From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Radu Nicolau Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] drivers/net: add support for IF-MIB and EtherLike-MIB for e1000 Date: Tue, 20 Jun 2017 12:38:12 +0100 Message-ID: References: <20170522143202.22424-1-michalx.k.jastrzebski@intel.com> <20170522143202.22424-2-michalx.k.jastrzebski@intel.com> <3AEA2BF9852C6F48A459DA490692831F0113CF3E@irsmsx110.ger.corp.intel.com> <6A0DE07E22DDAD4C9103DF62FEBC09093B5BBD53@shsmsx102.ccr.corp.intel.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: "Jain, Deepak K" , "Van Haaren, Harry" , "Azarewicz, PiotrX T" To: "Lu, Wenzhuo" , "Pattan, Reshma" , "Jastrzebski, MichalX K" , "dev@dpdk.org" Return-path: Received: from mga06.intel.com (mga06.intel.com [134.134.136.31]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2C8BF374F for ; Tue, 20 Jun 2017 13:38:16 +0200 (CEST) In-Reply-To: <6A0DE07E22DDAD4C9103DF62FEBC09093B5BBD53@shsmsx102.ccr.corp.intel.com> Content-Language: en-US List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" Hi, On 5/23/2017 6:53 AM, Lu, Wenzhuo wrote: > Hi Michal, > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces@dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Pattan, Reshma >> Sent: Tuesday, May 23, 2017 12:35 AM >> To: Jastrzebski, MichalX K; dev@dpdk.org >> Cc: Jain, Deepak K; Van Haaren, Harry; Azarewicz, PiotrX T >> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 1/3] drivers/net: add support for IF-MIB and >> EtherLike-MIB for e1000 >> >> Hi, >> >> Can you add the description to the commit message, describing what has >> been done. >> >> General doubt I have , I see all IF-MIB and Ether-Like-MIB attributes are >> added as Xstats. >> But most of IF-MIB attributes are not stats, instead they are information >> about the interface/port. >> So I guess such attributes should be displayed using separate method? >> Everything being displayed as xstats might not be correct. > The same question as Reshma. Seems most of the added parameters (if not all) are not stats. Yes, they are indeed mostly information rather than actual statistics, but I would say it's a better choice to have them in the xstats rather than add a new API.