All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
To: Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>, ChiYuan Huang <u0084500@gmail.com>
Cc: Heikki Krogerus <heikki.krogerus@linux.intel.com>,
	linux-usb@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	cy_huang <cy_huang@richtek.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] usb: typec: tcpm: Fix if vbus before cc, hard_reset_count not reset issue
Date: Fri, 2 Oct 2020 07:26:24 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <c2d689eb-5538-6af2-614f-766521100273@roeck-us.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20201002133145.GA3384841@kroah.com>

On 10/2/20 6:31 AM, Greg KH wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 15, 2020 at 11:07:18AM +0800, ChiYuan Huang wrote:
>> Hi, Guenter:
>>
>> ChiYuan Huang <u0084500@gmail.com> 於 2020年9月6日 週日 下午11:22寫道:
>>>
>>> Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net> 於 2020年9月5日 週六 下午11:51寫道:
>>>>
>>>> On 9/4/20 6:24 PM, ChiYuan Huang wrote:
>>>>> Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net> 於 2020年9月5日 週六 上午3:41寫道:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 9/3/20 9:21 AM, ChiYuan Huang wrote:
>>>>>>> Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net> 於 2020年9月3日 週四 上午12:57寫道:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Wed, Sep 02, 2020 at 11:35:33PM +0800, cy_huang wrote:
>>>>>>>>> From: ChiYuan Huang <cy_huang@richtek.com>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Fix: If vbus event is before cc_event trigger, hard_reset_count
>>>>>>>>> won't bt reset for some case.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Signed-off-by: ChiYuan Huang <cy_huang@richtek.com>
>>>>>>>>> ---
>>>>>>>>> Below's the flow.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> _tcpm_pd_vbus_off() -> run_state_machine to change state to SNK_UNATTACHED
>>>>>>>>> call tcpm_snk_detach() -> tcpm_snk_detach() -> tcpm_detach()
>>>>>>>>> tcpm_port_is_disconnected() will be called.
>>>>>>>>> But port->attached is still true and port->cc1=open and port->cc2=open
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> It cause tcpm_port_is_disconnected return false, then hard_reset_count won't be reset.
>>>>>>>>> After that, tcpm_reset_port() is called.
>>>>>>>>> port->attached become false.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> After that, cc now trigger cc_change event, the hard_reset_count will be kept.
>>>>>>>>> Even tcpm_detach will be called, due to port->attached is false, tcpm_detach()
>>>>>>>>> will directly return.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> CC_EVENT will only trigger drp toggling again.
>>>>>>>>> ---
>>>>>>>>>  drivers/usb/typec/tcpm/tcpm.c | 3 +--
>>>>>>>>>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> diff --git a/drivers/usb/typec/tcpm/tcpm.c b/drivers/usb/typec/tcpm/tcpm.c
>>>>>>>>> index a48e3f90..5c73e1d 100644
>>>>>>>>> --- a/drivers/usb/typec/tcpm/tcpm.c
>>>>>>>>> +++ b/drivers/usb/typec/tcpm/tcpm.c
>>>>>>>>> @@ -2797,8 +2797,7 @@ static void tcpm_detach(struct tcpm_port *port)
>>>>>>>>>               port->tcpc->set_bist_data(port->tcpc, false);
>>>>>>>>>       }
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> -     if (tcpm_port_is_disconnected(port))
>>>>>>>>> -             port->hard_reset_count = 0;
>>>>>>>>> +     port->hard_reset_count = 0;
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Doesn't that mean that the state machine will never enter
>>>>>>>> error recovery ?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I think it does't affect the error recovery.
>>>>>>> All error recovery seems to check pd_capable flag.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> >From my below case, it's A to C cable only. There is no USBPD contract
>>>>>>> will be estabilished.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> This case occurred following by the below test condition
>>>>>>> Cable -> A to C (default Rp bind to vbus) connected to PC.
>>>>>>> 1. first time plugged in the cable with PC
>>>>>>> It will make HARD_RESET_COUNT  to be equal 2
>>>>>>> 2. And then plug out. At that time HARD_RESET_COUNT is till 2.
>>>>>>> 3. next time plugged in again.
>>>>>>> Due to hard_reset_count is still 2 , after wait_cap_timeout, the state
>>>>>>> eventually changed to SNK_READY.
>>>>>>> But during the state transition, no hard_reset  be sent.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Defined in the USBPD policy engine, typec transition to USBPD, all
>>>>>>> variables must be reset included hard_reset_count.
>>>>>>> So it expected SNK must send hard_reset again.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> The original code defined hard_reset_count must be reset only when
>>>>>>> tcpm_port_is_disconnected.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> It doesn't make sense that it only occurred in some scenario.
>>>>>>> If tcpm_detach is called, hard_reset count must be reset also.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> If a hard reset fails, the state machine may cycle through states
>>>>>> HARD_RESET_SEND, HARD_RESET_START, SRC_HARD_RESET_VBUS_OFF,
>>>>>> SRC_HARD_RESET_VBUS_ON back to SRC_UNATTACHED. In this state,
>>>>>> tcpm_src_detach() and with it tcpm_detach() is called. The hard
>>>>>> reset counter is incremented in HARD_RESET_SEND. If tcpm_detach()
>>>>>> resets the counter, the state machine will keep cycling through hard
>>>>>> resets without ever entering the error recovery state. I am not
>>>>>> entirely sure where the counter should be reset, but tcpm_detach()
>>>>>> seems to be the wrong place.
>>>>>
>>>>> This case you specified means locally error occurred.
>>>>
>>>> It could be a local error (with the local hardware), or with the
>>>> remote partner not accepting the reset. We only know that an error
>>>> occurred.
>>>>
>>>>> It intended to re-run the state machine from typec  to USBPD.
>>>>> >From my understanding, hard_reset_count to be reset is reasonable.
>>>>>
>>>>> The normal stare from the state transition you specified is
>>>>> HARD_RESET_SEND, HARD_RESET_START -> SRC_HARD_RESET_VBUS_OFF,
>>>>> SRC_HARD_RESET_VBUS_ON -> received VBUS_EVENT then go to SRC_STARTUP.
>>>>>
>>>> The operational word is "normal". Error recovery is expected to handle
>>>> situations which are not normal.
>>>
>>> Following by the USBPD 3.0 revision 1.2, section 8.3.3.24.1
>>> The ErrorRecovery state is  used to electronically disconnect Port
>>> Partner using the USB Type-C connector.
>>> And there's one sentence to be said "The ErrorRecovery staste shall
>>> map to USB Type-C Error Recovery state operations".
>>> I also read ErrorRecovery state in USB TYPE-C 1.3 spec.
>>> Section 4.5.2.2.2.1   ErrorRecovery state requirement listed the below text.
>>> The port shall not drive VBUS or VCONN, and shall present a
>>> high-impedance to ground (above
>>> zOPEN) on its CC1 and CC2 pins.
>>> Section 4.5.2.2.2.2 Exiting from the error recovery state
>>> I read the description. The roughly meaning is to change the state to
>>> Unattached(Src or Snk) after tErrorRecovery.
>>>
>>> Summary the above text.
>>> Reset HardResetCounter is ok in tcpm_detach.
>>> My patch is just to relax the counter reset conditions during tcpm_detach().
>>> If not, it will check tcpm_port_is_disconnected().
>>> And only two scenario, the hard reset count will be cleared to 0 at this case.
>>> 1) port not attached and cc1=open and cc2=open
>>> 2) port attached and either (polarity=cc1, cc1=open) or (polarity=cc2, cc2=open)
>>>
>>> I think this judgement is narrow in tcpm_detach case.
>>>
>>>>
>>>> I don't question the need to reset the counter. The only question
>>>> is where and when to reset it.
>>>>
>>> I re-check all tcpm code for hard reset counter about the increment and reset.
>>> They all meets USBPD spec. Only the detach case, I'm wondering why it
>>> need to add the check for tcpm_port_is_disconnected().
>>>
>> Below's the real case log.
>> [ 4848.046358] VBUS off
>> [ 4848.046384] state change SNK_READY -> SNK_UNATTACHED
>> [ 4848.050908] Setting voltage/current limit 0 mV 0 mA
>> [ 4848.050936] polarity 0
>> [ 4848.052593] Requesting mux state 0, usb-role 0, orientation 0
>> [ 4848.053222] Start toggling
>> [ 4848.086500] state change SNK_UNATTACHED -> TOGGLING
>> [ 4848.089983] CC1: 0 -> 0, CC2: 3 -> 3 [state TOGGLING, polarity 0, connected]
>> [ 4848.089993] state change TOGGLING -> SNK_ATTACH_WAIT
>> [ 4848.090031] pending state change SNK_ATTACH_WAIT -> SNK_DEBOUNCED @ 200 ms
>> [ 4848.141162] CC1: 0 -> 0, CC2: 3 -> 0 [state SNK_ATTACH_WAIT,
>> polarity 0, disconnected]
>> [ 4848.141170] state change SNK_ATTACH_WAIT -> SNK_ATTACH_WAIT
>> [ 4848.141184] pending state change SNK_ATTACH_WAIT -> SNK_UNATTACHED @ 20 ms
>> [ 4848.163156] state change SNK_ATTACH_WAIT -> SNK_UNATTACHED [delayed 20 ms]
>> [ 4848.163162] Start toggling
>> [ 4848.216918] CC1: 0 -> 0, CC2: 0 -> 3 [state TOGGLING, polarity 0, connected]
>> [ 4848.216954] state change TOGGLING -> SNK_ATTACH_WAIT
>> [ 4848.217080] pending state change SNK_ATTACH_WAIT -> SNK_DEBOUNCED @ 200 ms
>> [ 4848.231771] CC1: 0 -> 0, CC2: 3 -> 0 [state SNK_ATTACH_WAIT,
>> polarity 0, disconnected]
>> [ 4848.231800] state change SNK_ATTACH_WAIT -> SNK_ATTACH_WAIT
>> [ 4848.231857] pending state change SNK_ATTACH_WAIT -> SNK_UNATTACHED @ 20 ms
>> [ 4848.256022] state change SNK_ATTACH_WAIT -> SNK_UNATTACHED [delayed 20 ms]
>> [ 4848.256049] Start toggling
>> [ 4848.871148] VBUS on
>> [ 4848.885324] CC1: 0 -> 0, CC2: 0 -> 3 [state TOGGLING, polarity 0, connected]
>> [ 4848.885372] state change TOGGLING -> SNK_ATTACH_WAIT
>> [ 4848.885548] pending state change SNK_ATTACH_WAIT -> SNK_DEBOUNCED @ 200 ms
>> [ 4849.088240] state change SNK_ATTACH_WAIT -> SNK_DEBOUNCED [delayed 200 ms]
>> [ 4849.088284] state change SNK_DEBOUNCED -> SNK_ATTACHED
>> [ 4849.088291] polarity 1
>> [ 4849.088769] Requesting mux state 1, usb-role 2, orientation 2
>> [ 4849.088895] state change SNK_ATTACHED -> SNK_STARTUP
>> [ 4849.088907] state change SNK_STARTUP -> SNK_DISCOVERY
>> [ 4849.088915] Setting voltage/current limit 5000 mV 0 mA
>> [ 4849.088927] vbus=0 charge:=1
>> [ 4849.090505] state change SNK_DISCOVERY -> SNK_WAIT_CAPABILITIES
>> [ 4849.090828] pending state change SNK_WAIT_CAPABILITIES -> SNK_READY @ 240 ms
>> [ 4849.335878] state change SNK_WAIT_CAPABILITIES -> SNK_READY [delayed 240 ms]
>>
>> You can see the next type c attach log.
>> It directly change state from SNK_WAIT_CAPABILITIES to SNK_READY due
>> to not reset hard_reset_count.
>>
>> It's easy to reproduce if you plugout USB Adapater w/i AtoC cable connected.
> 
> What ever happened with this patch, is there still disagreement?
> 

Yes, there is. I wouldn't have added the conditional without reason,
and I am concerned that removing it entirely will open another problem.
Feel free to apply, though - I can't prove that my concern is valid,
and after all we'll get reports from the field later if it is.

Guenter

  reply	other threads:[~2020-10-02 14:26 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-09-02 15:35 [PATCH] usb: typec: tcpm: Fix if vbus before cc, hard_reset_count not reset issue cy_huang
2020-09-02 16:57 ` Guenter Roeck
2020-09-03 16:21   ` ChiYuan Huang
2020-09-04 19:41     ` Guenter Roeck
2020-09-05  1:24       ` ChiYuan Huang
2020-09-05 15:51         ` Guenter Roeck
2020-09-06 15:22           ` ChiYuan Huang
2020-09-15  3:07             ` ChiYuan Huang
2020-10-02 13:31               ` Greg KH
2020-10-02 14:26                 ` Guenter Roeck [this message]
2020-10-05 11:08                   ` Greg KH
2020-10-05 15:30                     ` Guenter Roeck
2020-10-06  4:37                       ` ChiYuan Huang
2020-10-06 16:52                         ` Jun Li
2020-10-06 17:39                           ` ChiYuan Huang
2020-10-07 10:13                             ` ChiYuan Huang
2020-10-09  6:12                               ` Jun Li
2020-10-09 16:06                                 ` ChiYuan Huang
2020-10-10 11:21                                   ` Jun Li
2020-10-10 19:31                                     ` Guenter Roeck
2020-10-12  6:22                                       ` ChiYuan Huang
2020-10-12  9:25                                         ` Jun Li
2020-10-12  8:58                                       ` Jun Li
2020-10-10 15:46                                   ` Guenter Roeck
2020-10-09  2:58                             ` Jun Li

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=c2d689eb-5538-6af2-614f-766521100273@roeck-us.net \
    --to=linux@roeck-us.net \
    --cc=cy_huang@richtek.com \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=heikki.krogerus@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-usb@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=u0084500@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.