From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.3 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, NICE_REPLY_A,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F2C6BC433E0 for ; Wed, 10 Mar 2021 11:40:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.xenproject.org (lists.xenproject.org [192.237.175.120]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 743B664F16 for ; Wed, 10 Mar 2021 11:40:24 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 743B664F16 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=xen.org Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=xen-devel-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Received: from list by lists.xenproject.org with outflank-mailman.96023.181453 (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1lJxCE-0001vt-2E; Wed, 10 Mar 2021 11:40:10 +0000 X-Outflank-Mailman: Message body and most headers restored to incoming version Received: by outflank-mailman (output) from mailman id 96023.181453; Wed, 10 Mar 2021 11:40:10 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.xenproject.org) by lists.xenproject.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1lJxCD-0001vm-VL; Wed, 10 Mar 2021 11:40:09 +0000 Received: by outflank-mailman (input) for mailman id 96023; Wed, 10 Mar 2021 11:40:09 +0000 Received: from mail.xenproject.org ([104.130.215.37]) by lists.xenproject.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1lJxCD-0001vh-5q for xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org; Wed, 10 Mar 2021 11:40:09 +0000 Received: from xenbits.xenproject.org ([104.239.192.120]) by mail.xenproject.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1lJxCC-0000QF-6I; Wed, 10 Mar 2021 11:40:08 +0000 Received: from 54-240-197-234.amazon.com ([54.240.197.234] helo=a483e7b01a66.ant.amazon.com) by xenbits.xenproject.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1lJxCB-0004Fc-MQ; Wed, 10 Mar 2021 11:40:07 +0000 X-BeenThere: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org List-Id: Xen developer discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Precedence: list Sender: "Xen-devel" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=xen.org; s=20200302mail; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:In-Reply-To: MIME-Version:Date:Message-ID:From:References:Cc:To:Subject; bh=4gwFw7bDZ4IVq9c0TeW+bp5lxQ6YAX7wVVnripp8gKg=; b=MC1NE7j+w5ZjNOxzCcjbPRBcsA PwYoIs00P0sXR2uiUmbm/rZ9N0UGwGcpUYo2Nmzt4bDR4GjfAG3LLbX46IZ5XoRdjqav/pSrzi8ri vC4pJ+ljUz9KzxcNUwDHsbjPAOyoNlAAwwRTmtSw2K4OppHffyLzz91xBQjYDVLUu7Ow=; Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] arm: Add Kconfig entry to select CONFIG_DTB_FILE To: Ian Jackson , Jan Beulich Cc: Michal Orzel , Stefano Stabellini , Volodymyr Babchuk , Andrew Cooper , George Dunlap , Wei Liu , bertrand.marquis@arm.com, xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org References: <20210310065803.348-1-michal.orzel@arm.com> <3247ee1d-f843-7c74-20a4-315716a91097@suse.com> <24648.44686.272676.156900@mariner.uk.xensource.com> From: Julien Grall Message-ID: Date: Wed, 10 Mar 2021 11:40:05 +0000 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.15; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.8.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <24648.44686.272676.156900@mariner.uk.xensource.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-GB Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hi Ian, On 10/03/2021 11:33, Ian Jackson wrote: > Jan Beulich writes ("Re: [PATCH v4] arm: Add Kconfig entry to select CONFIG_DTB_FILE"): >> Nit: Linux, iirc, has dropped support for ---help--- (allowing >> only help now). To limit churn whenever we're going to re-sync >> our kconfig again, I'd like to avoid introduction of new uses >> of the old form. I'm sure this could be taken care of while >> committing. > > At this stage of the release I would prefer to avoid updates made by > the committer when committing. Ie the thing that is committed should > have been previously posted and had at least some minimal time to spot > howlers. I was under the impression that this patch would not target 4.15. At least I didn't see any request for it. Cheers, -- Julien Grall