From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970
From: bugzilla-daemon@freedesktop.org
Subject: [Bug 94231] Problems compiling libdrm since glibc 2.23
Date: Mon, 22 Feb 2016 23:39:33 +0000
Message-ID:
References:
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============0120629805=="
Return-path:
Received: from culpepper.freedesktop.org (culpepper.freedesktop.org
[IPv6:2610:10:20:722:a800:ff:fe98:4b55])
by gabe.freedesktop.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 40CD26E24C
for ; Mon, 22 Feb 2016 23:39:34 +0000 (UTC)
In-Reply-To:
List-Unsubscribe: ,
List-Archive:
List-Post:
List-Help:
List-Subscribe: ,
Errors-To: dri-devel-bounces@lists.freedesktop.org
Sender: "dri-devel"
To: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
List-Id: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
--===============0120629805==
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="14561843731.5099d01.11466";
charset="UTF-8"
--14561843731.5099d01.11466
Date: Mon, 22 Feb 2016 23:39:33 +0000
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=94231
Mike Frysinger changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |vapier@gentoo.org
--- Comment #12 from Mike Frysinger ---
it's really not that difficult to test for & include the sys/sysmacros.h header
directly when you're using the non-standard functions they provide. this is
the API under BSD systems, and where Linux C libs have already moved/are moving
towards. *this* is the deprecation period.
upstream glibc will take a more measured approach including updating their
docs, but realistically, no one is going to read those until they see breakage.
the Gentoo changes are only in an opt-in dev-only build, so it too isn't
hitting people randomly.
as the upstream thread shows, if you used the (long time documented)
AC_HEADER_MAJOR macro in autoconf, then this wouldn't have impacted drm.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
--14561843731.5099d01.11466
Date: Mon, 22 Feb 2016 23:39:33 +0000
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/html
Mike Frysinger
changed
bug 94231
What |
Removed |
Added |
CC |
|
vapier@gentoo.org
|
Comment # 12
on bug 94231
from Mike Frysinger
it's really not that difficult to test for & include the sys/sysmacros.h header
directly when you're using the non-standard functions they provide. this is
the API under BSD systems, and where Linux C libs have already moved/are moving
towards. *this* is the deprecation period.
upstream glibc will take a more measured approach including updating their
docs, but realistically, no one is going to read those until they see breakage.
the Gentoo changes are only in an opt-in dev-only build, so it too isn't
hitting people randomly.
as the upstream thread shows, if you used the (long time documented)
AC_HEADER_MAJOR macro in autoconf, then this wouldn't have impacted drm.
You are receiving this mail because:
- You are the assignee for the bug.
--14561843731.5099d01.11466--
--===============0120629805==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
Content-Disposition: inline
X19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX18KZHJpLWRldmVs
IG1haWxpbmcgbGlzdApkcmktZGV2ZWxAbGlzdHMuZnJlZWRlc2t0b3Aub3JnCmh0dHBzOi8vbGlz
dHMuZnJlZWRlc2t0b3Aub3JnL21haWxtYW4vbGlzdGluZm8vZHJpLWRldmVsCg==
--===============0120629805==--