From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: bugzilla-daemon-CC+yJ3UmIYqDUpFQwHEjaQ@public.gmane.org Subject: [Bug 94990] [GM204] GTX 970 + 4GB VRAM fails at secboot (v4.6+) Date: Tue, 08 Nov 2016 13:29:54 +0000 Message-ID: References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============0466909502==" Return-path: In-Reply-To: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: nouveau-bounces-PD4FTy7X32lNgt0PjOBp9y5qC8QIuHrW@public.gmane.org Sender: "Nouveau" To: nouveau-PD4FTy7X32lNgt0PjOBp9y5qC8QIuHrW@public.gmane.org List-Id: nouveau.vger.kernel.org --===============0466909502== Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="14786117940.5B02f94f.6904"; charset="UTF-8" --14786117940.5B02f94f.6904 Date: Tue, 8 Nov 2016 13:29:54 +0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://bugs.freedesktop.org/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3D94990 --- Comment #87 from Yann Golanski --- (In reply to Karol Herbst from comment #86) > (In reply to Yann Golanski from comment #85) > > Could we at least have this as a patch for now until a better one comes > > along. Otherwise us poor folks owning GT970 cannot update to Fedora 25= =E2=80=A6 =E2=98=B9 >=20 > we can't. there would be a less generic patch needed, because it would > affect a lot of different GPUs as well and mess with the amount of VRAM > reported. My bad. I did not understand that. Thank you for the clarification. --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.= --14786117940.5B02f94f.6904 Date: Tue, 8 Nov 2016 13:29:54 +0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://bugs.freedesktop.org/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated

Commen= t # 87 on bug 94990<= /a> from Yann Golanski 
(In reply to Karol Herbst from comment #86)
> (In reply to Yann Golanski from comment #85)
> > Could we at least have this as a patch for now until a better one=
 comes
> > along. Otherwise us poor folks owning GT970 cannot update to Fedo=
ra 25=E2=80=A6 =E2=98=B9
>=20
> we can't. there would be a less generic patch needed, because it would
> affect a lot of different GPUs as well and mess with the amount of VRAM
> reported.

My bad. I did not understand that. Thank you for the clarification.

You are receiving this mail because:
  • You are the assignee for the bug.
= --14786117940.5B02f94f.6904-- --===============0466909502== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 Content-Disposition: inline X19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX18KTm91dmVhdSBt YWlsaW5nIGxpc3QKTm91dmVhdUBsaXN0cy5mcmVlZGVza3RvcC5vcmcKaHR0cHM6Ly9saXN0cy5m cmVlZGVza3RvcC5vcmcvbWFpbG1hbi9saXN0aW5mby9ub3V2ZWF1Cg== --===============0466909502==--