From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix, from userid 118) id 9ACEAE00CEE; Sat, 23 Feb 2019 21:41:17 -0800 (PST) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on yocto-www.yoctoproject.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.2 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 X-Spam-HAM-Report: * -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% * [score: 0.0000] * -2.3 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, * medium trust * [147.11.146.13 listed in list.dnswl.org] Received: from mail1.windriver.com (mail1.windriver.com [147.11.146.13]) by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 93C7FE00B5C for ; Sat, 23 Feb 2019 21:41:16 -0800 (PST) Received: from ALA-HCB.corp.ad.wrs.com ([147.11.189.41]) by mail1.windriver.com (8.15.2/8.15.1) with ESMTPS id x1O5ex3Y027352 (version=TLSv1 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Sat, 23 Feb 2019 21:40:59 -0800 (PST) Received: from [128.224.163.169] (128.224.163.169) by ALA-HCB.corp.ad.wrs.com (147.11.189.41) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.3.435.0; Sat, 23 Feb 2019 21:40:40 -0800 To: Richard Purdie , Manjukumar Harthikote Matha , Stephen Lawrence , "mhalstead@linuxfoundation.org" , "ross.burton@intel.com" , "raj.khem@gmail.com" , "paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com" , "yocto@yoctoproject.org" References: <1550749039-67320-1-git-send-email-hongxu.jia@windriver.com> <2c3baa056663af88ed9e15b89128802cfc686b4e.camel@linuxfoundation.org> From: Hongxu Jia Message-ID: Date: Sun, 24 Feb 2019 13:40:37 +0800 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <2c3baa056663af88ed9e15b89128802cfc686b4e.camel@linuxfoundation.org> Cc: "lpd-cdc-core-dev@windriver.com" , "Zhangle.Yang@windriver.com" Subject: Re: Review request 0/13: Contribute meta-tensorflow to Yocto X-BeenThere: yocto@yoctoproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion of all things Yocto Project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 24 Feb 2019 05:41:17 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Language: en-US On 2019/2/23 下午11:29, Richard Purdie wrote: > Please don't do the meta-openembedded part! OK, I can't agree more, for tensorflow, if we move it to meta-openembedded/meta-ai, we have to move the depending layer `meta-java' to meta-openembedded  but it has been already as a standalone layer , otherwise the meta-openembedded will depend outer layer. //Hongxu > I believe that meta-oe is too large to be maintainable and that we need > a larger number of smaller layers. > > Having tensorflow in its own layer which as a specific purpose and its > specific maintainers who understand it is in my view much more > desirable and sustainable. > > Cheers, > > Richard