All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@amd.com>
To: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>,
	linux-efi@vger.kernel.org, platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
	Darren Hart <dvhart@infradead.org>,
	Andy Shevchenko <andy@infradead.org>,
	Matt Fleming <matt@codeblueprint.co.uk>,
	stable@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	x86@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] x86/sme: Explicitly map new EFI memmap table as encrypted
Date: Wed, 27 Oct 2021 10:11:41 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <c997e8a2-b364-2a8e-d247-438e9d937a1e@amd.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <8afff0c64feb6b96db36112cb865243f4ae280ca.1634922135.git.thomas.lendacky@amd.com>

On 10/22/21 12:02 PM, Tom Lendacky wrote:
> Reserving memory using efi_mem_reserve() calls into the x86
> efi_arch_mem_reserve() function. This function will insert a new EFI
> memory descriptor into the EFI memory map representing the area of
> memory to be reserved and marking it as EFI runtime memory.
> 
> As part of adding this new entry, a new EFI memory map is allocated and
> mapped. The mapping is where a problem can occur. This new EFI memory map
> is mapped using early_memremap(). If the allocated memory comes from an
> area that is marked as EFI_BOOT_SERVICES_DATA memory in the current EFI
> memory map, then it will be mapped unencrypted (see memremap_is_efi_data()
> and the call to efi_mem_type()).
> 
> However, during replacement of the old EFI memory map with the new EFI
> memory map, efi_mem_type() is disabled, resulting in the new EFI memory
> map always being mapped encrypted in efi.memmap. This will cause a kernel
> crash later in the boot.
> 
> Since it is known that the new EFI memory map will always be mapped
> encrypted when efi_memmap_install() is called, explicitly map the new EFI
> memory map as encrypted (using early_memremap_prot()) when inserting the
> new memory map entry.
> 
> Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # 4.14.x
> Fixes: 8f716c9b5feb ("x86/mm: Add support to access boot related data in the clear")
> Acked-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>
> Signed-off-by: Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@amd.com>

Ard, are you going to take this through the EFI tree or does it need to go 
through another tree?

Thanks,
Tom

> 
> ---
> Changes for v2:
> - Update/expand commit message to (hopefully) make it easier to read and
>    understand
> - Add a comment around the use of the early_memremap_prot() call
> ---
>   arch/x86/platform/efi/quirks.c | 14 +++++++++++++-
>   1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/x86/platform/efi/quirks.c b/arch/x86/platform/efi/quirks.c
> index b15ebfe40a73..14f8f20d727a 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/platform/efi/quirks.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/platform/efi/quirks.c
> @@ -277,7 +277,19 @@ void __init efi_arch_mem_reserve(phys_addr_t addr, u64 size)
>   		return;
>   	}
>   
> -	new = early_memremap(data.phys_map, data.size);
> +	/*
> +	 * When SME is active, early_memremap() can map the memory unencrypted
> +	 * if the allocation came from EFI_BOOT_SERVICES_DATA (see
> +	 * memremap_is_efi_data() and the call to efi_mem_type()). However,
> +	 * when efi_memmap_install() is called to replace the memory map,
> +	 * efi_mem_type() is "disabled" and so the memory will always be mapped
> +	 * encrypted. To avoid this possible mismatch between the mappings,
> +	 * always map the newly allocated memmap memory as encrypted.
> +	 *
> +	 * When SME is not active, this behaves just like early_memremap().
> +	 */
> +	new = early_memremap_prot(data.phys_map, data.size,
> +				  pgprot_val(pgprot_encrypted(FIXMAP_PAGE_NORMAL)));
>   	if (!new) {
>   		pr_err("Failed to map new boot services memmap\n");
>   		return;
> 

  reply	other threads:[~2021-10-27 15:11 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-10-22 17:02 [PATCH v2] x86/sme: Explicitly map new EFI memmap table as encrypted Tom Lendacky
2021-10-27 15:11 ` Tom Lendacky [this message]
2021-10-27 15:14   ` Ard Biesheuvel
2021-10-27 16:56     ` Borislav Petkov
2021-10-27 16:59       ` Ard Biesheuvel
2021-10-27 17:04         ` Tom Lendacky
2021-12-01 14:05           ` Tom Lendacky
2021-12-03 10:30             ` Ard Biesheuvel
2021-12-03 16:22               ` Tom Lendacky
2021-12-03 18:13                 ` Ard Biesheuvel

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=c997e8a2-b364-2a8e-d247-438e9d937a1e@amd.com \
    --to=thomas.lendacky@amd.com \
    --cc=andy@infradead.org \
    --cc=ardb@kernel.org \
    --cc=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=dvhart@infradead.org \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=linux-efi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=matt@codeblueprint.co.uk \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.