From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: bugzilla-daemon-CC+yJ3UmIYqDUpFQwHEjaQ@public.gmane.org Subject: [Bug 94990] [GM204] GTX 970 + 4GB VRAM fails at secboot (v4.6+) Date: Mon, 21 Nov 2016 05:58:05 +0000 Message-ID: References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============1471220535==" Return-path: In-Reply-To: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: nouveau-bounces-PD4FTy7X32lNgt0PjOBp9y5qC8QIuHrW@public.gmane.org Sender: "Nouveau" To: nouveau-PD4FTy7X32lNgt0PjOBp9y5qC8QIuHrW@public.gmane.org List-Id: nouveau.vger.kernel.org --===============1471220535== Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="14797078855.9B28ebb4.25433"; charset="UTF-8" --14797078855.9B28ebb4.25433 Date: Mon, 21 Nov 2016 05:58:05 +0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://bugs.freedesktop.org/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3D94990 --- Comment #94 from Alexandre Courbot --- Created attachment 128093 --> https://bugs.freedesktop.org/attachment.cgi?id=3D128093&action=3Dedit Log with patch 128091 Hi Ben, Patch did not do the trick for me (log attached). Confirmed that 0001-nvkm_gpuobj-size-is-smaller-then-nvkm_gpuobj-size-ca.patch still succeeded, so apparently the method is not perfectly correct. Rather strang= ely the printk'd value of 0x100ce0 is 0x00000000... --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.= --14797078855.9B28ebb4.25433 Date: Mon, 21 Nov 2016 05:58:05 +0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://bugs.freedesktop.org/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated

Commen= t # 94 on bug 94990<= /a> from Alexandre Courbot
Created attachment 128093<=
/a> [details]
Log with patch 128091

Hi Ben,

Patch did not do the trick for me (log attached). Confirmed that
0001-nvkm_gpuobj-size-is-smaller-then-nvkm_gpuobj-size-ca.patch still
succeeded, so apparently the method is not perfectly correct. Rather strang=
ely
the printk'd value of 0x100ce0 is 0x00000000...


You are receiving this mail because:
  • You are the assignee for the bug.
= --14797078855.9B28ebb4.25433-- --===============1471220535== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 Content-Disposition: inline X19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX18KTm91dmVhdSBt YWlsaW5nIGxpc3QKTm91dmVhdUBsaXN0cy5mcmVlZGVza3RvcC5vcmcKaHR0cHM6Ly9saXN0cy5m cmVlZGVza3RvcC5vcmcvbWFpbG1hbi9saXN0aW5mby9ub3V2ZWF1Cg== --===============1471220535==--