From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: bugzilla-daemon@freedesktop.org Subject: [Bug 89198] Setting Refresh Rate on monitor causes flickering/artifacting Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2015 01:09:26 +0000 Message-ID: References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============1012066395==" Return-path: Received: from culpepper.freedesktop.org (unknown [131.252.210.165]) by gabe.freedesktop.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 767A689F47 for ; Thu, 19 Feb 2015 17:09:26 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dri-devel-bounces@lists.freedesktop.org Sender: "dri-devel" To: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org List-Id: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org --===============1012066395== Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="1424394566.fDe70.31483"; charset="UTF-8" --1424394566.fDe70.31483 Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2015 01:09:26 +0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=89198 --- Comment #17 from andre35822@yahoo.com --- (In reply to Alex Deucher from comment #14) > (In reply to andre35822 from comment #13) > > Just thought I would post a little update, I am in the process of getting my > > system to use the new kernel. Ive already compiled it with the patch and > > stuff, i am just having a bit of trouble creating a ramdisk (I am followeing > > the arch linux wiki) although I will figure it out. Will the fixes from > > comment 19 and 20 be implemented into the next release of video-ati or does > > it still need testing? I am asking this so that if I know it isn't I may as > > well compile another kernel with the patches from 19 and 20. Thank you btw > > for everything. > > FWIW, using make install in your kernel tree will usually handle the ramdisk > update, but I'm not that familiar with arch, so if you are comfortable with > that, I'd stick with that. > > As for the patches from 19 and 20, I'm pretty confident they will work, but > it would be nice to get some confirmation. Alright so I tried out the kernel I compiled with the patch from comment 15 on the other bug report, and either I didn't install the patch correctly (or it didnt install correctly) or the patch is not solving the problem. I am still getting the flickering/artifacts. I have attached an xorg log and dmesg log and added comment15_patch to each of their file names so they are easily distinguishable. Should I be compiling another kernel with the patches from comment 19 and 20? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. --1424394566.fDe70.31483 Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2015 01:09:26 +0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8"

Comment # 17 on bug 89198 from
(In reply to Alex Deucher from comment #14)
> (In reply to andre35822 from comment #13)
> > Just thought I would post a little update, I am in the process of getting my
> > system to use the new kernel. Ive already compiled it with the patch and
> > stuff, i am just having a bit of trouble creating a ramdisk (I am followeing
> > the arch linux wiki) although I will figure it out. Will the fixes from
> > comment 19 and 20 be implemented into the next release of video-ati or does
> > it still need testing? I am asking this so that if I know it isn't I may as
> > well compile another kernel with the patches from 19 and 20. Thank you btw
> > for everything.
> 
> FWIW, using make install in your kernel tree will usually handle the ramdisk
> update, but I'm not that familiar with arch, so if you are comfortable with
> that, I'd stick with that.
> 
> As for the patches from 19 and 20, I'm pretty confident they will work, but
> it would be nice to get some confirmation.
Alright so I tried out the kernel I compiled with the patch from comment 15 on
the other bug report, and either I didn't install the patch correctly (or it
didnt install correctly) or the patch is not solving the problem. I am still
getting the flickering/artifacts. I have attached an xorg log and dmesg log and
added comment15_patch to each of their file names so they are easily
distinguishable. Should I be compiling another kernel with the patches from
comment 19 and 20?


You are receiving this mail because:
  • You are the assignee for the bug.
--1424394566.fDe70.31483-- --===============1012066395== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 Content-Disposition: inline X19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX18KZHJpLWRldmVs IG1haWxpbmcgbGlzdApkcmktZGV2ZWxAbGlzdHMuZnJlZWRlc2t0b3Aub3JnCmh0dHA6Ly9saXN0 cy5mcmVlZGVza3RvcC5vcmcvbWFpbG1hbi9saXN0aW5mby9kcmktZGV2ZWwK --===============1012066395==--