From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: bugzilla-daemon-CC+yJ3UmIYqDUpFQwHEjaQ@public.gmane.org Subject: [Bug 93458] page allocation failure: order:5, mode:0x240c0c0 Date: Sun, 17 Apr 2016 07:23:08 +0000 Message-ID: References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============0296374031==" Return-path: In-Reply-To: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: nouveau-bounces-PD4FTy7X32lNgt0PjOBp9y5qC8QIuHrW@public.gmane.org Sender: "Nouveau" To: nouveau-PD4FTy7X32lNgt0PjOBp9y5qC8QIuHrW@public.gmane.org List-Id: nouveau.vger.kernel.org --===============0296374031== Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="14608777871.Ce8dB8A8.28855"; charset="UTF-8" --14608777871.Ce8dB8A8.28855 Date: Sun, 17 Apr 2016 07:23:07 +0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=93458 --- Comment #6 from Matt Whitlock --- (In reply to Matt Whitlock from comment #5) > I would venture a guess that the memory allocated for a GPU FIFO buffer > needs to be physically continuous, as it will be used for DMA I take it back. Looking into the source code, the allocation is happening in nvkm_ramht_new(…), which is allocating a struct nvkm_ramht containing a variably-sized array of struct nvkm_ramht_data elements. As these elements, in turn, contain pointers, it seems very unlikely that they'd be DMA'd, so presumably the struct nvkm_ramht doesn't need to be physically contiguous and could safely be allocated by vzalloc(…). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. --14608777871.Ce8dB8A8.28855 Date: Sun, 17 Apr 2016 07:23:07 +0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/html

Comment # 6 on bug 93458 from
(In reply to Matt Whitlock from comment #5)
> I would venture a guess that the memory allocated for a GPU FIFO buffer
> needs to be physically continuous, as it will be used for DMA

I take it back. Looking into the source code, the allocation is happening in
nvkm_ramht_new(…), which is allocating a struct nvkm_ramht containing a
variably-sized array of struct nvkm_ramht_data elements. As these elements, in
turn, contain pointers, it seems very unlikely that they'd be DMA'd, so
presumably the struct nvkm_ramht doesn't need to be physically contiguous and
could safely be allocated by vzalloc(…).


You are receiving this mail because:
  • You are the assignee for the bug.
--14608777871.Ce8dB8A8.28855-- --===============0296374031== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 Content-Disposition: inline X19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX18KTm91dmVhdSBt YWlsaW5nIGxpc3QKTm91dmVhdUBsaXN0cy5mcmVlZGVza3RvcC5vcmcKaHR0cHM6Ly9saXN0cy5m cmVlZGVza3RvcC5vcmcvbWFpbG1hbi9saXN0aW5mby9ub3V2ZWF1Cg== --===============0296374031==--