From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: bugzilla-daemon-CC+yJ3UmIYqDUpFQwHEjaQ@public.gmane.org Subject: [Bug 94990] [GM204] GTX 970 + 4GB VRAM fails at secboot (v4.6+) Date: Thu, 24 Nov 2016 21:33:51 +0000 Message-ID: References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============0487926995==" Return-path: In-Reply-To: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: nouveau-bounces-PD4FTy7X32lNgt0PjOBp9y5qC8QIuHrW@public.gmane.org Sender: "Nouveau" To: nouveau-PD4FTy7X32lNgt0PjOBp9y5qC8QIuHrW@public.gmane.org List-Id: nouveau.vger.kernel.org --===============0487926995== Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="14800232315.9E6D2.14321"; charset="UTF-8" --14800232315.9E6D2.14321 Date: Thu, 24 Nov 2016 21:33:51 +0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://bugs.freedesktop.org/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3D94990 --- Comment #97 from Efrem McCrimon --- Hi all: Please help me understand the ram issue on the video card, is too many buffers created? I did not have this problem on a 4.6 kernel, now the kernel has been upgraded twice, 4.8.5, and now 4.8.6. No problems using a 960 GTX w/4GB DDR5 memory, plus I have a secondary 730 GTw/1GB RAM. Please advice On Wed, Nov 23, 2016 at 8:09 PM, wrote: > *Comment # 96 = on > bug 94990 from Zach > Wolfe * > > Could someone point me to how exactly to apply > "0001-nvkm_gpuobj-size-is-smaller-then-nvkm_gpuobj-size-ca.patch"? > > ------------------------------ > You are receiving this mail because: > > - You are the assignee for the bug. > > > _______________________________________________ > Nouveau mailing list > Nouveau-PD4FTy7X32lNgt0PjOBp9y5qC8QIuHrW@public.gmane.org > https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/nouveau > > --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.= --14800232315.9E6D2.14321 Date: Thu, 24 Nov 2016 21:33:51 +0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://bugs.freedesktop.org/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated

Commen= t # 97 on bug 94990<= /a> from Efrem McCrimon 
Hi all:

Please help me understand the ram issue on the video card, is too many
buffers created?  I did not have this problem on a 4.6 kernel, now the
kernel has been upgraded twice, 4.8.5, and now 4.8.6.  No problems using a
960 GTX w/4GB DDR5 memory, plus I have a secondary 730 GTw/1GB RAM.

Please advice

On Wed, Nov 23, 2016 at 8:09 PM, <bugzilla-daemon@freedesktop.org> wrote:

> *Comment=
 # 96 <https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_b=
ug.cgi?id=3D94990#c96> on
> bug 94990 <https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.c=
gi?id=3D94990> from Zach
> Wolfe <zwolfe21@hot=
mail.com> *
>
> Could someone point me to how exactly to apply
> "0001-nvkm_gpuobj-size-is-smaller-then-nvkm_gpuobj-size-ca.patch&=
quot;?
>
> ------------------------------
> You are receiving this mail because:
>
>    - You are the assignee for the bug.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Nouveau mailing list
> Nouveau@lists=
.freedesktop.org
> htt=
ps://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/nouveau
>
>

You are receiving this mail because:
  • You are the assignee for the bug.
= --14800232315.9E6D2.14321-- --===============0487926995== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 Content-Disposition: inline X19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX18KTm91dmVhdSBt YWlsaW5nIGxpc3QKTm91dmVhdUBsaXN0cy5mcmVlZGVza3RvcC5vcmcKaHR0cHM6Ly9saXN0cy5m cmVlZGVza3RvcC5vcmcvbWFpbG1hbi9saXN0aW5mby9ub3V2ZWF1Cg== --===============0487926995==--