From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753196Ab0LVQ7T (ORCPT ); Wed, 22 Dec 2010 11:59:19 -0500 Received: from mga11.intel.com ([192.55.52.93]:58596 "EHLO mga11.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752695Ab0LVQ7S (ORCPT ); Wed, 22 Dec 2010 11:59:18 -0500 Message-Id: X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.60,214,1291622400"; d="scan'208";a="870959615" Date: Wed, 22 Dec 2010 16:59:06 +0000 To: Takashi Iwai , Dave Airlie Subject: Re: [git pull] drm fixes Cc: torvalds@linux-foundation.org, DRI mailing list , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: References: From: Chris Wilson Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, 22 Dec 2010 17:24:36 +0100, Takashi Iwai wrote: > The commit 448f53a1ede54eb854d036abf54573281412d650 > drm/i915/bios: Reverse order of 100/120 Mhz SSC clocks > > causes a regression on a SandyBridge machine here. > The laptop display (LVDS) becomes blank. Reverting the commit fixes > the problem. The question is whose BIOS is wrong? The Lenovo U160's or the Sandybridge SDV? And why does it work for that other OS? It's back to the square one for one or the other platform... -Chris -- Chris Wilson, Intel Open Source Technology Centre