From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Michael Schmitz Subject: Re: [PATCH] m68k/atari: atari_scsi.c - use m68k_realnum_memory for FastRAM test Date: Tue, 6 Jun 2017 15:38:52 +1200 Message-ID: References: <1496648279-15702-1-git-send-email-schmitzmic@gmail.com> <20170605191709.GB4005@nunzio.venus.sol> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mail-pg0-f68.google.com ([74.125.83.68]:35591 "EHLO mail-pg0-f68.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751216AbdFFDi7 (ORCPT ); Mon, 5 Jun 2017 23:38:59 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20170605191709.GB4005@nunzio.venus.sol> Sender: linux-m68k-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-m68k@vger.kernel.org To: linux-m68k@vger.kernel.org Cc: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org Hi Christian Am 06.06.2017 um 07:17 schrieb Christian T. Steigies: > On Mon, Jun 05, 2017 at 07:37:59PM +1200, Michael Schmitz wrote: >> m68k_num_memory is unsuitable to test for the presence of FastRAM >> on CT60 if the kernel is located in FastRAM: in arch/m68k/mm/motorola.c >> the ST-RAM chunk is skipped and m68k_num_memory is decremented in this >> case. m68k_realnum_memory still contains the actual number of RAM chunks >> so use that. >> >> Tested by Christian Steiges on his Falcon with kernel loaded in FastRAM >> - could you please reply with your Tested-by tag, Christian? > > Sure, do I need to sign it or is this ok? > > Tested-by: Christian T. Steigies >> Signed-off-by: Michael Schmitz That's OK - we know it was you :-) Martin has already applied it - thanks! Cheers, Michael