From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jamal Hadi Salim Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 0/8] net: sched: cls: add extack support Date: Tue, 16 Jan 2018 17:12:57 -0500 Message-ID: References: <20180116172027.22128-1-aring@mojatatu.com> <20180116134654.10d4fdef@cakuba.netronome.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com, jiri@resnulli.us, davem@davemloft.net, netdev@vger.kernel.org, kernel@mojatatu.com, David Ahern To: Jakub Kicinski , Alexander Aring Return-path: Received: from mail-it0-f67.google.com ([209.85.214.67]:47011 "EHLO mail-it0-f67.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750750AbeAPWNA (ORCPT ); Tue, 16 Jan 2018 17:13:00 -0500 Received: by mail-it0-f67.google.com with SMTP id c16so6738134itc.5 for ; Tue, 16 Jan 2018 14:13:00 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <20180116134654.10d4fdef@cakuba.netronome.com> Content-Language: en-GB Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On 18-01-16 04:46 PM, Jakub Kicinski wrote: > On Tue, 16 Jan 2018 12:20:19 -0500, Alexander Aring wrote: [..] > Ugh, this is going to conflict with our series too :( (and I CCed you > on ours) > > Would it be OK for you to hold off until Jiri's code gets merged and > ours comes down via bpf-next? That shouldn't take long at all. The > conflicts between bpf/bpf-next/net-next are really taking their toll > on us this release cycles, I would really appreciate if we could make > some progress on this relatively simple series at least... > I would say precedence should be Jiri's patches, Alex's patches and then yours: Alex's patches fix the core (cls_api.c) area with proper extack for the core and then he has one patch to cover a specific use case of the u32 classifier extack. Yours is only concerned with one use case - bpf which depend on the core (that is in Alex's patches) cheers, jamal