From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; spf=pass (mailfrom) smtp.mailfrom=aj.id.au (client-ip=66.111.4.26; helo=out2-smtp.messagingengine.com; envelope-from=andrew@aj.id.au; receiver=) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=aj.id.au Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=aj.id.au header.i=@aj.id.au header.b="YEdZsXoT"; dkim=pass (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=messagingengine.com header.i=@messagingengine.com header.b="cPJ/Ssgt"; dkim-atps=neutral Received: from out2-smtp.messagingengine.com (out2-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.26]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 44715t21YnzDqMG for ; Mon, 25 Feb 2019 10:10:57 +1100 (AEDT) Received: from compute4.internal (compute4.nyi.internal [10.202.2.44]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 64FB822083; Sun, 24 Feb 2019 18:10:52 -0500 (EST) Received: from imap2 ([10.202.2.52]) by compute4.internal (MEProxy); Sun, 24 Feb 2019 18:10:52 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=aj.id.au; h= message-id:in-reply-to:references:date:from:to:subject :content-type; s=fm2; bh=xT0GmMEvjUkVXczmmSEzt23cn1/ejZv7yG3NI0R kVZY=; b=YEdZsXoTRKJcTiXSvqt0ykZo6/r4NvXF+/mLN1P+0KbfjZj6w54/9ut 17/LC9FeBZWg+c6EY1Ktcn1hysGiWf9lSopBGXrP86dEuJZEtdG5Y6cIX3agpJg8 xj6L+l8elLO7XO5//HI4EYI4vtzGI82wWuOG9aNzhDctAxDmywXcinHjRzMDeKcO vb/Y7+/3YxR0SJEWHEKsFalmY1sJNdIQ4vYN0whGAvtGZ5Rvufx7THtmINXO6Rwz am50AgQgiGOliwkYVueBKV7U/AySesqoIaiEKcg816hPF+gxuwz6e9OXuwiBS/+D tOWJ8R3siB3N8mjfWENIZ+Zzw5lfs2g== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=content-type:date:from:in-reply-to :message-id:references:subject:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy :x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm2; bh=xT0GmMEvjUkVXczmm SEzt23cn1/ejZv7yG3NI0RkVZY=; b=cPJ/SsgtFEtC7gf3YR4glt3yzgxf+ATBg Xi+QwA6dDkCLlWfXxWKmfmJ+kRlZcfW1S8E6dn34gW3nuxN/5WL3ei5vNcVrNeOp 9eHnviZFn+J0gQ79KvBw8heWf3KNX+qLI5pNYweHtp+KGUvG17Q+KpxPaayjI9UG LEu0bfBjOJQtAjmFrrQMiCwhGI7fGE0hDcCH/xnaryRFkW611IsEBZTBJyOl2q+q zZvhtqtyECXyNRtHOIZOuudxqEBgWl0ahVmqDLdRtc4knPPt97EDvJnDI62zHlce kmhNn4kQZDNG/ZYMoqfC33+WZVYit9kYG9gyB/G4eI5VJ0htODzKw== X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedutddrudehgddtgeculddtuddrgedtledrtddtmd cutefuodetggdotefrodftvfcurfhrohhfihhlvgemucfhrghsthforghilhdpqfhuthen uceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucesvcftvggtihhpihgvnhhtshculddquddttddmne cujfgurhepofgfkfgjfhffhffvufgtsehttdertderredtnecuhfhrohhmpedftehnughr vgifucflvghffhgvrhihfdcuoegrnhgurhgvfiesrghjrdhiugdrrghuqeenucffohhmrg hinhepghhithhhuhgsrdgtohhmnecurfgrrhgrmhepmhgrihhlfhhrohhmpegrnhgurhgv fiesrghjrdhiugdrrghunecuvehluhhsthgvrhfuihiivgeptd X-ME-Proxy: Received: by mailuser.nyi.internal (Postfix, from userid 501) id 4DE097C1EB; Sun, 24 Feb 2019 18:10:51 -0500 (EST) X-Mailer: MessagingEngine.com Webmail Interface User-Agent: Cyrus-JMAP/3.1.5-895-g0d23ba6-fmstable-20190213v1 X-Me-Personality: 52947553 Message-Id: In-Reply-To: <16fc4075-fd43-4d3a-b0be-1e2239e8085e@www.fastmail.com> References: <011d0902-7189-4562-86d3-f50e7f249e12@www.fastmail.com> <24741baf-40ba-31c9-98e4-f229c4df7323@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <16fc4075-fd43-4d3a-b0be-1e2239e8085e@www.fastmail.com> Date: Sun, 24 Feb 2019 18:10:51 -0500 From: "Andrew Jeffery" To: openbmc@lists.ozlabs.org, "Brad Bishop" , "Gunnar Mills" Subject: Re: Repository for CVE-2019-6260 test tool Content-Type: text/plain X-BeenThere: openbmc@lists.ozlabs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Development list for OpenBMC List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 24 Feb 2019 23:11:02 -0000 On Thu, 21 Feb 2019, at 14:27, Andrew Jeffery wrote: > > > On Thu, 21 Feb 2019, at 14:10, Gunnar Mills wrote: > > On 2/20/2019 8:42 PM, Andrew Jeffery wrote: > > > > Can you please create a cve-2019-6260 repository under the OpenBMC > > github organisation to host the tool? > > > > > Why a new cve-2019-6260 repo instead of openbmc-tools? > > No really good reason, just felt it was well defined enough to not get lumped > in with everything else in the openbmc-tools repo. openbmc-tools was > intended as a home for ill-defined scripts and bits that people had lying > around that they wouldn't have otherwise published. In the mean time I've pushed the repo here: https://github.com/amboar/cve-2019-6260 > > Andrew >