From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:46693) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1goaMJ-0004n3-30 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 29 Jan 2019 15:51:51 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1goaMI-0005Op-67 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 29 Jan 2019 15:51:51 -0500 References: <20181217224348.14922-1-mreitz@redhat.com> From: John Snow Message-ID: Date: Tue, 29 Jan 2019 15:51:28 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20181217224348.14922-1-mreitz@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [Qemu-block] [PATCH v12 00/31] block: Fix some filename generation issues List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Max Reitz , qemu-block@nongnu.org Cc: Kevin Wolf , qemu-devel@nongnu.org On 12/17/18 5:43 PM, Max Reitz wrote: > Once more, I=E2=80=99ll spare both me and you another iteration of the = cover > letter, so I direct you to the previous version=E2=80=99s cover letter = (which > will direct you further): >=20 > http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-block/2018-10/msg00229.html >=20 > There are only minor changes in this version. Provided no major > complaints arise, I intend to merge this series in the next month. >=20 It looked like this got a full set of reviews by Berto, should we not just merge it and see who cries? Would you like additional eyes on it?