially to rule out any problems.
Basically first try to get the most simple use case working, e.g. X with just
glxgears.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
[-- Attachment #1.2: Type: text/html, Size: 1764 bytes --]
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 159 bytes --]
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 38+ messages in thread
* [Bug 82455] Failed to allocate virtual address for buffer
2014-08-11 9:16 [Bug 82455] New: Failed to allocate virtual address for buffer bugzilla-daemon
` (15 preceding siblings ...)
2014-08-19 14:16 ` bugzilla-daemon
@ 2014-08-20 1:54 ` bugzilla-daemon
2014-08-20 2:43 ` bugzilla-daemon
` (19 subsequent siblings)
36 siblings, 0 replies; 38+ messages in thread
From: bugzilla-daemon @ 2014-08-20 1:54 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: dri-devel
[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 418 bytes --]
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=82455
--- Comment #16 from Michel Dänzer <michel@daenzer.net> ---
(In reply to comment #15)
> Basically first try to get the most simple use case working, e.g. X with
> just glxgears.
The simplest app I used for the initial radeonsi driver bringup was the Mesa
demo egltri_screen.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
[-- Attachment #1.2: Type: text/html, Size: 1279 bytes --]
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 159 bytes --]
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 38+ messages in thread
* [Bug 82455] Failed to allocate virtual address for buffer
2014-08-11 9:16 [Bug 82455] New: Failed to allocate virtual address for buffer bugzilla-daemon
` (16 preceding siblings ...)
2014-08-20 1:54 ` bugzilla-daemon
@ 2014-08-20 2:43 ` bugzilla-daemon
2014-08-20 3:38 ` bugzilla-daemon
` (18 subsequent siblings)
36 siblings, 0 replies; 38+ messages in thread
From: bugzilla-daemon @ 2014-08-20 2:43 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: dri-devel
[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1178 bytes --]
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=82455
--- Comment #17 from charlie <407883775@qq.com> ---
Created attachment 104930
--> https://bugs.freedesktop.org/attachment.cgi?id=104930&action=edit
bigend
This patch is about virtual space conflict . But this change has been fix in
the mesa-20140607(the version is 10.1.5) ; The new mesa version have a new
problem in our machine .
in founction
struct pipe_resource *r600_resource_create_common(struct pipe_screen *screen,
const struct pipe_resource
*templ)
{
if (templ->target == PIPE_BUFFER) {
return r600_buffer_create(screen, templ, 8192); // original
value is 4096 chen changed 2014-8-19
} else {
return r600_texture_create(screen, templ);
}
}
So, that the virtual address space conflict is disappear.
I am seeing your patch .
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/attachment.cgi?id=104877&action=edit
but i cannot find the "si_update_vertex_buffers" function in our mesa version.
thinks for your help . i will do many test in our machine.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
[-- Attachment #1.2: Type: text/html, Size: 2142 bytes --]
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 159 bytes --]
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 38+ messages in thread
* [Bug 82455] Failed to allocate virtual address for buffer
2014-08-11 9:16 [Bug 82455] New: Failed to allocate virtual address for buffer bugzilla-daemon
` (17 preceding siblings ...)
2014-08-20 2:43 ` bugzilla-daemon
@ 2014-08-20 3:38 ` bugzilla-daemon
2014-08-20 13:23 ` bugzilla-daemon
` (17 subsequent siblings)
36 siblings, 0 replies; 38+ messages in thread
From: bugzilla-daemon @ 2014-08-20 3:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: dri-devel
[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 322 bytes --]
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=82455
--- Comment #18 from charlie <407883775@qq.com> ---
>>anyway you guys should test without the DMA initially to rule out any problems.
How do it ?
Is is delete DMA options when i make kernel?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
[-- Attachment #1.2: Type: text/html, Size: 1114 bytes --]
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 159 bytes --]
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 38+ messages in thread
* [Bug 82455] Failed to allocate virtual address for buffer
2014-08-11 9:16 [Bug 82455] New: Failed to allocate virtual address for buffer bugzilla-daemon
` (18 preceding siblings ...)
2014-08-20 3:38 ` bugzilla-daemon
@ 2014-08-20 13:23 ` bugzilla-daemon
2014-08-21 9:35 ` bugzilla-daemon
` (16 subsequent siblings)
36 siblings, 0 replies; 38+ messages in thread
From: bugzilla-daemon @ 2014-08-20 13:23 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: dri-devel
[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 593 bytes --]
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=82455
--- Comment #19 from Marek Olšák <maraeo@gmail.com> ---
(In reply to comment #18)
> >>anyway you guys should test without the DMA initially to rule out any problems.
>
> How do it ?
>
> Is is delete DMA options when i make kernel?
He was talking about the DMA engine on the GPU, which can be disabled by
setting this environment variable prior to running any apps:
R600_DEBUG=nodma
It can also be used to disable DMA for a specific app.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
[-- Attachment #1.2: Type: text/html, Size: 1466 bytes --]
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 159 bytes --]
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 38+ messages in thread
* [Bug 82455] Failed to allocate virtual address for buffer
2014-08-11 9:16 [Bug 82455] New: Failed to allocate virtual address for buffer bugzilla-daemon
` (19 preceding siblings ...)
2014-08-20 13:23 ` bugzilla-daemon
@ 2014-08-21 9:35 ` bugzilla-daemon
2014-08-27 3:36 ` bugzilla-daemon
` (15 subsequent siblings)
36 siblings, 0 replies; 38+ messages in thread
From: bugzilla-daemon @ 2014-08-21 9:35 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: dri-devel
[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 788 bytes --]
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=82455
--- Comment #20 from Michel Dänzer <michel@daenzer.net> ---
Created attachment 105024
--> https://bugs.freedesktop.org/attachment.cgi?id=105024&action=edit
Use CPU page size instead of hardcoding 4096
Does this patch instead of your changes fix the virtual address allocation?
(In reply to comment #17)
> I am seeing your patch .
> https://bugs.freedesktop.org/attachment.cgi?id=104877&action=edit
>
> but i cannot find the "si_update_vertex_buffers" function in our mesa
> version.
Please use Mesa Git master. Once we have a set of fixes, we can consider
backporting them to stable branches, but they have to be on master first.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
[-- Attachment #1.2: Type: text/html, Size: 2021 bytes --]
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 159 bytes --]
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 38+ messages in thread
* [Bug 82455] Failed to allocate virtual address for buffer
2014-08-11 9:16 [Bug 82455] New: Failed to allocate virtual address for buffer bugzilla-daemon
` (20 preceding siblings ...)
2014-08-21 9:35 ` bugzilla-daemon
@ 2014-08-27 3:36 ` bugzilla-daemon
2014-08-27 6:26 ` bugzilla-daemon
` (14 subsequent siblings)
36 siblings, 0 replies; 38+ messages in thread
From: bugzilla-daemon @ 2014-08-27 3:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: dri-devel
[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 755 bytes --]
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=82455
--- Comment #21 from charlie <407883775@qq.com> ---
Created attachment 105313
--> https://bugs.freedesktop.org/attachment.cgi?id=105313&action=edit
GPU CP LOOKUP
I am git newest mesa code, and change PAGE_SIZE alignment.
I am closed all GPU DMA engine. R600_DMA=nodma.
but the GPU CP is locked
This time the ring index is 3. it isa DMA_INDEX_RING
[ 434.621770] radeon 0000:0a:00.0: GPU lockup CP stall for more than
5000msec
[ 434.621805] radeon 0000:0a:00.0: GPU lockup (waiting for 0x0000000000000017
last fence id 0x0000000000000016)
[ 434.621834] radeon 0000:0a:00.0: scheduling IB failed (-78).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
[-- Attachment #1.2: Type: text/html, Size: 1632 bytes --]
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 159 bytes --]
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 38+ messages in thread
* [Bug 82455] Failed to allocate virtual address for buffer
2014-08-11 9:16 [Bug 82455] New: Failed to allocate virtual address for buffer bugzilla-daemon
` (21 preceding siblings ...)
2014-08-27 3:36 ` bugzilla-daemon
@ 2014-08-27 6:26 ` bugzilla-daemon
2014-08-27 8:12 ` bugzilla-daemon
` (13 subsequent siblings)
36 siblings, 0 replies; 38+ messages in thread
From: bugzilla-daemon @ 2014-08-27 6:26 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: dri-devel
[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 644 bytes --]
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=82455
--- Comment #22 from Michel Dänzer <michel@daenzer.net> ---
(In reply to comment #21)
> I am git newest mesa code, and change PAGE_SIZE alignment.
So my patch fixes the virtual address allocation failure?
> I am closed all GPU DMA engine. R600_DMA=nodma.
That should be R600_DEBUG=nodma.
> but the GPU CP is locked
What did you try running when this happened?
> This time the ring index is 3. it isa DMA_INDEX_RING
Please attach the full dmesg from after the lockup.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
[-- Attachment #1.2: Type: text/html, Size: 1595 bytes --]
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 159 bytes --]
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 38+ messages in thread
* [Bug 82455] Failed to allocate virtual address for buffer
2014-08-11 9:16 [Bug 82455] New: Failed to allocate virtual address for buffer bugzilla-daemon
` (22 preceding siblings ...)
2014-08-27 6:26 ` bugzilla-daemon
@ 2014-08-27 8:12 ` bugzilla-daemon
2014-08-27 8:15 ` bugzilla-daemon
` (12 subsequent siblings)
36 siblings, 0 replies; 38+ messages in thread
From: bugzilla-daemon @ 2014-08-27 8:12 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: dri-devel
[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 606 bytes --]
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=82455
--- Comment #23 from charlie <407883775@qq.com> ---
>>So my patch fixes the virtual address allocation failure?
I am must change the code. you patch isn't work .
>>That should be R600_DEBUG=nodma.
Sorry , i am writing error. Actually, i am using R600_DEBUG=nodma
>>What did you try running when this happened?
i am using X:0& starting X, and I am runing xterm The GPU is lockup still .
ring index is 0
when i am runing startxfce4 , the GPU lookup , ring index is 3.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
[-- Attachment #1.2: Type: text/html, Size: 1470 bytes --]
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 159 bytes --]
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 38+ messages in thread
* [Bug 82455] Failed to allocate virtual address for buffer
2014-08-11 9:16 [Bug 82455] New: Failed to allocate virtual address for buffer bugzilla-daemon
` (23 preceding siblings ...)
2014-08-27 8:12 ` bugzilla-daemon
@ 2014-08-27 8:15 ` bugzilla-daemon
2014-08-27 8:19 ` bugzilla-daemon
` (11 subsequent siblings)
36 siblings, 0 replies; 38+ messages in thread
From: bugzilla-daemon @ 2014-08-27 8:15 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: dri-devel
[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 350 bytes --]
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=82455
charlie <407883775@qq.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Version|9.2 |git
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
[-- Attachment #1.2: Type: text/html, Size: 1012 bytes --]
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 159 bytes --]
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 38+ messages in thread
* [Bug 82455] Failed to allocate virtual address for buffer
2014-08-11 9:16 [Bug 82455] New: Failed to allocate virtual address for buffer bugzilla-daemon
` (24 preceding siblings ...)
2014-08-27 8:15 ` bugzilla-daemon
@ 2014-08-27 8:19 ` bugzilla-daemon
2014-08-27 9:13 ` bugzilla-daemon
` (10 subsequent siblings)
36 siblings, 0 replies; 38+ messages in thread
From: bugzilla-daemon @ 2014-08-27 8:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: dri-devel
[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 257 bytes --]
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=82455
--- Comment #24 from charlie <407883775@qq.com> ---
I am only running X, no other apply . the Xorg.0.log have any error message.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
[-- Attachment #1.2: Type: text/html, Size: 1015 bytes --]
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 159 bytes --]
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 38+ messages in thread
* [Bug 82455] Failed to allocate virtual address for buffer
2014-08-11 9:16 [Bug 82455] New: Failed to allocate virtual address for buffer bugzilla-daemon
` (25 preceding siblings ...)
2014-08-27 8:19 ` bugzilla-daemon
@ 2014-08-27 9:13 ` bugzilla-daemon
2014-08-28 2:46 ` bugzilla-daemon
` (9 subsequent siblings)
36 siblings, 0 replies; 38+ messages in thread
From: bugzilla-daemon @ 2014-08-27 9:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: dri-devel
[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 780 bytes --]
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=82455
--- Comment #25 from Michel Dänzer <michel@daenzer.net> ---
(In reply to comment #23)
> >>So my patch fixes the virtual address allocation failure?
> I am must change the code. you patch isn't work .
My 'Use CPU page size instead of hardcoding 4096' patch should encompass both
changes you mentioned before. What other changes do you need for that?
> >>What did you try running when this happened?
> i am using X:0& starting X, and I am runing xterm The GPU is lockup
> still . ring index is 0
As discussed before, can you try running a simpler app which doesn't need X,
e.g. egltri_screen from the mesa/demos repository?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
[-- Attachment #1.2: Type: text/html, Size: 1694 bytes --]
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 159 bytes --]
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 38+ messages in thread
* [Bug 82455] Failed to allocate virtual address for buffer
2014-08-11 9:16 [Bug 82455] New: Failed to allocate virtual address for buffer bugzilla-daemon
` (26 preceding siblings ...)
2014-08-27 9:13 ` bugzilla-daemon
@ 2014-08-28 2:46 ` bugzilla-daemon
2014-08-28 3:31 ` bugzilla-daemon
` (8 subsequent siblings)
36 siblings, 0 replies; 38+ messages in thread
From: bugzilla-daemon @ 2014-08-28 2:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: dri-devel
[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 819 bytes --]
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=82455
--- Comment #26 from charlie <407883775@qq.com> ---
Some place in mesa code you are still useing 4096 .
I am setting environment EGL_LOG_LEVEL=debug EGL_PLATFORM=drm R600_DEBUG=nodma
, and I am running egltri_screen. There havn't a tringle display in the
screen center. the message info as follow :
libEGL debug: Native platform type: drm (environment overwrite)
libEGL debug: EGL search path is /usr/lib64/egl
libEGL debug: added egl_dri2 to module array
libEGL debug: the best driver is DRI2
EGL_VERSION = 1.4 (DRI2)
libEGL debug: attribute 0x3033 has an invalid value 0x8
libEGL debug: EGL user error 0x3004 (EGL_BAD_ATTRIBUTE) in eglChooseConfig
EGLUT: failed to choose a config
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
[-- Attachment #1.2: Type: text/html, Size: 1577 bytes --]
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 159 bytes --]
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 38+ messages in thread
* [Bug 82455] Failed to allocate virtual address for buffer
2014-08-11 9:16 [Bug 82455] New: Failed to allocate virtual address for buffer bugzilla-daemon
` (27 preceding siblings ...)
2014-08-28 2:46 ` bugzilla-daemon
@ 2014-08-28 3:31 ` bugzilla-daemon
2014-08-28 13:58 ` bugzilla-daemon
` (7 subsequent siblings)
36 siblings, 0 replies; 38+ messages in thread
From: bugzilla-daemon @ 2014-08-28 3:31 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: dri-devel
[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 706 bytes --]
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=82455
--- Comment #27 from Michel Dänzer <michel@daenzer.net> ---
(In reply to comment #26)
> Some place in mesa code you are still useing 4096 .
Please be more specific. Do you still need the change you described in comment
17, or something else?
> libEGL debug: attribute 0x3033 has an invalid value 0x8
> libEGL debug: EGL user error 0x3004 (EGL_BAD_ATTRIBUTE) in eglChooseConfig
Looks like maybe your Mesa build picked up a non-Mesa EGL/eglext.h which
doesn't pull in eglmesaext.h, so EGL_MESA_screen_surface isn't defined in
src/egl/main/eglconfig.c .
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
[-- Attachment #1.2: Type: text/html, Size: 1638 bytes --]
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 159 bytes --]
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 38+ messages in thread
* [Bug 82455] Failed to allocate virtual address for buffer
2014-08-11 9:16 [Bug 82455] New: Failed to allocate virtual address for buffer bugzilla-daemon
` (28 preceding siblings ...)
2014-08-28 3:31 ` bugzilla-daemon
@ 2014-08-28 13:58 ` bugzilla-daemon
2014-08-29 1:18 ` bugzilla-daemon
` (6 subsequent siblings)
36 siblings, 0 replies; 38+ messages in thread
From: bugzilla-daemon @ 2014-08-28 13:58 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: dri-devel
[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 680 bytes --]
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=82455
--- Comment #28 from charlie <407883775@qq.com> ---
>>Looks like maybe your Mesa build picked up a non-Mesa EGL/eglext.h which doesn't pull in eglmesaext.h, so EGL_MESA_screen_surface isn't defined in src/egl/main/eglconfig.c .
Sorry , I am not clean about you saying . Do you means is that the
eglmesaext.h(PATH:include/EGL/eglmesaext.h) need including EGL/eglext.h file?
I change it , but not help.
or , I add EGL_MESA_screen_surface define in src/egl/main/eglconfig.c
#define EGL_MESA_screen_surface 1 .
the problem didn't solved.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
[-- Attachment #1.2: Type: text/html, Size: 1472 bytes --]
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 159 bytes --]
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 38+ messages in thread
* [Bug 82455] Failed to allocate virtual address for buffer
2014-08-11 9:16 [Bug 82455] New: Failed to allocate virtual address for buffer bugzilla-daemon
` (29 preceding siblings ...)
2014-08-28 13:58 ` bugzilla-daemon
@ 2014-08-29 1:18 ` bugzilla-daemon
2014-08-29 1:19 ` bugzilla-daemon
` (5 subsequent siblings)
36 siblings, 0 replies; 38+ messages in thread
From: bugzilla-daemon @ 2014-08-29 1:18 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: dri-devel
[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 8796 bytes --]
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=82455
--- Comment #29 from charlie <407883775@qq.com> ---
I am so sorry, i made a mistake . I am configure mesa no --enable-gallium-egl
options, I rebuild my mesa. The egltri_screen program can run in my system, But
the colourized triangle is didn't show in my machine screen. It is only a white
screen for a few minutes.
radeon: The kernel rejected CS, see dmesg for more information ,but any message
display in dmesg.
the message is follow:
libEGL debug: Native platform type: drm (environment overwrite)
libEGL debug: EGL search path is /usr/lib64/egl
libEGL debug: added /usr/lib64/egl/egl_gallium.so to module array
libEGL debug: added egl_dri2 to module array
libEGL debug: dlopen(/usr/lib64/egl/egl_gallium.so)
libEGL info: use DRM for display (nil)
libEGL debug: the best driver is Gallium
EGL_VERSION = 1.4 (Gallium)
Found 16 modes:
0: 1920 x 1080
1: 1680 x 1050
2: 1280 x 1024
3: 1280 x 1024
4: 1440 x 900
5: 1024 x 768
6: 1024 x 768
7: 1024 x 768
8: 832 x 624
9: 800 x 600
10: 800 x 600
11: 800 x 600
12: 640 x 480
13: 640 x 480
14: 640 x 480
15: 640 x 480
Will use screen size: 1920 x 1080
radeon: The kernel rejected CS, see dmesg for more information.
My system is 64bits and big-endian. It is means that the radeinsi driver send a
error commond using ring? It need big-endian to little-endian?
The eglinfo message:
libEGL debug: Native platform type: drm (environment overwrite)
libEGL debug: EGL search path is /usr/lib64/egl
libEGL debug: added /usr/lib64/egl/egl_gallium.so to module array
libEGL debug: added egl_dri2 to module array
libEGL debug: dlopen(/usr/lib64/egl/egl_gallium.so)
libEGL info: use DRM for display (nil)
libEGL debug: the best driver is Gallium
EGL API version: 1.4
EGL vendor string: Mesa Project
EGL version string: 1.4 (Gallium)
EGL client APIs: OpenGL OpenGL_ES2
EGL extensions string:
EGL_MESA_screen_surface EGL_MESA_drm_display EGL_MESA_drm_image
EGL_WL_bind_wayland_display EGL_KHR_image_base EGL_KHR_reusable_sync
EGL_KHR_fence_sync EGL_KHR_surfaceless_context
Configurations:
bf lv colorbuffer dp st ms vis cav bi renderable supported
id sz l r g b a th cl ns b id eat nd gl es es2 vg surfaces
---------------------------------------------------------------------
0x01 32 0 8 8 8 8 0 0 0 0 0x00-- a y y pb,scrn
0x02 32 0 8 8 8 8 16 0 0 0 0x00-- a y y pb,scrn
0x03 32 0 8 8 8 8 24 8 0 0 0x00-- a y y pb,scrn
0x04 32 0 8 8 8 8 24 0 0 0 0x00-- a y y pb,scrn
Number of Screens: 1
Screen 0 Modes:
id width height refresh name
-----------------------------------------
0x01 1920 1080 60.000 1920x1080
0x02 1680 1050 60.000 1680x1050
0x03 1280 1024 75.000 1280x1024
0x04 1280 1024 60.000 1280x1024
0x05 1440 900 60.000 1440x900
0x06 1024 768 75.000 1024x768
0x07 1024 768 70.000 1024x768
0x08 1024 768 60.000 1024x768
0x09 832 624 75.000 832x624
0x0a 800 600 75.000 800x600
0x0b 800 600 72.000 800x600
0x0c 800 600 60.000 800x600
0x0d 640 480 75.000 640x480
0x0e 640 480 73.000 640x480
0x0f 640 480 67.000 640x480
0x10 640 480 60.000 640x480
i am running eglkms program . the gpu will be lockup:
libEGL debug: Native platform type: drm (environment overwrite)
libEGL debug: EGL search path is /usr/lib64/egl
libEGL debug: added /usr/lib64/egl/egl_gallium.so to module array
libEGL debug: added egl_dri2 to module array
libEGL debug: dlopen(/usr/lib64/egl/egl_gallium.so)
libEGL info: use DRM for display 0x206010
libEGL debug: EGL user error 0x3001 (EGL_NOT_INITIALIZED) in eglInitialize(no
usable display)
libEGL debug: the best driver is DRI2
EGL_VERSION = 1.4 (DRI2)
radeon: The kernel rejected CS, see dmesg for more information.
radeon: The kernel rejected CS, see dmesg for more information.
handle=43, stride=7680
dmesg:
[ 543.035612] radeon 0000:0a:00.0: GPU lockup CP stall for more than 2000msec
[ 543.063462] radeon 0000:0a:00.0: GPU lockup (waiting for 0x0000000000000009
last fence id 0x0000000000000008)
[ 543.063513] [drm] Disabling audio 0 support
[ 543.063526] [drm] Disabling audio 1 support
[ 543.063538] [drm] Disabling audio 2 support
[ 543.063549] [drm] Disabling audio 3 support
[ 543.063560] [drm] Disabling audio 4 support
[ 543.063572] [drm] Disabling audio 5 support
[ 543.063746] radeon 0000:0a:00.0: sa_manager is not empty, clearing anyway
[ 543.790849] radeon 0000:0a:00.0: Saved 29 dwords of commands on ring 0.
[ 543.791009] radeon 0000:0a:00.0: GPU softreset: 0x00000049
[ 543.791030] radeon 0000:0a:00.0: GRBM_STATUS = 0xB3523028
[ 543.791052] radeon 0000:0a:00.0: GRBM_STATUS_SE0 = 0x2D800006
[ 543.791074] radeon 0000:0a:00.0: GRBM_STATUS_SE1 = 0x2D000006
[ 543.791092] radeon 0000:0a:00.0: SRBM_STATUS = 0x200000C0
[ 543.791220] radeon 0000:0a:00.0: SRBM_STATUS2 = 0x00000000
[ 543.791238] radeon 0000:0a:00.0: R_008674_CP_STALLED_STAT1 = 0x00000000
[ 543.791256] radeon 0000:0a:00.0: R_008678_CP_STALLED_STAT2 = 0x40000000
[ 543.791275] radeon 0000:0a:00.0: R_00867C_CP_BUSY_STAT = 0x00008000
[ 543.791293] radeon 0000:0a:00.0: R_008680_CP_STAT = 0x80228647
[ 543.791312] radeon 0000:0a:00.0: R_00D034_DMA_STATUS_REG = 0x44C83D57
[ 543.791331] radeon 0000:0a:00.0: R_00D834_DMA_STATUS_REG = 0x44C83D57
[ 543.791350] radeon 0000:0a:00.0: VM_CONTEXT1_PROTECTION_FAULT_ADDR
0x00000000
[ 543.791369] radeon 0000:0a:00.0: VM_CONTEXT1_PROTECTION_FAULT_STATUS
0x00000000
[ 544.484393] radeon 0000:0a:00.0: GRBM_SOFT_RESET=0x0000DDFF
[ 544.484468] radeon 0000:0a:00.0: SRBM_SOFT_RESET=0x00000100
[ 544.485647] radeon 0000:0a:00.0: GRBM_STATUS = 0x00003028
[ 544.485668] radeon 0000:0a:00.0: GRBM_STATUS_SE0 = 0x00000006
[ 544.485687] radeon 0000:0a:00.0: GRBM_STATUS_SE1 = 0x00000006
[ 544.485705] radeon 0000:0a:00.0: SRBM_STATUS = 0x200000C0
[ 544.485832] radeon 0000:0a:00.0: SRBM_STATUS2 = 0x00000000
[ 544.485851] radeon 0000:0a:00.0: R_008674_CP_STALLED_STAT1 = 0x00000000
[ 544.485869] radeon 0000:0a:00.0: R_008678_CP_STALLED_STAT2 = 0x00000000
[ 544.485887] radeon 0000:0a:00.0: R_00867C_CP_BUSY_STAT = 0x00000000
[ 544.485906] radeon 0000:0a:00.0: R_008680_CP_STAT = 0x00000000
[ 544.485924] radeon 0000:0a:00.0: R_00D034_DMA_STATUS_REG = 0x44C83D57
[ 544.485943] radeon 0000:0a:00.0: R_00D834_DMA_STATUS_REG = 0x44C83D57
[ 544.486089] radeon 0000:0a:00.0: GPU reset succeeded, trying to resume
[ 544.499083] [drm] probing gen 2 caps for device 10b5:8648 = 838cd02/0
[ 544.499102] [drm] PCIE gen 2 link speeds already enabled
[ 544.517700] [drm] PCIE GART of 1024M enabled (table at 0x0000000000276000).
[ 544.517913] radeon 0000:0a:00.0: WB enabled
[ 544.517939] radeon 0000:0a:00.0: fence driver on ring 0 use gpu addr
0x0000000080000c00 and cpu addr 0xfffff80008880c00
[ 544.517961] radeon 0000:0a:00.0: fence driver on ring 1 use gpu addr
0x0000000080000c04 and cpu addr 0xfffff80008880c04
[ 544.517984] radeon 0000:0a:00.0: fence driver on ring 2 use gpu addr
0x0000000080000c08 and cpu addr 0xfffff80008880c08
[ 544.518005] radeon 0000:0a:00.0: fence driver on ring 3 use gpu addr
0x0000000080000c0c and cpu addr 0xfffff80008880c0c
[ 544.518027] radeon 0000:0a:00.0: fence driver on ring 4 use gpu addr
0x0000000080000c10 and cpu addr 0xfffff80008880c10
[ 544.532531] radeon 0000:0a:00.0: fence driver on ring 5 use gpu addr
0x0000000000075a18 and cpu addr 0x000000ca10075a18
[ 544.767646] [drm] ring test on 0 succeeded in 1 usecs
[ 544.767669] [drm] ring test on 1 succeeded in 1 usecs
[ 544.767689] [drm] ring test on 2 succeeded in 1 usecs
[ 544.767773] [drm] ring test on 3 succeeded in 2 usecs
[ 544.767803] [drm] ring test on 4 succeeded in 2 usecs
[ 544.945163] [drm] ring test on 5 succeeded in 2 usecs
[ 544.945186] [drm] UVD initialized successfully.
[ 544.945245] [drm] Enabling audio 0 support
[ 544.945258] [drm] Enabling audio 1 support
[ 544.945270] [drm] Enabling audio 2 support
[ 544.945281] [drm] Enabling audio 3 support
[ 544.945292] [drm] Enabling audio 4 support
[ 544.945304] [drm] Enabling audio 5 support
[ 544.945388] [drm] ib test on ring 0 succeeded in 0 usecs
[ 544.945487] [drm] ib test on ring 1 succeeded in 0 usecs
[ 544.945573] [drm] ib test on ring 2 succeeded in 0 usecs
[ 544.945637] [drm] ib test on ring 3 succeeded in 0 usecs
[ 544.945699] [drm] ib test on ring 4 succeeded in 0 usecs
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
[-- Attachment #1.2: Type: text/html, Size: 9554 bytes --]
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 159 bytes --]
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 38+ messages in thread
* [Bug 82455] Failed to allocate virtual address for buffer
2014-08-11 9:16 [Bug 82455] New: Failed to allocate virtual address for buffer bugzilla-daemon
` (30 preceding siblings ...)
2014-08-29 1:18 ` bugzilla-daemon
@ 2014-08-29 1:19 ` bugzilla-daemon
2014-09-01 6:43 ` bugzilla-daemon
` (4 subsequent siblings)
36 siblings, 0 replies; 38+ messages in thread
From: bugzilla-daemon @ 2014-08-29 1:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: dri-devel
[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 271 bytes --]
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=82455
--- Comment #30 from charlie <407883775@qq.com> ---
>>It is only a white screen for a few minutes.
It is only a white screen for a few second
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
[-- Attachment #1.2: Type: text/html, Size: 1063 bytes --]
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 159 bytes --]
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 38+ messages in thread
* [Bug 82455] Failed to allocate virtual address for buffer
2014-08-11 9:16 [Bug 82455] New: Failed to allocate virtual address for buffer bugzilla-daemon
` (31 preceding siblings ...)
2014-08-29 1:19 ` bugzilla-daemon
@ 2014-09-01 6:43 ` bugzilla-daemon
2014-09-15 8:25 ` bugzilla-daemon
` (3 subsequent siblings)
36 siblings, 0 replies; 38+ messages in thread
From: bugzilla-daemon @ 2014-09-01 6:43 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: dri-devel
[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 840 bytes --]
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=82455
--- Comment #31 from Michel Dänzer <michel@daenzer.net> ---
(In reply to comment #29)
> radeon: The kernel rejected CS, see dmesg for more information.
>
> My system is 64bits and big-endian. It is means that the radeinsi driver
> send a error commond using ring? It need big-endian to little-endian?
That shouldn't be necessary, the kernel sets up the hardware to byte-swap the
ring/indirect buffer commands on the fly.
Basically, you need to find out why the radeon_cs_ioctl() function in the
kernel returns a non-0 value. Enabling DRM debugging output via
/sys/module/drm/parameters/debug may help, or you may have to add more
debugging printks to narrow down where it's coming from.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
[-- Attachment #1.2: Type: text/html, Size: 1707 bytes --]
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 159 bytes --]
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 38+ messages in thread
* [Bug 82455] Failed to allocate virtual address for buffer
2014-08-11 9:16 [Bug 82455] New: Failed to allocate virtual address for buffer bugzilla-daemon
` (32 preceding siblings ...)
2014-09-01 6:43 ` bugzilla-daemon
@ 2014-09-15 8:25 ` bugzilla-daemon
2014-09-17 6:57 ` bugzilla-daemon
` (2 subsequent siblings)
36 siblings, 0 replies; 38+ messages in thread
From: bugzilla-daemon @ 2014-09-15 8:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: dri-devel
[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 858 bytes --]
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=82455
--- Comment #32 from charlie <407883775@qq.com> ---
>>radeon: The kernel rejected CS, see dmesg for more information
This error is showed in the drm_ioctl function.The part code show as follow:
468 if (cmd & IOC_OUT) { //error place,
469 printk(KERN_EMERG "cmd & IOC_OUT\n");
470 if (copy_to_user((void __user *)arg, kdata,
471 usize) != 0){
472 printk(KERN_EMERG "cmd & IOC_OUT error\n");
473 retcode = -EFAULT;
474 }
475 }
The copy_from_user havn't error, So the error is cause by parameter.
Or, PAGE_SIZE cause it ?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
[-- Attachment #1.2: Type: text/html, Size: 1682 bytes --]
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 159 bytes --]
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 38+ messages in thread
* [Bug 82455] Failed to allocate virtual address for buffer
2014-08-11 9:16 [Bug 82455] New: Failed to allocate virtual address for buffer bugzilla-daemon
` (33 preceding siblings ...)
2014-09-15 8:25 ` bugzilla-daemon
@ 2014-09-17 6:57 ` bugzilla-daemon
2015-08-02 10:53 ` [Bug 82455] [SPARC] " bugzilla-daemon
2018-08-31 6:17 ` bugzilla-daemon
36 siblings, 0 replies; 38+ messages in thread
From: bugzilla-daemon @ 2014-09-17 6:57 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: dri-devel
[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 364 bytes --]
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=82455
--- Comment #33 from Michel Dänzer <michel@daenzer.net> ---
(In reply to comment #32)
> This error is showed in the drm_ioctl function.
No, as I said in comment 31, it comes from somewhere inside radeon_cs_ioctl()
AFAICT.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
[-- Attachment #1.2: Type: text/html, Size: 1262 bytes --]
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 159 bytes --]
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 38+ messages in thread
* [Bug 82455] [SPARC] Failed to allocate virtual address for buffer
2014-08-11 9:16 [Bug 82455] New: Failed to allocate virtual address for buffer bugzilla-daemon
` (34 preceding siblings ...)
2014-09-17 6:57 ` bugzilla-daemon
@ 2015-08-02 10:53 ` bugzilla-daemon
2018-08-31 6:17 ` bugzilla-daemon
36 siblings, 0 replies; 38+ messages in thread
From: bugzilla-daemon @ 2015-08-02 10:53 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: dri-devel
[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 467 bytes --]
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=82455
Marek Olšák <maraeo@gmail.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Summary|Failed to allocate virtual |[SPARC] Failed to allocate
|address for buffer |virtual address for buffer
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
[-- Attachment #1.2: Type: text/html, Size: 1157 bytes --]
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 159 bytes --]
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 38+ messages in thread
* [Bug 82455] [SPARC] Failed to allocate virtual address for buffer
2014-08-11 9:16 [Bug 82455] New: Failed to allocate virtual address for buffer bugzilla-daemon
` (35 preceding siblings ...)
2015-08-02 10:53 ` [Bug 82455] [SPARC] " bugzilla-daemon
@ 2018-08-31 6:17 ` bugzilla-daemon
36 siblings, 0 replies; 38+ messages in thread
From: bugzilla-daemon @ 2018-08-31 6:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: dri-devel
[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 434 bytes --]
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=82455
Timothy Arceri <t_arceri@yahoo.com.au> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Resolution|--- |WONTFIX
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
[-- Attachment #1.2: Type: text/html, Size: 1270 bytes --]
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 160 bytes --]
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 38+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2018-08-31 6:17 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 38+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2014-08-11 9:16 [Bug 82455] New: Failed to allocate virtual address for buffer bugzilla-daemon
2014-08-11 9:22 ` [Bug 82455] " bugzilla-daemon
2014-08-11 9:36 ` bugzilla-daemon
2014-08-11 11:47 ` bugzilla-daemon
2014-08-11 11:55 ` bugzilla-daemon
2014-08-12 1:20 ` bugzilla-daemon
2014-08-12 1:22 ` bugzilla-daemon
2014-08-12 1:26 ` bugzilla-daemon
2014-08-12 1:33 ` bugzilla-daemon
2014-08-14 9:07 ` bugzilla-daemon
2014-08-15 2:29 ` bugzilla-daemon
2014-08-15 7:17 ` bugzilla-daemon
2014-08-19 9:23 ` bugzilla-daemon
2014-08-19 9:59 ` bugzilla-daemon
2014-08-19 10:01 ` bugzilla-daemon
2014-08-19 13:37 ` bugzilla-daemon
2014-08-19 14:16 ` bugzilla-daemon
2014-08-20 1:54 ` bugzilla-daemon
2014-08-20 2:43 ` bugzilla-daemon
2014-08-20 3:38 ` bugzilla-daemon
2014-08-20 13:23 ` bugzilla-daemon
2014-08-21 9:35 ` bugzilla-daemon
2014-08-27 3:36 ` bugzilla-daemon
2014-08-27 6:26 ` bugzilla-daemon
2014-08-27 8:12 ` bugzilla-daemon
2014-08-27 8:15 ` bugzilla-daemon
2014-08-27 8:19 ` bugzilla-daemon
2014-08-27 9:13 ` bugzilla-daemon
2014-08-28 2:46 ` bugzilla-daemon
2014-08-28 3:31 ` bugzilla-daemon
2014-08-28 13:58 ` bugzilla-daemon
2014-08-29 1:18 ` bugzilla-daemon
2014-08-29 1:19 ` bugzilla-daemon
2014-09-01 6:43 ` bugzilla-daemon
2014-09-15 8:25 ` bugzilla-daemon
2014-09-17 6:57 ` bugzilla-daemon
2015-08-02 10:53 ` [Bug 82455] [SPARC] " bugzilla-daemon
2018-08-31 6:17 ` bugzilla-daemon
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.