From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:34579) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gz1nh-0006TT-U8 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 27 Feb 2019 11:11:19 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gz1nf-0002no-V1 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 27 Feb 2019 11:11:17 -0500 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:36910) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gz1nf-0002aX-Ih for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 27 Feb 2019 11:11:15 -0500 References: <155128177405.1544.2035274805815542420@49fa7ef69f7b> From: David Hildenbrand Message-ID: Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2019 17:10:49 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <155128177405.1544.2035274805815542420@49fa7ef69f7b> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v1] include/exec/helper-head.h: support "const void *" in helper calls List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org Cc: fam@euphon.net, pbonzini@redhat.com, rth@twiddle.net On 27.02.19 16:36, no-reply@patchew.org wrote: > Patchew URL: https://patchew.org/QEMU/20190221093459.22547-1-david@redhat.com/ > > > > Hi, > > This series seems to have some coding style problems. See output below for > more information: > > Message-id: 20190221093459.22547-1-david@redhat.com > Subject: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v1] include/exec/helper-head.h: support "const void *" in helper calls > Type: series > > === TEST SCRIPT BEGIN === > #!/bin/bash > git rev-parse base > /dev/null || exit 0 > git config --local diff.renamelimit 0 > git config --local diff.renames True > git config --local diff.algorithm histogram > ./scripts/checkpatch.pl --mailback base.. > === TEST SCRIPT END === > > Updating 3c8cf5a9c21ff8782164d1def7f44bd888713384 > From https://github.com/patchew-project/qemu > * [new tag] patchew/20190221093459.22547-1-david@redhat.com -> patchew/20190221093459.22547-1-david@redhat.com > * [new tag] patchew/20190225012530.28225-1-richardw.yang@linux.intel.com -> patchew/20190225012530.28225-1-richardw.yang@linux.intel.com > * [new tag] patchew/20190225162325.24008-1-maxiwell@linux.ibm.com -> patchew/20190225162325.24008-1-maxiwell@linux.ibm.com > Switched to a new branch 'test' > > === OUTPUT BEGIN === > checkpatch.pl: no revisions returned for revlist '1' While patchew seems to be broken right now, I wonder why patches are tested that are long upstream? Is this some leftover from fixing patchew? -- Thanks, David / dhildenb