From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5FEE8C433EF for ; Wed, 13 Jul 2022 23:57:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S230428AbiGMX5X (ORCPT ); Wed, 13 Jul 2022 19:57:23 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:34632 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229495AbiGMX5W (ORCPT ); Wed, 13 Jul 2022 19:57:22 -0400 Received: from mail-pf1-x432.google.com (mail-pf1-x432.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::432]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 26AFB53D16 for ; Wed, 13 Jul 2022 16:57:22 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-pf1-x432.google.com with SMTP id l124so370056pfl.8 for ; Wed, 13 Jul 2022 16:57:22 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kernel-dk.20210112.gappssmtp.com; s=20210112; h=message-id:date:mime-version:user-agent:subject:content-language:to :cc:references:from:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=Kmp9OwZZXpp7dYLW+I8EROE7mdEtSphWTitPY+itN4A=; b=foAugmdL46coCdeOwuUQbCi0E6TbeAxJKdHVpuIQJZKo1+V8dq+7pdDKj0vNtrzq1v on/JvI0c6iN8H3xLRXRl35TnqMBtEuYRVNoWNqpmTiYPRA/9TDxPqIp98PwQHKSPJvOv IYoJ7uAKvuqnkrysXsV35nTaT2NcTHNni87skjX+HAzVUKdGfnLN6Wuh9plrdDTrZ+kq nwu0H6mhdfVMqe2kQDmUO/ZgNUgoH7L8hPBl94ZaNC3xqymPC83DVKCxbGYJ3uecV+8d onANMXhGYTV/IR1IFQr/8pCjSMrzrfJ105izYPuz148HcNuSFYevXq1EP+gB14fzQpYZ YNtg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:message-id:date:mime-version:user-agent:subject :content-language:to:cc:references:from:in-reply-to :content-transfer-encoding; bh=Kmp9OwZZXpp7dYLW+I8EROE7mdEtSphWTitPY+itN4A=; b=4B5V614xUhmKHOu4w3f542UKnbsa0SwLjLyij4DYg0zxHWHMZU/wFWdLaPQ3pDXfg0 cTWksjVil2obGb+kX3aH82h145xitC1M4OV/gAXQ5gannvqL2u5m1IqQTW7KLziS5Y08 b3TNw9DWcIiXY/1TrbJ2yX72bcvh5mh/Sw5CLtAdgsLV8vJ+Jm80dtvgERRBzuPUB4sI 5VcopaOqQNZcpzYxfjqUWVlkOFy/bOjfbl8FxOfVSrskHB5o0Zt3BjRn50KHAyxfCi/N pqjvD88/qkuC+bBSuNXhJOKizr1zGE6WqmzldJTdB5Zl0ysdbG/E7oqrvcpMxO+i8ip/ vQsg== X-Gm-Message-State: AJIora9cS4vsmVszvkcti90hFmL9BkylecbhNT1mdsghsKOtMtN+6i4R DXF9a+hPnmrqDiK83s1eyGi8/A== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGRyM1vFBOg7SlcSGkkP6dNcoqUsyVQplclOJyy5i0FfMKeZ0CDbgPD291lVnYQ1LgS/gQkd2SGiQQ== X-Received: by 2002:a63:1009:0:b0:415:d29d:eadd with SMTP id f9-20020a631009000000b00415d29deaddmr4937510pgl.195.1657756641576; Wed, 13 Jul 2022 16:57:21 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.1.100] ([198.8.77.157]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id q16-20020aa79830000000b00528d4f647f2sm121743pfl.91.2022.07.13.16.57.20 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 13 Jul 2022 16:57:20 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Wed, 13 Jul 2022 17:57:19 -0600 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux aarch64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.10.0 Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 00/63] Improve static type checking for request flags Content-Language: en-US To: Bart Van Assche Cc: linux-block@vger.kernel.org, Christoph Hellwig References: <20220629233145.2779494-1-bvanassche@acm.org> <0496421c-5793-40c4-4662-865fc19bbbdc@acm.org> From: Jens Axboe In-Reply-To: <0496421c-5793-40c4-4662-865fc19bbbdc@acm.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-block@vger.kernel.org On 7/13/22 5:49 PM, Bart Van Assche wrote: > On 7/13/22 16:46, Jens Axboe wrote: >> On 7/13/22 3:48 PM, Bart Van Assche wrote: >>> I think that everyone who is interested in reviewing this patch series >>> has had sufficient time to review the patches in this patch series. Do >>> you prefer to queue this patch series for kernel v5.20 or kernel >>> v5.21? >> >> I've been pondering the same. I'm fine with going for 5.20 as this will >> be a pain to maintain, but the first patch doesn't even apply to my >> for-5.20/block branch... > > Hi Jens, > > This patch series was prepared against your for-next branch. I will > rebase it on top of your for-5.20/block branch, retest and repost it. It probably just conflicts with changes added after you posted this one, though not that many went in I think. In any case, please do respin on the current branch and we'll see what it looks like. -- Jens Axboe