From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S971727AbeEXVxI (ORCPT ); Thu, 24 May 2018 17:53:08 -0400 Received: from mailout.easymail.ca ([64.68.200.34]:46685 "EHLO mailout.easymail.ca" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S966391AbeEXVxF (ORCPT ); Thu, 24 May 2018 17:53:05 -0400 Subject: Re: [PATCH 4.4 00/92] 4.4.133-stable review To: Naresh Kamboju , Guenter Roeck Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman , open list , patches@kernelci.org, lkft-triage@lists.linaro.org, Ben Hutchings , linux- stable , Andrew Morton , Linus Torvalds , Shuah Khan References: <20180524093159.286472249@linuxfoundation.org> <20180524180652.7bqyquqfe2nqdxfg@xps> <20180524181739.GB13327@roeck-us.net> From: Shuah Khan Message-ID: Date: Thu, 24 May 2018 15:52:49 -0600 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.7.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 05/24/2018 03:34 PM, Naresh Kamboju wrote: > On 24 May 2018 at 23:47, Guenter Roeck wrote: >> On Thu, May 24, 2018 at 01:06:52PM -0500, Dan Rue wrote: >>> On Thu, May 24, 2018 at 11:37:37AM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: >>>> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.4.133 release. >>>> There are 92 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response >>>> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please >>>> let me know. >>>> >>>> Responses should be made by Sat May 26 09:31:28 UTC 2018. >>>> Anything received after that time might be too late. >>> >>> Results from Linaro’s test farm. >>> No regressions on arm64, arm and x86_64. >>> >>> Summary >>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>> >>> kernel: 4.4.133-rc1 >>> git repo: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git >>> git branch: linux-4.4.y >>> git commit: 915a3d7cdea9daa9e9fb6b855f10c1312e6910c4 >>> git describe: v4.4.132-93-g915a3d7cdea9 >>> Test details: https://qa-reports.linaro.org/lkft/linux-stable-rc-4.4-oe/build/v4.4.132-93-g915a3d7cdea9 >>> >>> >>> No regressions (compared to build v4.4.132-71-g180635995c36) >>> >> >> Shouldn't this compare against v4.4.132 ? >> >> I looked into kselftest/rtnetlink.sh test results. >> The test history is a bit confusing. >> >> - v4.4.131-57-ge33795f7a573 and earlier passed >> - v4.4.132 failed >> - v4.4.132-30-ga102378c6551 passed >> ... >> - v4.4.132-70-gaa7ab28e9c5e passed >> - v4.4.132-71-g180635995c36 and later failed >> >> Does that mean that this specific test is unreliable ? > > kselftest rtnetlink.sh test case failure is not a regression on 4.16, > 4.14, 4.9 and 4.4 builds. > Because it used to skip due to missing tc tool. > > Now the ''tc' tool added to Open Embedded build and test running and > reported failed. > This is not a regression in the kernel. > It is a change in the user space. > > Old output > ============ > SKIP: Could not run test without the tc tool > selftests: rtnetlink.sh [PASS] > https://lkft.validation.linaro.org/scheduler/job/225015#L2255 > > > New output > ============= > RTNETLINK answers: Operation not supported > Cannot find device \"test-dummy0\" > FAIL: cannot add dummy interface > selftests: rtnetlink.sh [FAIL] > https://lkft.validation.linaro.org/scheduler/job/226352#L3375 > > Ref bug link: > https://bugs.linaro.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3834 > > - Naresh > Which kselftest versdion do you run? Is this from linux-next? thanks, -- Shuah