From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: bugzilla-daemon-CC+yJ3UmIYqDUpFQwHEjaQ@public.gmane.org Subject: [Bug 94990] [GM204] GTX 970 + 4GB VRAM fails at secboot (v4.6+) Date: Mon, 21 Nov 2016 06:50:57 +0000 Message-ID: References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============1412860800==" Return-path: In-Reply-To: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: nouveau-bounces-PD4FTy7X32lNgt0PjOBp9y5qC8QIuHrW@public.gmane.org Sender: "Nouveau" To: nouveau-PD4FTy7X32lNgt0PjOBp9y5qC8QIuHrW@public.gmane.org List-Id: nouveau.vger.kernel.org --===============1412860800== Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="14797110571.A303Aaa1f.28701"; charset="UTF-8" --14797110571.A303Aaa1f.28701 Date: Mon, 21 Nov 2016 06:50:57 +0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://bugs.freedesktop.org/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3D94990 --- Comment #95 from Ben Skeggs --- (In reply to Alexandre Courbot from comment #94) > Created attachment 128093 [details] > Log with patch 128091 >=20 > Hi Ben, >=20 > Patch did not do the trick for me (log attached). Confirmed that > 0001-nvkm_gpuobj-size-is-smaller-then-nvkm_gpuobj-size-ca.patch still > succeeded, so apparently the method is not perfectly correct. Rather > strangely the printk'd value of 0x100ce0 is 0x00000000... Yeah, everyone, don't bother trying this. This register is written by the secure boot ucode, so the problem remains unsolved. --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.= --14797110571.A303Aaa1f.28701 Date: Mon, 21 Nov 2016 06:50:57 +0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://bugs.freedesktop.org/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated

Commen= t # 95 on bug 94990<= /a> from = Ben Skeggs 
(In reply to Alexandre Courbot from comment #94)
> Created atta=
chment 128093 [details]
> Log with patch 128091
>=20
> Hi Ben,
>=20
> Patch did not do the trick for me (log attached). Confirmed that
> 0001-nvkm_gpuobj-size-is-smaller-then-nvkm_gpuobj-size-ca.patch still
> succeeded, so apparently the method is not perfectly correct. Rather
> strangely the printk'd value of 0x100ce0 is 0x00000000...

Yeah, everyone, don't bother trying this.  This register is written by the
secure boot ucode, so the problem remains unsolved.

You are receiving this mail because:
  • You are the assignee for the bug.
= --14797110571.A303Aaa1f.28701-- --===============1412860800== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 Content-Disposition: inline X19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX18KTm91dmVhdSBt YWlsaW5nIGxpc3QKTm91dmVhdUBsaXN0cy5mcmVlZGVza3RvcC5vcmcKaHR0cHM6Ly9saXN0cy5m cmVlZGVza3RvcC5vcmcvbWFpbG1hbi9saXN0aW5mby9ub3V2ZWF1Cg== --===============1412860800==--