All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Vidya Sagar <vidyas@nvidia.com>
To: Kishon Vijay Abraham I <kishon@ti.com>
Cc: <linux-pci@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"Lorenzo Pieralisi" <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com>,
	Andrew Murray <amurray@thegoodpenguin.co.uk>,
	Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>,
	"Athani Nadeem Ladkhan" <nadeem@cadence.com>,
	Tom Joseph <tjoseph@cadence.com>,
	Manikanta Maddireddy <mmaddireddy@nvidia.com>,
	Om Prakash Singh <omp@nvidia.com>,
	Krishna Thota <kthota@nvidia.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/5] PCI: endpoint: Replace spinlock with mutex
Date: Mon, 21 Jun 2021 15:08:14 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <c5e5a847-fd2f-6a52-1587-03ac4f1c7ec4@nvidia.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <36aa4b00-0b3f-011a-4ade-1f79df983157@ti.com>



On 6/21/2021 10:44 AM, Kishon Vijay Abraham I wrote:
> External email: Use caution opening links or attachments
> 
> 
> Hi Vidya Sagar,
> 
> On 11/06/21 3:22 pm, Vidya Sagar wrote:
>> Hi Kishon,
>> Apologies for bringup it up this late.
>> I'm wondering if there was any issue which this patch tried to address?
> 
> There was one function pci_epc_linkup() which was expected to be invoked
> in interrupt context (basically when the LINKUP interrupt is raised).
> But after it was moved to use atomic notifier, all the EPC core APIs
> were replaced to use mutex.
>> Actually, "The pci_epc_ops is not intended to be invoked from interrupt
>> context" isn't true in case of Tegra194. We do call
>> dw_pcie_ep_init_notify() API from threaded irq service routine and it
>> eventually calls mutext_lock() of pci_epc_get_features() which is
>> reusulting in the following warning log.
>> BUG: sleeping function called from invalid context at
>> kernel/locking/mutex.c:
>> Would like hear your comments on it.
After reviewing the logs and code again, I think it was my mistake to 
come to early conclusion that it was because of calling mutex_lock() in 
the atomic context. It is clear now.

I would like to understand the reason behind putting locks in the epc 
core driver before calling ops.
I believe the ops callers should implement lock if they are concurrently 
accessing the ops instead of adding a global lock in the epc core.
This would help in scenarios like the one below.

	We have a performance oriented endpoint function driver which calls 
map, unmap & raise_irq ops from softirq context and because of 
mutex_lock(), we can't do that now. epc core driver should not restrict 
the function drivers to use only non-atomic functions.

Thanks,
Vidya Sagar
> 
> I don't think it is ideal to initialize EPC in interrupt context (unless
> there is a specific reason for it). EPC initialization can be moved to
> bottom half similar to how commands are handled after LINKUP.

> 
> Thanks
> Kishon
> 
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Vidya Sagar
>>
>> On 2/12/2020 4:55 PM, Kishon Vijay Abraham I wrote:
>>> External email: Use caution opening links or attachments
>>>
>>>
>>> The pci_epc_ops is not intended to be invoked from interrupt context.
>>> Hence replace spin_lock_irqsave and spin_unlock_irqrestore with
>>> mutex_lock and mutex_unlock respectively.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Kishon Vijay Abraham I <kishon@ti.com>
>>> ---
>>>    drivers/pci/endpoint/pci-epc-core.c | 82 +++++++++++------------------
>>>    include/linux/pci-epc.h             |  6 +--
>>>    2 files changed, 34 insertions(+), 54 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/pci/endpoint/pci-epc-core.c
>>> b/drivers/pci/endpoint/pci-epc-core.c
>>> index 2f6436599fcb..e51a12ed85bb 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/pci/endpoint/pci-epc-core.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/pci/endpoint/pci-epc-core.c
>>> @@ -120,7 +120,6 @@ const struct pci_epc_features
>>> *pci_epc_get_features(struct pci_epc *epc,
>>>                                                       u8 func_no)
>>>    {
>>>           const struct pci_epc_features *epc_features;
>>> -       unsigned long flags;
>>>
>>>           if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(epc) || func_no >= epc->max_functions)
>>>                   return NULL;
>>> @@ -128,9 +127,9 @@ const struct pci_epc_features
>>> *pci_epc_get_features(struct pci_epc *epc,
>>>           if (!epc->ops->get_features)
>>>                   return NULL;
>>>
>>> -       spin_lock_irqsave(&epc->lock, flags);
>>> +       mutex_lock(&epc->lock);
>>>           epc_features = epc->ops->get_features(epc, func_no);
>>> -       spin_unlock_irqrestore(&epc->lock, flags);
>>> +       mutex_unlock(&epc->lock);
>>>
>>>           return epc_features;
>>>    }
>>> @@ -144,14 +143,12 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(pci_epc_get_features);
>>>     */
>>>    void pci_epc_stop(struct pci_epc *epc)
>>>    {
>>> -       unsigned long flags;
>>> -
>>>           if (IS_ERR(epc) || !epc->ops->stop)
>>>                   return;
>>>
>>> -       spin_lock_irqsave(&epc->lock, flags);
>>> +       mutex_lock(&epc->lock);
>>>           epc->ops->stop(epc);
>>> -       spin_unlock_irqrestore(&epc->lock, flags);
>>> +       mutex_unlock(&epc->lock);
>>>    }
>>>    EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(pci_epc_stop);
>>>
>>> @@ -164,7 +161,6 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(pci_epc_stop);
>>>    int pci_epc_start(struct pci_epc *epc)
>>>    {
>>>           int ret;
>>> -       unsigned long flags;
>>>
>>>           if (IS_ERR(epc))
>>>                   return -EINVAL;
>>> @@ -172,9 +168,9 @@ int pci_epc_start(struct pci_epc *epc)
>>>           if (!epc->ops->start)
>>>                   return 0;
>>>
>>> -       spin_lock_irqsave(&epc->lock, flags);
>>> +       mutex_lock(&epc->lock);
>>>           ret = epc->ops->start(epc);
>>> -       spin_unlock_irqrestore(&epc->lock, flags);
>>> +       mutex_unlock(&epc->lock);
>>>
>>>           return ret;
>>>    }
>>> @@ -193,7 +189,6 @@ int pci_epc_raise_irq(struct pci_epc *epc, u8
>>> func_no,
>>>                         enum pci_epc_irq_type type, u16 interrupt_num)
>>>    {
>>>           int ret;
>>> -       unsigned long flags;
>>>
>>>           if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(epc) || func_no >= epc->max_functions)
>>>                   return -EINVAL;
>>> @@ -201,9 +196,9 @@ int pci_epc_raise_irq(struct pci_epc *epc, u8
>>> func_no,
>>>           if (!epc->ops->raise_irq)
>>>                   return 0;
>>>
>>> -       spin_lock_irqsave(&epc->lock, flags);
>>> +       mutex_lock(&epc->lock);
>>>           ret = epc->ops->raise_irq(epc, func_no, type, interrupt_num);
>>> -       spin_unlock_irqrestore(&epc->lock, flags);
>>> +       mutex_unlock(&epc->lock);
>>>
>>>           return ret;
>>>    }
>>> @@ -219,7 +214,6 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(pci_epc_raise_irq);
>>>    int pci_epc_get_msi(struct pci_epc *epc, u8 func_no)
>>>    {
>>>           int interrupt;
>>> -       unsigned long flags;
>>>
>>>           if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(epc) || func_no >= epc->max_functions)
>>>                   return 0;
>>> @@ -227,9 +221,9 @@ int pci_epc_get_msi(struct pci_epc *epc, u8 func_no)
>>>           if (!epc->ops->get_msi)
>>>                   return 0;
>>>
>>> -       spin_lock_irqsave(&epc->lock, flags);
>>> +       mutex_lock(&epc->lock);
>>>           interrupt = epc->ops->get_msi(epc, func_no);
>>> -       spin_unlock_irqrestore(&epc->lock, flags);
>>> +       mutex_unlock(&epc->lock);
>>>
>>>           if (interrupt < 0)
>>>                   return 0;
>>> @@ -252,7 +246,6 @@ int pci_epc_set_msi(struct pci_epc *epc, u8
>>> func_no, u8 interrupts)
>>>    {
>>>           int ret;
>>>           u8 encode_int;
>>> -       unsigned long flags;
>>>
>>>           if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(epc) || func_no >= epc->max_functions ||
>>>               interrupts > 32)
>>> @@ -263,9 +256,9 @@ int pci_epc_set_msi(struct pci_epc *epc, u8
>>> func_no, u8 interrupts)
>>>
>>>           encode_int = order_base_2(interrupts);
>>>
>>> -       spin_lock_irqsave(&epc->lock, flags);
>>> +       mutex_lock(&epc->lock);
>>>           ret = epc->ops->set_msi(epc, func_no, encode_int);
>>> -       spin_unlock_irqrestore(&epc->lock, flags);
>>> +       mutex_unlock(&epc->lock);
>>>
>>>           return ret;
>>>    }
>>> @@ -281,7 +274,6 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(pci_epc_set_msi);
>>>    int pci_epc_get_msix(struct pci_epc *epc, u8 func_no)
>>>    {
>>>           int interrupt;
>>> -       unsigned long flags;
>>>
>>>           if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(epc) || func_no >= epc->max_functions)
>>>                   return 0;
>>> @@ -289,9 +281,9 @@ int pci_epc_get_msix(struct pci_epc *epc, u8 func_no)
>>>           if (!epc->ops->get_msix)
>>>                   return 0;
>>>
>>> -       spin_lock_irqsave(&epc->lock, flags);
>>> +       mutex_lock(&epc->lock);
>>>           interrupt = epc->ops->get_msix(epc, func_no);
>>> -       spin_unlock_irqrestore(&epc->lock, flags);
>>> +       mutex_unlock(&epc->lock);
>>>
>>>           if (interrupt < 0)
>>>                   return 0;
>>> @@ -311,7 +303,6 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(pci_epc_get_msix);
>>>    int pci_epc_set_msix(struct pci_epc *epc, u8 func_no, u16 interrupts)
>>>    {
>>>           int ret;
>>> -       unsigned long flags;
>>>
>>>           if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(epc) || func_no >= epc->max_functions ||
>>>               interrupts < 1 || interrupts > 2048)
>>> @@ -320,9 +311,9 @@ int pci_epc_set_msix(struct pci_epc *epc, u8
>>> func_no, u16 interrupts)
>>>           if (!epc->ops->set_msix)
>>>                   return 0;
>>>
>>> -       spin_lock_irqsave(&epc->lock, flags);
>>> +       mutex_lock(&epc->lock);
>>>           ret = epc->ops->set_msix(epc, func_no, interrupts - 1);
>>> -       spin_unlock_irqrestore(&epc->lock, flags);
>>> +       mutex_unlock(&epc->lock);
>>>
>>>           return ret;
>>>    }
>>> @@ -339,17 +330,15 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(pci_epc_set_msix);
>>>    void pci_epc_unmap_addr(struct pci_epc *epc, u8 func_no,
>>>                           phys_addr_t phys_addr)
>>>    {
>>> -       unsigned long flags;
>>> -
>>>           if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(epc) || func_no >= epc->max_functions)
>>>                   return;
>>>
>>>           if (!epc->ops->unmap_addr)
>>>                   return;
>>>
>>> -       spin_lock_irqsave(&epc->lock, flags);
>>> +       mutex_lock(&epc->lock);
>>>           epc->ops->unmap_addr(epc, func_no, phys_addr);
>>> -       spin_unlock_irqrestore(&epc->lock, flags);
>>> +       mutex_unlock(&epc->lock);
>>>    }
>>>    EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(pci_epc_unmap_addr);
>>>
>>> @@ -367,7 +356,6 @@ int pci_epc_map_addr(struct pci_epc *epc, u8 func_no,
>>>                        phys_addr_t phys_addr, u64 pci_addr, size_t size)
>>>    {
>>>           int ret;
>>> -       unsigned long flags;
>>>
>>>           if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(epc) || func_no >= epc->max_functions)
>>>                   return -EINVAL;
>>> @@ -375,9 +363,9 @@ int pci_epc_map_addr(struct pci_epc *epc, u8 func_no,
>>>           if (!epc->ops->map_addr)
>>>                   return 0;
>>>
>>> -       spin_lock_irqsave(&epc->lock, flags);
>>> +       mutex_lock(&epc->lock);
>>>           ret = epc->ops->map_addr(epc, func_no, phys_addr, pci_addr,
>>> size);
>>> -       spin_unlock_irqrestore(&epc->lock, flags);
>>> +       mutex_unlock(&epc->lock);
>>>
>>>           return ret;
>>>    }
>>> @@ -394,8 +382,6 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(pci_epc_map_addr);
>>>    void pci_epc_clear_bar(struct pci_epc *epc, u8 func_no,
>>>                          struct pci_epf_bar *epf_bar)
>>>    {
>>> -       unsigned long flags;
>>> -
>>>           if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(epc) || func_no >= epc->max_functions ||
>>>               (epf_bar->barno == BAR_5 &&
>>>                epf_bar->flags & PCI_BASE_ADDRESS_MEM_TYPE_64))
>>> @@ -404,9 +390,9 @@ void pci_epc_clear_bar(struct pci_epc *epc, u8
>>> func_no,
>>>           if (!epc->ops->clear_bar)
>>>                   return;
>>>
>>> -       spin_lock_irqsave(&epc->lock, flags);
>>> +       mutex_lock(&epc->lock);
>>>           epc->ops->clear_bar(epc, func_no, epf_bar);
>>> -       spin_unlock_irqrestore(&epc->lock, flags);
>>> +       mutex_unlock(&epc->lock);
>>>    }
>>>    EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(pci_epc_clear_bar);
>>>
>>> @@ -422,7 +408,6 @@ int pci_epc_set_bar(struct pci_epc *epc, u8 func_no,
>>>                       struct pci_epf_bar *epf_bar)
>>>    {
>>>           int ret;
>>> -       unsigned long irq_flags;
>>>           int flags = epf_bar->flags;
>>>
>>>           if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(epc) || func_no >= epc->max_functions ||
>>> @@ -437,9 +422,9 @@ int pci_epc_set_bar(struct pci_epc *epc, u8 func_no,
>>>           if (!epc->ops->set_bar)
>>>                   return 0;
>>>
>>> -       spin_lock_irqsave(&epc->lock, irq_flags);
>>> +       mutex_lock(&epc->lock);
>>>           ret = epc->ops->set_bar(epc, func_no, epf_bar);
>>> -       spin_unlock_irqrestore(&epc->lock, irq_flags);
>>> +       mutex_unlock(&epc->lock);
>>>
>>>           return ret;
>>>    }
>>> @@ -460,7 +445,6 @@ int pci_epc_write_header(struct pci_epc *epc, u8
>>> func_no,
>>>                            struct pci_epf_header *header)
>>>    {
>>>           int ret;
>>> -       unsigned long flags;
>>>
>>>           if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(epc) || func_no >= epc->max_functions)
>>>                   return -EINVAL;
>>> @@ -468,9 +452,9 @@ int pci_epc_write_header(struct pci_epc *epc, u8
>>> func_no,
>>>           if (!epc->ops->write_header)
>>>                   return 0;
>>>
>>> -       spin_lock_irqsave(&epc->lock, flags);
>>> +       mutex_lock(&epc->lock);
>>>           ret = epc->ops->write_header(epc, func_no, header);
>>> -       spin_unlock_irqrestore(&epc->lock, flags);
>>> +       mutex_unlock(&epc->lock);
>>>
>>>           return ret;
>>>    }
>>> @@ -487,8 +471,6 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(pci_epc_write_header);
>>>     */
>>>    int pci_epc_add_epf(struct pci_epc *epc, struct pci_epf *epf)
>>>    {
>>> -       unsigned long flags;
>>> -
>>>           if (epf->epc)
>>>                   return -EBUSY;
>>>
>>> @@ -500,9 +482,9 @@ int pci_epc_add_epf(struct pci_epc *epc, struct
>>> pci_epf *epf)
>>>
>>>           epf->epc = epc;
>>>
>>> -       spin_lock_irqsave(&epc->lock, flags);
>>> +       mutex_lock(&epc->lock);
>>>           list_add_tail(&epf->list, &epc->pci_epf);
>>> -       spin_unlock_irqrestore(&epc->lock, flags);
>>> +       mutex_unlock(&epc->lock);
>>>
>>>           return 0;
>>>    }
>>> @@ -517,15 +499,13 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(pci_epc_add_epf);
>>>     */
>>>    void pci_epc_remove_epf(struct pci_epc *epc, struct pci_epf *epf)
>>>    {
>>> -       unsigned long flags;
>>> -
>>>           if (!epc || IS_ERR(epc) || !epf)
>>>                   return;
>>>
>>> -       spin_lock_irqsave(&epc->lock, flags);
>>> +       mutex_lock(&epc->lock);
>>>           list_del(&epf->list);
>>>           epf->epc = NULL;
>>> -       spin_unlock_irqrestore(&epc->lock, flags);
>>> +       mutex_unlock(&epc->lock);
>>>    }
>>>    EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(pci_epc_remove_epf);
>>>
>>> @@ -604,7 +584,7 @@ __pci_epc_create(struct device *dev, const struct
>>> pci_epc_ops *ops,
>>>                   goto err_ret;
>>>           }
>>>
>>> -       spin_lock_init(&epc->lock);
>>> +       mutex_init(&epc->lock);
>>>           INIT_LIST_HEAD(&epc->pci_epf);
>>>           ATOMIC_INIT_NOTIFIER_HEAD(&epc->notifier);
>>>
>>> diff --git a/include/linux/pci-epc.h b/include/linux/pci-epc.h
>>> index 36644ccd32ac..9dd60f2e9705 100644
>>> --- a/include/linux/pci-epc.h
>>> +++ b/include/linux/pci-epc.h
>>> @@ -88,7 +88,7 @@ struct pci_epc_mem {
>>>     * @mem: address space of the endpoint controller
>>>     * @max_functions: max number of functions that can be configured in
>>> this EPC
>>>     * @group: configfs group representing the PCI EPC device
>>> - * @lock: spinlock to protect pci_epc ops
>>> + * @lock: mutex to protect pci_epc ops
>>>     * @notifier: used to notify EPF of any EPC events (like linkup)
>>>     */
>>>    struct pci_epc {
>>> @@ -98,8 +98,8 @@ struct pci_epc {
>>>           struct pci_epc_mem              *mem;
>>>           u8                              max_functions;
>>>           struct config_group             *group;
>>> -       /* spinlock to protect against concurrent access of EP
>>> controller */
>>> -       spinlock_t                      lock;
>>> +       /* mutex to protect against concurrent access of EP controller */
>>> +       struct mutex                    lock;
>>>           struct atomic_notifier_head     notifier;
>>>    };
>>>
>>> --
>>> 2.17.1
>>>

  reply	other threads:[~2021-06-21  9:38 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-02-12 11:25 [PATCH v2 0/5] PCI: Endpoint: Miscellaneous improvements Kishon Vijay Abraham I
2020-02-12 11:25 ` [PATCH v2 1/5] PCI: endpoint: Use notification chain mechanism to notify EPC events to EPF Kishon Vijay Abraham I
2020-02-17 12:14   ` Vidya Sagar
2020-02-12 11:25 ` [PATCH v2 2/5] PCI: endpoint: Replace spinlock with mutex Kishon Vijay Abraham I
2021-06-11  9:52   ` Vidya Sagar
2021-06-20 13:21     ` Vidya Sagar
2021-06-21  5:14     ` Kishon Vijay Abraham I
2021-06-21  9:38       ` Vidya Sagar [this message]
2021-06-21 13:37         ` Kishon Vijay Abraham I
2021-06-22  5:29           ` Vidya Sagar
2020-02-12 11:25 ` [PATCH v2 3/5] PCI: endpoint: Protect concurrent access to memory allocation " Kishon Vijay Abraham I
2020-02-12 11:25 ` [PATCH v2 4/5] PCI: endpoint: Protect concurrent access to pci_epf_ops " Kishon Vijay Abraham I
2020-02-12 11:25 ` [PATCH v2 5/5] PCI: endpoint: Assign function number for each PF in EPC core Kishon Vijay Abraham I
2020-02-21 15:54 ` [PATCH v2 0/5] PCI: Endpoint: Miscellaneous improvements Lorenzo Pieralisi

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=c5e5a847-fd2f-6a52-1587-03ac4f1c7ec4@nvidia.com \
    --to=vidyas@nvidia.com \
    --cc=amurray@thegoodpenguin.co.uk \
    --cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
    --cc=kishon@ti.com \
    --cc=kthota@nvidia.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com \
    --cc=mmaddireddy@nvidia.com \
    --cc=nadeem@cadence.com \
    --cc=omp@nvidia.com \
    --cc=tjoseph@cadence.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.