All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
To: Maxim Levitsky <mlevitsk@redhat.com>, kvm@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Oliver Upton <oupton@google.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
	Sean Christopherson <sean.j.christopherson@intel.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	open list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>,
	Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>,
	Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@tencent.com>,
	Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>, Jim Mattson <jmattson@google.com>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
	"open list:DOCUMENTATION" <linux-doc@vger.kernel.org>,
	Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>,
	"maintainer:X86 ARCHITECTURE (32-BIT AND 64-BIT)"
	<x86@kernel.org>, Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] KVM: x86: introduce KVM_X86_QUIRK_TSC_HOST_ACCESS
Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2020 14:54:01 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <c093973e-c8da-4d09-11f2-61cc0918f55f@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20201130133559.233242-3-mlevitsk@redhat.com>

On 30/11/20 14:35, Maxim Levitsky wrote:
> This quirk reflects the fact that we currently treat MSR_IA32_TSC
> and MSR_TSC_ADJUST access by the host (e.g qemu) in a way that is different
> compared to an access from the guest.
> 
> For host's MSR_IA32_TSC read we currently always return L1 TSC value, and for
> host's write we do the tsc synchronization.
> 
> For host's MSR_TSC_ADJUST write, we don't make the tsc 'jump' as we should
> for this msr.
> 
> When the hypervisor uses the new TSC GET/SET state ioctls, all of this is no
> longer needed, thus leave this enabled only with a quirk
> which the hypervisor can disable.
> 
> Suggested-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
> Signed-off-by: Maxim Levitsky <mlevitsk@redhat.com>

This needs to be covered by a variant of the existing selftests testcase 
(running the same guest code, but different host code of course).

Paolo

> ---
>   arch/x86/include/uapi/asm/kvm.h |  1 +
>   arch/x86/kvm/x86.c              | 19 ++++++++++++++-----
>   2 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/x86/include/uapi/asm/kvm.h b/arch/x86/include/uapi/asm/kvm.h
> index 8e76d3701db3f..2a60fc6674164 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/include/uapi/asm/kvm.h
> +++ b/arch/x86/include/uapi/asm/kvm.h
> @@ -404,6 +404,7 @@ struct kvm_sync_regs {
>   #define KVM_X86_QUIRK_LAPIC_MMIO_HOLE	   (1 << 2)
>   #define KVM_X86_QUIRK_OUT_7E_INC_RIP	   (1 << 3)
>   #define KVM_X86_QUIRK_MISC_ENABLE_NO_MWAIT (1 << 4)
> +#define KVM_X86_QUIRK_TSC_HOST_ACCESS      (1 << 5)
>   
>   #define KVM_STATE_NESTED_FORMAT_VMX	0
>   #define KVM_STATE_NESTED_FORMAT_SVM	1
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
> index 4f0ae9cb14b8a..46a2111d54840 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
> @@ -3091,7 +3091,8 @@ int kvm_set_msr_common(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct msr_data *msr_info)
>   		break;
>   	case MSR_IA32_TSC_ADJUST:
>   		if (guest_cpuid_has(vcpu, X86_FEATURE_TSC_ADJUST)) {
> -			if (!msr_info->host_initiated) {
> +			if (!msr_info->host_initiated ||
> +			    !kvm_check_has_quirk(vcpu->kvm, KVM_X86_QUIRK_TSC_HOST_ACCESS)) {
>   				s64 adj = data - vcpu->arch.ia32_tsc_adjust_msr;
>   				adjust_tsc_offset_guest(vcpu, adj);
>   			}
> @@ -3118,7 +3119,8 @@ int kvm_set_msr_common(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct msr_data *msr_info)
>   		vcpu->arch.msr_ia32_power_ctl = data;
>   		break;
>   	case MSR_IA32_TSC:
> -		if (msr_info->host_initiated) {
> +		if (msr_info->host_initiated &&
> +		    kvm_check_has_quirk(vcpu->kvm, KVM_X86_QUIRK_TSC_HOST_ACCESS)) {
>   			kvm_synchronize_tsc(vcpu, data);
>   		} else {
>   			u64 adj = kvm_compute_tsc_offset(vcpu, data) - vcpu->arch.l1_tsc_offset;
> @@ -3409,17 +3411,24 @@ int kvm_get_msr_common(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct msr_data *msr_info)
>   		msr_info->data = vcpu->arch.msr_ia32_power_ctl;
>   		break;
>   	case MSR_IA32_TSC: {
> +		u64 tsc_offset;
> +
>   		/*
>   		 * Intel SDM states that MSR_IA32_TSC read adds the TSC offset
>   		 * even when not intercepted. AMD manual doesn't explicitly
>   		 * state this but appears to behave the same.
>   		 *
> -		 * On userspace reads and writes, however, we unconditionally
> +		 * On userspace reads and writes, when KVM_X86_QUIRK_SPECIAL_TSC_READ
> +		 * is present, however, we unconditionally
>   		 * return L1's TSC value to ensure backwards-compatible
>   		 * behavior for migration.
>   		 */
> -		u64 tsc_offset = msr_info->host_initiated ? vcpu->arch.l1_tsc_offset :
> -							    vcpu->arch.tsc_offset;
> +
> +		if (msr_info->host_initiated &&
> +		    kvm_check_has_quirk(vcpu->kvm, KVM_X86_QUIRK_TSC_HOST_ACCESS))
> +			tsc_offset = vcpu->arch.l1_tsc_offset;
> +		else
> +			tsc_offset = vcpu->arch.tsc_offset;
>   
>   		msr_info->data = kvm_scale_tsc(vcpu, rdtsc()) + tsc_offset;
>   		break;
> 


  reply	other threads:[~2020-11-30 13:56 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-11-30 13:35 [PATCH 0/2] RFC: Precise TSC migration Maxim Levitsky
2020-11-30 13:35 ` [PATCH 1/2] KVM: x86: implement KVM_SET_TSC_PRECISE/KVM_GET_TSC_PRECISE Maxim Levitsky
2020-11-30 14:33   ` Paolo Bonzini
2020-11-30 15:58     ` Maxim Levitsky
2020-11-30 17:01       ` Paolo Bonzini
2020-12-01 19:43   ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-12-03 11:11     ` Maxim Levitsky
2020-11-30 13:35 ` [PATCH 2/2] KVM: x86: introduce KVM_X86_QUIRK_TSC_HOST_ACCESS Maxim Levitsky
2020-11-30 13:54   ` Paolo Bonzini [this message]
2020-11-30 14:11     ` Maxim Levitsky
2020-11-30 14:15       ` Paolo Bonzini
2020-11-30 15:33         ` Maxim Levitsky
2020-11-30 13:38 ` [PATCH 0/2] RFC: Precise TSC migration (summary) Maxim Levitsky
2020-11-30 16:54 ` [PATCH 0/2] RFC: Precise TSC migration Andy Lutomirski
2020-11-30 16:59   ` Paolo Bonzini
2020-11-30 19:16 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2020-12-01 12:30   ` Maxim Levitsky
2020-12-01 19:48     ` Marcelo Tosatti
2020-12-03 11:39       ` Maxim Levitsky
2020-12-03 20:18         ` Marcelo Tosatti
2020-12-07 13:00           ` Maxim Levitsky
2020-12-01 13:48   ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-12-01 15:02     ` Marcelo Tosatti
2020-12-03 11:51       ` Maxim Levitsky
2020-12-01 14:01   ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-12-01 16:19     ` Andy Lutomirski
2020-12-03 11:57       ` Maxim Levitsky
2020-12-01 19:35 ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-12-03 11:41   ` Paolo Bonzini
2020-12-03 12:47   ` Maxim Levitsky

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=c093973e-c8da-4d09-11f2-61cc0918f55f@redhat.com \
    --to=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=corbet@lwn.net \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=jmattson@google.com \
    --cc=joro@8bytes.org \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=mlevitsk@redhat.com \
    --cc=mtosatti@redhat.com \
    --cc=oupton@google.com \
    --cc=sean.j.christopherson@intel.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=vkuznets@redhat.com \
    --cc=wanpengli@tencent.com \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.