All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Guoqing Jiang <guoqing.jiang@linux.dev>
To: Ojaswin Mujoo <ojaswin@linux.ibm.com>,
	linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Cc: Ritesh Harjani <riteshh@linux.ibm.com>,
	linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>, Kemeng Shi <shikemeng@huaweicloud.com>,
	Ritesh Harjani <ritesh.list@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 09/12] ext4: Ensure ext4_mb_prefetch_fini() is called for all prefetched BGs
Date: Tue, 6 Jun 2023 22:00:57 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <c3173405-713d-d2eb-bd9c-af8b8c747533@linux.dev> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <05e648ae04ec5b754207032823e9c1de9a54f87a.1685449706.git.ojaswin@linux.ibm.com>

Hello,

On 5/30/23 20:33, Ojaswin Mujoo wrote:
> Before this patch, the call stack in ext4_run_li_request is as follows:
>
>    /*
>     * nr = no. of BGs we want to fetch (=s_mb_prefetch)
>     * prefetch_ios = no. of BGs not uptodate after
>     * 		    ext4_read_block_bitmap_nowait()
>     */
>    next_group = ext4_mb_prefetch(sb, group, nr, prefetch_ios);
>    ext4_mb_prefetch_fini(sb, next_group prefetch_ios);
>
> ext4_mb_prefetch_fini() will only try to initialize buddies for BGs in
> range [next_group - prefetch_ios, next_group). This is incorrect since
> sometimes (prefetch_ios < nr), which causes ext4_mb_prefetch_fini() to
> incorrectly ignore some of the BGs that might need initialization. This
> issue is more notable now with the previous patch enabling "fetching" of
> BLOCK_UNINIT BGs which are marked buffer_uptodate by default.
>
> Fix this by passing nr to ext4_mb_prefetch_fini() instead of
> prefetch_ios so that it considers the right range of groups.

Thanks for the series.

> Similarly, make sure we don't pass nr=0 to ext4_mb_prefetch_fini() in
> ext4_mb_regular_allocator() since we might have prefetched BLOCK_UNINIT
> groups that would need buddy initialization.

Seems ext4_mb_prefetch_fini can't be called by ext4_mb_regular_allocator
if nr is 0.

https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v6.4-rc5/source/fs/ext4/mballoc.c#L2816

Am I miss something?

Thanks,
Guoqing

> Signed-off-by: Ojaswin Mujoo<ojaswin@linux.ibm.com>
> Reviewed-by: Ritesh Harjani (IBM)<ritesh.list@gmail.com>
> Reviewed-by: Jan Kara<jack@suse.cz>
> ---
>   fs/ext4/mballoc.c |  4 ----
>   fs/ext4/super.c   | 11 ++++-------
>   2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/ext4/mballoc.c b/fs/ext4/mballoc.c
> index 79455c7e645b..6775d73dfc68 100644
> --- a/fs/ext4/mballoc.c
> +++ b/fs/ext4/mballoc.c
> @@ -2735,8 +2735,6 @@ ext4_mb_regular_allocator(struct ext4_allocation_context *ac)
>   			if ((prefetch_grp == group) &&
>   			    (cr > CR1 ||
>   			     prefetch_ios < sbi->s_mb_prefetch_limit)) {
> -				unsigned int curr_ios = prefetch_ios;
> -
>   				nr = sbi->s_mb_prefetch;
>   				if (ext4_has_feature_flex_bg(sb)) {
>   					nr = 1 << sbi->s_log_groups_per_flex;
> @@ -2745,8 +2743,6 @@ ext4_mb_regular_allocator(struct ext4_allocation_context *ac)
>   				}
>   				prefetch_grp = ext4_mb_prefetch(sb, group,
>   							nr, &prefetch_ios);
> -				if (prefetch_ios == curr_ios)
> -					nr = 0;
>   			}
>   
>   			/* This now checks without needing the buddy page */
> diff --git a/fs/ext4/super.c b/fs/ext4/super.c
> index 2da5476fa48b..27c1dabacd43 100644
> --- a/fs/ext4/super.c
> +++ b/fs/ext4/super.c
> @@ -3692,16 +3692,13 @@ static int ext4_run_li_request(struct ext4_li_request *elr)
>   	ext4_group_t group = elr->lr_next_group;
>   	unsigned int prefetch_ios = 0;
>   	int ret = 0;
> +	int nr = EXT4_SB(sb)->s_mb_prefetch;
>   	u64 start_time;
>   
>   	if (elr->lr_mode == EXT4_LI_MODE_PREFETCH_BBITMAP) {
> -		elr->lr_next_group = ext4_mb_prefetch(sb, group,
> -				EXT4_SB(sb)->s_mb_prefetch, &prefetch_ios);
> -		if (prefetch_ios)
> -			ext4_mb_prefetch_fini(sb, elr->lr_next_group,
> -					      prefetch_ios);
> -		trace_ext4_prefetch_bitmaps(sb, group, elr->lr_next_group,
> -					    prefetch_ios);
> +		elr->lr_next_group = ext4_mb_prefetch(sb, group, nr, &prefetch_ios);
> +		ext4_mb_prefetch_fini(sb, elr->lr_next_group, nr);
> +		trace_ext4_prefetch_bitmaps(sb, group, elr->lr_next_group, nr);
>   		if (group >= elr->lr_next_group) {
>   			ret = 1;
>   			if (elr->lr_first_not_zeroed != ngroups &&


  reply	other threads:[~2023-06-06 14:01 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-05-30 12:33 [PATCH v2 00/12] multiblock allocator improvements Ojaswin Mujoo
2023-05-30 12:33 ` [PATCH v2 01/12] Revert "ext4: remove ac->ac_found > sbi->s_mb_min_to_scan dead check in ext4_mb_check_limits" Ojaswin Mujoo
2023-05-30 16:28   ` Sedat Dilek
2023-05-31  8:57     ` Ojaswin Mujoo
2023-06-02 13:45       ` Thorsten Leemhuis
2023-06-02 16:45         ` Theodore Ts'o
2023-05-30 12:33 ` [PATCH v2 02/12] ext4: mballoc: Remove useless setting of ac_criteria Ojaswin Mujoo
2023-05-30 12:33 ` [PATCH v2 03/12] ext4: Remove unused extern variables declaration Ojaswin Mujoo
2023-05-30 12:33 ` [PATCH v2 04/12] ext4: Convert mballoc cr (criteria) to enum Ojaswin Mujoo
2023-06-06 13:13   ` Jan Kara
2023-05-30 12:33 ` [PATCH v2 05/12] ext4: Add per CR extent scanned counter Ojaswin Mujoo
2023-05-30 12:33 ` [PATCH v2 06/12] ext4: Add counter to track successful allocation of goal length Ojaswin Mujoo
2023-05-30 12:33 ` [PATCH v2 07/12] ext4: Avoid scanning smaller extents in BG during CR1 Ojaswin Mujoo
2023-05-30 12:33 ` [PATCH v2 08/12] ext4: Don't skip prefetching BLOCK_UNINIT groups Ojaswin Mujoo
2023-05-30 12:33 ` [PATCH v2 09/12] ext4: Ensure ext4_mb_prefetch_fini() is called for all prefetched BGs Ojaswin Mujoo
2023-06-06 14:00   ` Guoqing Jiang [this message]
2023-06-27  6:51     ` Ojaswin Mujoo
2023-06-28  1:33       ` Guoqing Jiang
2023-05-30 12:33 ` [PATCH v2 10/12] ext4: Abstract out logic to search average fragment list Ojaswin Mujoo
2023-05-30 12:33 ` [PATCH v2 11/12] ext4: Add allocation criteria 1.5 (CR1_5) Ojaswin Mujoo
2023-06-07 10:21   ` Jan Kara
2023-06-08 14:45     ` Theodore Ts'o
2023-06-09 10:57       ` Ojaswin Mujoo
2023-05-30 12:33 ` [PATCH v2 12/12] ext4: Give symbolic names to mballoc criterias Ojaswin Mujoo
2023-06-07 10:39   ` Jan Kara
2023-06-09  3:14 ` [PATCH v2 00/12] multiblock allocator improvements Theodore Ts'o

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=c3173405-713d-d2eb-bd9c-af8b8c747533@linux.dev \
    --to=guoqing.jiang@linux.dev \
    --cc=jack@suse.cz \
    --cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=ojaswin@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=ritesh.list@gmail.com \
    --cc=riteshh@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=shikemeng@huaweicloud.com \
    --cc=tytso@mit.edu \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.