From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Miles Bader Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC] rebase: add --revisions flag Date: Wed, 09 Dec 2009 13:51:41 +0900 Message-ID: References: <20091208144740.GA30830@redhat.com> <20091208160822.GA1299@atjola.homenet> <20091208161406.GB32045@redhat.com> <20091208163737.GA2005@atjola.homenet> <20091208164449.GA32204@redhat.com> Reply-To: Miles Bader Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: =?iso-8859-1?Q?Bj=F6rn?= Steinbrink , git@vger.kernel.org, Junio C Hamano To: "Michael S. Tsirkin" X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Wed Dec 09 05:52:47 2009 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@lo.gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1NIEX9-0006Xe-6x for gcvg-git-2@lo.gmane.org; Wed, 09 Dec 2009 05:52:15 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756915AbZLIEwE (ORCPT ); Tue, 8 Dec 2009 23:52:04 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1755803AbZLIEwC (ORCPT ); Tue, 8 Dec 2009 23:52:02 -0500 Received: from TYO201.gate.nec.co.jp ([202.32.8.193]:65062 "EHLO tyo201.gate.nec.co.jp" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755972AbZLIEwB (ORCPT ); Tue, 8 Dec 2009 23:52:01 -0500 Received: from relay11.aps.necel.com ([10.29.19.46]) by tyo201.gate.nec.co.jp (8.13.8/8.13.4) with ESMTP id nB94pgtt002957; Wed, 9 Dec 2009 13:51:42 +0900 (JST) Received: from relay11.aps.necel.com ([10.29.19.24] [10.29.19.24]) by relay11.aps.necel.com with ESMTP; Wed, 9 Dec 2009 13:51:42 +0900 Received: from dhlpc061 ([10.114.114.39] [10.114.114.39]) by relay11.aps.necel.com with ESMTP; Wed, 9 Dec 2009 13:51:41 +0900 Received: by dhlpc061 (Postfix, from userid 31295) id AC2E352E1FC; Wed, 9 Dec 2009 13:51:41 +0900 (JST) System-Type: x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu Blat: Foop In-Reply-To: <20091208164449.GA32204@redhat.com> (Michael S. Tsirkin's message of "Tue, 8 Dec 2009 18:44:49 +0200") Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: "Michael S. Tsirkin" writes: > OTOH, rebase --revisions as I implemented is a "smarter cherry-pick" which > can't easily be achieved with existing commands, especially if you add > "-i". It also allows making use of rebase's rather extensive machinery for dealing with conflicts (e.g., rebase --continue / --skip / --abort). But it would make more sense to have it in cherry-pick... (cherry-pick --continue / --skip / --abort...) -Miles -- Consult, v.i. To seek another's disapproval of a course already decided on.