From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.0 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, INCLUDES_PATCH,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SIGNED_OFF_BY,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CDB84C43381 for ; Thu, 7 Mar 2019 15:36:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A26CE2064A for ; Thu, 7 Mar 2019 15:36:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726680AbfCGPg1 (ORCPT ); Thu, 7 Mar 2019 10:36:27 -0500 Received: from mx2.suse.de ([195.135.220.15]:52722 "EHLO mx1.suse.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726275AbfCGPg0 (ORCPT ); Thu, 7 Mar 2019 10:36:26 -0500 X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at test-mx.suse.de Received: from relay2.suse.de (unknown [195.135.220.254]) by mx1.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id CAE33ABF5; Thu, 7 Mar 2019 15:36:24 +0000 (UTC) Subject: Re: [PATCH] bcache: add cond_resched() in __bch_cache_cmp() To: Shile Zhang Cc: Kent Overstreet , linux-bcache@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <1551935728-243664-1-git-send-email-shile.zhang@linux.alibaba.com> <24916a71-39ff-7324-ad12-9d79cc68d0da@suse.de> <3640cd7f-f32a-1509-dbef-6000b6e14e75@linux.alibaba.com> From: Coly Li Openpgp: preference=signencrypt Organization: SUSE Labs Message-ID: Date: Thu, 7 Mar 2019 23:36:18 +0800 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.14; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.5.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <3640cd7f-f32a-1509-dbef-6000b6e14e75@linux.alibaba.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 2019/3/7 11:06 下午, Shile Zhang wrote: > > On 2019/3/7 18:34, Coly Li wrote: >> On 2019/3/7 1:15 下午, shile.zhang@linux.alibaba.com wrote: >>> From: Shile Zhang >>> >>> Read /sys/fs/bcache//cacheN/priority_stats can take very long >>> time with huge cache after long run. >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Shile Zhang >> Hi Shile, >> >> Do you test your change ? It will be helpful with more performance data >> (what problem that you improved). > > In case of 960GB SSD cache device, once read of the 'priority_stats' > costs about 600ms in our test environment. > After the fix, how much time it takes ? > The perf tool shown that near 50% CPU time consumed by 'sort()', this > means once sort will hold the CPU near 300ms. > > In our case, the statistics collector reads the 'priority_stats' > periodically, it will trigger the schedule latency jitters of the > > task which shared same CPU core. > Hmm, it seems you just make the sort slower, and nothing more changes. Am I right ? Coly Li >> >> Thanks. >> >> Coly Li >> >>> --- >>>   drivers/md/bcache/sysfs.c | 1 + >>>   1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) >>> >>> diff --git a/drivers/md/bcache/sysfs.c b/drivers/md/bcache/sysfs.c >>> index 557a8a3..028fea1 100644 >>> --- a/drivers/md/bcache/sysfs.c >>> +++ b/drivers/md/bcache/sysfs.c >>> @@ -897,6 +897,7 @@ static void bch_cache_set_internal_release(struct >>> kobject *k) >>>     static int __bch_cache_cmp(const void *l, const void *r) >>>   { >>> +    cond_resched(); >>>       return *((uint16_t *)r) - *((uint16_t *)l); >>>   } >>>   >> -- Coly Li