From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: bugzilla-daemon@freedesktop.org Subject: [Bug 94231] Problems compiling libdrm since glibc 2.23 Date: Mon, 22 Feb 2016 14:03:22 +0000 Message-ID: References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============1444350827==" Return-path: Received: from culpepper.freedesktop.org (culpepper.freedesktop.org [IPv6:2610:10:20:722:a800:ff:fe98:4b55]) by gabe.freedesktop.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 13F836E1E2 for ; Mon, 22 Feb 2016 14:03:33 +0000 (UTC) In-Reply-To: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dri-devel-bounces@lists.freedesktop.org Sender: "dri-devel" To: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org List-Id: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org --===============1444350827== Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="14561498121.ad0a0073.15402"; charset="UTF-8" --14561498121.ad0a0073.15402 Date: Mon, 22 Feb 2016 14:03:32 +0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=94231 --- Comment #7 from Emil Velikov --- Hmm... Gentoo devs decided to patch glibc in order to remove the include. At the same time they lean that applications (25+ based on the incomplete list) should be fixed to use sys/sysmacros.h. There's no justification and the manual does not support this :-( To make it even more strange the patch isn't alongside the glibc-2.23.ebuild in the repo. Am I looking at the wrong repo ? Can anyone share a link with discussion behind this decision ? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. --14561498121.ad0a0073.15402 Date: Mon, 22 Feb 2016 14:03:32 +0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/html

Comment # 7 on bug 94231 from 
Hmm... Gentoo devs decided to patch glibc in order to remove the include.

At the same time they lean that applications (25+ based on the incomplete list)
should be fixed to use sys/sysmacros.h. There's no justification and the manual
does not support this :-(

To make it even more strange the patch isn't alongside the glibc-2.23.ebuild in
the repo. Am I looking at the wrong repo ? Can anyone share a link with
discussion behind this decision ?

You are receiving this mail because:
  • You are the assignee for the bug.
--14561498121.ad0a0073.15402-- --===============1444350827== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 Content-Disposition: inline X19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX18KZHJpLWRldmVs IG1haWxpbmcgbGlzdApkcmktZGV2ZWxAbGlzdHMuZnJlZWRlc2t0b3Aub3JnCmh0dHBzOi8vbGlz dHMuZnJlZWRlc2t0b3Aub3JnL21haWxtYW4vbGlzdGluZm8vZHJpLWRldmVsCg== --===============1444350827==--