Re: [PATCH] mm: use the existing variable instead of a duplicate statement

[Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com>]

On 11/25/2019 08:23 PM, Hao Lee wrote:
> The address of zone has been stored in variable 'zone', so there is no need
> to get it again with a duplicate statement.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Hao Lee <haolee.swjtu@gmail.com>
> ---
>  mm/vmscan.c | 3 +--
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/mm/vmscan.c b/mm/vmscan.c
> index ee4eecc7e1c2..de4b2d1e66be 100644
> --- a/mm/vmscan.c
> +++ b/mm/vmscan.c
> @@ -363,22 +363,21 @@ unsigned long lruvec_lru_size(struct lruvec *lruvec, enum lru_list lru, int zone
>  	for (zid = zone_idx + 1; zid < MAX_NR_ZONES; zid++) {
>  		struct zone *zone = &lruvec_pgdat(lruvec)->node_zones[zid];
>  		unsigned long size;
>  
>  		if (!managed_zone(zone))
>  			continue;
>  
>  		if (!mem_cgroup_disabled())
>  			size = mem_cgroup_get_zone_lru_size(lruvec, lru, zid);
>  		else
> -			size = zone_page_state(&lruvec_pgdat(lruvec)->node_zones[zid],
> -				       NR_ZONE_LRU_BASE + lru);
> +			size = zone_page_state(zone, NR_ZONE_LRU_BASE + lru);

Is not this already merged with following commit on next-20191126 ?

54eacdb0dd8f9a ("mm: vmscan: simplify lruvec_lru_size()")

>  		lru_size -= min(size, lru_size);
>  	}
>  
>  	return lru_size;
>  
>  }
>  
>  /*
>   * Add a shrinker callback to be called from the vm.
>   */
>