All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Maxim Levitsky <mlevitsk@redhat.com>
To: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org
Cc: seanjc@google.com, stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 01/18] KVM: x86: host-initiated EFER.LME write affects the MMU
Date: Wed, 23 Feb 2022 15:40:30 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <c337d280825c1e95d9181ab8aeb505a0b074c8d1.camel@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220217210340.312449-2-pbonzini@redhat.com>

On Thu, 2022-02-17 at 16:03 -0500, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> While the guest runs, EFER.LME cannot change unless CR0.PG is clear, and therefore
> EFER.NX is the only bit that can affect the MMU role.  However, set_efer accepts
> a host-initiated change to EFER.LME even with CR0.PG=1.  In that case, the
> MMU has to be reset.
> 
> Fixes: 11988499e62b ("KVM: x86: Skip EFER vs. guest CPUID checks for host-initiated writes")
> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
> Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
> ---
>  arch/x86/kvm/mmu.h | 1 +
>  arch/x86/kvm/x86.c | 2 +-
>  2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu.h b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu.h
> index 51faa2c76ca5..a5a50cfeffff 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu.h
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu.h
> @@ -48,6 +48,7 @@
>  			       X86_CR4_SMEP | X86_CR4_SMAP | X86_CR4_PKE)
>  
>  #define KVM_MMU_CR0_ROLE_BITS (X86_CR0_PG | X86_CR0_WP)
> +#define KVM_MMU_EFER_ROLE_BITS (EFER_LME | EFER_NX)
>  
>  static __always_inline u64 rsvd_bits(int s, int e)
>  {
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
> index d3da64106685..99a58c25f5c2 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
> @@ -1647,7 +1647,7 @@ static int set_efer(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct msr_data *msr_info)
>  	}
>  
>  	/* Update reserved bits */
> -	if ((efer ^ old_efer) & EFER_NX)
> +	if ((efer ^ old_efer) & KVM_MMU_EFER_ROLE_BITS)
>  		kvm_mmu_reset_context(vcpu);
>  
>  	return 0;

It makes sense.

I am just curios, is there a report of failure
due to this issue? I can imagine something like this breaking
nested migration of 32 bit guests and such and/or smm and such.

Reviewed-by: Maxim Levitsky <mlevitsk@redhat.com>

Best regards,
	Maxim Levitsky


  parent reply	other threads:[~2022-02-23 13:41 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 66+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-02-17 21:03 [PATCH v2 00/18] KVM: MMU: do not unload MMU roots on all role changes Paolo Bonzini
2022-02-17 21:03 ` [PATCH v2 01/18] KVM: x86: host-initiated EFER.LME write affects the MMU Paolo Bonzini
2022-02-18 17:08   ` Sean Christopherson
2022-02-18 17:26     ` Paolo Bonzini
2022-02-23 13:40   ` Maxim Levitsky [this message]
2022-02-17 21:03 ` [PATCH v2 02/18] KVM: x86: do not deliver asynchronous page faults if CR0.PG=0 Paolo Bonzini
2022-02-18 17:12   ` Sean Christopherson
2022-02-23 14:07   ` Maxim Levitsky
2022-02-17 21:03 ` [PATCH v2 03/18] KVM: x86/mmu: WARN if PAE roots linger after kvm_mmu_unload Paolo Bonzini
2022-02-18 17:14   ` Sean Christopherson
2022-02-18 17:23     ` Paolo Bonzini
2022-02-23 14:11       ` Maxim Levitsky
2022-02-17 21:03 ` [PATCH v2 04/18] KVM: x86/mmu: avoid NULL-pointer dereference on page freeing bugs Paolo Bonzini
2022-02-18 17:15   ` Sean Christopherson
2022-02-23 14:12   ` Maxim Levitsky
2022-02-17 21:03 ` [PATCH v2 05/18] KVM: x86/mmu: use struct kvm_mmu_root_info for mmu->root Paolo Bonzini
2022-02-23 14:39   ` Maxim Levitsky
2022-02-23 15:42     ` Sean Christopherson
2022-02-17 21:03 ` [PATCH v2 06/18] KVM: x86/mmu: do not consult levels when freeing roots Paolo Bonzini
2022-02-18 17:27   ` Sean Christopherson
2022-02-23 14:59   ` Maxim Levitsky
2022-02-17 21:03 ` [PATCH v2 07/18] KVM: x86/mmu: Do not use guest root level in audit Paolo Bonzini
2022-02-18 18:37   ` Sean Christopherson
2022-02-18 18:46     ` Paolo Bonzini
2022-02-23 15:02       ` Maxim Levitsky
2022-02-17 21:03 ` [PATCH v2 08/18] KVM: x86/mmu: do not pass vcpu to root freeing functions Paolo Bonzini
2022-02-18 18:39   ` Sean Christopherson
2022-02-23 15:16   ` Maxim Levitsky
2022-02-23 15:48     ` Sean Christopherson
2022-02-17 21:03 ` [PATCH v2 09/18] KVM: x86/mmu: look for a cached PGD when going from 32-bit to 64-bit Paolo Bonzini
2022-02-18 18:08   ` Sean Christopherson
2022-02-23 16:01   ` Maxim Levitsky
2022-02-17 21:03 ` [PATCH v2 10/18] KVM: x86/mmu: load new PGD after the shadow MMU is initialized Paolo Bonzini
2022-02-18 23:59   ` Sean Christopherson
2022-02-23 16:20   ` Maxim Levitsky
2022-02-17 21:03 ` [PATCH v2 11/18] KVM: x86/mmu: Always use current mmu's role when loading new PGD Paolo Bonzini
2022-02-18 23:59   ` Sean Christopherson
2022-02-23 16:23   ` Maxim Levitsky
2022-02-17 21:03 ` [PATCH v2 12/18] KVM: x86/mmu: clear MMIO cache when unloading the MMU Paolo Bonzini
2022-02-18 23:59   ` Sean Christopherson
2022-02-23 16:32   ` Maxim Levitsky
2022-02-17 21:03 ` [PATCH v2 13/18] KVM: x86: reset and reinitialize the MMU in __set_sregs_common Paolo Bonzini
2022-02-19  0:22   ` Sean Christopherson
2022-02-23 16:48   ` Maxim Levitsky
2022-02-17 21:03 ` [PATCH v2 14/18] KVM: x86/mmu: avoid indirect call for get_cr3 Paolo Bonzini
2022-02-18 20:30   ` Sean Christopherson
2022-02-19 10:03     ` Paolo Bonzini
2022-02-24 11:02   ` Maxim Levitsky
2022-02-24 15:12     ` Sean Christopherson
2022-02-24 15:14       ` Maxim Levitsky
2022-02-17 21:03 ` [PATCH v2 15/18] KVM: x86/mmu: rename kvm_mmu_new_pgd, introduce variant that calls get_guest_pgd Paolo Bonzini
2022-02-18  9:39   ` Paolo Bonzini
2022-02-18 21:00     ` Sean Christopherson
2022-02-24 15:41       ` Maxim Levitsky
2022-02-25 17:40         ` Sean Christopherson
2022-02-17 21:03 ` [PATCH v2 16/18] KVM: x86: introduce KVM_REQ_MMU_UPDATE_ROOT Paolo Bonzini
2022-02-18 21:45   ` Sean Christopherson
2022-02-19  7:54     ` Paolo Bonzini
2022-02-22 16:06       ` Sean Christopherson
2022-02-24 15:50       ` Maxim Levitsky
2022-02-17 21:03 ` [PATCH v2 17/18] KVM: x86: flush TLB separately from MMU reset Paolo Bonzini
2022-02-18 23:57   ` Sean Christopherson
2022-02-21 15:01     ` Paolo Bonzini
2022-02-24 16:11   ` Maxim Levitsky
2022-02-17 21:03 ` [PATCH v2 18/18] KVM: x86: do not unload MMU roots on all role changes Paolo Bonzini
2022-02-24 16:25   ` Maxim Levitsky

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=c337d280825c1e95d9181ab8aeb505a0b074c8d1.camel@redhat.com \
    --to=mlevitsk@redhat.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=seanjc@google.com \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.