From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:49076) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1go2Ak-0001H0-5R for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 28 Jan 2019 03:21:39 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1go2Ai-0001Fj-FP for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 28 Jan 2019 03:21:38 -0500 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:12959) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1go2Ah-0001Dx-Kx for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 28 Jan 2019 03:21:36 -0500 References: <20190125151440.13794-1-sourav.jb1988@gmail.com> From: Thomas Huth Message-ID: Date: Mon, 28 Jan 2019 09:14:03 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] hw: input: set category of the i8042 device List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: =?UTF-8?Q?Philippe_Mathieu-Daud=c3=a9?= , kumar sourav , qemu-trivial@nongnu.org Cc: pbonzini@redhat.com, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, mst@redhat.com On 2019-01-25 17:44, Philippe Mathieu-Daud=C3=A9 wrote: > On 1/25/19 4:24 PM, Thomas Huth wrote: >> On 2019-01-25 16:14, kumar sourav wrote: >>> Sets the category of i8042 device as DEVICE_CATEGORY_INPUT >>> Devices should be assigned to one of DEVICE_CATEGORY_XXXX. >>> >>> Signed-off-by: kumar sourav >>> --- >>> hw/input/pckbd.c | 1 + >=20 > It seems we have other potential cases: >=20 > $ git grep -L 'set_bit(DEVICE_CATEGORY_INPUT' hw/input/*c > hw/input/adb.c > hw/input/hid.c > hw/input/lm832x.c > hw/input/milkymist-softusb.c > hw/input/pckbd.c > hw/input/pl050.c > hw/input/ps2.c > hw/input/pxa2xx_keypad.c > hw/input/stellaris_input.c > hw/input/tsc2005.c > hw/input/tsc210x.c > hw/input/virtio-input-hid.c > hw/input/virtio-input-host.c Note that some of these are not even "qomified" yet (e.g. tsc2005), others are not creatable by the user (pl050) as far as I can see, so it does not make much sense to set a category for these devices yet. Thomas